PDA

View Full Version : drew bledsoes career stats..


grego
April-24th-2006, 08:36 AM
didnt see this after a search. it was posted at CZ by a boys fan who apparently isnt too fond of bledsoe.


http://www.eagletribune.com/news/sto...327/SP_004.htm

Among quarterbacks that have thrown for 10,000 or more yards (which means they were starters for at least three full seasons), Bledsoe ranks about 120th all-time, behind Jeff George, Trent Dilfer and Jay Schroeder, averaging 180.1 yards per touchdown.

Bledsoe has never thrown for 30 touchdowns in a season. His best, 28 in 1997 and 27 in 1996, were the closest. In fact, since the 1997 season, which was eight years ago, Bledsoe has averaged only 18.5 TDs per season, which puts him in the bottom third of quarterbacks of that time span.



Now let's look at the most important statistic of all for a quarterback -- victories. Bledsoe is even a bigger loser here.
Bledsoe is 89-88 as a starter, including playoffs.
Breaking down that even further hurts him even more. Over his career, he has played against 39 teams that finished the season at 10-5-1 or better (we call those very good teams, winning twice as much as you lose).
Bledsoe for his career is -- please hide this from the children -- 5-34.
That's right. He has guided his teams to a five wins in 39 games against the cream of the crop.
The problem with what Dallas is getting is that record worsened when Bledsoe went to Buffalo. He was 4-21 as a Patriot against very good teams. He was 1-13 as Bill.
Yikes. That is believed to be the worst winning percentage against very good teams for every quarterback that threw for 20,000 yards or more. WORST EVER.



Now the key ingredient: Despite Bledsoe's not-so-wonderful career, he was the highest paid player in the history of the NFL. Not until recently did Brett Favre pass him in that category. The only difference is that Favre won a Super Bowl and three MVP awards.



I will add that he has finished last or next to last in his division as a starter 9 out of 12 or 10 out of 13 times I don't remember right now which it was...



here is another article



http://www.coldhardfootballfacts.com...le.php?Page=61




Bledsoe: An NFL never-was Cold, Hard Football Facts for October 4, 2004

It’s a testament to Drew Bledsoe’s character that so many New England fans still respect him. His arrival in New England in 1993, along with that of Bill Parcells, helped mark a change in fortunes for a franchise that had been among the most inept in NFL history.
New Englanders also admire Bledsoe’s toughness, dignity, accountability and, of course, his 30.06 rifle of an arm. His farewell, full-page advertisement in Boston newspapers when he departed for Buffalo in 2002 was among the classiest acts ever by a Boston-area athlete.
Bledsoe was so respected in New England that his replacement, Tom Brady, needed to win not one but two Super Bowl MVP awards before many Patriots fans finally admitted that keeping Brady over Bledsoe was the right thing to do.
The Cold, Hard Football Facts admire the respect accorded Bledsoe. But they’re not slaves to misty-eyed public sentiment, and they certainly don’t attempt to swim against a torrent of historical data buoyed only by a skimpy life vest called respect.
“The Truth Hurts,” say the Cold, Hard Football Facts, the truth is this: Bledsoe does not need a better line, another receiver, a top running game, or a different offensive coordinator. And he’s certainly not in the twilight of a glorious career that seems to be spiraling hopelessly downward in Buffalo. The truth is that Bledsoe is not an NFL has-been. The truth is that Bledsoe is an NFL never-was. He’s an NFL overall No. 1 draft pick who has never lived up to expectations.
Here then is the execution the Drew Bledsoe legacy, courtesy of an impassive black-cloaked hangman called the Cold, Hard Football Facts:
* Heading into the 2004 season, Bledsoe has posted a single-season passer rating of more than 80 just four times in 11 years. (Tom Brady has posted an 80-plus passer rating three times in three seasons.)
* Bledsoe’s career passer rating of 76.8 ranks 18th among active quarterbacks with a 1,500 career attempts. (Brady’s career passer rating of 86.4 ranks puts him at a tie for ninth all time with Dan Marino.)
* Bledsoe has led the league in pass attempts three times, completions twice, and passing yards just once. He’s never finished better than third in touchdown passes. (Brady has never led the league in pass attempts, completions or passing yards, but has already led the league once in touchdown passes.)
* Bledsoe has thrown more interceptions than touchdowns in five of 11 seasons. (Brady has never thrown more interceptions than touchdowns over the course of a season and has a nearly 2 to1 touchdown to interception ratio in his career.)
* Despite his reputation as a strong-armed gunslinger, Bledsoe has a career average of just 6.6 yards per pass attempt. (“Dink and dunk” passer Brady averages 6.7 yards per attempt in his career.)
* Bledsoe has completed just 57.1 percent of the passes in his career, with a single-season best of 61.5 percent in 2002. (Brady’s career completion percentage is 61.9).
* Bledsoe’s numbers in seven career postseasons games are dreadful: 129 for 252, 1,335 yards, 6 TDs, 12 INTs, and passer rating of 54.9 that makes even fraud Peyton Manning’s postseason performances look respectable.
* In his one Super Bowl appearance, Bledsoe posted a line of 25 for 48 (52.1 percent), 253 yards, 2 TDs, 4 INTs, and a 46.6 passer rating. He lost that game, 35-21. In two Super Bowl appearances, Brady has posted a line of 48 for 75 (64.0 percent), 499 yards, 4 TDs, 1 INT, and a 95.4 passer rating. He’s won both games.
Drew Bledsoe was accorded elite quarterback status the day he walked into the NFL as an overall No. 1 draft pick in 1993. The Cold, Hard Football Facts believe it’s taken 11 years of mediocre play for NFL “pundits” to finally acknowledge that Bledsoe is in fact a mediocre quarterback.
How do the Cold, Hard Football Facts know? Consider this one other fact: Bledsoe has looked painfully poor and immobile in his first two games of the 2004 season. He’s led the Buffalo offense to just 20 total points and the team to an 0-2 record. Yet if he keeps up his 86.3 passer rating so far this season, it will be the second best statistical year of his substandard career.




http://www.coldhardfootballfacts.com...e.php?Page=173





Bledsoe kissed, dissed, dismissed Cold, Hard Football Facts for November 15, 2004
The Cold, Hard Football Facts tossed dirt on the coffin of Drew Bledsoe’s career earlier this season. After a dreadful performance in Sunday’s 29-6 loss to New England the “pundits” are dancing on the grave.
Bledsoe was 8 of 19 for 76 yards, with three interceptions and an embarrassing 14.6 passer rating – a performance so poor that the passer rating calculator on football.com advises quarterbacks to “turn in your jersey.” Bledsoe was replaced in the fourth quarter by rookie quarterback J.P. Losman, who’s still recovering from a broken leg, while Buffalo’s only points came on a punt return. Even Bledsoe’s pass on a two-point conversion attempt fell incomplete.
The bury Bledsoe bandwagon hit the road moments after the game. Boston sportscaster Bob Neumeier, who has a reputation for bombast and verbosity, actually offered one of the pithiest comments: “Drew Bledsoe has no football left in him,” he said during the Patriots 5th Quarter postgame show.
NFL analyst and former quarterback Boomer Esiason said “It doesn’t look like there’s any juice left in the tank” on WEEI sports radio Monday morning.
Even Ron Borges of the Boston Globe, one of Bledsoe’s most ardent supporters, admitted in his Monday column that “the end came, for all intents and purposes, at 11:20 last night.”
The Buffalo Bills Web site www.twobillsdrive.com offers links to all the obituaries.
There is no getting around the fact that Bledsoe’s overrated career is coming to a sad, pitiful, inglorious end. After Sunday’s performance, Bledsoe’s passer rating for the season has dropped to 70.3, the second lowest number of his career. And as sad as that number is, it’s not that far off his average. Bledsoe’s career passer rating is just 76.5 and he has posted a passer rating of better than 78.0 just once in the last six seasons. He has thrown more than 20 touchdown passes just once over those same six years. It's not likely he'll reach that milestone this year, either.
More indicting than the passing stats are the performances of the teams on which Bledsoe has played. He's just 22-37 as a starting quarterback since the start of the 2000 season. He’s been on just one winning team in those five years – as the back-up quarterback for the Super Bowl champion 2001 Patriots. The last time Bledsoe quarterbacked a winning team was in the Pete Carroll era, when the 1998 Patriots finished the season 9-7.
After gleefully announcing the end of Bledsoe's career, Neumeier did try to backpedal by talking about quarterback's roll in building Gillette Stadium. It's an important part of a legacy that still endears Bledsoe to many longtime New England fans, who know how pitiful the Patriots were before his arrival.
Kevin Rousseau of PatsFan.com puts it best:
“Let me just say that (Bledsoe) does not deserve this fate. He is a decent man, a class act and a good quarterback at times. He could have easily divided the team during the 2001 season but he put his personal feelings aside for the good of the team and it brought the Patriots their first championship.”
It's not a bad legacy for a quarterback who’s career is over. But it's time to let go.



or from the sporting news

The games don't match the names on this unit.(overrated football players)(includes other professional football news)(Column) Get unlimited subscription access to ALL articles and tools with a FREE TRIAL



http://www.highbeam.com/Aspx/GetPubL...News&type=MAGS The Sporting News; 10/7/1996; Glauber, Bob
A list of 12 professional football players who do not deserve their superstar status is presented. The players include Larry Brown, Marshall Faulk, Drew Bledsoe and David Williams.
They make the big bucks and carry the trig reputations. Their names and faces are plastered on billboards and featured in television commercials.
But sometimes, their on-field performance doesn't measure up to their contracts, and their reputations are bigger than their achievements.

Santana_Fan
April-24th-2006, 08:40 AM
that is horrible, and some say that this guy is better than Brunell....wow

pvkeeper19
April-24th-2006, 08:45 AM
I guess you've got a point, but if you were just trying to prove that Bledsoe sucks, I don't think anyone here needed to be convinced.;)

:dallasuck

CPstretch
April-24th-2006, 08:49 AM
why is this in the stadium??

grego
April-24th-2006, 08:50 AM
its a long article- just a few interesting points to recap....

He's just 22-37 as a starting quarterback since the start of the 2000 season. He’s been on just one winning team in those five years – as the back-up quarterback for the Super Bowl champion 2001 Patriots.

Bledsoe is 89-88 as a starter, including playoffs.

Breaking down that even further hurts him even more. Over his career, he has played against 39 teams that finished the season at 10-5-1 or better (we call those very good teams, winning twice as much as you lose).
Bledsoe for his career is -- please hide this from the children -- 5-34.
That's right. He has guided his teams to a five wins in 39 games against the cream of the crop.
The problem with what Dallas is getting is that record worsened when Bledsoe went to Buffalo. He was 4-21 as a Patriot against very good teams. He was 1-13 as Bill.


Bledsoe has thrown more interceptions than touchdowns in five of 11 seasons.

Heading into the 2004 season, Bledsoe has posted a single-season passer rating of more than 80 just four times in 11 years.

CPstretch
April-24th-2006, 08:50 AM
drew bledsoe is the reason the cowboys will suck again this year

grego
April-24th-2006, 08:51 AM
why is this in the stadium??


its the offseason? mods will move it, i'm sure.

Stew
April-24th-2006, 09:06 AM
i like seeing stats like that fro Bledsoe, it confirms what I have thought about him all along.

IrishOrange15
April-24th-2006, 09:23 AM
drew bledsoe is the reason the cowboys will suck again this year

Yes, because Washington's record of 10-6 in 2006 compared to Dallas' record of 9-7 was worlds better.

:rolleyes:

Rich.........

Sailskipper
April-24th-2006, 09:24 AM
Those articles really put him in a bad light. My only question is how much of that is Bledsoe and how much of that is the team that surrounded him? I think if you put Brady in Buffalo he might be hard pressed to win games too.

jwpanic
April-24th-2006, 09:32 AM
those articles don't even address bledsoe's main problem, his lack of mobility. if you get tired of standing around waiting for him to throw an int. you can just run up and sack him.

jnhay
April-24th-2006, 09:34 AM
Sounds like a hater to me.

"Bledsoe has never thrown for 30 touchdowns in a season. His best, 28 in 1997 and 27 in 1996, were the closest."

The most TDs Brunell has thrown is 23, and that was last year. He had a good season last year. 28 and 27 tds in a season is pretty good.



Breaking down that even further hurts him even more. Over his career, he has played against 39 teams that finished the season at 10-5-1 or better (we call those very good teams, winning twice as much as you lose).
Bledsoe for his career is -- please hide this from the children -- 5-34.
That's right. He has guided his teams to a five wins in 39 games against the cream of the crop.


He's never really been on a good team, except for the Cowboys now, and the year he was the backup for the Patriots. You can't blame him for having a horrible record with horrible teams.

Gamebreaker
April-24th-2006, 09:45 AM
I don't think it's fair to say Bledsoe has never been on a good team, when the year the Patriots won their first superbowl was the year he lost his job to Tom Brady. Was that team not a good team? Sure seemed like they were as soon as Bledsoe was taken out of the line-up.

ouvan59
April-24th-2006, 09:46 AM
Yes, because Washington's record of 10-6 in 2006 compared to Dallas' record of 9-7 was worlds better.

:rolleyes:

Rich.........

In the world of the NFL it was worlds better. Considering in 2004 you guys were arguing that your 6-10 was better than ours. Dance your little dance, spin your little spin and you and your little friends try to convince yourselves of whatever you need to help you make it through the night. But the Skins made the playoffs and won a playoff game. They played toe-to-toe with the NFC Champs before bowing out. The Cowboys were a full two games from making the playoffs. We scored more points and gave up fewer. We gained more yards and gave up fewer. We had a better turnover margin. We rushed for more TDs and passed for more TDs. We gave up fewer sacks and interceptions. We intercepted more passes and recovered more fumbles.

:secret:

Rich..........

jnhay
April-24th-2006, 09:47 AM
I don't think it's fair to say Bledsoe has never been on a good team, when the year the Patriots won their first superbowl was the year he lost his job to Tom Brady. Was that team not a good team? Sure seemed like they were as soon as Bledsoe was taken out of the line-up.
I said they were a good team, and don't you remember the quandary Billicheck (aka the fans and media) had when Bledsoe performed really well to get the Patriots into the Super Bowl? Remember that?

This whole Brunell vs. Bledsoe thing is really stupid. Even though I think Brunell has obviously had the better career and is the better QB, if things were switched around and Bledsoe was playing for the Redskins everyone would change their tunes. Dallas fans would support Brunell, and we would support Bledsoe for the most part. The guy who brought this up, along with some others, are exceptions.

jnhay
April-24th-2006, 09:54 AM
Yes, because Washington's record of 10-6 in 2006 compared to Dallas' record of 9-7 was worlds better.

:rolleyes:

Rich.........

Well, head-to-head, Brunell made Bledsoe his *****.

ouvan59
April-24th-2006, 09:58 AM
He's never really been on a good team, except for the Cowboys now, and the year he was the backup for the Patriots. You can't blame him for having a horrible record with horrible teams.

I think we have a chicken or the egg scenario. In 2001 he was the starter at the beginning of the year and led the "hapless" Patriots to an 0-2 start while looking dreadful doing it. All of a sudden he goes down and the team wins the Super Bowl. So you have to ask yourself why is it he hasn't been on very good teams?

jnhay
April-24th-2006, 10:05 AM
I think we have a chicken or the egg scenario. In 2001 he was the starter at the beginning of the year and led the "hapless" Patriots to an 0-2 start while looking dreadful doing it. All of a sudden he goes down and the team wins the Super Bowl. So you have to ask yourself why is it he hasn't been on very good teams?

Well, just looking at the stats because my memory sucks, it looks like he played really well the first game and struggled the second. He also led the team to a win in the playoffs and as I said before, everyone was wondering whether he or Brady would start the next game.

ouvan59
April-24th-2006, 10:07 AM
I said they were a good team, and don't you remember the quandary Billicheck (aka the fans and media) had when Bledsoe performed really well to get the Patriots into the Super Bowl? Remember that?

Is the "performed really well" you were talking about?

21-10-102 yds

The Pats returned a punt and a blocked FG for TDs in that game to put them up 21-3. It took 3 Kordell Stewart picks to preserve the victory. Bledsoe's lone scoring drive was a total of 40 yards. He was only able to get the Pats into Steeler territory once after that.

ouvan59
April-24th-2006, 10:12 AM
Well, just looking at the stats because my memory sucks, it looks like he played really well the first game and struggled the second. He also led the team to a win in the playoffs and as I said before, everyone was wondering whether he or Brady would start the next game.

If by "really well" you mean scoring 17 points against a bad Bengals team in a loss then yeah, he played really well.

The Pats also scored 44 points the week after Bledsoe went down.

jnhay
April-24th-2006, 10:12 AM
Is the "performed really well" you were talking about?

21-10-102 yds

The Pats returned a punt and a blocked FG for TDs in that game to put them up 21-3. It took 3 Kordell Stewart picks to preserve the victory. Bledsoe's lone scoring drive was a total of 40 yards. He was only able to get the Pats into Steeler territory once after that.
I told you my memory sucks. Well, he got the win anyways. My bad, but wasn't there questions around who would start the next game? I wouldn't think there would be if Bledsoe played that poorly.

ouvan59
April-24th-2006, 10:23 AM
I told you my memory sucks. Well, he got the win anyways. My bad, but wasn't there questions around who would start the next game? I wouldn't think there would be if Bledsoe played that poorly.

Yes there were but they were media driven. Belichick said if Brady is healthy he would start.

The media has always loved Bledsoe because he absolutely looks the part and I don't think anybody can argue that he isn't a good guy. Plus his career path looked like it was going to take him to great things but he plateaued after 1996 and in fact has slid backwards since then.

shawn
April-24th-2006, 10:37 AM
didnt see this after a search. it was posted at CZ by a boys fan who apparently isnt too fond of bledsoe.


http://www.eagletribune.com/news/sto...327/SP_004.htm

Among quarterbacks that have thrown for 10,000 or more yards (which means they were starters for at least three full seasons), Bledsoe ranks about 120th all-time, behind Jeff George, Trent Dilfer and Jay Schroeder, averaging 180.1 yards per touchdown.

Bledsoe has never thrown for 30 touchdowns in a season. His best, 28 in 1997 and 27 in 1996, were the closest. In fact, since the 1997 season, which was eight years ago, Bledsoe has averaged only 18.5 TDs per season, which puts him in the bottom third of quarterbacks of that time span.



Now let's look at the most important statistic of all for a quarterback -- victories. Bledsoe is even a bigger loser here.
Bledsoe is 89-88 as a starter, including playoffs.
Breaking down that even further hurts him even more. Over his career, he has played against 39 teams that finished the season at 10-5-1 or better (we call those very good teams, winning twice as much as you lose).
Bledsoe for his career is -- please hide this from the children -- 5-34.
That's right. He has guided his teams to a five wins in 39 games against the cream of the crop.
The problem with what Dallas is getting is that record worsened when Bledsoe went to Buffalo. He was 4-21 as a Patriot against very good teams. He was 1-13 as Bill.
Yikes. That is believed to be the worst winning percentage against very good teams for every quarterback that threw for 20,000 yards or more. WORST EVER.



Now the key ingredient: Despite Bledsoe's not-so-wonderful career, he was the highest paid player in the history of the NFL. Not until recently did Brett Favre pass him in that category. The only difference is that Favre won a Super Bowl and three MVP awards.



I will add that he has finished last or next to last in his division as a starter 9 out of 12 or 10 out of 13 times I don't remember right now which it was...



here is another article



http://www.coldhardfootballfacts.com...le.php?Page=61




Bledsoe: An NFL never-was Cold, Hard Football Facts for October 4, 2004

It’s a testament to Drew Bledsoe’s character that so many New England fans still respect him. His arrival in New England in 1993, along with that of Bill Parcells, helped mark a change in fortunes for a franchise that had been among the most inept in NFL history.
New Englanders also admire Bledsoe’s toughness, dignity, accountability and, of course, his 30.06 rifle of an arm. His farewell, full-page advertisement in Boston newspapers when he departed for Buffalo in 2002 was among the classiest acts ever by a Boston-area athlete.
Bledsoe was so respected in New England that his replacement, Tom Brady, needed to win not one but two Super Bowl MVP awards before many Patriots fans finally admitted that keeping Brady over Bledsoe was the right thing to do.
The Cold, Hard Football Facts admire the respect accorded Bledsoe. But they’re not slaves to misty-eyed public sentiment, and they certainly don’t attempt to swim against a torrent of historical data buoyed only by a skimpy life vest called respect.
“The Truth Hurts,” say the Cold, Hard Football Facts, the truth is this: Bledsoe does not need a better line, another receiver, a top running game, or a different offensive coordinator. And he’s certainly not in the twilight of a glorious career that seems to be spiraling hopelessly downward in Buffalo. The truth is that Bledsoe is not an NFL has-been. The truth is that Bledsoe is an NFL never-was. He’s an NFL overall No. 1 draft pick who has never lived up to expectations.
Here then is the execution the Drew Bledsoe legacy, courtesy of an impassive black-cloaked hangman called the Cold, Hard Football Facts:
* Heading into the 2004 season, Bledsoe has posted a single-season passer rating of more than 80 just four times in 11 years. (Tom Brady has posted an 80-plus passer rating three times in three seasons.)
* Bledsoe’s career passer rating of 76.8 ranks 18th among active quarterbacks with a 1,500 career attempts. (Brady’s career passer rating of 86.4 ranks puts him at a tie for ninth all time with Dan Marino.)
* Bledsoe has led the league in pass attempts three times, completions twice, and passing yards just once. He’s never finished better than third in touchdown passes. (Brady has never led the league in pass attempts, completions or passing yards, but has already led the league once in touchdown passes.)
* Bledsoe has thrown more interceptions than touchdowns in five of 11 seasons. (Brady has never thrown more interceptions than touchdowns over the course of a season and has a nearly 2 to1 touchdown to interception ratio in his career.)
* Despite his reputation as a strong-armed gunslinger, Bledsoe has a career average of just 6.6 yards per pass attempt. (“Dink and dunk” passer Brady averages 6.7 yards per attempt in his career.)
* Bledsoe has completed just 57.1 percent of the passes in his career, with a single-season best of 61.5 percent in 2002. (Brady’s career completion percentage is 61.9).
* Bledsoe’s numbers in seven career postseasons games are dreadful: 129 for 252, 1,335 yards, 6 TDs, 12 INTs, and passer rating of 54.9 that makes even fraud Peyton Manning’s postseason performances look respectable.
* In his one Super Bowl appearance, Bledsoe posted a line of 25 for 48 (52.1 percent), 253 yards, 2 TDs, 4 INTs, and a 46.6 passer rating. He lost that game, 35-21. In two Super Bowl appearances, Brady has posted a line of 48 for 75 (64.0 percent), 499 yards, 4 TDs, 1 INT, and a 95.4 passer rating. He’s won both games.
Drew Bledsoe was accorded elite quarterback status the day he walked into the NFL as an overall No. 1 draft pick in 1993. The Cold, Hard Football Facts believe it’s taken 11 years of mediocre play for NFL “pundits” to finally acknowledge that Bledsoe is in fact a mediocre quarterback.
How do the Cold, Hard Football Facts know? Consider this one other fact: Bledsoe has looked painfully poor and immobile in his first two games of the 2004 season. He’s led the Buffalo offense to just 20 total points and the team to an 0-2 record. Yet if he keeps up his 86.3 passer rating so far this season, it will be the second best statistical year of his substandard career.




http://www.coldhardfootballfacts.com...e.php?Page=173





Bledsoe kissed, dissed, dismissed Cold, Hard Football Facts for November 15, 2004
The Cold, Hard Football Facts tossed dirt on the coffin of Drew Bledsoe’s career earlier this season. After a dreadful performance in Sunday’s 29-6 loss to New England the “pundits” are dancing on the grave.
Bledsoe was 8 of 19 for 76 yards, with three interceptions and an embarrassing 14.6 passer rating – a performance so poor that the passer rating calculator on football.com advises quarterbacks to “turn in your jersey.” Bledsoe was replaced in the fourth quarter by rookie quarterback J.P. Losman, who’s still recovering from a broken leg, while Buffalo’s only points came on a punt return. Even Bledsoe’s pass on a two-point conversion attempt fell incomplete.
The bury Bledsoe bandwagon hit the road moments after the game. Boston sportscaster Bob Neumeier, who has a reputation for bombast and verbosity, actually offered one of the pithiest comments: “Drew Bledsoe has no football left in him,” he said during the Patriots 5th Quarter postgame show.
NFL analyst and former quarterback Boomer Esiason said “It doesn’t look like there’s any juice left in the tank” on WEEI sports radio Monday morning.
Even Ron Borges of the Boston Globe, one of Bledsoe’s most ardent supporters, admitted in his Monday column that “the end came, for all intents and purposes, at 11:20 last night.”
The Buffalo Bills Web site www.twobillsdrive.com offers links to all the obituaries.
There is no getting around the fact that Bledsoe’s overrated career is coming to a sad, pitiful, inglorious end. After Sunday’s performance, Bledsoe’s passer rating for the season has dropped to 70.3, the second lowest number of his career. And as sad as that number is, it’s not that far off his average. Bledsoe’s career passer rating is just 76.5 and he has posted a passer rating of better than 78.0 just once in the last six seasons. He has thrown more than 20 touchdown passes just once over those same six years. It's not likely he'll reach that milestone this year, either.
More indicting than the passing stats are the performances of the teams on which Bledsoe has played. He's just 22-37 as a starting quarterback since the start of the 2000 season. He’s been on just one winning team in those five years – as the back-up quarterback for the Super Bowl champion 2001 Patriots. The last time Bledsoe quarterbacked a winning team was in the Pete Carroll era, when the 1998 Patriots finished the season 9-7.
After gleefully announcing the end of Bledsoe's career, Neumeier did try to backpedal by talking about quarterback's roll in building Gillette Stadium. It's an important part of a legacy that still endears Bledsoe to many longtime New England fans, who know how pitiful the Patriots were before his arrival.
Kevin Rousseau of PatsFan.com puts it best:
“Let me just say that (Bledsoe) does not deserve this fate. He is a decent man, a class act and a good quarterback at times. He could have easily divided the team during the 2001 season but he put his personal feelings aside for the good of the team and it brought the Patriots their first championship.”
It's not a bad legacy for a quarterback who’s career is over. But it's time to let go.



or from the sporting news

The games don't match the names on this unit.(overrated football players)(includes other professional football news)(Column) Get unlimited subscription access to ALL articles and tools with a FREE TRIAL



http://www.highbeam.com/Aspx/GetPubL...News&type=MAGS The Sporting News; 10/7/1996; Glauber, Bob
A list of 12 professional football players who do not deserve their superstar status is presented. The players include Larry Brown, Marshall Faulk, Drew Bledsoe and David Williams.
They make the big bucks and carry the trig reputations. Their names and faces are plastered on billboards and featured in television commercials.
But sometimes, their on-field performance doesn't measure up to their contracts, and their reputations are bigger than their achievements.

but he has taken his team to a supebowl and won an NFC championship game when brady got injured.

Switchgear
April-24th-2006, 11:22 AM
but he has taken his team to a supebowl and won an NFC championship game when brady got injured.

You quoted the entire first post to add this? Please tell me this was a joke post. Please?

jnhay
April-24th-2006, 11:36 AM
Yes there were but they were media driven. Belichick said if Brady is healthy he would start.

The media has always loved Bledsoe because he absolutely looks the part and I don't think anybody can argue that he isn't a good guy. Plus his career path looked like it was going to take him to great things but he plateaued after 1996 and in fact has slid backwards since then.
Good, at least my memory didn't totally fail me. I still don't think that Bledsoe is as bad as the guy who found the stats wants us to believe. He's proven, just like Brunell has, that he is still capable of being a starting quarterback. Yes, there are better quarterbacks out there, no question there are plenty, but that doesn't mean that he can't lead the Cowboys to another winning season. With how their team looks right now, they should make the playoffs next year. The only thing is, it's kinda hard to tell because the NFC east is gonna be good. Phili's gotta be better, the Giants have Lavar and an older Eli, and of course the Redskins are just so unbelievably good it's crazy!

ouvan59
April-26th-2006, 03:34 PM
With how their team looks right now, they should make the playoffs next year.

That all rests on how their offensive line holds up. If it plays like last year then they are in serious doo-doo. If they play well then the Bledsoe-Owens tandem could be lethal.

Skins4481
April-26th-2006, 04:44 PM
In the world of the NFL it was worlds better. Considering in 2004 you guys were arguing that your 6-10 was better than ours. Dance your little dance, spin your little spin and you and your little friends try to convince yourselves of whatever you need to help you make it through the night. But the Skins made the playoffs and won a playoff game. They played toe-to-toe with the NFC Champs before bowing out. The Cowboys were a full two games from making the playoffs. We scored more points and gave up fewer. We gained more yards and gave up fewer. We had a better turnover margin. We rushed for more TDs and passed for more TDs. We gave up fewer sacks and interceptions. We intercepted more passes and recovered more fumbles.

:secret:

Rich..........

:applause: :notworthy :applause: :notworthy

by the way, love the "Rich....."!!!!

Zaxor
April-28th-2006, 06:53 AM
I'm the guy at CBZ that wrote the stuff...and I have no hate towards Bledsoe as far as I know he seems a nice guy and seems to say all the right stuff...

My contention in all this is Bledsoe is really nothing more than a mediocre QB (nothing wrong with that) but there were a few knuckleheads who prostrated themselves before him and proclaimed his greatness... :doh: as in him being top 5 great :doh: and other stupidity like that..

enjoy the draft and I wish your team and their fans good health

Go Cowboys

ouvan59
April-28th-2006, 08:07 AM
I'm the guy at CBZ that wrote the stuff...and I have no hate towards Bledsoe as far as I know he seems a nice guy and seems to say all the right stuff...

My contention in all this is Bledsoe is really nothing more than a mediocre QB (nothing wrong with that) but there were a few knuckleheads who prostrated themselves before him and proclaimed his greatness... :doh: as in him being top 5 great :doh: and other stupidity like that..

enjoy the draft and I wish your team and their fans good health

Go Cowboys

I would say that is a fair assessment. A lot of people still look at him as the 1996 Drew Bledsoe but he hasn't been that guy for a long while. He throws a really nice ball and when given protection can torch teams. But pretty much any NFL QB this side of Chad Hutchinson can torch teams when given time.

I remember going into last year most Cowboy fans were talking about Testeverde turning the ball over too much and looking at the interception numbers Bledsoe was a big upgrade in that department. What they didn't take into account was his propensity to get sacked and subsequently fumble. I don't remember the exact numbers but I'll take the numbers off the top of my head. In their careers Testerverde has averaged a fumble or interception once every 26 pass attempts. Bledsoe on the other hand averages a fumble or interception once every 20 pass attempts. Patrick Ramsey, whose biggest knock was turning the ball over, averaged a turnover every 24 pass attempts. Last year Bledsoe fumbled or threw an interception once every 14.67 pass attempts.

Under the right circumstances Bledsoe can be a very good QB but putting those circumstances together isn't that easy.

Zaxor
April-28th-2006, 08:20 AM
I would say that is a fair assessment. A lot of people still look at him as the 1996 Drew Bledsoe but he hasn't been that guy for a long while. He throws a really nice ball and when given protection can torch teams. But pretty much any NFL QB this side of Chad Hutchinson can torch teams when given time.

I remember going into last year most Cowboy fans were talking about Testeverde turning the ball over too much and looking at the interception numbers Bledsoe was a big upgrade in that department. What they didn't take into account was his propensity to get sacked and subsequently fumble. I don't remember the exact numbers but I'll take the numbers off the top of my head. In their careers Testerverde has averaged a fumble or interception once every 26 pass attempts. Bledsoe on the other hand averages a fumble or interception once every 20 pass attempts. Patrick Ramsey, whose biggest knock was turning the ball over, averaged a turnover every 24 pass attempts. Last year Bledsoe fumbled or threw an interception once every 14.67 pass attempts.

Under the right circumstances Bledsoe can be a very good QB but putting those circumstances together isn't that easy.

it is dang near impossible...but some things can be done...

TE, RB and WR...There has never been a offensive line built that can protect this guy so that is out...

but getting back to the Vinny vs. Bledsoe

Testy has fumbled 114 times I think while Bled has fumbled 120 times

Testy has been sacked I think 408 times while Bled has been sacked 451 times

They are the same guy...in fact Vinny might be a tad better...though I get attacked when I say that...

Vinny has more yards in less attempts and more TD's...
but more ints

and when Vinny had both a decent WR and RB he put up pretty good numbers... but Vinny is also just a mediocre QB

Oh I think you can win with Bledsoe but the more responsibility you take out of his hands the better...

#98QBKiller
April-28th-2006, 10:29 AM
Someone please tell "WeownU" about this thread. He honestly thinks that Bledsoe is better than Brunell.

Angie
April-28th-2006, 11:38 AM
Still does not mean a dag on thing... Dallas nor the Redskins are the SUPERBOWL Champs!