PDA

View Full Version : 16-0 or 0-16 (Which Is Harder)



.Guy.
October-9th-2006, 06:11 PM
Do you think its easier for a team to win all 16 games or lose all 16?

I think its harder to win all 16 because there is going to be a day when a team just isnt there. A really bad team can come out and play decent and beat another bad team.

What do you think?

thespaniard
October-9th-2006, 06:13 PM
is it really that hard to lose all 16 games? :whoknows:

There have been several winless teams over the years, but only one undefeated team. I think that in itself answers your question..

DWinzit
October-9th-2006, 06:25 PM
is it really that hard to lose all 16 games? :whoknows:
Lets ask the Raiders :laugh:

jwebst1
October-9th-2006, 06:25 PM
definitely win them all..... even the worst teams in the league get up to knock off an unbeaten (e.g. Tennessee yesterday)

FunBunch7
October-9th-2006, 06:32 PM
The Bears DO have a soft schedule...they play at New England which is definelty going to be tough and as we all know the Giants are tough at home.

There's no way thoght that this team can go undefeated...there is the regular pressure of going undefeated once a team gets to 11-0 but there is also the pressure of the 85' Bears whi many would agree is arguable the best team of all time.

I would on th eother hand LOVE to see the Raiders go 0-16 but it won't happen.

kevin11
October-9th-2006, 06:34 PM
I hope Dallas goes 0-16. But it won't ever happen..:(

SackMachine
October-9th-2006, 06:43 PM
Lets ask the Raiders :laugh:

:laugh::laugh: Best reply :notworthy