View Full Version : It's no wonder Iggles fans are deluded...
Throwin64
March-3rd-2006, 03:11 AM
if this is the quality of coverage they get from their local paper. Talk about rose colored glasses!!! :eaglesuck
"The Birds, about $14 million under the cap even before they release Terrell Owens, don't need to do any analyzing or restructuring. They want to start shopping, but that darned mall security chief, the tall guy with the "Tagliabue" nameplate pinned to his blazer, won't unlock the doors for them, as they rap on the glass, brandishing the discount coupons they've carefully clipped."
"So a team in really bad cap shape right now, such as the Redskins, is flat-out unlikely to be competitive next season, unless there's a CBA soon."
http://www.philly.com/mld/dailynews/14006047.htm
jrockster21
March-3rd-2006, 04:01 AM
No wonder WB36 and the rest of the Eagle fanboys are in here daily talking about how the Skins are going to be doomed! Its piped straigh into their skulls from their local media!! :laugh:
SkinsGuy
March-3rd-2006, 04:23 AM
What's funny about this article is not the falsehood that the Redskins can't be competitive next year or that they will be doomed to "cap hell".
It's the notion that the Eagles, well under the cap (according to the article) are chomping at the bit to go FA shopping. They simply can't wait. :rolleyes:
Since when? :laugh: When have they ever been like that?
The Eagles are way under the cap for a reason. And it has nothing to do with clever FO work. :)
JimboDaMan
March-3rd-2006, 04:34 AM
What's the little birdie say?
Cheap! Cheap! Cheap!
Major Harris
March-3rd-2006, 05:08 AM
that's what i want people to say about our team.
throwin64, welcome to the board......you're from the espn boards, right?
Throwin64
March-3rd-2006, 05:12 AM
throwin64, welcome to the board......you're from the espn boards, right?
Yes, an occaisional poster to both. Depends on my caseload at work if I can fool around on the boards or not.
Chief skin
March-3rd-2006, 05:17 AM
The turd birds have way too many holes to fix but, listening to the philly media talk this team up in the off season then during the season reality strikes and they rip the crap right out of them is hilarious.
aREDSKIN
March-3rd-2006, 05:27 AM
What's funny about this article is not the falsehood that the Redskins can't be competitive next year or that they will be doomed to "cap hell".
It's the notion that the Eagles, well under the cap (according to the article) are chomping at the bit to go FA shopping. They simply can't wait. :rolleyes:
Since when? :laugh: When have they ever been like that?
The Eagles are way under the cap for a reason. And it has nothing to do with clever FO work. :)
And this is one of the sticking points at least with Upshaw. High revenues teams who do not spend their entire cap on players and then just "pocket" the money. Typical Lurie/Banner MO.
Matador36
March-3rd-2006, 05:51 AM
they'll be good enough to choke again
Xameil
March-3rd-2006, 07:15 AM
Since when? :laugh: When have they ever been like that?
The Eagles are way under the cap for a reason. And it has nothing to do with clever FO work. :)
The Eagles go and buy FAs when they are at a discount...which is what is projected if there is no CBA. Since teams can't afford high-quality players, then those players will all be at lower prices...theoretically. However, if there is no CBA, then no player will sign for more then a year, knowing they potentially will get lots of money the next year.
RedskinsNation
March-3rd-2006, 07:18 AM
My roomate is from Philly....all he and THEY do is sit and listen to God Howard Eskin ramble about anything negative regarding any team outside of philthy. He poops they go smell it....
That WIP is their lifeline....they cant live without it....and thats fine....i respect a passionate sports fan...but that is their audio bible on the world of sports. My dear friend and roomy calls me yesterday telling me that we are going to have 20 rookies starting...im like ok so 10 on Offense and 10 on D? Get real.....I ask his cheap ass to go splurge on a WaPo and it maps out who we will have to cut.
If Matt Bowen is the most Prized Player lost...or perhaps James Thrash then I dont think any Skins fans are losing sleep over it.
I cant wait for the season to start and the Eagles to have another dumpy year....who to blame now???? Me-O's ghost?????? How about some of the other players that are supposed to be all world??????????
I cant wait.
frommd
March-3rd-2006, 07:20 AM
that's what i want people to say about our team.
Exactly. Don't tell them they're wrong. We don't stand a chance.
TLusby
March-3rd-2006, 07:25 AM
They won't spend any money. They will get a TO replacement with a grade of 2-3 stars at the most.
thomasroane
March-3rd-2006, 07:30 AM
Eagles can add whomever they want. Their problem starts with Andy Reid. It's pretty interesting that he plays the part of a tough guy to the media. But his actions speak louder than all that gruff. He coulda straightened TO a long time ago. Like during the Superbowl for instance. Instead of letting TO get in D-Mac's face he shoulda intervened right there and shut him up. Doesn't matter if TO was right or not. You don't do that in the biggest game of your lives. Looking at the litany of other actions (parking in a coaches space, talking back to the OC, etc) it seems as if Andy has a problem confronting.
Andy lost some of his clout this past couple of years. It will be damn hard to get it back. And then there's their penchant for low-balling players. Especially Westbrook who really didn't deserved to be strung out like he was. Trust me, his days are numbered.
ChiefPowhatan17
March-3rd-2006, 09:37 AM
The iggles are only hoping. They are disillusioned with this type of stuff. They just can't accept that they are on their slow slide back to mediocrity where they are use to being. Just like the old days.:logo:
mikeyf316
March-3rd-2006, 09:51 AM
Look at this upcoming season like an Iggles fan does...
They can't come in any worse than 4th in the NFC East. That means that this year can only get better for them. At worst, they will come in 4th just like last year, no change.
We'll see who is competitive in the 17th game of the year, you Philly jackasses.
chef8181
March-3rd-2006, 10:30 AM
Sounds like somebody is upset about getting swept by the Skins.
natsfan3
March-3rd-2006, 10:53 AM
I WROTE HIM
Buddy why don't you do some good reporting. This is pure inuindo and is baseless. NEWSFLASH!!! The skins cap situation isn't as bad as you so called experts thought. Hmm it's ironic that you seem to think the bridesmaids, err I mean e gals can go buy their players and its okay. When the skins do it you bashed and bashed. We don't need to shop, just add pieces. Since yesterday have restructured 6 guys and are releasing guys we want gone anyway. No wonder your fans are under the impression that the skins will look like Temple next year. The way you put it, I would assume you went 10-6 last year. I know better, your birds were where they have been for the majority of their existence. IN LAST!!!!
if this is the quality of coverage they get from their local paper. Talk about rose colored glasses!!! :eaglesuck
"The Birds, about $14 million under the cap even before they release Terrell Owens, don't need to do any analyzing or restructuring. They want to start shopping, but that darned mall security chief, the tall guy with the "Tagliabue" nameplate pinned to his blazer, won't unlock the doors for them, as they rap on the glass, brandishing the discount coupons they've carefully clipped."
"So a team in really bad cap shape right now, such as the Redskins, is flat-out unlikely to be competitive next season, unless there's a CBA soon."
http://www.philly.com/mld/dailynews/14006047.htm
Y100Rocks
March-3rd-2006, 10:59 AM
Bahaha. That main board. Usually I just like to quote a few things. Only this entire thread needs to be ripped apart.
SkinsGuy
What's funny about this article is not the falsehood that the Redskins can't be competitive next year or that they will be doomed to "cap hell".
It's the notion that the Eagles, well under the cap (according to the article) are chomping at the bit to go FA shopping. They simply can't wait.
Since when? When have they ever been like that?
The Eagles are way under the cap for a reason. And it has nothing to do with clever FO work.
You talk about falsehoods and you don't even know you yourself what it going on. "When". "When have they gone chomping at the bit in free-agency." Oh so dramatic and poignant. How about the year they signed Kearse and T.O. bud?
Banner invented the philosphy of false incentives in order to bulk up cap room in upcoming years. I'm sorry if thinking ahead into the future is ass backwards of the type of philosphy you might like, but I think its clever. I'm not the type of person that would max out credit cards and pay them off with other ones, though. Banner manages to spend the second most ammount of money in the NFL (its true if you've ever bothered to look at the figures), just under Snyder. Yet he does it while being 20 million under the cap, instead of over it. And here we are and guess which team is pre-occupied with restructures and who needs to be cut while the other can devote all their attention to who to sign in free-agency, and who do draft. Who is more clever again?
JimboDaMan
What's the little birdie say?
Cheap! Cheap! Cheap!
Ignorant ignorant ignorant. See above
Major Harris
throwin64, welcome to the board
bahahaha, yes I'm sure he fits right in, welcome him with open arms
aREDSKIN
And this is one of the sticking points at least with Upshaw. High revenues teams who do not spend their entire cap on players and then just "pocket" the money. Typical Lurie/Banner MO.
Pocketing the money would indicate at the end of the day they still have the money. They spend the money. They just do it without having a rightfully criticized cap figure.
Again, more "falsehoods" , ay skinsguy. Nobody here seems to have a problem critcizing eagles fans knowledge, yet they don't seem to have a clue whats going on either. And the ones that do, I don't see you stepping up to spread some knowledge.
Xameil
The Eagles go and buy FAs when they are at a discount...which is what is projected if there is no CBA. Since teams can't afford high-quality players, then those players will all be at lower prices...theoretically. However, if there is no CBA, then no player will sign for more then a year, knowing they potentially will get lots of money the next year.
Jevon Kearse didn't come at a discount. He was the highest paid DE ever. Eagles are the best team in the league at signing their own players to the second contract of their NFL career. Resigning guys to their third and 4th contract when their 32 years old might be a different case but I digress. We all know how those guys turned out.
That second half is purely speculation. A lot of people believe if the cap doesn't get saved now, it never will be again. So why then would all the players decide to wait it out anyway? Heck. The good players that are going to make the most money with a cap or without, are going to make the most money in a capless NFL. Its the players that are making the least ammount of money now that are going to be the ones to lose out in the end without a cap. Not the Pro-bowlers. And the majority of players want long term deals anyway. How many Sean Alexanders do we have every offseason? Despite getting the franchise tender and get paid the top 5 average of players at their position, they still would prefer a long term deal which gaurantees them money incase they suffer a career ending injury. Makes sense to me.
RedskinsNation
My roomate is from Philly....all he and THEY do is sit and listen to God Howard Eskin ramble about anything negative regarding any team outside of philthy. He poops they go smell it....
If you believe everybody is loyal to that guy for some reason, then go register at the philadelphiaeagles.com message boards. Ask them what they think about him. It would appear you haven't checked yourself.
ChiefPowhatan17
The iggles are only hoping. They are disillusioned with this type of stuff. They just can't accept that they are on their slow slide back to mediocrity where they are use to being. Just like the old days.
Excuse me? Where we are use to being? I'm sorry I forgot which team has done anything in recent memory. Exactly. If the Eagles ever slipped off, it be like the "old days". And if the skins slip down from their great one year of getting to the playoffs, thats what NFL fans nation wide are going to assume is what they are "use to". You or I cannot change that fact. Thats gonna be the correct national perception. Lets just set the record straight on that now.
Westbrook36
March-3rd-2006, 11:07 AM
Lots of fear in this thread.
Heavy Jumbo
March-3rd-2006, 11:09 AM
Banner manages to spend the second most ammount of money in the NFL (its true if you've ever bothered to look at the figures), just under Snyder.
Do you care to share a source about this little fact? I'm not sure I've ever heard this before.
TomK
March-3rd-2006, 11:11 AM
I live in the Philly area and wouldn't say the Eagles are cheap, they just manage the cap better, yes better. They spend within the limits instead of over spending like we tend to do. The thing they do that I don't agree with is letting players go once they hit 30 for the most part. They won't give them big dollars, except I think they did with Brian Dawkins.
I read in the Philadelphia Inquirer this morning that the Eagles will be signing LeCharles Bentley as soon as the free agency signing period starts. Here is the link: http://www.philly.com/mld/philly/sports/football/14003995.htm
Heavy Jumbo
March-3rd-2006, 11:14 AM
I have no problem with the way the Eagles handle their salary cap. They've been able to field competitive teams for a while now.
But the Eagle fans shouldn't be bashing our system either. While we've had to cut a few players here and there, most of that was because of new coaches coming in and getting players to fit their system.
Every year, Skins fans hear that we'll be in cap hell, but we ALWAYS manage to get around that and still have enough money to sign key FA's.
The Skins cap management works too.
TD_washingtonredskins
March-3rd-2006, 11:27 AM
I have no problem with the way the Eagles handle their salary cap. They've been able to field competitive teams for a while now.
But the Eagle fans shouldn't be bashing our system either. While we've had to cut a few players here and there, most of that was because of new coaches coming in and getting players to fit their system.
Every year, Skins fans hear that we'll be in cap hell, but we ALWAYS manage to get around that and still have enough money to sign key FA's.
The Skins cap management works too.
I think that's the best way to look at it. Both teams have systems and they both work, they are just different.
TomK
March-3rd-2006, 11:30 AM
I agree that our way of managing the cap does work, but it could be and will be better in the future. One way to manage it is to have players come out of the draft that can step into your lineup because they don't make as much.
Since Gibbs came back the "quick fix" method is easing up and we have been getting contributors via the draft.
dockeryfan
March-3rd-2006, 11:32 AM
I have no problem with the way the Eagles handle their salary cap. They've been able to field competitive teams for a while now.
But the Eagle fans shouldn't be bashing our system either. While we've had to cut a few players here and there, most of that was because of new coaches coming in and getting players to fit their system.
Every year, Skins fans hear that we'll be in cap hell, but we ALWAYS manage to get around that and still have enough money to sign key FA's.
The Skins cap management works too.
I think this my biggest problem.
Eagles fans look at the philosophy of the Redskins who as of late sign FA and vet role players, hover over the cap on a consistent basis, and say that it is fiscally irresponsible.
Yet I've been waiting for cap hell forever. A cap hell that would never come, because of the ability to restructure. Even when faced with a 94.5 mil cap this year , it looks like they would have been able to make it without the roster purge everyone was predicting.
But you have Lurie claiming that the Eagles were the "Gold Standard" when it comes to NFL front office management.
Here's a tip Lurie. Next time you claim to be the Gold Standard, make sure you are hoisting the Lombardi trophy, and not a minute before.
But everyone seems to buy into the fact that the Redskins are doing everything wrong, because it isn't like the Eagles.
Redskins cap management is really quite successful. They spend more money, and still manage to stay under the cap. No one will give Snyder credit for this, but this is the only club doing this. He doesn't care if he spends 20% more than everybody else, that's the only reason he does it.
SkinsHokieFan
March-3rd-2006, 11:33 AM
I agree that our way of managing the cap does work, but it could be and will be better in the future. One way to manage it is to have players come out of the draft that can step into your lineup because they don't make as much.
Since Gibbs came back the "quick fix" method is easing up and we have been getting contributors via the draft.
And the way that happens is to have a coaching staff in place for the long term, which we have now
There wont be an offseason where the staff needs to sign 10 guys to fill needs because it is now "their team"
This offseason we only need to add 3-4 players in terms of starting caliber, and a couple of depth guys
We are in fine shape, and the Iggles, as always, will win the Salary Cap Championship instead of the Superbowl :laugh:
Westbrook36
March-3rd-2006, 12:01 PM
This offseason we only need to add 3-4 players in terms of starting caliber, and a couple of depth guys
We are in fine shape, and the Iggles, as always, will win the Salary Cap Championship instead of the Superbowl :laugh:
Only 3 or 4 starting caliber players? Should be no problem. You know, especially when you are 20m over the cap. ;)
dockeryfan
March-3rd-2006, 12:03 PM
Only 3 or 4 starting caliber players? Should be no problem. You know, especially when you are 20m over the cap. ;)
There's a salary cap?
Westbrook36
March-3rd-2006, 12:07 PM
There's a salary cap?
Mr Snyder, is that you? :cool:
TD_washingtonredskins
March-3rd-2006, 12:21 PM
Only 3 or 4 starting caliber players? Should be no problem. You know, especially when you are 20m over the cap. ;)
I get the feeling all the Philly fans around here are going to be VERY disappointed if the players and owners can agree to extend the CBA. You guys have been banking on a cap hell for the Redskins for a month or so now.
SkinsHokieFan
March-3rd-2006, 12:59 PM
Only 3 or 4 starting caliber players? Should be no problem. You know, especially when you are 20m over the cap. ;)
Your Jedi mind tricks don't work on me boy! :laugh:
jrockster21
March-3rd-2006, 01:55 PM
Only 3 or 4 starting caliber players? Should be no problem. You know, especially when you are 20m over the cap. ;)
:laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
Have you been under a rock the past couple days?? We will be well under the cap if and when the CBA does not go through. Several key veterans have volunteered to redo their contracts; Jansen and Brunell alone save us 5 mill; Portis, Springs, Thomas and Wynn have also redone their deals and who knows how many others have stepped up to the plate. The contracts were designed with this day in mind.
Yet you want to go and quote a cap figure that was never even right in the first place!! :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: You're right, WB, there is a lot of fear in this thread!! :laugh: A lot of sour grapes too!!
TD_washingtonredskins
March-3rd-2006, 02:16 PM
It's funny...it really sounds like WB would like to see this happen (even though it's worse for most of the league and better for the Redskins long-term) just in the hopes that he can laugh when we cut John Hall or Walt Harris.
SkinsGuy
March-3rd-2006, 02:49 PM
You talk about falsehoods and you don't even know you yourself what it going on.
I don't know everything that's going on behind closed doors, but I do know that the Redskins aren't in any trouble. Sorry to burst your "Washington in Cap Hell" bubble for you. :)
"When". "When have they gone chomping at the bit in free-agency." Oh so dramatic and poignant. How about the year they signed Kearse and T.O. bud?
Gee, two guys. :rolleyes: Why didn't he go completely crazy and give someone on the team an extension? :laugh:
Banner invented the philosphy of false incentives in order to bulk up cap room in upcoming years.
You mean that they invented the philosophy of fake bonuses and incentives to make it look like they are spending more than what they are so they won't look like the cheapskates they are.
I'm sorry if thinking ahead into the future is ass backwards of the type of philosphy you might like, but I think its clever.
Doesn't matter what I think. I'm not in either F.O.
If you are referring to the Redskins, however, well, this is why they are not in "cap hell", despite the CBA not getting done (for now). It's b/c they DID think 3 or 4 years ahead when structuring contracts. They knew there may be problems with the CBA 2 years ago, so they structured the contracts in such a way that gave them a lot of movement in them.
You may not want to believe it cause you were so hoping your Eagles would have a free ride on a Redskin team decimated by "cap hell", but I think what the Washington F.O. did was clever. :)
I'm not the type of person that would max out credit cards and pay them off with other ones, though.
Snyder probably OWNS a credit card company. :D
Banner manages to spend the second most ammount of money in the NFL (its true if you've ever bothered to look at the figures), just under Snyder.
Through a lot of fakery and book-cooking, yes, Banner does.
Don't misunderstand that statement. I'm not saying they cheat. I'm saying they put a lot of numbers in thier books in terms of incentives and bonuses they know they'll never pay out. They'll cut a guy whose busted thier ***** for them before they give them that money.
This is why there is envy and animosity on your team right now.
Envy of one player towards another who feels that player is being treated better (mainly towads McNabb), and animosity towards the F.O. who low-balls all thier players who have given it up on the field for them (except McNabb).
This is why Upshaw gave Snyder praise for the money he lavishes on the players. He knows that the Eagles' F.O. so called "high spending" is just smoke-and-mirrors. :)
And here we are and guess which team is pre-occupied with restructures and who needs to be cut while the other can devote all their attention to who to sign in free-agency, and who do draft. Who is more clever again?
I'd say Snyder. It takes a LOT of cleverness on the part of him and the F.O. to spend thier entire cap every year and STILL not haft to purge our roster when the CBA collapes (if it does). The only guys we will probably haft to cut are guys we were going to cut or trade or were going to retire, anyway.
Meanwhile, Reid and Co. have been going at this for what??? Five, six or seven years? All thier smoke-and-mirror tactics and low-balling of players has gotten them is that empty trophy case in your avatar. :)
Meanwhile Gibbs and Snyder have gotten the Redskins to the 2nd round of the playoffs in just Gibbs 2nd year.
And avoided a purge of the team should the CBA not go through which means this great team will remian intact.
Oh yeah, I can see who the more clever one is. :)
slm2856
March-3rd-2006, 03:56 PM
Excuse me? Where we are use to being? I'm sorry I forgot which team has done anything in recent memory. Exactly. If the Eagles ever slipped off, it be like the "old days". And if the skins slip down from their great one year of getting to the playoffs, thats what NFL fans nation wide are going to assume is what they are "use to". You or I cannot change that fact. Thats gonna be the correct national perception. Lets just set the record straight on that now.
Has your team done anything EVER? 0 Rings says it all. Now, because of the events during recent years, not only will the national perception know the Iggles as 'ringless' and 'losers', but also a 'chokers'!! Please do not write something like this until your franchise actually wins a big game.
eagles78
March-3rd-2006, 04:10 PM
Sounds like somebody is upset about getting swept by the Skins.Yes, we are upest that you hung on by the skin of your teeth to beat the Eagles at Fed Ex. And then somehow you guys were able to amazingly hang on and beat McMahon and a bunch of second and third stringers. Quite an accomplishment. You wanna talk about a delusional fan base? I came on here the day of that game and just about all of you were picking the deadskins to win by 3 plus TDs.:rolleyes: What happened? I love how you 'Skins fans somehow think we as Eagles fans are scared to play you.:laugh: The Eagles have owned your team for the last 5 years. I can't wait until next year.
Number5
March-3rd-2006, 04:18 PM
All I can say is that the Shawn Barber back to the Eagles rumor might not be a rumor after all........
tr1
March-3rd-2006, 04:49 PM
The Eagles have owned your team for the last 5 years. I can't wait until next year.
Um, I think we've taken the last two...so, I guess you could say 'we owned you last year.'
eagles78
March-3rd-2006, 04:59 PM
Um, I think we've taken the last two...so, I guess you could say 'we owned you last year.'8 out of 12 since the 2000 season is owning. You guys looked really impressive against McMahon this year.
Number5
March-3rd-2006, 05:03 PM
8 out of 12 since the 2000 season is owning. You guys looked really impressive against McMahon this year.
Fact is that they won the game and we lost. Nuff said! Now while next year be a different story, they got us this year....but as we all know on this site, the PAST HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE FUTURE! Right Skins fans? :laugh:
eagles78
March-3rd-2006, 05:08 PM
Fact is that they won the game and we lost. Nuff said! Now while next year be a different story, they got us this year....but as we all know on this site, the PAST HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE FUTURE! Right Skins fans? :laugh:I always love bringing up the Eagles recent success over the Redskins. They always tell me to stop living in the past, but then they go talking about Super Bowls they won 15 years ago.
The-Rock
March-3rd-2006, 05:09 PM
Fact is that they won the game and we lost. Nuff said! Now while next year be a different story, they got us this year....but as we all know on this site, the PAST HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE FUTURE! Right Skins fans? :laugh:
Only, and I mean ONLY when bringing up current Eagles superbowl wins to date, and cool records and stuff that make the skins look better than everyone. :)
Weird. Homerism on a site for fans of a team. So strange.
Goaldeje
March-3rd-2006, 05:10 PM
Fact is that they won the game and we lost. Nuff said! Now while next year be a different story, they got us this year....but as we all know on this site, the PAST HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE FUTURE! Right Skins fans? :laugh:
Damn it boy. This is our site. THe past is relevant when we want it to be relevant. Not at your discretion. Ours. Get that through your head! :laugh:
Number5
March-3rd-2006, 05:17 PM
Damn it boy. This is our site. THe past is relevant when we want it to be relevant. Not at your discretion. Ours. Get that through your head! :laugh:
Boy? This cat is younger then me! :silly:
Goaldeje
March-3rd-2006, 05:21 PM
And yet, clearly (as evidence by our choice of football teams), far more mature. Listen to your intellectual elders, son...
mboyd784
March-3rd-2006, 05:40 PM
I think it's reasonably safe to say at this point that Terrell Owens is not only the greatest athlete ever to wear the Eagles uniform, but the classiest, most well-rounded individual ever to be associated wiith the franchise in any capacity.
Seabee1973
March-3rd-2006, 05:47 PM
I remeber after the 2000 season when the eagles were entering free agency and Eric moulds was entering free agency all these eagle fans were drooling at the prospect of signing Moulds but of course i got called every name in the book when i said teh eagles would not pony up for him because the Bills would franchise him. All thses eagle fans asured me the bills woudl never franchise Moulds because the could not afford to.
Had the eagle sponied up for Moulds that year they might have won a superbowl or 3
Number5
March-3rd-2006, 06:00 PM
And yet, clearly (as evidence by our choice of football teams), far more mature. Listen to your intellectual elders, son...
omg.....and yet, clearly (as evidence by our choice of football teams), far less physically developed. Eagles football is for grown men stumpy....get wit the program little dude! :laugh:
Goaldeje
March-3rd-2006, 06:07 PM
omg.....and yet, clearly (as evidence by our choice of football teams), far less physically developed. Eagles football is for grown men stumpy....get wit the program little dude! :laugh:
So you're saying all Skins fans are "stumpy" and less "physically developed"? Hmmm. And you wonder why people in this forum need to "cool out"?
Anyway, intellectually superior is more appealing than physically intimidating. I can use big words to confuse you long enough to get away from you. Mr Poopy Pants. :silly:
Number5
March-3rd-2006, 06:11 PM
So you're saying all Skins fans are "stumpy" and less "physically developed"? Hmmm. And you wonder why people in this forum need to "cool out"?
Anyway, intellectually superior is more appealing than physically intimidating. I can use big words to confuse you long enough to get away from you. Mr Poopy Pants. :silly:
While you point is very true, if you were a contestant on Beauty And The Geek, nothing wrong with a little ribbing, just as long as it doesn't get personal as it has in the past. Besides folks who know me up here know I respect your team......most of the time anyways!
Goaldeje
March-3rd-2006, 06:17 PM
While you point is very true, if you were a contestant on Beauty And The Geek, nothing wrong with a little ribbing, just as long as it doesn't get personal as it has in the past. Besides folks who know me up here know I respect your team......most of the time anyways!
Not following the first part, but I know you're cool (except for the whole Eagles thing - WTF is up with that?!?!). I don't often engage, just watch. Thought I would throw my two cents in a little more here.
I figured I would start small, you know, intellectually, not a difficult challenge for me. Saw your posts, and well... you know... :silly:
Number5
March-3rd-2006, 06:29 PM
Not following the first part, but I know you're cool (except for the whole Eagles thing - WTF is up with that?!?!). I don't often engage, just watch. Thought I would throw my two cents in a little more here.
I figured I would start small, you know, intellectually, not a difficult challenge for me. Saw your posts, and well... you know... :silly:
YOU NEVER SAW BEAUTY AND THE GEEK ON THE WB?
Thanks for thinking I'm cool! You seem cool too! Even if you're a Skins fan. What's important is that we are both football fans! :cheers:
The-Rock
March-3rd-2006, 06:41 PM
YOU NEVER SAW BEAUTY AND THE GEEK ON THE WB?
You havent yet realized there are many many networks out there that are vastly superior to the WB?
Like for instance my two favorite, the NFL network and all those porno channels I get. :)
Goaldeje
March-3rd-2006, 06:46 PM
You havent yet realized there are many many networks out there that are vastly superior to the WB?
Like for instance my two favorite, the NFL network and all those porno channels I get. :)
Yeah, the WB reminds me too much of another Eagles poster here... :laugh:
Thank you Number 5. I am cool. And dammit, people like me...
Number5
March-3rd-2006, 07:00 PM
You havent yet realized there are many many networks out there that are vastly superior to the WB?
Like for instance my two favorite, the NFL network and all those porno channels I get. :)
I gotta watch Smallville dude! I'm a DC COMICS baby! Even gotta cool arse poster of Batman (Jim Lee version) next to my Dawkins jersey.
I think to myself, "The Two Nastiest Playas In The Game!" :notworthy
vBulletin® v3.8.4, Copyright ©2000-2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.