Giants over the pukes?

[tr1]

Seems to be a difficult task being in Dallas, but we'll see.

If Dallas does lose, I'd say that confirms they're a mediocre team....and that the Giants are a good team.

[DWinzit]

I can't wait to watch this game!
With Romo's late preformance on Sunday, if Bledsoe wavers he is going in!

[BigDave95]

I can't wait to watch this game!
With Romo's late preformance on Sunday, if Bledsoe wavers he is going in!

????

Romo threw two passes in garbage time. It's not like he brought them back on a 4th quarter comeback drive.

[THEHEREAFTER]

tr1 is the #1 NFCE analyst. I have to agree with you though. If we drop this game, we're nothing more than mediocore.

[Westbrook36]

Come on. Dallas wins at home. :laugh:

[IrishOrange15]

From a statistical standpoint, Dallas is doing a lot of things well. They are dominating the running game battle, have a solid sack ratio, are doing a solid job of forcing turnovers, doing very well in first quarter scoring differential, and their points allowed per game is decent.

The big problem is Bledsoe. In their losses to Philly and Jacksonville, Bledsoe's turnovers were the majority of the problem. And while most criticize his mobility and holding onto the ball too long, I'm more worried about his inability to anticipate his receivers this year. It's not just throwing to Owens, he's struggled anticipating Witten and Crayton as well. The only guy he seems to anticipate well is Terry Glenn.

I'll take a win any way the Cowboys can get it, but if I had my choice I'd like to see Bledsoe play a mediocre game, but not turn the ball over. If he does that and Dallas wins easily, then it would be easy for me to see that the rest of the team is pretty good when their QB doesn't screw it up for them. Unfortunately, it will still mean that they rely on a shaky QB.


YAKUZA

[WeownU]

If Dallas does lose, I'd say that confirms they're a mediocre team


Agreed.

[Eagle091]

dallas will win at home.

[kingfish50]

I feel like throwing up. Philthy, NY and dallASS fighting for the division. I agree with Tr1. If dallASS can't win this one at home, they are mediocre at best.

[Fred Jones]

I have to agree with TR on this one that if the pukes do not win at home they should be dropped down to an average team that has to scramble to make the playoffs. If the Giants do win you have to give them props for winning on the road in back-to-back games.

I also agree that this should be a good game.

[Warhead36]

It's going to be an old Texas style shootout down in Little D.

Cowboys 31 Giants 28



Now with that said it will probably be a defensive slugfest :laugh:

[HeHateMe]

Seems to be a difficult task being in Dallas, but we'll see.

If Dallas does lose, I'd say that confirms they're a mediocre team....and that the Giants are a good team.

If losing at home to the Giants makes Dallas "mediocre", what does losing at home to Tennessee to make Washington?

[GoSkinsGo]

If losing at home to the Giants makes Dallas "mediocre", what does losing at home to Tennessee to make Washington?
Gut shot.

That's going to hurt all year. And for the record that makes us bad.

[GibbsFactor]

I know I'm going to be killed for this, but I want the Cowboys to win this game because we've played both once already and the Giants already have a road win in Philly. As a rule, always root for the home team in division play when all chips are equal as in this case.

[HeHateMe]

Gut shot.

That's going to hurt all year. And for the record that makes us bad.

It wasnt intended to sting, although I see how it does.

I was just trying to get a barometer on how different losses stack up.

[tr1]

It wasnt intended to sting, although I see how it does.

I was just trying to get a barometer on how different losses stack up.

No...it wasn't trolling...really it wasn't... :laugh:

[DWinzit]

It wasnt intended to sting, although I see how it does.
It sure seems to have a stinger attached ;)


I was just trying to get a barometer on how different losses stack up.
The loss to the Titans put the Skins in a deep hole. Fortunately, we can still see the light!

[roanoker]

If losing at home to the Giants makes Dallas "mediocre", what does losing at home to Tennessee to make Washington?




Although subtle, no need to go for the jugular... Some of us have bled enough.
:(

[DWinzit]

Romo threw two passes in garbage time. It's not like he brought them back on a 4th quarter comeback drive.
Point was Romo has been gaining support through the organization, media and fans. Although only going in for a period of garbage time, he did what supporters expected. Most important was getting his feet wet which he did successfully.
Bledsoe can now begin to feel him breathing down his neck.

[kingfish50]

If losing at home to the Giants makes Dallas "mediocre", what does losing at home to Tennessee to make Washington?
Pathetic. Happy now?
:dallasuck

[Lil Kenzo]

If losing at home to the Giants makes Dallas "mediocre", what does losing at home to Tennessee to make Washington?


Damn. I was hoping you wouldn't go there. But it makes us terrible.

[Westbrook36]

The NFL is a funny thing. IF the Skins somehow win at the Colts, we take the gun from their heads, at least for tw more weeks. If they lose, with Dallas and Philly after the bye, they are as good as done.

This weekend will tell a lot about the NFC East.

Eagles at the Bucs. If they lose, well, they are not a good team. Should be 5-2 with only the Jags, at home, standing in the way of 8-2.

Giants at Dallas. This is a tough one. I expect the Cowboys to win, because they are the better team. We'll see. If the Giants win, I still wouldn't count the Boys out completely. If McNabb was on their team, they'd be undefeated. Such is life.

Skins at Indy. Do or die. I don't think the Skins have the coaching, talent, or desire to win this game on the road. I see it being close for a bit but the Colts pulling away late. We can all blame Brunnell afterwards; even if the defense gives up 40.

[tr1]

Skins at Indy. Do or die. I don't think the Skins have the coaching, talent, or desire to win this game on the road. I see it being close for a bit but the Colts pulling away late. We can all blame Brunnell afterwards; even if the defense gives up 40.

You didn't mention any of our injuries on defense...think it might have anything to do with a potential loss?

Our offense may keep us in this game, though.

And if we pull it out in Indy, you will start shaking in your boots...we have two games with you guys...

The winner of this division will be 10-6 or 9-7...and no home field advantage in the playoffs...

[Westbrook36]

You didn't mention any of our injuries on defense...think it might have anything to do with a potential loss?



Hey, I'm not the guy who thought that acceptable depth meant a couple of late round rookies backing up a few 30+ year old defensive lineman. Danny Snyder did. If you want to be mad at anyone, be mad at him.

[dockeryfan]

Hey, I'm not the guy who thought that acceptable depth meant a couple of late round rookies backing up a few 30+ year old defensive lineman. Danny Snyder did. If you want to be mad at anyone, be mad at him.
Pick your poison.

The Eagles chose to go light at RB and LB.

Shawn Barber? When Matt McKoy had looked so great?
Correll Buckhalter?

You only get 53. You choose to go light in some areas and roll the dice.

[THEHEREAFTER]

The big problem is Bledsoe.

YAKUZA


Rich, Bledsoe is money at home. The giants are still horrible against the run. I'd like to see us neutralize their pass rush with draws and screens and also pound them all night. Bledsoe will have a big game.

[Westbrook36]

Pick your poison.

The Eagles chose to go light at RB and LB.

Shawn Barber? When Matt McKoy had looked so great?
Correll Buckhalter?

You only get 53. You choose to go light in some areas and roll the dice.

Be real. Shawn Barber is having a great year, what are you talking about. In the nickle defense, he is doing his job very well. Buckhalter is averaging over 4 yards a carry.

The Eagles have a plan when it comes to depth. The Skins do not. They are too busy star shopping to really be concerned with backup OL, DL, Kicker, DBs, etc.

Thats why you wind up signing a kicker week 5 and a safety week 6. You have no plan. Depth isn't sexy. With the Skins, sexy always wins.

You are smart....you know this is true, dock.

[BigDave95]

Point was Romo has been gaining support through the organization, media and fans. Although only going in for a period of garbage time, he did what supporters expected. Most important was getting his feet wet which he did successfully.
Bledsoe can now begin to feel him breathing down his neck.

He might be gaining support through the media and fans but the only opinion that matters is Parcells. And Bill will NEVER go to Romo unless disaster strikes and the season is out of reach.

[scyber]

The giants are still horrible against the run.

Huh? The giants have had one bad game agains the run. They were in the top 5 in yards per run before the Atlanta game. I think you underestimate the giants run D.

[THEHEREAFTER]

Huh? The giants have had one bad game agains the run. They were in the top 5 in yards per run before the Atlanta game. I think you underestimate the giants run D.

Perhaps you're right. I'm just basing this on their last game but Atlanta has an excellent running game. Either way, aside from the skins game, the giants have been getting torched through the air as well.

[dockeryfan]

Be real. Shawn Barber is having a great year, what are you talking about. In the nickle defense, he is doing his job very well. Buckhalter is averaging over 4 yards a carry.

The Eagles have a plan when it comes to depth. The Skins do not. They are too busy star shopping to really be concerned with backup OL, DL, Kicker, DBs, etc.

Thats why you wind up signing a kicker week 5 and a safety week 6. You have no plan. Depth isn't sexy. With the Skins, sexy always wins.

You are smart....you know this is true, dock.
Revisionist history.

The barber signing at the time was being slammed on all fronts, and they knew he was only going to contribute part time.
The fact that he's doing this well is a surprise to a lot of people.
Buckhalter was a huge questionmark.
Moats hurt his knee early in camp.
Westy went down with a sprained foot in the preseason opener, and he had a lisfranc sprain in the other foot just a year earlier.

You can spin it all you want, but the fact remains that the Eagles rolled the dice on Linebacker, which they have for a few years now, and on runningback, where Westbrook is the most important component of their offense after MvNabb.

There is some argument for the LB situation, because they don't rely on them as much as other teams, but ythere is no excuse for how they handled the RB situation.
It put their whole season potentially in jeopardy.
And still may.
That is no plan. Just because it's working out doesn't mean it's a plan.

[tr1]

Pick your poison.

The Eagles chose to go light at RB and LB.

Shawn Barber? When Matt McKoy had looked so great?
Correll Buckhalter?

You only get 53. You choose to go light in some areas and roll the dice.


Doc...stop with the logic.

WB can't handle it.

[tr1]

He might be gaining support through the media and fans but the only opinion that matters is Parcells. And Bill will NEVER go to Romo unless disaster strikes and the season is out of reach.

You have to give Parcells credit for that...if Romo goes in, you're throwing in the towel.

[Eagle091]

those are absolutely not true dock. dude, talk about over-exxageration. mcCoy has played great, barber too. moats, westy, and buck have all looked good. neither has had a bad game yet. your off in left field on this one.

[tr1]

That is no plan. Just because it's working out doesn't mean it's a plan.

Last year was the first year the injury bug hit the Eagles in five years...and it wasn't McNabb you missed the most, it was Westbrook.

I still think the Eagles are one bad sprain away from being very mediocre.

[BlueinBuf]

Perhaps you're right. I'm just basing this on their last game but Atlanta has an excellent running game. Either way, aside from the skins game, the giants have been getting torched through the air as well.

The giants run D has been great, the secondary has definately left some things to be desired. Now with our SS out I'm a little scared for the dallas game.

[tr1]

those are absolutely not true dock. dude, talk about over-exxageration. mcCoy has played great, barber too. moats, westy, and buck have all looked good. neither has had a bad game yet. your off in left field on this one.

You haven't beat a good team yet...that includes the pukes.

I think TB will give you fits.

[dockeryfan]

those are absolutely not true dock. dude, talk about over-exxageration. mcCoy has played great, barber too. moats, westy, and buck have all looked good. neither has had a bad game yet. your off in left field on this one.
What are you talking about?
I don't think you read my post.
I'm talking about the state of things in August, where Moats was down, Westy was down, Correll had the injury history...

Do me a favor and read my post a few above this one.

[dockeryfan]

Revisionist history.

The barber signing at the time was being slammed on all fronts, and they knew he was only going to contribute part time.
The fact that he's doing this well is a surprise to a lot of people.
Buckhalter was a huge questionmark.
Moats hurt his knee early in camp.
Westy went down with a sprained foot in the preseason opener, and he had a lisfranc sprain in the other foot just a year earlier.

You can spin it all you want, but the fact remains that the Eagles rolled the dice on Linebacker, which they have for a few years now, and on runningback, where Westbrook is the most important component of their offense after MvNabb.

There is some argument for the LB situation, because they don't rely on them as much as other teams, but ythere is no excuse for how they handled the RB situation.
It put their whole season potentially in jeopardy.
And still may.
That is no plan. Just because it's working out doesn't mean it's a plan.
Here.
I posted it again for you.

[Westbrook36]

Hey dock, of course we shouldn't go by what happens on the field. We should go off of how free agent moves are lauded in the press as an indication of how good of a move it was. In that case, the Skins are the best team in the league.

You ever even think that maybe the Eagles KNEW what they were getting and weren't guessing at all? They've made lots of questionable moves over the last few years and it has produced a winning formula.

Just because we have 100s of threads in the offseason where you were clearly WRONG, doesn't mean the Eagles didn't have a sound plan.

I have the regular season to back my side up. You have 2-4.

[dockeryfan]

Just because we have 100s of threads in the offseason where you were clearly WRONG, doesn't mean the Eagles didn't have a sound plan.

Whose the hater?

Oh where are these hundreds of threads where I am wrong? Link?

This coming from the salary cap genius. I remember the doom and gloom even if there are those here that forget, or those that want to believe your revisionist history.

[tr1]

Salary cap genius...oh, yeah...I remember WB's predictions... :laugh: :laugh:

And, WB, tell me you weren't down on your FO when they let FA after FA slip through your fingers....you were bashing your FO as badly as I was... :laugh:

And, as for your winning record, let's see what happens when you stop playing the 'Lil Sisters of the Poor.

You keep losing to good teams...and you face 6 in a row at the end of the season... :laugh:

Let's see what kind of record you have then.

[Westbrook36]

When did I bash the Eagles FO regarding FAs? Link?

[tr1]

When did I bash the Eagles FO regarding FAs? Link?

Bently and no WR acquisition until Stallworth...

If you want, I can do the research...but not today.

[Westbrook36]

tr1, you have went nuts. I never bashed the Eagles over Bentley or the WR situation. I defended them, and rightfully so.

[Cassow]

Salary cap genius...oh, yeah...I remember WB's predictions... :laugh: :laugh:

And, WB, tell me you weren't down on your FO when they let FA after FA slip through your fingers....you were bashing your FO as badly as I was... :laugh:

And, as for your winning record, let's see what happens when you stop playing the 'Lil Sisters of the Poor.

You keep losing to good teams...and you face 6 in a row at the end of the season... :laugh:

Let's see what kind of record you have then.

Sun., Nov. 26 @ Indy
Mon., Dec. 4 Carolina
Sun., Dec. 10 @ Washington
Sun., Dec. 17 @ Giants
Mon., Dec. 25 @ Dallas
Sun., Dec. 31 Atlanta


Dont you mean 5 good teams?

[Tom [Giants fan]]

Westbrook,

Explain to me how the Cowboys are a better team than the Giants. Look at who the Cowboys have beaten. Washington (sorry guys), Tennessee, and Houston. How have they proven they are a better team than the Giants by beating those teams? The Giants have won in Philly and in Atlanta. Even as strange as that Giants/Eagles game was, they still did it on the road. I don't see how the Cowboys are a better team right now. They may win Monday Night but until that time, I don't see them as the better team.

[Who Del]

I bashed the FO over Bentley and the WRs. Maybe tr1 has us confused WB. I'm a negative nancy. :(

[tr1]

Sun., Nov. 26 @ Indy
Mon., Dec. 4 Carolina
Sun., Dec. 10 @ Washington
Sun., Dec. 17 @ Giants
Mon., Dec. 25 @ Dallas
Sun., Dec. 31 Atlanta


Don't you mean 5 good teams?

Sure...it's gonna be a cakewalk for the Eagles here on the 10th...no problem...

Playing at a division rival's stadium is always easy...

:doh:

[tr1]

I bashed the FO over Bentley and the WRs. Maybe tr1 has us confused WB. I'm a negative nancy. :(

I didn't hear WB disagree with you.

[Riggo#44]

Be real. Shawn Barber is having a great year, what are you talking about. In the nickle defense, he is doing his job very well. Buckhalter is averaging over 4 yards a carry.

The Eagles have a plan when it comes to depth. The Skins do not. They are too busy star shopping to really be concerned with backup OL, DL, Kicker, DBs, etc.

Thats why you wind up signing a kicker week 5 and a safety week 6. You have no plan. Depth isn't sexy. With the Skins, sexy always wins.

You are smart....you know this is true, dock.

Yeah the Redskins are not real deep - but I'll tell you what, sit your top 2 DTs, Sheppard and Brown as well as your #3 saftey - see how well you do. Oh wait - yeah - we've seen that - you were finished 6-10, 0-6 in the division...

[scyber]

Perhaps you're right. I'm just basing this on their last game but Atlanta has an excellent running game. Either way, aside from the skins game, the giants have been getting torched through the air as well.

Giants are ranked better than dallas against the pass ;) But I will agree that the weak point of the giants D was there pass D in the beginning of the season. They have played better the last two games, but we shall see what happens on Monday night.

[dockeryfan]

Yeah the Redskins are not real deep - but I'll tell you what, sit your top 2 DTs, Sheppard and Brown as well as your #3 saftey - see how well you do. Oh wait - yeah - we've seen that - you were finished 6-10, 0-6 in the division...
No no no
The Eagles have a plan, see. Gold standard of the nfl and all.
The Redskins they give up draft picks and have no depth continue rant
Whos a hater? WB36.

[WeownU]

Sun., Nov. 26 @ Indy
Mon., Dec. 4 Carolina
Sun., Dec. 10 @ Washington
Sun., Dec. 17 @ Giants
Mon., Dec. 25 @ Dallas
Sun., Dec. 31 Atlanta


Don't you mean 5 good teams?

Now that there's funny, I don't care who you are. :notworthy

[Warhead36]

Be real. Shawn Barber is having a great year, what are you talking about. In the nickle defense, he is doing his job very well. Buckhalter is averaging over 4 yards a carry.

The Eagles have a plan when it comes to depth. The Skins do not. They are too busy star shopping to really be concerned with backup OL, DL, Kicker, DBs, etc.

Thats why you wind up signing a kicker week 5 and a safety week 6. You have no plan. Depth isn't sexy. With the Skins, sexy always wins.

You are smart....you know this is true, dock.

Yep.

I see the light.

[THEHEREAFTER]

[QUOTE='Tom [Giants fan]']Westbrook,

Explain to me how the Cowboys are a better team than the Giants.QUOTE]

Tom, you're right. Even though you guys looked horrible in Seattle, I'd have to give you guys the edge based on who you've beat. Of course, that all changes Monday night. ;)

[BigRay]

How about it being a tie how about both of them beating the snot out of each other .

[HeHateMe]

No...it wasn't trolling...really it wasn't... :laugh:

Yet you still avoid the question. :doh:

[HeHateMe]

Pathetic. Happy now?
:dallasuck

No, actually, I respect all of your opinons and the question wasnt really posed to you or others responding.

It was posed to tr1 who started the thread but refuses to respond when called out onto the carpet.

[Riggo#44]

No, actually, I respect all of your opinons and the question wasnt really posed to you or others responding.

It was posed to tr1 who started the thread but refuses to respond when called out onto the carpet.

This should be a good game - since it is in Dallas - and they seem to play very well there - I have to go with Dallas on that one. But I still believe the Giants are the best team in the division - the beat Atl in Atl, Dallas has yet to beat a legitimate opponent.

[Who Del]

I didn't hear WB disagree with you.

I made a thread in the Stadium about it and WB denounced me for that. I remember that. It stung a little but everything is ok now. Jamaal has been doing very well at C.

[BigDFan5]

Sp tr1 says early in the thread the Eagles hevent beaten anybody good "including Dallas'

Then later says the Eagles " keep losing to good teams...and you face 6 in a row at the end of the season"

and one of those games is Dallas

"logic" like this is great

[tr1]

Sp tr1 says early in the thread the Eagles hevent beaten anybody good "including Dallas'

Then later says the Eagles " keep losing to good teams...and you face 6 in a row at the end of the season"

and one of those games is Dallas

"logic" like this is great

Your right...I should have said 5 out of 6 games are against tough teams.

The pukes and 'good teams' just don't go together.

Thanks for pointing that out.

:laugh:

[DWinzit]

Your right...I should have said 5 out of 6 games are against tough teams.
The pukes and 'good teams' just don't go together.
Thanks for pointing that out.:laugh:
tri, I was beginning to worry about you. Thanks for the clarificaton! :laugh: :helmet:

[BigDFan5]

Your right...I should have said 5 out of 6 games are against tough teams.

The pukes and 'good teams' just don't go together.

Thanks for pointing that out.

:laugh:

That would still be false because as was pointed out earlier Washington is among those teams as well. All of the sudden according to your own premises their schedule is not so bad looking

[Fifty Gut]

nah, taking Dallas in this one

I think their D will step up and make Eli look silly, not cause their talented, just a hunch

[Westbrook36]

We actually need Dallas to win. I don't want NY 3-0 in the NFC East.

[tr1]

That would still be false because as was pointed out earlier Washington is among those teams as well. All of the sudden according to your own premises their schedule is not so bad looking


I suspect we'll be healthier by then.


If you're so confident of a win at FedEX, why don't you predict the score right now?

[Westbrook36]

I made a thread in the Stadium about it and WB denounced me for that. I remember that. It stung a little but everything is ok now. Jamaal has been doing very well at C.

Let's not let facts get in the way of tr1 trying to rewrite history.

http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php?t=151181&highlight=bentley

http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php?t=149322&highlight=bentley


Eagles had a great FA class. What are you talking about? If the basis for posting threads is to find unhappy Eagles fans and post their thoughts, I can find you much better sources than the ones you are currently using.

http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php?t=147902&highlight=bentley

http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php?t=147856&highlight=bentley

Who Del sticks his foot in his mouth:

http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php?t=147742&highlight=bentley


Once again the organization I root for has officially found a way to **** something up. The rumor is now Bentley is headed to the Browns on a six year deal. Thats per Sirius radio. I'm so embarassed I don't even know what to say. Why does my team do this to me every ****ing year? Why??

At least it looks like you guys are going to have a good offseason. More power to the people who spend their ****ing money. I've had it. Good luck.


Ugh, you are a disgrace to real Eagles fans. Seriously. Coming on a Skins board to congratulate them? Are you really that hard up for friends?


Del, you are going to be well liked around here. As long as you keep bashing the Eagles and kissing Skins fans asses.

Good luck with that.

Actually, if anyone has a few minutes to spare and wants a HUGE LAUGH, search for "Bentley" and read the threads that come up. Especially the baiting type threads that tr1 made. It is absolutely hilarious to see so many people who were so ****ing wrong. HILARIOUS. tr1 was 1000 percent wrong about everything he wrote. I would say 100 but that is not high enough. I have softened in my old age and kind of let bygones be bygones from this past offseason.

Going back in time and reading a few threads really brightened my day. I was thisclose to bumping all of them back to the top for everyone's enjoyment. :laugh:

[tr1]

Actually, if anyone has a few minutes to spare and wants a HUGE LAUGH, search for "Bentley" and read the threads that come up. Especially the baiting type threads that tr1 made. It is absolutely hilarious to see so many people who were so ****ing wrong. HILARIOUS. tr1 was 1000 percent wrong about everything he wrote. I would say 100 but that is not high enough. I have softened in my old age and kind of let bygones be bygones from this past offseason.

So I was wrong about the Eagles being to cheap to get Bentley? Didn't he end up with the Browns?

Oh, yeah, I'm always 100% wrong. :laugh:

I was wrong about TO wrecking Philly, wrong about McNabb's injury, wrong about Stallworth, wrong about Pinkston, wrong about Bunkley not starting this year, etc....

Shall I continue?

[tr1]

And shame on you for picking on Who Del...

[Westbrook36]

Read the threads! They are great. Man, I haven't had that much fun in a long long time. I love seeing you reaching out, trying to find a tree branch, and then falling right on your face. The only thing funnier is watching you do it again and again and again. :laugh: :laugh:

[Cassow]

I suspect we'll be healthier by then.


If you're so confident of a win at FedEX, why don't you predict the score right now?

Healthier? Maybe.

Playing for "pride" by that point? Definitely.

[IrishOrange15]

So I was wrong about the Eagles being to cheap to get Bentley? Didn't he end up with the Browns?

The Browns gave Bentley an outrageous contract for a center. Also, Bentley stated from the very beginning that he was a lifelong Browns fan (grew up in Ohio, played at Ohio State) and would pretty much play for the Browns if they gave him a decent offer since he wanted to play back home. The Browns wound up giving him a much bigger offer than even he expected and Philly stood no shot, despite reportedly offering him quite a bit of money.

Of course coming from one of Daniel Snyder's obsequious lapdogs, one can't expect you to understand the concept that just because your team doesn't greatly overpay for a FA, doesn't mean they are cheap either.


YAKUZA

[Number5]

Last year was the first year the injury bug hit the Eagles in five years...and it wasn't McNabb you missed the most, it was Westbrook.

I still think the Eagles are one bad sprain away from being very mediocre.


I guess that's why McNabb basically beat Green Bay this year by himself? I mean according to your logic, a man who went to 4 straight NFC Title games, 2 of which were seasons in which Westbrook was either still a Wildcat or a rookie, and one season when we went on the IR doesn't account for anything huh?

[Westbrook36]

I wonder what tr1 would say if the Eagles won two Superbowls during strike shortened seasons....

[Riggo#44]

I wonder what tr1 would say if the Eagles won two Superbowls during strike shortened seasons....

Well, did they? Not that I can recall...

[BigDave95]

Read the threads! They are great. Man, I haven't had that much fun in a long long time. I love seeing you reaching out, trying to find a tree branch, and then falling right on your face. The only thing funnier is watching you do it again and again and again. :laugh: :laugh:

Those old threads are hilarious. You've got to give tr1 some credit for having the balls to make predictions and throw his opinions out there. That being said, I don't think the guy has ever been right in his life. You would think just with the law of averages he would get one sooner or later.

[tr1]

Of course coming from one of Daniel Snyder's obsequious lapdogs, one can't expect you to understand the concept that just because your team doesn't greatly overpay for a FA, doesn't mean they are cheap either.


YAKUZA


Revisionist history. So Bentley had no $ amount that would have landed him in Philly.

Ok. Sure. :doh:

[tr1]

I wonder what tr1 would say if the Eagles won two Superbowls during strike shortened seasons....

He'd say they have two...but they don't...so he can't.

[tr1]

That being said, I don't think the guy has ever been right in his life.

You haven't been here long enough...TO...Eagles last year being losers...ask my Philly pals.

That's why WB has such a grudge...I was right, and he was wrong.

So, are pukes gonna win?

You do believe in your team don't you?

[BigDave95]

So, are pukes gonna win?

You do believe in your team don't you?

Yes. Cowboys win. It's going to be a tough game, very tough... but the Boys will win.

Bledsoe is a different QB at home. (I guess he must enjoy all of the boos.) Plus the Giants' pass rush comes mainly off the edge and that's not how you beat Drew. You've got to get rushers up the middle and in his face and the Giants don't blitz well enough to get that done. Drew won't lose us the game like he did in Philly and Jax.

The D will limit Tiki and Eli doesn't scare me at all. My prediction:

Dallas - 23
Giants - 16

[tr1]

Yes. Cowboys win. It's going to be a tough game, very tough... but the Boys will win.

Bledsoe is a different QB at home. (I guess he must enjoy all of the boos.) Plus the Giants' pass rush comes mainly off the edge and that's not how you beat Drew. You've got to get rushers up the middle and in his face and the Giants don't blitz well enough to get that done. Drew won't lose us the game like he did in Philly and Jax.

The D will limit Tiki and Eli doesn't scare me at all. My prediction:

Dallas - 23
Giants - 16


I'd be more afraid of the Giants d ends...

We'll see what your tackles are made of.

[BigDave95]

I'd be more afraid of the Giants d ends...

We'll see what your tackles are made of.


Did I miss your prediction for the Colts/Skins game?

[BigDFan5]

I suspect we'll be healthier by then.


If you're so confident of a win at FedEX, why don't you predict the score right now?


Why do I need to predict a score? See my team already beat yours. All season we heard about how Wash would sweep Dallas' I believe you were in the sweep camp as well. Face facts tr1 your team isnt very good right now. Use any reasons you want but the facts remain the same. How will the Skins do in indy this sunday?

[tr1]

Did I miss your prediction for the Colts/Skins game?

Isn't it obvious?

I'd love to see an upset, but I don't think it will happen.

But, I won't miss the game.

[FLRedskins]

Hate both teams can't pick

3-3 tie :dallasuck :gaintsuck

[IrishOrange15]

Revisionist history. So Bentley had no $ amount that would have landed him in Philly.

Ok. Sure. :doh:


According to Bentley, no. There's nothing revisionist about it. He stated on Sirius radio before FA went up that he wanted out of New Orleans and wanted to play for the Browns.

And like I pointed out, he signed an obscene contract for a center. So for Philly to get him instead (and they offered him some good $$$ as well), he would've gotten an out of this world type of contract.

Just because Philly didn't want to sign him to some preposterous contract, doesn't make them cheap.


YAKUZA

[tr1]

Bump...for giggles.

[kingfish50]

Waking up this morning and hearing that the dallASS cowBoys lost to the giants put a big smile on my face. I didn't watch the game. The giants seemed to win by a large margin but was it closer than the score indicates?
:dallasuck :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

[Tom [Giants fan]]

Waking up this morning and hearing that the dallASS cowBoys lost to the giants put a big smile on my face. I didn't watch the game. The giants seemed to win by a large margin but was it closer than the score indicates?

Actually, the margin probably should have been larger than 14.

[BlueinBuf]

']Actually, the margin probably should have been larger than 14.

I don't know man eli threw a couple passes right to dallas defenders, we were lucky they couldn't catch them.

[NOVA2Tampa]

I don't know man eli threw a couple passes right to dallas defenders, we were lucky they couldn't catch them.

True dat...Eli caught a couple of breaks in that game...there were at least two balls that could have been picked...but the Giants missed a couple of INT opportunities, too, so it balances out.

The Cowgirls just plain got beat in every aspect of the game.