PDA

View Full Version : NFL owners OK $300M for new Giants-Jets stadium


DWinzit
December-8th-2006, 06:07 AM
Too bad the Jets stadium plans in NYC fell through. It would have been nice to have one of these teams play in NY.

The article states the $300M is a loan. If so, why would to of the small market teams cast dissenting votes?

NFL owners OK $300M for new Giants-Jets stadium
ESPN.com news services
click for full link- http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2690151

NEWARK, N.J. -- The New York Giants and Jets will receive $300 million in funding help from NFL owners for their new stadium at the Meadowlands.

The ballpark is projected to cost between $1.1 billion and $1.2 billion.

The owners approved the league stadium financing request, a loan, at the NFL owners meeting in Frisco, Texas, NFL spokesman Greg Aiello said.

The vote was 30-2 for stadium funding, with the Bills and Bengals dissenting

"It's absolutely important to have a world-class facility in the No. 1 market for the NFL," commissioner Roger Goodell said after the meeting. "In New York, there's a lot of competing facilities being built, and it's important for us to keep up with the other sports in the New York area."

The teams are jointly financing the stadium, which is expected to open in 2010 and seat between 82,500 and 84,000. Construction is expected to begin next spring.

"They all recognize the importance of having a modern facility in the largest media market in the world," Johnson said from an airport in Texas after attending the meeting. "They voted for the league."

Johnson said the vote was "almost unanimous" and described it as a "vote of confidence from the other league owners."

"This modern and technologically advanced stadium will bring about a new excitement for football in the region and throughout the league, and be a showcase for the grandeur and fun that NFL gamedays offer," the two said.

The owners also approved a $42.5 million loan for renovations of Arrowhead Stadium, home of the Kansas City Chiefs.

H-O-G
December-8th-2006, 12:20 PM
I could see why the Bills didn't want the stadium but why the bengals?

rictus58
December-8th-2006, 01:31 PM
I could see why the Bills didn't want the stadium but why the bengals?

probably because the owner is "frugal"

SnyderMustGo
December-8th-2006, 02:10 PM
at the NFL owners meeting in Frisco, Texas

This is outside of Dallas, right?

Why do they always do these things in Dallas? Didn't they just have an owner's meeting in Dallas the airport last year?

SnyderMustGo
December-8th-2006, 02:15 PM
The ballpark is projected to cost between $1.1 billion and $1.2 billion.

Woah. I didn't even see that the first time through.

That's obscene. That is twice as expensive as that new park Jerry Jones is building in Dallas and 4x what the Seattle football field cost.

Busch1724
December-8th-2006, 02:35 PM
Woah. I didn't even see that the first time through.

That's obscene. That is twice as expensive as that new park Jerry Jones is building in Dallas and 4x what the Seattle football field cost.

Welcome to New York unions.

TXREDSKINS44
December-8th-2006, 02:48 PM
This is outside of Dallas, right?

Why do they always do these things in Dallas? Didn't they just have an owner's meeting in Dallas the airport last year?


It's about 30 minutes outside of Dallas.

DWinzit
December-8th-2006, 05:40 PM
I could see why the Bills didn't want the stadium but why the bengals?
The way I read it, the money is coming out of a program with allocated funds. It is called a loan. The assumption is the money would come back eventually. Why would the Bills and the Bengals vote no? :whoknows:

HapHaszard
December-9th-2006, 06:17 AM
Woah. I didn't even see that the first time through.

That's obscene. That is twice as expensive as that new park Jerry Jones is building in Dallas and 4x what the Seattle football field cost.
Property in Dallas costs a whole lot less than property in NY/NJ area.?

Seabee1973
December-9th-2006, 11:46 PM
The way I read it, the money is coming out of a program with allocated funds. It is called a loan. The assumption is the money would come back eventually. Why would the Bills and the Bengals vote no? :whoknows:

Same 2 teams that voted no on the cap agreement

DWinzit
December-10th-2006, 09:22 AM
Same 2 teams that voted no on the cap agreementYes, but I understood their small market creates a limited fund situation. The cap agreement directly affected them. I don't understand how this "loan", if indeed it is to be paid back, ill affects them.

Tom [Giants fan]
December-10th-2006, 11:12 AM
It may cost twice the money of other stadiums but there are going to be two teams playing there. That makes it average out. :D