Do the Redskins win this game in Chicago?

[nneece]

Okay, for those of you that say that the Redskins dominated this game. Here's a question for you, would we have won this game in Chicago? The game was only decided by 2 points. I read a quote from Orton where he says that crowd noise was a factor at one point near the end of the game (which is a good thing because it shows we maybe starting to get a homefield advantage again). Given the meager scoring the Skins put together against a good defensive team, but a mediocre overall team, how would we have done on the road in this game? I fear it would have gone the other direction and this is not impressive against an average Bears team that is not in the top half of the league.

[orlskinsfan]

redskins d was to much for a limited bears offense...the skins could have played them in my backyard and still won.

[dreamshatterer]

WHO GIVES A FLYING F---!!!! We won!!! Were 1-0, its 2005. Just be happy, damn!

Go Skins!!!

[Skins24]

We did win this game in Chicago....last year.
Only difference between this year and last year is that we got over 100 yards passing.

[Underwater Ally]

Tough to say. Had Ramsey played the whole game, I think we definitely win. As it panned out though, I don't know. Too many variables and intangibles. Bottom line is, we need more of a passing game if we hope to win in Dallas.

[Dead Money]

No. (too short of a response so I repeat... NO.)

[Mr. Nostril]

Crowd noise affects both teams. I think that if anyone points to that as an explanation for their loss, they're wusses. The Redskins found a way to use it to their advantage, if the Bears had been more heads up and proactive about it, they could have found a way to do the same.