PDA

View Full Version : Pukes haven't won a playoff game in ten years...make it eleven.


tr1
December-7th-2006, 06:51 PM
Sorry, puke pals, I just don't see it happening.

Pukes struggled with the Giants...the team in total collapse, and manage to sqeeze out a victory.

I think NO will cause you fits.

flashback
December-7th-2006, 07:28 PM
If the Saints win you were right, the Cowboys can't play with the good teams.

If the Cowboys win, the Saints were never that good and gakked one up to the Cowboys.

Yeah, yeah. I remember this song from the last 6 weeks you've been singing it.

CowboysForLife
December-7th-2006, 07:31 PM
If the Saints win you were right, the Cowboys can't play with the good teams.

If the Cowboys win, the Saints were never that good and gakked one up to the Cowboys.

Yeah, yeah. I remember this song from the last 6 weeks you've been singing it.

Yup.

Don't forget about tr1 and his little buddy Bubba complaining about the refs for about a year.

skins1972
December-7th-2006, 07:33 PM
Let the pukes win all the way through to the playoffs, so they can just fall flat on their face then, Romo is hot, but Playoffs is a different animal.... Are they a better team than our Skins... YES, they drafed well, their D is young and getting better. Lets all face it, they will be a good team for years to come, .... it pains me to say it. But that is how you build a team through the draft (well most of it, specially on D). I just hope we can do the same next year.

skins1972
December-7th-2006, 07:34 PM
Yup.

Don't forget about tr1 and his little buddy Bubba complaining about the refs for about a year.


Did you ask momy if you can use the pc?? Go to be kid :silly:

flashback
December-7th-2006, 07:40 PM
Did you ask momy if you can use the pc?? Go to be kid :silly:

:wtf:

Even if it made sense, do you really need to pick on a 16 year old to make yourself feel like a man?

How's that commercial go? "Like it when things are easy?"

You're a :loser:

CowboysForLife
December-7th-2006, 07:48 PM
Did you ask momy if you can use the pc?? Go to be kid :silly:


Aww, still bitter over another losing season?

Get a life.

THEHEREAFTER
December-7th-2006, 08:02 PM
I think NO will cause you fits.

tr1, you pick us to lose EVERY week. Cards, Colts, Giants, Panthers, ... give up man.

skinsngibbs4life
December-7th-2006, 08:05 PM
Aww, still bitter over another losing season?

Get a life.

of course, you have nothin intelligent to say, so you come up with that. :rolleyes:

if you dont like what someone says, just ignore it. The guy already above you already mentioned it, so why feel the need to come in with some lame insult?

oh, thats right, it makes yourself feel better :rolleyes:

CowboysForLife
December-7th-2006, 08:12 PM
of course, you have nothin intelligent to say, so you come up with that. :rolleyes:

if you dont like what someone says, just ignore it. The guy already above you already mentioned it, so why feel the need to come in with some lame insult?

oh, thats right, it makes yourself feel better :rolleyes:

Practice what you preach.

I think it's a good trade off.

He makes a comment about my age, I make a comment about his team.

So yeah, anyway, just stay out of it, has nothing to do with you.

Who Del
December-7th-2006, 08:15 PM
tr1 is probably going to end up looking silly again.

skinsngibbs4life
December-7th-2006, 08:16 PM
Practice what you preach.

I think it's a good trade off.

He makes a comment about my age, I make a comment about his team.

So yeah, anyway, just stay out of it, has nothing to do with you.

"He makes a comment about me, so I have to say soemthing back"
What are you? a toddler?

your a troll on a redskins board, of course it involves me.

Who Del
December-7th-2006, 08:19 PM
Not that it matters but I think skins1972 was making a playful comment hence the :silly:.

CowboysForLife
December-7th-2006, 08:19 PM
"He makes a comment about me, so I have to say soemthing back"
What are you? a toddler?

your a troll on a redskins board, of course it involves me.

And what made me a troll from my post?

I said that tr1 and bubba complain about ref calls frequently. I was referring to their posts after the Indianapolis game.

Just because I'm a Cowboys fan does not mean I'm a troll.

Again, I don't understand what your problem is here.

So basically, you're saying that if I personally attack you, you have no right to respond?

CowboysForLife
December-7th-2006, 08:21 PM
Not that it matters but I think skins1972 was making a playful comment hence the :silly:.

Okay, but what makes skinsgibbs think that he/she can act like a guard dog?

I guess I was wrong for jumping on skins1972, but skinsgibbs needs to chill out also.

Who Del
December-7th-2006, 08:23 PM
I agree CFL. skins didn't have to jump in but everyone should just relax. It was a stupid joke anyway.

Let's focus on how dumb tr1 always looks.

Everyone point and laugh. :D

skinsngibbs4life
December-7th-2006, 08:23 PM
So basically, you're saying that if I personally attack you, you have no right to respond?

I would hope someone had a little self restraint, but that may be too much to ask. Especcially sense the original poster was kidding about you, but that must have gone right over your head.

When you have to resort to making fun of the home team when your unsulting someone, its pretty clear you are only here to stir things up, hence troll

skinsngibbs4life
December-7th-2006, 08:24 PM
Let's focus on how dumb tr1 always looks.



who says I didnt start this to take attention AWAY from Tr1 :silly:

CowboysForLife
December-7th-2006, 08:24 PM
I would hope someone had a little self restraint, but that may be too much to ask. Especcially sense the original poster was kidding about you, but that must have gone right over your head.

When you have to resort to making fun of the home team when your unsulting someone, its pretty clear you are only here to stir things up, hence troll


Yeah, whatever.

Still, don't understand why you're sticking your head in this thing.

skinsngibbs4life
December-7th-2006, 08:27 PM
Yeah, whatever.

Still, don't understand why you're sticking your head in this thing.

maybe cause yet another cowboys fan feels the need to come over here and strut their stuff just because they are winning. Just a little word for the wise, if you dont want people attacking you, dont come out and make a dumb trollish comment trying to stir things up. The only thing you inteded by that skins comment was to stir things up, nothing else.

CowboysForLife
December-7th-2006, 08:29 PM
maybe cause yet another cowboys fan feels the need to come over here and strut their stuff just because they are winning. Just a little word for the wise, if you dont want people attacking you, dont come out and make a dumb trollish comment trying to stir things up. The only thing you inteded by that skins comment was to stir things up, nothing else.

And I guess it did stir things up.

Ok, I apologize, I didn't think people would get so worked up about this.

Still though, you don't need to play guard dog. If you didn't notice, if you didn't go crazy saying, "BLAH BLAH BLAH you're trying to stir things up!!!!!", nobody would have said anything. Just remember that.

skins1972
December-7th-2006, 08:57 PM
:wtf:

Even if it made sense, do you really need to pick on a 16 year old to make yourself feel like a man?

How's that commercial go? "Like it when things are easy?"

You're a :loser:


So I missed the D in bed... STFU goat slammer.

skins1972
December-7th-2006, 09:01 PM
Aww, still bitter over another losing season?

Get a life.


Wow yet another product of Dad screwing his sister.. STFU kid, your piss hasnt foamed yet brock back. I have said that you were a better team you bandwagon :jerk: Come back to take your spanking the way you like it when you get blown out during the 1st round of playoffs. Now go to bed, you have school tomorrow my little turd. Oh forgot, F dallas and all their fans...

CowboysForLife
December-7th-2006, 09:03 PM
Wow yet another product of Dad screwing his sister.. STFU kid, your piss hasnt foamed yet brock back. I have said that you were a better team you bandwagon :jerk: Come back to take your spanking the way you like it when you get blown out during the 1st round of playoffs. Now go to bed, you have school tomorrow my little turd. Oh forgot, F dallas and all their fans...

Wow, what a waste of life.

And how would I be a bandwagoner when I first joined here following a disappointing 9-7 season after getting owned by the Redskins?

skinsngibbs?

See who you protected?

skinsngibbs4life
December-7th-2006, 09:06 PM
skinsngibbs?

See who you protected?

I stand by what I did :laugh:

CowboysForLife
December-7th-2006, 09:08 PM
I stand by what I did :laugh:

:laugh: So do I.

And skins1972, you're free to get that life.

flashback
December-7th-2006, 09:55 PM
So I missed the D in bed.

That's what SHE said!!

:laugh:

STFU goat slammer.

A man is sitting at a bar, drinking, and he says to no one in particular, "A man can spend his life building bridges. Do they call him "flashback the Bridge Builder?" No. A man can spend his life raising crops. Do they call him "flashback the Farmer?" No. But you **** one goat . . .

HeHateMe
December-7th-2006, 10:27 PM
Here we go again.

After Dallas beats New Orleans, it will continue about not winning a playoff game.

After Dallas wins a playoff game, it will be about not winning two playoff games.

Then when Dallas is in the Super Bowl, it will be because of the refs and the NFL putting us there and the other teams all being injured.

Then when Dallas wins the Super Bowl, well, who knows, but tr1 will probably have jumped off the nearest bridge at that point.

FedExFielder
December-7th-2006, 10:36 PM
Here we go again.

After Dallas beats New Orleans, it will continue about not winning a playoff game.

After Dallas wins a playoff game, it will be about not winning two playoff games.

Then when Dallas is in the Super Bowl, it will be because of the refs and the NFL putting us there and the other teams all being injured.

Then when Dallas wins the Super Bowl, well, who knows, but tr1 will probably have jumped off the nearest bridge at that point.


I'm honestly thinking about bailing til my 1st anniversary on the site. I can't take this anymore.

Merlin Emrys
December-7th-2006, 10:45 PM
If the Cowboys win, the Saints were never that good and gakked one up to the Cowboys.

Sine a troll is a fan of another team, especially a hated rival, on our message board, yes, you are by definition a troll. Here's to you, troll.
:cheers:

HeHateMe
December-7th-2006, 11:14 PM
I'm honestly thinking about bailing til my 1st anniversary on the site. I can't take this anymore.

What? tr1's lunacy?

FedExFielder
December-7th-2006, 11:43 PM
What? tr1's lunacy?


No the Dallas invasion. Things were much happier in the offseason when there was still hope. Now like 5,000 Cowboys fans have joined up in the last 2 months. It's ridiculous.

MattGeorge85
December-7th-2006, 11:44 PM
It doesn't matter who goes to the SB for the NFC. The AFC will own them just like the last 5 of 6 years. There is nothing different. The AFC is just fundementally stronger right now. Not unlike most of the 80's and 90's for the NFC. I'm a Skins fan and think that we would honestly lose to the AFC (any of them) in the SuperBowl, if we would be fortunate enough to make it...maybe next year. Dallas is not my concern, if they make it we'll enjoy it more than seeing Philly lose to NE.

Westbrook36
December-8th-2006, 02:54 AM
Well, tr1 got exactly the response he wanted...from both Skins and Cowboys fans.

He is so transparent, yet it works every time.

tr1
December-8th-2006, 04:09 AM
I agree CFL. skins didn't have to jump in but everyone should just relax. It was a stupid joke anyway.

Let's focus on how dumb tr1 always looks.

Everyone point and laugh. :D

WD, you never talk football anymore...too bad.

tr1
December-8th-2006, 04:13 AM
Here we go again.

After Dallas beats New Orleans, it will continue about not winning a playoff game.

After Dallas wins a playoff game, it will be about not winning two playoff games.

Then when Dallas is in the Super Bowl, it will be because of the refs and the NFL putting us there and the other teams all being injured.

Then when Dallas wins the Super Bowl, well, who knows, but tr1 will probably have jumped off the nearest bridge at that point.

This is a great post....trust me, I'll treasure it when your average pukes lose...you'll see it time and time again.

:laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

tr1
December-8th-2006, 04:18 AM
No the Dallas invasion. Things were much happier in the offseason when there was still hope. Now like 5,000 Cowboys fans have joined up in the last 2 months. It's ridiculous.

Personally, to visit another teams' board and gloat is scummy.

Puke fans don't talk football anymore...they just send love notes about Romo.

But the pretense is gone...they aren't here to discuss football, they're here to troll.

For the last four weeks of last year, there were maybe two occassional puke posters...this year, it's all about stomping on the Skins...

Character guys.

:doh:

tr1
December-8th-2006, 04:26 AM
It doesn't matter who goes to the SB for the NFC. The AFC will own them just like the last 5 of 6 years. There is nothing different. The AFC is just fundementally stronger right now. Not unlike most of the 80's and 90's for the NFC. I'm a Skins fan and think that we would honestly lose to the AFC (any of them) in the SuperBowl, if we would be fortunate enough to make it...maybe next year. Dallas is not my concern, if they make it we'll enjoy it more than seeing Philly lose to NE.

I think you're right. The NFC was built up to be the strongest division in football prior to the season...well, that was certainly wrong...due either to misjudged talent/coaching OR due to injuries.

I still believe defense wins in the playoffs. That's why I don't think Indy will go far. I'd like San Diego, except for Marty's penchant for a tight sphincter in playoff games.

No, I think NE will probably win it this year.

As for the pukes, I haven't seen one team really blitz Romo yet. It'll be interesting to see how Philly treats him...if they care about winning by then.

tr1
December-8th-2006, 04:28 AM
Well, tr1 got exactly the response he wanted...from both Skins and Cowboys fans.

He is so transparent, yet it works every time.

WB, you and WD must be spending a lot of time together...you never talk about football anymore....

Plane Thrower
December-8th-2006, 07:37 AM
Puke fans don't talk football anymore...they just send love notes about Romo.

But the pretense is gone...they aren't here to discuss football, they're here to troll.That's funny, 3 pages into this thread and the first one to mention Romo is YOU! There are plenty of people here to talk football, but they get lame@ss comebacks like "Wait until you lose a playoff game then come back here and get your spanking..." I can't imagine that anyone with half a brain would expect to get their "spanking" from fans of a team who didn't even make the playoffs, let alone finish with a winning record.

Santana_Fan
December-8th-2006, 07:40 AM
Sorry, puke pals, I just don't see it happening.

Pukes struggled with the Giants...the team in total collapse, and manage to sqeeze out a victory.

I think NO will cause you fits.



I was telling a Cowboy fan the same thing the other day, Cowboys are one of the healthiest teams in the league, yet they struggled with a team tore up in injuries. Oh well, we'll see.

THEHEREAFTER
December-8th-2006, 07:55 AM
I was telling a Cowboy fan the same thing the other day, Cowboys are one of the healthiest teams in the league, yet they struggled with a team tore up in injuries. Oh well, we'll see.


We "struggled" with the Giants. :laugh: Many experts and people on this site figured we would outright LOSE the game. They're the defending NFCE champs fighting for their lives at home. They got 3 key defenders back for that game. That was a very tough game.

Riggo#44
December-8th-2006, 08:00 AM
We "struggled" with the Giants. :laugh: Many experts and people on this site figured we would outright LOSE the game. They're the defending NFCE champs fighting for their lives at home. They got 3 key defenders back for that game. That was a very tough game.

I don't think people can sleep on the Giants or Seattle. They are getting healthy now. Although if Tommie Harris is out for the season, Chicago would take a major hit.

I am going to start petioning EA Sports to put Romo on the cover next year!

Rocky21
December-8th-2006, 08:02 AM
Sorry, puke pals, I just don't see it happening.

Pukes struggled with the Giants...the team in total collapse, and manage to sqeeze out a victory.

I think NO will cause you fits.tr1, haven't you heard that undrafted Tony Romo walks on water and turned the water into wine? I agree that the '06 Cowpies are paper tigers. Wasn't it 1996 (the last millennium) since that organization won a playoff game? I see that streak continuing.

BWareofDWare94
December-8th-2006, 08:25 AM
Personally, to visit another teams' board and gloat is scummy.

Puke fans don't talk football anymore...they just send love notes about Romo.

But the pretense is gone...they aren't here to discuss football, they're here to troll.

For the last four weeks of last year, there were maybe two occassional puke posters...this year, it's all about stomping on the Skins...

Character guys.

:doh:


Ok, you wanna talk football.



In the AFC, we have prolly the greatest playoff’s ever about to start in four weeks. This may be the best year for that conference as far as competitive playoff football. With:



The Chargers-Best all around player in the NFL (LT) the best young QB in the league in Rivers, and a great attacking 3-4 Defense led by two outstanding edge rushers in Phillips and Merriman. Mix that with a great coach like Shotty and you have a team primed and ready for a great run deep into the playoffs.



Don’t ever sleep on the Colts. They will be in the mix again. Manning/Harrison/Wayne, mixed with a fresh but HARD running Adai will be a force. The Defense will have to hold some things down, but all in all a threat to win it all.



Patriots. Great coach, great QB, and a great 3-4 Defense that attacks and schemes very well and this team SHOULD play well down the stretch. Look for them to be in the mix for the SB as well.



Ravens. As much as I would like to see this team do well (I have some real good friends that love the ravens) this team will not make that run…not as long as defenses can play that close to the line of scrimmage. Defenses can play that way because its getting to be apparent that McNair cant get the ball out over 15 yards with any consistency. Yes the defense is great but the offense will cause this team an early exit.



Bengals. This team I think no one wants to see come playoff time. The have a QB with a laser for and arm and a WR that has been off the hook the last few weeks. Chad has been out of his mind! The Defense is playing better too so I see this team as a threat to win it all.



Denver – Done

Chiefs-have a shot to get in the playoffs and could win a game, on LJ alone, but I do not see them as a SB threat.



Jets

Jags

And even the Steelers have a shot, but its unlikely.



The NFC is much weaker yet improved from last season. Last season was one of the all time worst playoffs for the NFC.



Chicago-Great Defense, but the worst starting QB in the conference. That could spell disaster for them in the playoffs. They do have a huge home field advantage though…….



Seattle-my pick for the SB. Playing much better with SA and Hassleback, but more importantly they have a great Defense, that I feel is under rated.



Dallas/Nawlens- The winner Sunday night will be riding high. The winner of this game will have some serious confidence going into the playoffs. I would like it to be Dallas (obviously) but with the way Brees is playin and the way they hit the big plays, this could be a steal for the Saints…god I hope not. Dallas is known for giving up the untimely big play, but has been pretty good this year so far in containing it.



Eagles

Giants

Panthers

Falcons



I feel the Eagles will get a spot, and then the winner of the Giants and Panthers this weekend.I could be wrong, but I just think the Eagles are going to win some games down the stretch. Garcia looked good Monday night.



OK, so this is a Skins board so I can’t leave them out in this football discussion.



The Difference between the skins and The Cowboys IMO is Number one, team chemistry and make up. And number two is injuries, unlike last season, Dallas is healthy and Washington is not. That is the luck portion of this game. The good teams at the end of the year always seem to be the luckiest as well…..



But I contend when both teams are healthy Dallas is still better. Better running game and a better QB, and defenses aren’t even close.

Riggo#44
December-8th-2006, 08:28 AM
Better running game and a better QB, and defenses aren’t even close.

Our HEALTHY defense was better than yours last year.

And you cannot be serious about a better running game. Portis healthy is a top 5 back in the league, and Betts has proven to be a solid back up that I underrated.

BigRay
December-8th-2006, 08:35 AM
I think their chances would be greater if they have home field advantage. Do not like their chances they have to go on the road to get it done with a young quarterback sure he has looking very good but it's a whole different animal in the post season.

BWareofDWare94
December-8th-2006, 08:36 AM
Our HEALTHY defense was better than yours last year.

And you cannot be serious about a better running game. Portis healthy is a top 5 back in the league, and Betts has proven to be a solid back up that I underrated.


dont start with the "last year" stuff...last year the Saints sucked, this year they will win the South.....last year is over. This years defences at full strenght is not close Riggo. Dallas has a better Defence! besides your healthy D last season was 2 yards better then Dallas......

Dallas has a better running game even witrh Portis healthy. I have Portis as the 3rd best back in the NFL...but look its also about run blocking, playcalling and perfromance. JJ/MB3 combo is a great 1-2 punch. If Portis was healthy then we would rarely see Betts. So the running game would not be better then dallas even with Portis.

BWareofDWare94
December-8th-2006, 08:39 AM
I think their chances would be greater if they have home field advantage. Do not like their chances they have to go on the road to get it done with a young quarterback sure he has looking very good but it's a whole different animal in the post season.


I agree with that. No doubt it will be tough for Romo in the playoffs, but someone pointed out "blitzing" Romo, thats not a good idea, he is too mobile, thats why teams arent blitzing him more.

if Romo plays @Chicago in the playoffs, he will struggle......ok, so if he dosnt and he kicks butt and they win, go ahead and pull this thread up and shove it in my face.......

tone_dubbz
December-8th-2006, 08:41 AM
NO should expose these clowns. I'm tired of hearing all this BS about the cowduns. They make me sick and so does manboobs. Reggie is going to have like 3 TDs, and so is Duece. Brees is going to liight you brokeback homos up.:dallasuck

Riggo#44
December-8th-2006, 08:45 AM
dont start with the "last year" stuff...last year the Saints sucked, this year they will win the South.....last year is over. This years defences at full strenght is not close Riggo. Dallas has a better Defence! besides your healthy D last season was 2 yards better then Dallas......

Dallas has a better running game even witrh Portis healthy. I have Portis as the 3rd best back in the NFL...but look its also about run blocking, playcalling and perfromance. JJ/MB3 combo is a great 1-2 punch. If Portis was healthy then we would rarely see Betts. So the running game would not be better then dallas even with Portis.

You're on crack. There is no way, NO WAY, Dallas has a better running game than the Redskins. Betts has shown to be a better runner than Jones - care to debate that one? Look at the stats. Look at the last 2 games. Are you telling me that the combination of Jones Barber is better than Portis Betts?

Jones has never had a 1000 yard season. Barber has run well this year, but Portis averaged 4.1/carry and 7 TDs in 8 games despite player with a shoulder that required surgery! Portis worst year was 1300 yards. If you honestly think the Cowboys have a better running game, you're more a blind homer than I thought!!

THEHEREAFTER
December-8th-2006, 08:50 AM
Our HEALTHY defense was better than yours last year.



Riggo just stop please. :doh: :stop:

Riggo#44
December-8th-2006, 08:52 AM
Riggo just stop please. :doh: :stop:

Yeah that was a stretch - I got more fired up over the Dallas has a better running game.

THEHEREAFTER
December-8th-2006, 08:55 AM
You're on crack. There is no way, NO WAY, Dallas has a better running game than the Redskins

Who cares, Saunders doesn't even run the ball consistently. What's the point if you're not winning games? You were losing with Portis and losing without him. When Portis was playing he wasn't having a good season by his standards. He was on pace for his worst year ever. I just don't understand this argument.

BigRay
December-8th-2006, 08:56 AM
I agree with that. No doubt it will be tough for Romo in the playoffs, but someone pointed out "blitzing" Romo, thats not a good idea, he is too mobile, thats why teams arent blitzing him more.

if Romo plays @Chicago in the playoffs, he will struggle......ok, so if he dosnt and he kicks butt and they win, go ahead and pull this thread up and shove it in my face.......


It's pretty wide open in the NFC I can see any of these teams going Bears, Seahawks, Cowboys. Just disappointed we layed such an egg this season :mad: . Oh well there is always next year and if the Cowboys should win it all at least we can say we have a win over the world champs:D .

flashback
December-8th-2006, 08:56 AM
Jones has never had a 1000 yard season. Barber has run well this year, but Portis averaged 4.1/carry and 7 TDs in 8 games despite player with a shoulder that required surgery! Portis worst year was 1300 yards. If you honestly think the Cowboys have a better running game, you're more a blind homer than I thought!!

Riggo#44, maybe you should look at the stats. The Redskins have a better average per rush, but other than that, the Cowboys have more yards, more TDs, more 1st Downs, and oh yeah, the Cowboys have won 2x as many games as the Redskins!

This isn't a real good year to compare the Redskins to the Cowboys. Maybe you should just continue predicting Cowboys losses. Oops, that's not working either.

BWareofDWare94
December-8th-2006, 08:58 AM
You're on crack. There is no way, NO WAY, Dallas has a better running game than the Redskins. Betts has shown to be a better runner than Jones - care to debate that one? Look at the stats. Look at the last 2 games. Are you telling me that the combination of Jones Barber is better than Portis Betts?

Jones has never had a 1000 yard season. Barber has run well this year, but Portis averaged 4.1/carry and 7 TDs in 8 games despite player with a shoulder that required surgery! Portis worst year was 1300 yards. If you honestly think the Cowboys have a better running game, you're more a blind homer than I thought!!


Betts is not better then Jones, get outta here with that.

I said itr before the Portis injury and i say it now, the running combination of MB3 and JJ with The Dallas offense, is better then the Portis/Betts with the Skins offense. If that makes me a blind homer then oh well....JJ has not been healthy for a full season yet, this season is his first and he will have over 1000 yards, that with being spelled in the games by a great back in MB3. it is by design, to have two good backs in Dallas. It is what Parcells wants. MB3 has 568 yard with 5.2 yards per carry and 13 (11 rushing) in 12 games as a back up, that has alo to do with my thinking here. MB3 has been great and the running game even with having the 5th best passing attack in football is awesome this year.


look at the last 2 games? So thats how jundge players now right, so i guess you will admit it then, ROMO is a beast based on his 6.5 games this year. Same goes for Romo as it does Betts. Betts is a career back-up untill he proives otherwise.

BWareofDWare94
December-8th-2006, 09:02 AM
Who cares, Saunders doesn't even run the ball consistently. What's the point if you're not winning games? You were losing with Portis and losing without him. When Portis was playing he wasn't having a good season by his standards. He was on pace for his worst year ever. I just don't understand this argument.


thats my point. i dont care if you have Sanders and Smith back there. Your OC is not calling the right running plays or enough running plays, or your line is not opening enough holes...no matter the point Dallas has a better Rushing attack then the skins...

Riggo, glad you admitted how horrible of a reference you made about the defences......way to come to your senses, much respect for that.

Riggo#44
December-8th-2006, 09:13 AM
Who cares, Saunders doesn't even run the ball consistently. What's the point if you're not winning games? You were losing with Portis and losing without him. When Portis was playing he wasn't having a good season by his standards. He was on pace for his worst year ever. I just don't understand this argument.

You try running with a separated shoulder that has since required surgery, and he was still was having a 1000 yrd 14 td season. STILL a better year than Jones. Thanks though.

Betts is averaging 4.6 per carry this year - half-a-yard per carry more than Jones. Despite Saunders not calling the running game consistantly.

It's amazing what winning games will do to people's perspective.

Riggo#44
December-8th-2006, 09:14 AM
way to come to your senses, much respect for that.

Yeah it's takes a good amount of character to admit when you're wrong especially on here. I don't expect the same from you.

Riggo#44
December-8th-2006, 09:17 AM
Betts is not better then Jones, get outta here with that.

I said itr before the Portis injury and i say it now, the running combination of MB3 and JJ with The Dallas offense, is better then the Portis/Betts with the Skins offense. If that makes me a blind homer then oh well....JJ has not been healthy for a full season yet, this season is his first and he will have over 1000 yards, that with being spelled in the games by a great back in MB3. it is by design, to have two good backs in Dallas. It is what Parcells wants. MB3 has 568 yard with 5.2 yards per carry and 13 (11 rushing) in 12 games as a back up, that has alo to do with my thinking here. MB3 has been great and the running game even with having the 5th best passing attack in football is awesome this year.


look at the last 2 games? So thats how jundge players now right, so i guess you will admit it then, ROMO is a beast based on his 6.5 games this year. Same goes for Romo as it does Betts. Betts is a career back-up untill he proives otherwise.

The last 2 games they have comitted to the run and it Betts has run hard, much harder than JOnes. I will not budge on this. The Redskins running attack is far better than the Cowboys. Anyone who says differently is on crack and drinking the Kool-aid.

The Skins have been horrible this year - but they have a good running game when it's fed. Far better than Dallas. STFU otherwise!

BWareofDWare94
December-8th-2006, 09:18 AM
Yeah it's takes a good amount of character to admit when you're wrong especially on here. I don't expect the same from you.

then you obviously dont read all the threads, i admitted wrong and apologized to Henry the coach on a thread just this morning, but dont expect me to on this case, because i am right.

Dallas rush off 2006 > Washington rush off. 2006 with or without Portis. This is the NFL where production counts no matter who its obtained, this is not Fantasy Football, where Portis is a light year ahead of MB3 and JJ combined.

Production from two backs is fine by me.

skinsngibbs4life
December-8th-2006, 09:19 AM
look at the last 2 games? So thats how jundge players now right, so i guess you will admit it then, ROMO is a beast based on his 6.5 games this year. Same goes for Romo as it does Betts. Betts is a career back-up untill he proives otherwise.

considering those were the only two game where betts has gotten real action(besides the houston game, which, yet again, he rushed for over 100 yards) then yes, you kind of have to look at it.

just because MB3 and JJ get more carries than betts doesnt mean they are better. The simple fact that portis was getting probably 75-80% of the carries throws that notion right out the window. With the oppurtunities Betts has had this, he has been lights out

BWareofDWare94
December-8th-2006, 09:21 AM
The last 2 games they have comitted to the run and it Betts has run hard, much harder than JOnes. I will not budge on this. The Redskins running attack is far better than the Cowboys. Anyone who says differently is on crack and drinking the Kool-aid.

The Skins have been horrible this year - but they have a good running game when it's fed. Far better than Dallas. STFU otherwise!


thanks for halfway getting my point finally, Dallas has a better ground game for that reason. Not your fault or Portis's fault or even Betts fault, but you cant have a great running game if you DONT stick with it....maybe next year he will and you guys have a beast of a running game, but until then, i am right, 2006 Dallas rushing attack > 2006 Skins rushing attack WITH OR WITHOUT PORTIS

Riggo#44
December-8th-2006, 09:22 AM
then you obviously dont read all the threads, i admitted wrong and apologized to Henry the coach on a thread just this morning, but expect me to on this case, because i am right.

Dallas rush off 2006 > Washington rush off. 2006 with or without Portis. This is the NFL where production counts no matter who its obtained, this is not Fantasy Football, where Portis is a light year ahead of MB3 and JJ combined.

Production from two backs is fine by me.

Whatever dude. You're so far off your rocker on this one.

Anyone outside of Dallas would agree Portis and Betts are far greater than Jones and MB3. And you know whay - b/c Dallas has the #5 passing game. They have a passing game teams have to respect. Portis and Betts were facing 8 man fronts, b/c no one thought Brunell could throw it past 10 yrds. The Redskins #2 back has outplayed your #1 back.

Who Del
December-8th-2006, 09:29 AM
No point in talking football with someone who doesn't know what they're talking about tr1.

I'm not a big fan of the "Let me throw something against the wall and see if it sticks" debate.

BWareofDWare94
December-8th-2006, 09:32 AM
Whatever dude. You're so far off your rocker on this one.

Anyone outside of Dallas would agree Portis and Betts are far greater than Jones and MB3. And you know whay - b/c Dallas has the #5 passing game. They have a passing game teams have to respect. Portis and Betts were facing 8 man fronts, b/c no one thought Brunell could throw it past 10 yrds. The Redskins #2 back has outplayed your #1 back.


yet another reason that i am right...thanks.

2006 Dallas Rush attack > 2006 Skins rush attack with our without portis.

Portis/Betts over JJ/MB3 maybe on a fantasy team, but in overall production, this running attack in Dallas is better, for the simple facts that you helped me point out.

JJ/MB3 05 1531 yards 10 TD
Betts/port 05 1856 yards 12 TD

JJ/MB3 06 (12 games) 1445 yards 14 TD
Betts/port 06 (12 games) 1166 yards 9 TD

Riggo#44
December-8th-2006, 09:38 AM
yet another reason that i am right...thanks.

2006 Dallas Rush attack > 2006 Skins rush attack with our without portis.

Portis/Betts over JJ/MB3 maybe on a fantasy team, but in overall production, this running attack in Dallas is better, for the simple facts that you helped me point out.

JJ/MB3 05 1531 yards 10 TD
Betts/port 05 1856 yards 12 TD

JJ/MB3 06 (12 games) 1445 yards 14 TD
Betts/port 06 (12 games) 1166 yards 9 TD

Dallas Rushing O:
389 att
1585 yards
4.1 avg

Wash Rushing O:
352 att
1541 yards
4.4 avg


Just because you run the ball more, doesn't give you a better running game. The Redskins are #9 in YPC, Dallas is #15.

BWareofDWare94
December-8th-2006, 09:45 AM
Dallas Rushing O:
389 att
1585 yards
4.1 avg

Wash Rushing O:
352 att
1541 yards
4.4 avg


Just because you run the ball more, doesn't give you a better running game. The Redskins are #9 in YPC, Dallas is #15.


just because the skins have a better ypc does not gibve them a better running attack. Way to cherry pick a stat to help you out of an unwinnable argument.....

Dallas has 17 rushing TD's to Washington's 9.

I could careless if Dallas was 32nd in ypc, if the carryed the ball 45 times a game then they would have 1620 yards.....i am not arguing about fantasy football here, i am arguing about total performance. I could give a rats butt about y p carry...but i do care about yards per game and TD's!

skinsngibbs4life
December-8th-2006, 09:49 AM
just because the skins have a better ypc does not gibve them a better running attack. Way to cherry pick a stat to help you out of an unwinnable argument.....

Dallas has 17 rushing TD's to Washington's 9.

I could careless if Dallas was 32nd in ypc, if the carryed the ball 45 times a game then they would have 1620 yards.....i am not arguing about fantasy football here, i am arguing about total performance. I could give a rats butt about y p carry...but i do care about yards per game and TD's!

obviously you missed his whole point. Since you all have carried the ball, obviously you are going to have more total yards. Thats why he brought up YPC. If you can't accurately portray yards, whats the best indicator? YPC. And it simply shows that we are more efficient in our chances to run than you all are.

Riggo#44
December-8th-2006, 09:49 AM
just because the skins have a better ypc does not gibve them a better running attack. Way to cherry pick a stat to help you out of an unwinnable argument.....

Dallas has 17 rushing TD's to Washington's 9.

I could careless if Dallas was 32nd in ypc, if the carryed the ball 45 times a game then they would have 1620 yards.....i am not arguing about fantasy football here, i am arguing about total performance. I could give a rats butt about y p carry...but i do care about yards per game and TD's!

I love how you pull stats it's the "truth", but when I do it, I am cherry-picking stats. But, whatever, you're right. (If you don't know what placate means, look it up.)

So do you think you have a better running game than Seattle?

BWareofDWare94
December-8th-2006, 10:00 AM
I love how you pull stats it's the "truth", but when I do it, I am cherry-picking stats. But, whatever, you're right. (If you don't know what placate means, look it up.)

So do you think you have a better running game than Seattle?

i am speaking on production as a whole, and Yes Dallas has produced more yards then Washington and double the TD's. We have a better running attack, we would even if Portis was healthy. See you next year on this if i am wrong, ill admit it.

Yes Dallas has a better running attack then Seattle, a better rb...heck no, but a better running attack. YES!

BWareofDWare94
December-8th-2006, 10:03 AM
obviously you missed his whole point. Since you all have carried the ball, obviously you are going to have more total yards. Thats why he brought up YPC. If you can't accurately portray yards, whats the best indicator? YPC. And it simply shows that we are more efficient in our chances to run than you all are.


who cares if your more effecient when you dont or cant stick to it. It all factors in at the end. Dallas has a better running attack then Washington, why is that so hard for you all to grasp. Portis is a beast i get that, but in overall offense production, MB3/JJ are better then Betts/Portis

Riggo#44
December-8th-2006, 10:05 AM
We have a better running attack, we would even if Portis was healthy.

Yep, you're probably right since your #1 back has never cracked a 100 yard season, and Portis has never had less than 1300 yards. And Betts has averaged well over 4.0 ypc. But cool, yeah you go with that belief. If it take our #1 back to go on IR for you to feel better about your running game, go for it.

See you next year on this if i am wrong, ill admit it.

No we won't. When the Cowboys stuggle you'll disappear and no one will cry your loss.

Yes Dallas has a better running attack then Seattle, a better rb...heck no, but a better running attack. YES!

A healthy Seattle running game blows away Dallas. This just shows what an unbearable homer you are. Cool, go with it. The Cowboys are winning. Good for you.

BWareofDWare94
December-8th-2006, 10:22 AM
Yep, you're probably right since your #1 back has never cracked a 100 yard season, and Portis has never had less than 1300 yards. And Betts has averaged well over 4.0 ypc. But cool, yeah you go with that belief. If it take our #1 back to go on IR for you to feel better about your running game, go for it.

ok, Clinton Portis is a beast...how many times can one Cowboy fan say that....he is a GREAT BACK. JJ cant touch him nor can MB3.

Betts has how many 1000 yard seasons in his five years?

JJ is sharing time with a guy that averages 5.2 ypc (since you love that stat so much.)

JJ is playing in his first full season by the way and MB3 was a rookie last season and is far better then Betts in his 5th year.

I am sorry that Portis is on the IR, i hate injuries, but i am contending that even if he was healthy, the duo of JJ/MB3 would produce more then the duo of Betts/Portis. Never EVER EVER would i say JJ > Portis or MB3 > Portis...NEVER, that would go far past homer, it would be insane......


No we won't. When the Cowboys stuggle you'll disappear and no one will cry your loss.

as long as i am not banned ill be here and ill own up IF i am wrong....



A healthy Seattle running game blows away Dallas. This just shows what an unbearable homer you are. Cool, go with it. The Cowboys are winning. Good for you.

well in 2006 it was not healthy, again i hate injuries, but chit happens. And besides, i bet MB3/JJ could come close to SA/and his back up as well...in total production.

Arent we all unbelievable homers? We would not be fans if we werent.

Dallas Rushing attack 2006 > Skins rushing attack 2006.

Number5
December-8th-2006, 10:28 AM
This entire thread is b.s! Out all 5 pages, I have only read that BWare and Riggo talk football, if you want to call it that. This thread was started to start a riot and look what it did.....

We have had people call others "goat slammers", one person be accused of being a troll because he even posted, we had two Eagles fans who basically told the truth be slammed because they added nothing more than the obvious, yet, the poster complains that they don't talk football.....HELLO, the intent of this thread was NEVER TO TALK FOOTBALL!

What is wrong with this site? Is the pain of having a possibily bad season so painful to bear that it's open pissing season on the fans of other teams up here? Come on, that is no class....."We suck, so why not bring everyone else down so that they can feel as sh*tty as we do?" That's middle school behavior and those who started the fire and added fuel to it should be ashamed of themselves......

Grown men getting all upset over nothing.....seriously, reading this type of stuff is the reason why I haven't posted up here in over a week. This site used to be a blessing to those who love to talk football and enjoy reading banter back and forth between fans who know what they are talking about.


Bottom line, the Cowboys this season are better than the Redskins. Their record proves that they are better than any other team in the NFC East and they deserve the credit that they are getting. It may get on our nerves, but hey, they deserve it none the less. If a certain FO stopped spending money on people like it was going out of style or if another team realized that "hey, maybe we should run the ball more or maybe we should bolster our secondary and LB core" and if another team stopped practicing jumpshots and learned a bit of self control, then maybe things would be different, but they aren't....as grown men, we all should be well versed in the term, DEAL WITH IT!

Riggo#44
December-8th-2006, 10:36 AM
ok, Clinton Portis is a beast...how many times can one Cowboy fan say that....he is a GREAT BACK. JJ cant touch him nor can MB3.

Betts has how many 1000 yard seasons in his five years?

How many times has he been the #1 back? He is the #1 back now and it out performing your #1 back. He has just as many 100 yard games on 141 carries that Jones does on 224. Betts could very well have his 1st this year on far fewer carries. Barber is a solid #2 back.

JJ is sharing time with a guy that averages 5.2 ypc (since you love that stat so much.)

Betts is sharing carries with a running back who avergages similar yards-per-game (since you love that stat so much) as Jim Brown, Emmitt Smith, and Barry Sanders.


JJ is playing in his first full season by the way and MB3 was a rookie last season and is far better then Betts in his 5th year.

I am sorry that Portis is on the IR, i hate injuries, but i am contending that even if he was healthy, the duo of JJ/MB3 would produce more then the duo of Betts/Portis. Never EVER EVER would i say JJ > Portis or MB3 > Portis...NEVER, that would go far past homer, it would be insane......

You don't believe that a healthy Portis would make up a 37 carry/40 yard difference between the 2 teams right now? You don;t think that a healthy Portis would totally change the focus of this team?

well in 2006 it was not healthy, again i hate injuries, but chit happens. And besides, i bet MB3/JJ could come close to SA/and his back up as well...in total production.

Arent we all unbelievable homers? We would not be fans if we werent.

Dallas Rushing attack 2006 > Skins rushing attack 2006.

You know what the difference between denial and delusion is? Denial, you are aware of the truth, but won't acknowledge it. Delusion means you live in a fantasy world. You, sir, are delusional.

BWareofDWare94
December-8th-2006, 10:52 AM
How many times has he been the #1 back? He is the #1 back now and it out performing your #1 back. He has just as many 100 yard games on 141 carries that Jones does on 224. Betts could very well have his 1st this year on far fewer carries. Barber is a solid #2 back.



Betts is sharing carries with a running back who avergages similar yards-per-game (since you love that stat so much) as Jim Brown, Emmitt Smith, and Barry Sanders.




You don't believe that a healthy Portis would make up a 37 carry/40 yard difference between the 2 teams right now? You don;t think that a healthy Portis would totally change the focus of this team?



You know what the difference between denial and delusion is? Denial, you are aware of the truth, but won't acknowledge it. Delusion means you live in a fantasy world. You, sir, are delusional.


CALL ME WHAT YOU WILL, I DONT CARE, AND I NEVER INSULTED YOU. You say i am on crack ,then you say i am delusional....just stick with the points.

Betts is a #2 RB no matter how yaou spin it. He has had a couple good perfromances back to back, and now he is great....whatever...

we shall see in the future i guess. No need to argue about something neither one of us can prove.

Riggo#44
December-8th-2006, 10:54 AM
CALL ME WHAT YOU WILL, I DONT CARE, AND I NEVER INSULTED YOU. You say i am on crack ,then you say i am delusional....just stick with the points.

Betts is a #2 RB no matter how yaou spin it. He has had a couple good perfromances back to back, and now he is great....whatever...

we shall see in the future i guess. No need to argue about something neither one of us can prove.

I never said he was great - he's just better than Jones.

Portis>MB3>Betts>Jones.

Angie
December-8th-2006, 10:55 AM
If the Saints win you were right, the Cowboys can't play with the good teams.

If the Cowboys win, the Saints were never that good and gakked one up to the Cowboys.

Yeah, yeah. I remember this song from the last 6 weeks you've been singing it.

We almost had the same schedule and we beat more of the teams the the dreadskins. You guys always have something negative to say about Dallas. I think you need to play your role as being the spoiler team and stop focsuing on the 8-4 Dallas team. Worry about the Redskins and if you can make it to the playoffs at 8-8..

TD_washingtonredskins
December-8th-2006, 10:57 AM
Have either of you realized yet that you share a different opinion and you're not going to convince the other guy?

Let it go.

BWareofDWare94
December-8th-2006, 10:58 AM
I never said he was great - he's just better than Jones.

Portis>MB3>Betts>Jones.


Betts is not better then Jones, no way no how....just my opinion.....

Do all the other skins fans on this site that are still reading agree? Is Betts a better starting RB then JJ?

BWareofDWare94
December-8th-2006, 10:59 AM
Have either of you realized yet that you share a different opinion and you're not going to convince the other guy?

Let it go.

ok, good point, and i never called anyone a crackhead or delusional.......

Riggo#44
December-8th-2006, 11:09 AM
ok, good point, and i never called anyone a crackhead or delusional.......

If you;re going to post here - you're going to need thicker skin:

http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php?t=162983

Passizle
December-8th-2006, 11:10 AM
And what made me a troll from my post?

I said that tr1 and bubba complain about ref calls frequently. I was referring to their posts after the Indianapolis game.

Just because I'm a Cowboys fan does not mean I'm a troll.

Again, I don't understand what your problem is here.

So basically, you're saying that if I personally attack you, you have no right to respond?

No offense kid, but you are a troll. First take a look at your handle... now look at the name of the forum you are constantly posting in. It just comes with the territory. You're like a hen that hangs out with foxes. You may think you are a fox, but sooner or later someone is going to eat you because you are in fact a hen.

IrishOrange15
December-8th-2006, 11:12 AM
tr1, you pick us to lose EVERY week. Cards, Colts, Giants, Panthers, ... give up man.

No, KEEP IT GOING.

At least our season wasn't over in November.



YAKUZA

BWareofDWare94
December-8th-2006, 11:15 AM
ok, i am going to say this, maybe i am a little bit over stating the JJ/MB3 to call them BETTER then Portis/Betts. Betts has done great the past couple of weeks. I still think he would not be a good #1 RB, but thats besides the point. Portis is so much better then either MB3 or JJ that i can see Riggo's point....but i was also considering other things like our passing game and wr's being so much more of a threat that our running game can operate so much better...plus the Dallas line has out performed the skins line which i would never would have though that when the season started. and factred into my thinking is the defeciencies in Al Saunders play calling. But heck, i took five minutes to clear my head and though logically about what this argument was about, and i just cant disrespect Portis no matter if he is hurt or not.

BWareofDWare94
December-8th-2006, 11:18 AM
If you;re going to post here - you're going to need thicker skin:

http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php?t=162983


please, if i go calling you out as being on crack or delusional, i would get hit with the trolling warnings and such....

on a personal note i could care less it just shows weakness in your argument to call names.

TD_washingtonredskins
December-8th-2006, 11:23 AM
ok, i am going to say this, maybe i am a little bit over stating the JJ/MB3 to call them BETTER then Portis/Betts. Betts has done great the past couple of weeks. I still think he would not be a good #1 RB, but thats besides the point. Portis is so much better then either MB3 or JJ that i can see Riggo's point....but i was also considering other things like our passing game and wr's being so much more of a threat that our running game can operate so much better...plus the Dallas line has out performed the skins line which i would never would have though that when the season started. and factred into my thinking is the defeciencies in Al Saunders play calling. But heck, i took five minutes to clear my head and though logically about what this argument was about, and i just cant disrespect Portis no matter if he is hurt or not.

So, you are basically contending that the Cowboys offense (with their running game being a vital component) is better and more dangerous than Washington's?

True story.

Riggo is apparently saying that, in a vacuum, the Skins' running game is better than Dallas'. Could be true.

Let's get back to watching people rip on TR for his weird opinions!

Number5
December-8th-2006, 11:25 AM
ok, i am going to say this, maybe i am a little bit over stating the JJ/MB3 to call them BETTER then Portis/Betts. Betts has done great the past couple of weeks. I still think he would not be a good #1 RB, but thats besides the point. Portis is so much better then either MB3 or JJ that i can see Riggo's point....but i was also considering other things like our passing game and wr's being so much more of a threat that our running game can operate so much better...plus the Dallas line has out performed the skins line which i would never would have though that when the season started. and factred into my thinking is the defeciencies in Al Saunders play calling. But heck, i took five minutes to clear my head and though logically about what this argument was about, and i just cant disrespect Portis no matter if he is hurt or not.


(Doesn't Brian Westbrook have more yards then both Betts and Jones? In fact he does, http://www.nfl.com/stats/leaders/NFC/RYDS/2006/regular so does that mean that he is better than either one of them?) Just curious :silly:

BWareofDWare94
December-8th-2006, 11:29 AM
(Doesn't Brian Westbrook have more yards then both Betts and Jones? In fact he does, http://www.nfl.com/stats/leaders/NFC/RYDS/2006/regular so does that mean that he is better than either one of them?) Just curious :silly:


to be honest and i know ill be blasted by many...i say yes, BWestbrook is a better all around RB then both Betts and JJ. I have ton of respect for him as well. NFC EAST 2006 RB Bwares preseason rankings

Portis
Tiki
Westbrook
JJ
Barber
Betts

now

Westbrook
Tiki
JJ
MB3
Betts

with Portis being back to #1 IF healthy.

Rocky21
December-8th-2006, 11:30 AM
NO should expose these clowns. I'm tired of hearing all this BS about the cowduns. They make me sick and so does manboobs. Reggie is going to have like 3 TDs, and so is Duece. Brees is going to liight you brokeback homos up.:dallasuckThanks tone. Loved this post.

You Cowboys fans that spend so much time gloating on a Redskins board really need to take a hard look at yourselves. It's sad, really. I've been to Cowboys Zone once, maybe twice, in the last year.

BWareofDWare94
December-8th-2006, 11:30 AM
Let's get back to watching people rip on TR for his weird opinions!


perfect!

Westbrook36
December-8th-2006, 11:31 AM
Well, tr1 got exactly the response he wanted...from both Skins and Cowboys fans.

He is so transparent, yet it works every time.

BWareofDWare94
December-8th-2006, 11:32 AM
Thanks tone. Loved this post.

You Cowboys fans that spend so much time gloating on a Redskins board really need to take a hard look at yourselves. It's sad, really. I've been to Cowboys Zone once, maybe twice, in the last year.

Good for you man, to each his own, i just happen to think FOR THE MOST PART this place is alright, i mean there are a ton of registered memebers that i like to read post from and go back n forth with. Just cause you dont like ,that doesnt mean i have to agree with you and be just like you.

BWareofDWare94
December-8th-2006, 11:35 AM
well i see Betts resigned, so we can continue this next season.

Angie
December-8th-2006, 12:18 PM
But you have been on one.

CowboysForLife
December-8th-2006, 03:27 PM
No offense kid, but you are a troll. First take a look at your handle... now look at the name of the forum you are constantly posting in. It just comes with the territory. You're like a hen that hangs out with foxes. You may think you are a fox, but sooner or later someone is going to eat you because you are in fact a hen.


So just because I'm a Cowboys fan, I'm a troll?

Yeah, ok, whatever.

tr1
December-8th-2006, 04:01 PM
No point in talking football with someone who doesn't know what they're talking about tr1.

I'm not a big fan of the "Let me throw something against the wall and see if it sticks" debate.


Thanks again for adding to the conversation WD....I thought you were better than that.

tr1
December-8th-2006, 04:05 PM
This entire thread is b.s! Out all 5 pages, I have only read that BWare and Riggo talk football, if you want to call it that. This thread was started to start a riot and look what it did.....

We have had people call others "goat slammers", one person be accused of being a troll because he even posted, we had two Eagles fans who basically told the truth be slammed because they added nothing more than the obvious, yet, the poster complains that they don't talk football.....HELLO, the intent of this thread was NEVER TO TALK FOOTBALL!

What is wrong with this site? Is the pain of having a possibily bad season so painful to bear that it's open pissing season on the fans of other teams up here? Come on, that is no class....."We suck, so why not bring everyone else down so that they can feel as sh*tty as we do?" That's middle school behavior and those who started the fire and added fuel to it should be ashamed of themselves......

Grown men getting all upset over nothing.....seriously, reading this type of stuff is the reason why I haven't posted up here in over a week. This site used to be a blessing to those who love to talk football and enjoy reading banter back and forth between fans who know what they are talking about.


Bottom line, the Cowboys this season are better than the Redskins. Their record proves that they are better than any other team in the NFC East and they deserve the credit that they are getting. It may get on our nerves, but hey, they deserve it none the less. If a certain FO stopped spending money on people like it was going out of style or if another team realized that "hey, maybe we should run the ball more or maybe we should bolster our secondary and LB core" and if another team stopped practicing jumpshots and learned a bit of self control, then maybe things would be different, but they aren't....as grown men, we all should be well versed in the term, DEAL WITH IT!


#4, if you have time to climb off your high-horse, you'll see that a puke fan is actually engaged in a football discussion...that's something that's been lacking here for awhile (I might add that he's losing... :D )

If you have nothing to add, please don't post.

Thanks in advance.

tr1
December-8th-2006, 04:06 PM
Betts is not better then Jones, no way no how....just my opinion.....

Do all the other skins fans on this site that are still reading agree? Is Betts a better starting RB then JJ?

Yes he is. He's more all around...not only rushing, but he's a threat to catch the ball.

This is JJ's first year where he's been decent...he's usually injured.

tr1
December-8th-2006, 04:07 PM
No, KEEP IT GOING.

At least our season wasn't over in November.



YAKUZA


It's gonna be a bad Sunday night for you.... :laugh:

tr1
December-8th-2006, 04:11 PM
So just because I'm a Cowboys fan, I'm a troll?

Yeah, ok, whatever.

No. You're judged on the quality of your posts ON AN OPPOSITION'S BOARD.

You rarely talk football.

CPortJGibbs89
December-8th-2006, 04:13 PM
to be honest and i know ill be blasted by many...i say yes, BWestbrook is a better all around RB then both Betts and JJ. I have ton of respect for him as well. NFC EAST 2006 RB Bwares preseason rankings

Portis
Tiki
Westbrook
JJ
Barber
Betts

now

Westbrook
Tiki
JJ
MB3
Betts

with Portis being back to #1 IF healthy.You really think Portis is better than Tiki? I always thought Portis was right there with Tiki but Tiki is always so consistent and had two 200 yard games last year and seems to get better with age. Just wondering what you think makes him better than Tiki. Funny some people call you a cowboy troll and a crack head yet you come to a skins site and declare Portis the best back in the NFCE, thank you.

DallasRocks!!
December-8th-2006, 04:17 PM
Just get used to the trolling skin fans now fellow Dallas fans. They have nothing to play for anymore and their team sucks. Their lives are focused on Cowboys football as much as they are on deadskins football. So every skin fan is now trying to find anyway to put the Cowboys down. First it was Romo will never turn out to be anything, which those who said that look like idiots now and now its the Cowboys are overrated and are just an average team. Just know that what the Cowboys are doing right now has guys like Tr1 and all the other haters scared and nervous as hell as to what the Cowboys might do this season.

DallasRocks!!
December-8th-2006, 04:20 PM
also funny how tr1 says people dont talk football but starts off the post not talking any football but just being a typical troll by saying Cowboys have no shot.:doh:

tr1
December-8th-2006, 04:21 PM
Just get used to the trolling skin fans now fellow Dallas fans. They have nothing to play for anymore and their team sucks. Their lives are focused on Cowboys football as much as they are on deadskins football. So every skin fan is now trying to find anyway to put the Cowboys down. First it was Romo will never turn out to be anything, which those who said that look like idiots now and now its the Cowboys are overrated and are just an average team. Just know that what the Cowboys are doing right now has guys like Tr1 and all the other haters scared and nervous as hell as to what the Cowboys might do this season.

Once again, a post about me, and not about football.

You've got nothin'.

Thanks for the visit.

tr1
December-8th-2006, 04:22 PM
also funny how tr1 says people dont talk football but starts off the post not talking any football but just being a typical troll by saying Cowboys have no shot.:doh:

I gave an opinion about your team...that's much more than you've contributed. :laugh:

But, please, keep visiting...I'm always up for a giggle.

DallasRocks!!
December-8th-2006, 04:23 PM
I gave an opinion about your team...that's much more than you've contributed. :laugh:

But, please, keep visiting...I'm always up for a giggle.

you know you look dumb, right?

DallasRocks!!
December-8th-2006, 04:24 PM
and if your up for a giggle just take a moment to look over your season.

tr1
December-8th-2006, 04:25 PM
Does anyone know of a team other than Pittsburgh that won it all with a 'rookie' quarterback?

How about a first round playoff game?

One, five, ten?

DallasRocks!!
December-8th-2006, 04:26 PM
Does anyone know of a team other than Pittsburgh that won it all with a 'rookie' quarterback?

How about a first round playoff game?

One, five, ten?

if we had a rookie QB i would be worried

tr1
December-8th-2006, 04:27 PM
if we had a rookie QB i would be worried


Ok, then, first year starting qb.

One, five, ten?

DallasRocks!!
December-8th-2006, 04:31 PM
my whole point is that you start trolling threads like this is because you are scarred. Before the season started if you could come up with the worst possible way this season could go being a deadskins fan, the way its currently going would be the worst. Skins are out of the picture and Cowboys are dead smack in the middle of it. So that eats at all the haters out there and every week with every win it just gets at you even more. So instead of looking dumb just give some credit where its due. I am not saying that the Cowboys are the best team in the league and will even get past one playoff game if they even make it. But Cowboys are having a much better season than the deadskins so just get over it and stop hating.

tr1
December-8th-2006, 04:34 PM
my whole point is that you start trolling threads like this is because you are scarred.

Scarred? Oh, you mean scared.

This is what, your third post in this thread, and you haven't said a word about your team, what you think its chances are, if you make the playoffs...

Please...consider who is scared. :laugh:

BigDFan5
December-8th-2006, 04:47 PM
Does anyone know of a team other than Pittsburgh that won it all with a 'rookie' quarterback?

How about a first round playoff game?

One, five, ten?


Super Bowl wins

Brady and the Pats

Warner and the Rams

Roger Staubach of the Cowboys

Jeff Hostetler Giants


First round playoff wins would take to long to count, but I am sure there are plenty of them around

DallasRocks!!
December-8th-2006, 04:50 PM
Scarred? Oh, you mean scared.

This is what, your third post in this thread, and you haven't said a word about your team, what you think its chances are, if you make the playoffs...

Please...consider who is scared. :laugh:

i did mention my team. I cant see the future so my predictions on what is going to happen in future games has no point. But my opinion on the current status of the Cowboys...they are one of the best teams in the NFC right now. They have as much a shot to make the SB for the NFC as any team in the NFC right now. Name a team that is clearly that much better than the Cowboys right now. The Bears?? You put up a 1.3 QB rating against any playoff team and you are going to lose. If Rex continues to play the way he has recently that team has no shot. So then the Saints. Very good team with a lot of Cowboy ties. But the defense is soft at times. Two of their starting linebackers were back up players for the Cowboys last year. The third receiver was a special teams player for the Cowboys last year. They have a great offense, which is better than the Boys offense right now but not by much. And Cowboys have the better defense, clearly. Then there is Seattle. Cant even tell what the deal is with this team. Play in one of the worst divisions in the NFL. Matt has not looked all that great since being back, but I just need to see more. Ill throw the Giants into this mix. People want to hate the Cowboys for struggling against the Giants. Why? Giants got all but one defensive starter back last week. They are missing Strahan and we are missing Ellis. That offense is missing a couple people but they still have their key guys there. Cowboys probably played average football last sunday. Yet the Giants probably played the best they will on both sides of the football. They won the turnover battle. They were at home. Yet they still couldnt beat the Cowboys. Romo didnt put up great numbers but he made plays when he needed to. Thats why Romo got a lot of praise after that game. Not for his numbers but for the fact that he didnt get down after the two pics and came back and led his team down the field many times and made a big play when he had to.
This is why I think the Cowboys have a good shot right now. I am not saying they will stomp through the playoffs because I have no idea whats going to happen in the future. But right now, that is why they have just a good of shot to make the SB than anybody else.

DallasRocks!!
December-8th-2006, 04:51 PM
one other thing that shows how dumb you are tr1, i am supposed to be scared of the Cowboys in the hunt? Thats the best part of the season when your team is actually still alive. I am loving this, not scurred in any way.

CowboysForLife
December-8th-2006, 05:02 PM
No. You're judged on the quality of your posts ON AN OPPOSITION'S BOARD.

You rarely talk football.

Uh, wow.

Just wow...

YOU don't talk football. I talk football when I don't constantly have people like you all over me for trivial things.

DallasRocks!!
December-8th-2006, 05:03 PM
Uh, wow.

Just wow...

YOU don't talk football. I talk football when I don't constantly have people like you all over me for trivial things.

welcome to the world of dealing with tr1...:doh:

HeHateMe
December-8th-2006, 05:28 PM
No point in talking football with someone who doesn't know what they're talking about tr1.

I'm not a big fan of the "Let me throw something against the wall and see if it sticks" debate.

Cheers to that.

And too bad not a single thing has stuck on that wall for tr1.

Yet, it will continue on and on. :doh:

IrishOrange15
December-8th-2006, 05:57 PM
Ok, then, first year starting qb.

One, five, ten?

Yeah, Tom Brady.



YAKUZA

skinsngibbs4life
December-8th-2006, 06:35 PM
Just get used to the trolling skin fans now fellow Dallas fans. They have nothing to play for anymore and their team sucks. Their lives are focused on Cowboys football as much as they are on deadskins football. So every skin fan is now trying to find anyway to put the Cowboys down. First it was Romo will never turn out to be anything, which those who said that look like idiots now and now its the Cowboys are overrated and are just an average team. Just know that what the Cowboys are doing right now has guys like Tr1 and all the other haters scared and nervous as hell as to what the Cowboys might do this season.

Wow, theres no irony here. A cowboys fan, who, only joined this season, coming and talking about trolls. :rolleyes:

You think that the reason that this board it starting to go downhill is because of people like you? Ever since you all went on a little streak here, all of the brokeback fans have ironically emerged. Hm, i wonder why you wern't around here last year? You all complain about how bitter skins fans are, but you all would be just as bitter if you had your horrible season constantly rubbed in your face. Maybe you should take a look in the mirror before you call anyone a troll

DallasRocks!!
December-8th-2006, 06:46 PM
Wow, theres no irony here. A cowboys fan, who, only joined this season, coming and talking about trolls. :rolleyes:

You think that the reason that this board it starting to go downhill is because of people like you? Ever since you all went on a little streak here, all of the brokeback fans have ironically emerged. Hm, i wonder why you wern't around here last year? You all complain about how bitter skins fans are, but you all would be just as bitter if you had your horrible season constantly rubbed in your face. Maybe you should take a look in the mirror before you call anyone a troll

i wasnt around here last year cause I had skin fans to deal with face to face. I moved so I no longer have the satisfaction of the interaction with deadskin fans. I am not rubbing the bad season in anybody's face but when tr1 makes statements like the one he did then I am going to say something. I havent been a troll in this thread. A Cowboy fan posting here doesnt make him a troll. I dont know why all of you think that someone being a Cowboy fan makes them a troll. Maybe you need to check up on that definition again.

dwdj75
December-8th-2006, 07:10 PM
Super Bowl wins

Brady and the Pats

Warner and the Rams

Roger Staubach of the Cowboys

Jeff Hostetler Giants


First round playoff wins would take to long to count, but I am sure there are plenty of them around

Why was there not a reply to this post ? Great post.

tr1
December-9th-2006, 06:22 AM
Super Bowl wins

Brady and the Pats

Warner and the Rams

Roger Staubach of the Cowboys

Jeff Hostetler Giants


First round playoff wins would take to long to count, but I am sure there are plenty of them around


So let's do a little math...

There are 32 teams and have been 40 SBs. In 1967 there were only 16 teams.

So, let's average 24 teams by 40 years by an average of 7 new qbs per year... That's 280 first year players...and what, four have won the SB.

That's .014 who've done it.

Sure...Romo has a great chance. :doh:

I doubt the first playoff win number is much better.

Maybe LittleDFan can find those numbers.

You puke fans are brilliant.
:laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

tr1
December-9th-2006, 06:23 AM
Why was there not a reply to this post ? Great post.

^^

tr1
December-9th-2006, 06:24 AM
Yeah, Tom Brady.



YAKUZA

Brilliant!

BWareofDWare94
December-9th-2006, 06:51 AM
You really think Portis is better than Tiki? I always thought Portis was right there with Tiki but Tiki is always so consistent and had two 200 yard games last year and seems to get better with age. Just wondering what you think makes him better than Tiki. Funny some people call you a cowboy troll and a crack head yet you come to a skins site and declare Portis the best back in the NFCE, thank you.

Hey i call it like it is, and i truly feel he (Portis) is the best back in the east andthe third best in the NFL behind, LT and LJ. I honestly like portis
(as a rb) better then SA. I may be a hyge Cowboy fan and a homer, but i am also a realist football fan, and Clinton Portis, outside of this injury filled season has been nothing short of spectacular.

BWareofDWare94
December-9th-2006, 06:54 AM
Yes he is. He's more all around...not only rushing, but he's a threat to catch the ball.

This is JJ's first year where he's been decent...he's usually injured.

he has been decent but injured. on pace for 1000 yards or more his first two years, but injured.

Betts is haveing a n ice run, but up until this season he sucked as a starter but was fine as a back-up. I am intersted in seeing how he finishes out. If he finishes the next four games with 400-500 yards, then ill come back here and say, hey i was wrong about Betts, but until then he is still a solid back-up and nothing more.

IrishOrange15
December-9th-2006, 08:43 AM
So let's do a little math...

There are 32 teams and have been 40 SBs. In 1967 there were only 16 teams.

So, let's average 24 teams by 40 years by an average of 7 new qbs per year... That's 280 first year players...and what, four have won the SB.

That's .014 who've done it.

Sure...Romo has a great chance. :doh:

I doubt the first playoff win number is much better.

Maybe LittleDFan can find those numbers.

You puke fans are brilliant.
:laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

If only if this is what you originally asked

Does anyone know of a team other than Pittsburgh that won it all with a 'rookie' quarterback?

How about a first round playoff game?

One, five, ten?

So it was pointed out there are 4 different QB's that were "rookie" QB's that won the Super Bowl.

I think it's safe to say that there's been quite a few of those type of QB's that have won a 1st round playoff game.

Off the top of my head I'd say the following have fit that profile and won a playoff game:

Pennington
Fiedler
Brady
Kordell Stewart
Roethlisberger
Stan Humphries
Hostetler
Staubach
Vick
Delhomme
Aaron Brooks
Culpepper
Montana
Warner

But don't let facts get in the way of a good story.



YAKUZA

Number5
December-9th-2006, 12:08 PM
#4, if you have time to climb off your high-horse, you'll see that a puke fan is actually engaged in a football discussion...that's something that's been lacking here for awhile (I might add that he's losing... :D )

If you have nothing to add, please don't post.

Thanks in advance.


You sir, are a complete idiot. Did you even read the first sentence of my post? :doh:

BigDFan5
December-9th-2006, 12:21 PM
So let's do a little math...

There are 32 teams and have been 40 SBs. In 1967 there were only 16 teams.

So, let's average 24 teams by 40 years by an average of 7 new qbs per year... That's 280 first year players...and what, four have won the SB.

That's .014 who've done it.

Sure...Romo has a great chance. :doh:

I doubt the first playoff win number is much better.

Maybe LittleDFan can find those numbers.

You puke fans are brilliant.
:laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

I love how you just made numbers up there, 7 new QBs a year? can you link me to your figures? Do these same 7 get replaced every year?

You "doubt" the playoff number is better yet you are not willing to figure it out, maybe its because you dont want the answer? Come on tr1 we are talking football here, back your points up with something solid instead of just making up numbers ok?

twenty-eight
December-9th-2006, 01:46 PM
deserves its own thread:)

Plane Thrower
December-9th-2006, 06:19 PM
I love how you just made numbers up there, 7 new QBs a year? can you link me to your figures? Do these same 7 get replaced every year?

You "doubt" the playoff number is better yet you are not willing to figure it out, maybe its because you dont want the answer? Come on tr1 we are talking football here, back your points up with something solid instead of just making up numbers ok?I need some popcorn here... this is great watching tr1 scramble to back up "facts" he just pulled out of his @ss.

tr1
December-9th-2006, 07:53 PM
I love how you just made numbers up there, 7 new QBs a year? can you link me to your figures? Do these same 7 get replaced every year?

You "doubt" the playoff number is better yet you are not willing to figure it out, maybe its because you dont want the answer? Come on tr1 we are talking football here, back your points up with something solid instead of just making up numbers ok?

I just undressed you with your silly post of FOUR players who have gone all the way since 1967...and this is what you come back with?

How embarassing for you... :doh:

You should have ignored my challenge.

Sheeze...I thought we had some intelligent puke fans here...oh well, silly me.

:laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

tr1
December-9th-2006, 07:55 PM
You sir, are a complete idiot. Did you even read the first sentence of my post? :doh:

Come on #4...can't you be a bit more creative in your insults?

Really poor.

tr1
December-9th-2006, 07:56 PM
I need some popcorn here... this is great watching tr1 scramble to back up "facts" he just pulled out of his @ss.

What number would you care to plug in? I thought seven was being conservative.

Give me a number, and I'll do the math...I wouldn't want you to kill any brain cells...you need all you've got.
:laugh:

Plane Thrower
December-10th-2006, 08:51 AM
I just undressed you with your silly post of FOUR players who have gone all the way since 1967...and this is what you come back with?

How embarassing for you... :doh:

You should have ignored my challenge.

Sheeze...I thought we had some intelligent puke fans here...oh well, silly me.

:laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
Solid numbers?? You yourself just gave numbers you guessed on... give me some FACTS, you obviously tilt your opinions to serve your bias and mistakenly state them as facts, but anyone with half a brain cell sees right through it.

Plane Thrower
December-10th-2006, 08:52 AM
What number would you care to plug in? I thought seven was being conservative.

Give me a number, and I'll do the math...I wouldn't want you to kill any brain cells...you need all you've got.
:laugh:
You thought... and that's how it starts.

tr1
December-10th-2006, 03:04 PM
Solid numbers?? You yourself just gave numbers you guessed on... give me some FACTS, you obviously tilt your opinions to serve your bias and mistakenly state them as facts, but anyone with half a brain cell sees right through it.


Very weak...afraid to give me a number?

Sure you are. :laugh:

tr1
December-10th-2006, 03:42 PM
Waiting....

Plane Thrower
December-10th-2006, 05:07 PM
Very weak...afraid to give me a number?

Sure you are. :laugh:I'm not the one claiming that I know... YOU are, so provide FACTS, not your uninformed OPINIONS, as you apparently have the two confused again. Don't try to turn this around on me... YOU stated your opinion, however it's not backed up by factual numbers. You stand on quicksand, dummy.

Fred Jones
December-10th-2006, 05:30 PM
I'm not the one claiming that I know... YOU are, so provide FACTS, not your uninformed OPINIONS, as you apparently have the two confused again. Don't try to turn this around on me... YOU stated your opinion, however it's not backed up by factual numbers. You stand on quicksand, dummy.


Dummy?, what is that?

Warhead36
December-10th-2006, 05:35 PM
Breaking news(I can't make new threads so I'm posting this here):

Supposedly there is another TO controversy. Now I don't know much about it but they just had a TO/Irvin interview on ESPNEWS. I didn't see much of it, only caught the end but TO was saying things about how depressed he was or some kind of crap like that, I don't know exactly.

Afterwards The Blitz crew were talking to Ed Werder and he said there is talk TO could be jealous of the attention Romo has garnered. Ed also said according to Cowboys insiders Parcells will return next year under the condition that TO gets cut.

Again I don't know how legit or illegit this is. I only saw the end of the TO/Irvin clip and the rest could just be speculation...

tr1
December-10th-2006, 10:03 PM
I'm not the one claiming that I know... YOU are, so provide FACTS, not your uninformed OPINIONS, as you apparently have the two confused again. Don't try to turn this around on me... YOU stated your opinion, however it's not backed up by factual numbers. You stand on quicksand, dummy.

How's your evening going?

:laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

Rocky21
December-11th-2006, 09:05 AM
NO should expose these clowns. I'm tired of hearing all this BS about the cowduns. They make me sick and so does manboobs. Reggie is going to have like 3 TDs, and so is Duece. Brees is going to light you brokeback homos up.:dallasuckLike the man said.

Rocky21
December-26th-2006, 09:37 AM
After Dallas beats New Orleans, it will continue about not winning a playoff game.

After Dallas wins a playoff game, it will be about not winning two playoff games.

Then when Dallas is in the Super Bowl, it will be because of the refs and the NFL putting us there and the other teams all being injured.

Then when Dallas wins the Super Bowl, well, who knows, but tr1 will probably have jumped off the nearest bridge at that point.

tr1's prediction is looking more and more accurate as the weeks pass, doesn't it?

THEHEREAFTER
December-26th-2006, 09:40 AM
tr1's prediction is looking more and more accurate as the weeks pass, doesn't it?


:laugh: tr1 predicts Dallas will lose EVERY WEEK so he's right "when" that happens. Not very difficult.

Plane Thrower
December-26th-2006, 09:50 AM
tr1's prediction is looking more and more accurate as the weeks pass, doesn't it?
Yep, but it's funny as hell when he's looking up from the cellar of the NFC East predicting doom and gloom for everyone else. Hilarious actually.

Yep the Boys played like crap last night... and they will probably be bounced out in the first round because losses like this tend to linger... But hey, they split with the Skins who are on the outside looking in at the Cowboys in the playoffs (since last week, mind you), so I'm happy.

Riggo#44
December-26th-2006, 10:06 AM
they will probably be bounced out in the first round because losses like this tend to linger... But hey, they split with the Skins who are on the outside looking in at the Cowboys in the playoffs (since last week, mind you), so I'm happy.

You're happy with choking away the division title, and losing in the 1st round of the playoffs? Wow, have the expectations of "America's Team" dipped so low?

fuji869
December-26th-2006, 11:11 AM
It was a Wild Card win over the Vikings in Big D the they went on to loose to the 2nd year Panthers in the next round in a game that Cowboy Haters loved because Deion Sanders and Michael Irvin got knocked out of the game and Troy Aikman lost his cool at the end yelling at his O-Line and WRs.

Lets go for 11 years but only thing is they might have to come up here to Seattle and the Hawks are limping into the playoffs.

Plane Thrower
December-26th-2006, 11:28 AM
You're happy with choking away the division title, and losing in the 1st round of the playoffs? Wow, have the expectations of "America's Team" dipped so low?Amazing how you can talk smack when your team didn't even make the playoffs... after all the yapping you did at the beginning of the year about how great your team was going to be.

Face it, your team's season ends this weekend. The Cowboys? Nope. The fact they did it without spending millions a year each on two assistant coaches says even more.

Riggo#44
December-26th-2006, 11:40 AM
Amazing how you can talk smack when your team didn't even make the playoffs... after all the yapping you did at the beginning of the year about how great your team was going to be.

Face it, your team's season ends this weekend. The Cowboys? Nope. The fact they did it without spending millions a year each on two assistant coaches says even more.

Yep - we're terrible. Nice job stating the obvious. We know we're terrible.

But another December slide for the Cowboys - and now it has most likely cost themselves the division and will have to travel to Seattle. Not an easy place to play, despite how poorly the Hawks have played the past couple of weeks. This team loses all passsion as soon as Nov. 30th passes.

For all the smack you were talking a few weeks ago, Cowboys fans in general sure have been humbled and greatly reduced in number. And their expectations have been reduced to just getting into the playoffs. Sad, really.

Plane Thrower
December-26th-2006, 12:01 PM
For all the smack you were talking a few weeks ago, Cowboys fans in general sure have been humbled and greatly reduced in number. And their expectations have been reduced to just getting into the playoffs. Sad, really.Hello pot, meet kettle, (except the playoffs part of course).

Riggo#44
December-26th-2006, 12:03 PM
Hello pot, meet kettle, (except the playoffs FIRST ROUND LOSS part of course).

There's that a little more accurate...but I guess you'd be happy with that.

Plane Thrower
December-26th-2006, 12:09 PM
There's that a little more accurate...but I guess you'd be happy with that.
I'll be the first one to admit that they will probably not get past the first round... but really, come on. Does it really make you feel better to talk smack about someone who is in the playoffs when your team isn't? That's like you driving up to a Mercedes dealership in your Ford Pinto and telling the salesman that your car is better because it's got chrome bumpers and vinyl seats which can be wiped clean of passenger puke because of the way you drive. :applause:

Riggo#44
December-26th-2006, 12:24 PM
I'll be the first one to admit that they will probably not get past the first round... but really, come on. Does it really make you feel better to talk smack about someone who is in the playoffs when your team isn't? That's like you driving up to a Mercedes dealership in your Ford Pinto and telling the salesman that your car is better because it's got chrome bumpers and vinyl seats which can be wiped clean of passenger puke because of the way you drive. :applause:

I've known the Skins were done for a while. I've accepted it. Does it make you feel better that the Cowboys collapsed, again, in December b/c the Skins blow?

I find it funny how drastically things have changed. Weren't the Cowboys predicting Super Bowl after Thanksgiving?

Besides your analogy would fit if I were attempting to talk smack to a Chargers, Bears, or Ravens fan - you know the good teams. You're analogy would be better served if you replaced the Mercedes with a 1989 Maxima, with the huge rims, retarded spoiler on the back, ridiculous muffler that sounds like a lawn mower, lowered - a POS covered in glitz and hype - that everyone else knows is a POS - but the owner still thinks is great!

chimster7
December-26th-2006, 01:19 PM
All I know is that I would love for the Skins to be in the Boys situation right now. Just having hope of getting to the big game is a good thing. I hated when Boys fans last year were like the Skins are going to one and done and they won't have a chance against the Seahawks. All that amounts to is that the person is jealous. Will the boys win the super bowl, nah. I think they have a great chance against the Hawks to win. Hell I think SF would beat the hawks in the playoffs. The boys will get bounced where the Skins did last year in the second round, but I don't see that being even a close game. Especially now that Romo has some tape on him and he isn't the next Elway now. But if I was a Cowboys fan I would be happy right now.

Jumbo
December-26th-2006, 02:21 PM
I'll be the first one to admit that they will probably not get past the first round... but really, come on. Does it really make you feel better to talk smack about someone who is in the playoffs when your team isn't? That's like you driving up to a Mercedes dealership in your Ford Pinto and telling the salesman that your car is better because it's got chrome bumpers and vinyl seats which can be wiped clean of passenger puke because of the way you drive. :applause:


Pinto?

Better watch your tongue. There's already one guy from this thread that won't be back.


Pinto.


:mad:

SkinsFTW
December-27th-2006, 02:12 AM
You're analogy would be better served if you replaced the Mercedes with a 1989 Maxima, with the huge rims, retarded spoiler on the back, ridiculous muffler that sounds like a lawn mower, lowered - a POS covered in glitz and hype - that everyone else knows is a POS - but the owner still thinks is great!

Exactly. A couple weeks ago the Lowered Maxima guys around here were talking about winning the Championship.

The difference between the 2005 Cowboys and the 2006 Cowboys is that the Giants and Redskins both suck. The Cowboys choked once again. 3 weeks ago they had the division by 2 games. Now they've lost 2 home games by blowout and will not win the division unless the Eagles choke as well.

At least I can say my team hasn't bentover at the end of the past 2 seasons.

Plane Thrower
December-30th-2006, 03:32 PM
Pinto?

Better watch your tongue. There's already one guy from this thread that won't be back.


Pinto.


:mad:
What?

Califan007
December-30th-2006, 05:42 PM
I've known the Skins were done for a while. I've accepted it. Does it make you feel better that the Cowboys collapsed, again, in December b/c the Skins blow?

I find it funny how drastically things have changed. Weren't the Cowboys predicting Super Bowl after Thanksgiving?

Besides your analogy would fit if I were attempting to talk smack to a Chargers, Bears, or Ravens fan - you know the good teams. You're analogy would be better served if you replaced the Mercedes with a 1989 Maxima, with the huge rims, retarded spoiler on the back, ridiculous muffler that sounds like a lawn mower, lowered - a POS covered in glitz and hype - that everyone else knows is a POS - but the owner still thinks is great!
:laugh: :laugh: :notworthy

It's pretty funny when the Skins would bring up the fact that the Cowboys haven't won a playoff game in over a decade, the response would always be "15 out of 16" or whatever the number was...in their minds, playoff wins and appearances didn't matter, only wins over the Skins.

Well, now the Skins have won 3 out of the last 4, AND have won a playoff game in that span...meanwhile the Cowboys look to be having yet another December fade, possibly choking away a two-game division lead (two freakin' game lead in December!!), the division title, a home game in the playoffs AND a first round playoff bye...

There's lots of smack-worthy problems with the Cowboys, trust me...

tr1
January-6th-2007, 10:18 PM
Wow...two bad teams that should never have been in the playoffs.

The Dude
January-6th-2007, 10:20 PM
Watching NFC football is like watching women's basketball.

Who Del
January-6th-2007, 10:23 PM
Wow...two bad teams that should never have been in the playoffs.

:laugh:

You're ****ing crazy dude.

THEHEREAFTER
January-6th-2007, 10:24 PM
Wow...two bad teams that should never have been in the playoffs.

Who should have made it instead.

Plane Thrower
January-6th-2007, 10:25 PM
Wow...two bad teams that should never have been in the playoffs.
Sounds like someone is jealous.

You know what they say... misery loves company.

Califan007
January-6th-2007, 10:28 PM
Watching NFC football is like watching women's basketball.
:laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

tr1
January-6th-2007, 10:28 PM
You think that was good football?

Califan007
January-6th-2007, 10:28 PM
Sounds like someone is jealous.

You know what they say... misery loves company.
Jealous of WHAT??!!...lol :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

DWinzit
January-6th-2007, 10:31 PM
Wow...two bad teams that should never have been in the playoffs.
Interesting how you brought this thread back to write this comment.

I guess the streak stays alive!;)

tr1
January-6th-2007, 10:33 PM
Interesting how you brought this thread back to write this comment.

I guess the streak stays alive!;)

I'm sure that had the pukes won, you'd have seen it again, regardless. :laugh:

THEHEREAFTER
January-6th-2007, 10:34 PM
I'm sure that had the pukes won, you'd have seen it again, regardless. :laugh:

Congrats tr1. You deserve this one. Have fun with it.

SkinsHokieFan
January-6th-2007, 10:39 PM
And there is order in the universe

No playoff wins in 11 years for "America's Team"

:laugh:

Boss_Hogg
January-6th-2007, 11:27 PM
And there is order in the universe

No playoff wins in 11 years for "America's Team"

:laugh:

Playoff wins in the last 11 years:
Redskins 2
Cowboys 0

THEHEREAFTER
January-6th-2007, 11:27 PM
Playoff wins in the last 11 years:
Redskins 2
Cowboys 0


OUch.

kevin11
January-6th-2007, 11:49 PM
Playoff wins in the last 11 years:
Redskins 2
Cowboys 0

That is nice, but come on...they have what like 3 superbowl trophies more than us these last 20 years...I am enjoying this win, but we are getting carried away..anyway:dallasuck :logo: :helmet: :point2sky

Califan007
January-6th-2007, 11:51 PM
That is nice, but come on...they have what like 3 superbowl trophies more than us these last 20 years...I am enjoying this win, but we are getting carried away..anyway:dallasuck :logo: :helmet: :point2sky
Uh, nope...last 20 years the Cowboys have three SB trophes, the Skins have two SB trophies.

kevin11
January-6th-2007, 11:58 PM
Uh, nope...last 20 years the Cowboys have three SB trophes, the Skins have two SB trophies.
O yeah. I was just throwing numbers out there..My point is that we are getting carried away and it doesn't mean we are the better franchise.

Califan007
January-7th-2007, 12:02 AM
O yeah. I was just throwing numbers out there..My point is that we are getting carried away and it doesn't mean we are the better franchise.
1) The thread was a pre-emptive calling out of the Cowboys and their winless streak in the playoffs...so taking glee in seeing that wonderful streak still in tact is not only to be expected, it should be encouraged.

2) We always have been, and always will be, the better franchise lol... :cool:

THEHEREAFTER
January-7th-2007, 12:04 AM
2) We always have been, and always will be, the better franchise lol... :cool:

Death, taxes and extemeskins. You gotta love it. I can't even argue.

Califan007
January-7th-2007, 12:07 AM
Death, taxes and extemeskins. You gotta love it. I can't even argue.
George Allen taught me well lol... :)

kevin11
January-7th-2007, 12:08 AM
1) The thread was a pre-emptive calling out of the Cowboys and their winless streak in the playoffs...so taking glee in seeing that wonderful streak still in tact is not only to be expected, it should be encouraged.

2) We always have been, and always will be, the better franchise lol... :cool:
yeah, I just avoid getting too excited because my skins have made me so numb. I might sound a party pooper.

Califan007
January-7th-2007, 12:11 AM
yeah, I just avoid getting too excited because my skins have made me so numb. I might sound a party pooper.
I have 30 years on you as far as being a Skins fan, so I've lived through SOOOOO many highs and lows (mg...losing to the Cowboys something like 35-34 in the last game of the season with a playoff birth on the line??...Holy crap, that pissed me off for YEARS!!)...I take bucketloads of satisfaction in seeing them fall on their face, and hard lol... :D

bubba9497
January-7th-2007, 12:16 AM
losing to the Cowboys something like 35-34


I still curse the name Clint Longley

kevin11
January-7th-2007, 12:19 AM
I have 30 years on you as far as being a Skins fan, so I've lived through SOOOOO many highs and lows (mg...losing to the Cowboys something like 35-34 in the last game of the season with a playoff birth on the line??...Holy crap, that pissed me off for YEARS!!)...I take bucketloads of satisfaction in seeing them fall on their face, and hard lol... :D
I'd figure that if you watch the skins from 1992 and on...we should be used to heartbreakers. O well, I would never give up and still be bummed after every lose and be estatic(sp?) when we win.

Califan007
January-7th-2007, 12:27 AM
I still curse the name Clint Longley
:laugh: :mad: :mad: :mad:

tr1
January-7th-2007, 07:26 AM
yeah, I just avoid getting too excited because my skins have made me so numb. I might sound a party pooper.

You generally do.

You might do better if you're a bit more enthusiastic about your team and less needy of approval from an opposing team's fan base.

But you're young...you'll learn... ;)

TD_washingtonredskins
January-7th-2007, 07:39 AM
Well, I don't typically bash other NFCE teams just to bash them, but I'm very happy the 'Boys lost this game.

I take a lot of satisfaction in the fact that they haven't been able to get any further under Parcells than we have under Gibbs (despite the fact that we seem to be doing everything wrong according to experts).

Plus, I can make a little fun of the Cowboys losing a game on a botched snap since, well, my Redskins exited the playoffs the exact same way in the 1999 season. We'd have beaten TB to move on and get our asses kicked in St. Louis just as they'd have beaten Seattle to move on and get smoked in either NO or Chicago.

All in all, I'm happy, but for Tony Romo, everyone should remember they'd probably have finished out of the playoffs if he didn't take over for this team earlier in the season, so I hope this doesn't ruin the poor guy. I hope we beat him everytime we play, but I think he's a promising QB and I'd hate to see a fluke like that keep him from taking the next step.

See you in September Cowboys! Now we just need the the winner of today's game to lose next weekend @ Chicago or NO...

Plane Thrower
January-7th-2007, 07:11 PM
I still curse the name Clint Longley
Umm... Bubba... wrong game.

Clint Longley happened in 1974 (Thanksgiving), and that was 24-23.

35-34 was Staubach's final regular season game in 1979.

:laugh:

Henry
January-8th-2007, 09:04 AM
I have 30 years on you as far as being a Skins fan, so I've lived through SOOOOO many highs and lows (mg...losing to the Cowboys something like 35-34 in the last game of the season with a playoff birth on the line??...Holy crap, that pissed me off for YEARS!!)...I take bucketloads of satisfaction in seeing them fall on their face, and hard lol... :D

35-34. That's all you need to say.

Starting with that game, I have hated the Cowboys with the intensity of a thousand burning suns. And I always will.

As such, another year without a Cowboy playoff win brings a smile to my face.

Now, if only we could figure out what the hell is wrong with our Redskins ...

Rocky21
January-8th-2007, 11:24 AM
Wow...two bad teams that should never have been in the playoffs.
Thank you for bumping this thread. As soon as bobblefingers choked the game away I thought about your prediction. Hats off to you! :cheers:

Califan007
January-8th-2007, 11:29 AM
35-34. That's all you need to say.

Starting with that game, I have hated the Cowboys with the intensity of a thousand burning suns. And I always will.

As such, another year without a Cowboy playoff win brings a smile to my face.

Now, if only we could figure out what the hell is wrong with our Redskins ...
That game solidified my hatred for the Cowboys as well...Well, I hated them before, but I despised and loathed them afterwards lol.

I need a drink just thinking about it...