View Full Version : tr1 hates Romo. Let's read about it (merged)
tr1
December-12th-2006, 05:48 AM
Wow... :laugh:
http://www.dfw.com/mld/dfw/16220728.htm
QB's response could dictate rest of season
By MAC ENGEL
STAR-TELEGRAM STAFF WRITER
IRVING -- It was as if Bill Parcells forgot who, exactly, Tony Romo is. That Parcells found himself a little swept up in all the Romo-mania.
That despite his success, the Cowboys quarterback is seven games into his NFL career as a starter. And Parcells and his offensive coaching staff needed Sunday night's 42-17 blowout loss to the New Orleans Saints to be reminded of that.
"It's, 'Hey, let's take a look at this and let's not get too far off the reservation ourselves,'" Parcells said.
He will have more, but Sunday's performance was Romo's first dud.
The Saints offered a few ways to stop Romo. Now the Cowboys will find out how he can rebound from a forgettable performance, and if his play Sunday was merely an aberration.
"It's disappointing and frustrating," Romo said after the game. "It's going to happen if you play the game long enough."
Seven starts is apparently long enough.
Throughout Romo's rise, Parcells insisted his expectations for the quarterback were higher because he is a fourth-year player. But even Parcells had to agree with NBC color analyst John Madden, who said during Sunday night's telecast that the Cowboys were asking Romo to do too much.
Parcells said it was something he will have to think about.
"Cutting down some of the options on some of the things we're doing," Parcells offered as one possible solution. "That would be under the category of simplifying."
Since Romo started his first game at Carolina on Oct. 29, there had been no need to simplify, because Romo made the game appear to be so simple. In his first five starts, he had 10 touchdowns and two interceptions.
But in the past two games, he has thrown one touchdown pass and been intercepted four times. The one touchdown, a 34-yarder to Terrell Owens, should have been another interception. The pass went through the hands of Saints defensive back Fred Thomas before it popped into Owens' hands.
Against the Saints, Romo had his first sub-.500 completion day. The Saints were the first team to successfully make him a conventional, pocket passer. Some of that had to do with a game plan that was basically never opened; the Cowboys ran 21 plays in the first half, compared with the Saints' 45.
But unlike the previous weeks when Romo danced in or outside of the pocket and turned a nothing into a big something, there was not one instance of that against the Saints.
After more than a month as a starting quarterback, enough game film exists of Romo that teams can, and are, game-planning for him. Opposing defensive coaches and players have knowledge of him.
That's not to say Romo has been solved. But this was the first time he was knocked down.
"I think that would not only fit him," Parcells said. "We took another one on the chin. I'm anxious to see how we respond."
If the play of the quarterback is an indication of how this team will play, how Romo responds could determine the rest of the season.
"We had been playing pretty well, so we definitely didn't see this coming," Romo said. "This Cowboys team hasn't been beaten like this in a while. We'll see what we're made of now."
And what Romo is made of.
IN THE KNOW
Reality check
A look at Romo's first five games as the starter, and the past two:
W-L Cmp-Att. Pct. Yds. TD-Int. Rating
First five starts 4-1 109-153 71.2 1,394 10-2 115.8
Last two starts 1-1 36-67 53.7 506 1-4 58.4
tr1
December-12th-2006, 06:09 AM
...and we now know the reason Billy didn't switch to Romo at the beginning of the season:
A look at Romo's first five games as the starter, and the past two:
W-L Cmp-Att. Pct. Yds. TD-Int. Rating
First five starts 4-1 109-153 71.2 1,394 10-2 115.8
Last two starts 1-1 36-67 53.7 506 1-4 58.4*
* The TD should have been a pick... :laugh:
Romo had the same kind of success many new qbs do...there's no book on them. After a few weeks, he's been figured out: Keep him in the pocket...he's better throwing while scrambling when he can get a bit more time. I thought the d tackles in his peripheral vision distracted him.
This doesn't bode well for the puke franchise.
He ain't no Aikman...not even close.
[Edit for puke fans: Yes, the Skins suck this year. Carry on.]
Westbrook36
December-12th-2006, 06:23 AM
I love how Puke fans keep on talking about his "one bad game". :laugh:
DWinzit
December-12th-2006, 06:24 AM
"We took another one on the chin. I'm anxious to see how we respond."
If the play of the quarterback is an indication of how this team will play, how Romo responds could determine the rest of the season.
How Romo responds will determine the rest of the season. It's not like Bledsoe is coming in to replace him.
Excluding Cowboy fans and the media, which often seem the same, most are happy to see the fairy tale take a tail spin. It was getting a bit much.
It will be interesting to how Atlanta's defense attacks Romo. Romo-mania being deflated may be the best thing that could happen to him. Or it could get him into a funk like most other inexperienced QB's encounter.
IrishOrange15
December-12th-2006, 07:14 AM
Yes.
Let's forget that he had 5 drops in the NYG game. 1 which bounced off of Glenn and landed into Kiwanuka's hands. 2 of them came from Owens which would've led to at least big yardage and probably 1 TD. Not to mention drawing a 27 yard PI that would've been a TD to Fasano, but that doesn't go into his statistics.
Romo played poorly against the Saints, but a lot of it was caused by either mental mistakes or lack of execution from his other teammates. The second INT was a perfect example as Witten and Crayton ran into each other and with it being 4th and 5, Romo had to throw the ball and had nowhere to throw it to.
YAKUZA
DWinzit
December-12th-2006, 07:19 AM
2 of them came from Owens which would've led to at least big yardage and probably 1 TD.
For what ever reason, this seems to be a given in every game this year with TO!
IMO Romo needs to look at Witten and Glenn more, TO less. :2cents:
Westbrook36
December-12th-2006, 08:37 AM
tr1, didn't you know that Romo was just an innocent bystander and the only person who played on Sunday was Payton? :laugh: :laugh:
Look at the skill position players around Romo and he is still sucking bolts lately. Owens, Glenn, Witten, Fasano, Jones, Barber, etc.
DON'T PUT HIM ON THE COVER OF MADDEN JUST YET!!! :laugh: :laugh:
Riggo#44
December-12th-2006, 08:48 AM
tr1, didn't you know that Romo was just an innocent bystander and the only person who played on Sunday was Payton? :laugh: :laugh:
Look at the skill position players around Romo and he is still sucking bolts lately. Owens, Glenn, Witten, Fasano, Jones, Barber, etc.
DON'T PUT HIM ON THE COVER OF MADDEN JUST YET!!! :laugh: :laugh:
Right it definitely isn't Romo, I mean how can it, don't you understand, he's TONY FREAKIN' ROMO...all of his picks, stats and bad throws can be easily explained away. He is immune to having 2 bad games in a row!
By the way Romo has thrown 3 TDs 8 INTs and has a 70 passer rating against winning teams. This has to make a playoff team nervous.
:dallasuck
Warhead36
December-12th-2006, 09:27 AM
tr1 is on fire!
BTW anyone else freaked out that tr1 and Westbrook36 are on the same side?
Riggo#44
December-12th-2006, 09:29 AM
tr1 is on fire!
BTW anyone else freaked out that tr1 and Westbrook36 are on the same side?
Yeah, that's a sign of the apocolypse. I guess the enemy of my enemy is my friend.
cyfar
December-12th-2006, 10:44 AM
Yeah, that's a sign of the apocolypse. I guess the enemy of my enemy is my friend.
Well....
http://www.nohayrosasinespina.com/imagenes/full/c_apocalypto_teaser_cartel.jpg
:)
IrishOrange15
December-12th-2006, 11:32 AM
For what ever reason, this seems to be a given in every game this year with TO!
IMO Romo needs to look at Witten and Glenn more, TO less. :2cents:
You've got to throw it to the guy that's open. I'd still rather have that than throwing into double or triple coverage
YAKUZA
IrishOrange15
December-12th-2006, 11:36 AM
Right it definitely isn't Romo, I mean how can it, don't you understand, he's TONY FREAKIN' ROMO...all of his picks, stats and bad throws can be easily explained away. He is immune to having 2 bad games in a row!
:dallasuck
I don't know a soul that's explained away the Saints game for Romo. He played poorly. But the Giants game doesn't count for the multiple drops (5), with one of which hit Glenn in the chest and bounced into Kiwi's hands. What do you want Romo to do, catch his own passes?
YAKUZA
skinsngibbs4life
December-12th-2006, 11:38 AM
irish, serious question...
I have heard a lot of talk, most from cowboy fans, that romo's problem is passing from in the pocket. The last two games, it seems like the giants and saints have contained the outside, and kept him from scrambling. My question is, do you think that teams have finally found out the strategy for stopping romo? or do you think that it is just a bad two game stretch?
thespaniard
December-12th-2006, 11:41 AM
Could you just put all of these articles in one thread and call it 'Dallas Sucks' or something like that tr1?
It's really cluttering up the board..
skinsngibbs4life
December-12th-2006, 11:44 AM
Could you just put all of these articles in one thread and call it 'Dallas Sucks' or something like that tr1?
It's really cluttering up the board..
:applause:
8 new threads in one day isn't exactly what we need...
Ken
December-12th-2006, 12:47 PM
irish, serious question...
I have heard a lot of talk, most from cowboy fans, that romo's problem is passing from in the pocket. The last two games, it seems like the giants and saints have contained the outside, and kept him from scrambling. My question is, do you think that teams have finally found out the strategy for stopping romo? or do you think that it is just a bad two game stretch?
Romo killed the Giants outside the pocket. They tried to conain him but couldn't.
Carry on..
TD_washingtonredskins
December-12th-2006, 12:49 PM
Romo killed the Giants outside the pocket. They tried to conain him but couldn't.
Carry on..
Cool, but that wasn't the question.
He asked if the "inside the pocket" thing is a way to contain TR or if he's just having a couple bad games in a row.
It's a legitimate question that warrants a legitimate answer from Irish...
skinsngibbs4life
December-12th-2006, 12:50 PM
Romo killed the Giants outside the pocket. They tried to conain him but couldn't.
Carry on..
you see, this is why I directed my question to Irish, someone who can actually talk intelligent football.
If I wanted your useless opinion, I would have asked for it :rolleyes:
ross3909
December-12th-2006, 01:00 PM
The real question is...if the Cowboys fail to win a playoff game again this year, will Parcells return for 07?
jeronimobrat
December-12th-2006, 01:08 PM
you see, this is why I directed my question to Irish, someone who can actually talk intelligent football.
If I wanted your useless opinion, I would have asked for it :rolleyes:
:applause: SLAPPED WITH THE PROVERBIAL HAND!
The reason why you will not get an answer from Irish is because he re-read the title of the thread.
:laugh:
Tom [Giants fan]
December-12th-2006, 04:15 PM
Have they even included his stats from the first Giants game when they INT'd him 3 times?
He is 34 of 59 (57%) for 484 yards 2 TD's 5 INT's vs. the Giants this year. I've seen Cowboy fans unimpressed by Eli. I have the same feelings about Romo.
Had a good but not great game vs. Carolina.
He did have a very good game against the Skins.
He had a great game vs. the Cardinals.
He had a high completion percent against Indy but not much else.
And he had an unbelieveable game vs. Tampa.
Not the highest level of competition with some of these games. I want to see him play in the playoffs. If he shines there, I will be a believer. And I hold the same standard for Eli. He has shown some good things and some bad things. But he has to do it in the playoffs. He definitely has to play better than he did last year if they make it.
THEHEREAFTER
December-12th-2006, 04:38 PM
Wait a minute. So you're telling me a first year starter 7 games in is experiencing highs and lows at the QB position. Peaks and Valleys? :( I wonder if this has happened to anyone else?
THEHEREAFTER
December-12th-2006, 04:41 PM
He ain't no Aikman...not even close.
[Edit for puke fans: Yes, the Skins suck this year. Carry on.]
Yeah because Aikman NEVER struggled early on? :rolleyes:
bubba9497
December-12th-2006, 04:52 PM
I might add for every pass TO dropped, Romo's had a sure Int dropped or called back
NoCalMike
December-12th-2006, 05:38 PM
So is Romo uncomfortable in the pocket, and needs to scramble away from pressure to have success, or is he just a more viable weapon when he is scrambling because there is a difference between being a pocket passer that can throw on the run, and a guy who is afraid and buckles under the pressure.
Pocket Presence is something that is a MUST in the NFL.
HeHateMe
December-12th-2006, 05:54 PM
Romo had the same kind of success many new qbs do...there's no book on them. After a few weeks, he's been figured out: Keep him in the pocket...he's better throwing while scrambling when he can get a bit more time. I thought the d tackles in his peripheral vision distracted him.
This doesn't bode well for the puke franchise.
Amazing then how Campbell hasnt even had 1/100th the success of Romo.
If this Romo doesnt bode well for the Dallas franchise, please do tell, what does that say about the future of the Skins with Campbell?
HeHateMe
December-12th-2006, 05:55 PM
I might add for every pass TO dropped, Romo's had a sure Int dropped or called back
Which interception was called back?
Goaldeje
December-12th-2006, 05:59 PM
Amazing then how Campbell hasnt even had 1/100th the success of Romo.
If this Romo doesnt bode well for the Dallas franchise, please do tell, what does that say about the future of the Skins with Campbell?
Stay on topic. If you want to discuss Skins fans and our franchise's future, go to the Stadium. There are a million such threads there.
HeHateMe
December-12th-2006, 06:00 PM
I'll take 5-2 as a starter any day of the week. (While putting his team in position to win one of the two losses)
He could have 0 TDs and 15 ints.
He's catapulted Dallas to first in the NFC East.
I'll buy that for a dollar.
HeHateMe
December-12th-2006, 06:01 PM
:applause:
8 new threads in one day isn't exactly what we need...
Obessed much?
I'd be worried about her. Imagine when Dallas does win it all.
HeHateMe
December-12th-2006, 06:03 PM
Stay on topic. If you want to discuss Skins fans and our franchise's future, go to the Stadium. There are a million such threads there.
Just putting things in perspective for tr1.
I actually think Campbell is going to be a very good QB.
But by tr1's standards, he's a complete bust already.
Goaldeje
December-12th-2006, 06:07 PM
Just putting things in perspective for tr1.
I actually think Campbell is going to be a very good QB.
But by tr1's standards, he's a complete bust already.
But that's not what we're discussing.
To the point of the thread: Romo should be fine. He had a bad game. We all knew it was going to happen. He should be fine. So long as this is a one game aberation and not a trend. As has been pointed out elsewhere, Romo hasn't played well against good teams. We'll see what he does in the playoffs....
mrtacconi
December-12th-2006, 06:09 PM
Yes, we have had a depressing season...BUT we did beat the boys, WITH ROMO!!! And we got to see them get smashed at home, right when everyone was riding their jocks!!! HTTR
redskin81
December-12th-2006, 06:28 PM
Actually most of the fans that I know here in Dallas are concerned. No donial just honest concern about how real this team is. Romo doesnt play in the secondary anf the Cowgirls secondary looked like they had Carlos playing every position.
bubba9497
December-12th-2006, 06:38 PM
Just putting things in perspective for tr1.
I actually think Campbell is going to be a very good QB.
But by tr1's standards, he's a complete bust already.
Just putting things in perspective for HeHateMe.
Did anyone compare Campbell to Farve, Brady, Manning, Elway, Marino, etc.... after his first couple of starts???
has ESPN, SI, USA Today, etc.... have Jason Campbell pics, stories, predictions, almost every day since his first start?
Did Redskins fans go on pokefan message boards bragging that the Skins were the best team in the NFL now that Campbell is playing QB?
tr1
December-12th-2006, 07:10 PM
Amazing then how Campbell hasnt even had 1/100th the success of Romo.
If this Romo doesnt bode well for the Dallas franchise, please do tell, what does that say about the future of the Skins with Campbell?
Classic!
Change the subject.
Denial deluxe!
:laugh:
tr1
December-12th-2006, 07:14 PM
Just putting things in perspective for HeHateMe.
Did anyone compare Campbell to Farve, Brady, Manning, Elway, Marino, etc.... after his first couple of starts???
has ESPN, SI, USA Today, etc.... have Jason Campbell pics, stories, predictions, almost every day since his first start?
Did Redskins fans go on pokefan message boards bragging that the Skins were the best team in the NFL now that Campbell is playing QB?
Thank you, bubba...you beat me to it.
HeHateMe is in total denial.
kevin11
December-12th-2006, 07:19 PM
Problem with Romo is that he is too short of a QB to play in the pocket and if you contain him while you send guys to pressure him up front. He will have a hard time seeing over the 6'3+ Defensive line and he will try to scramble, and if you contain him, he usually will throw it up for grabs..But with that said, I believe romo will be a good QB, not great, not HOF, but a good QB...JC, I have no clue if he will be good, but I think he will win us some games.
Also, DId anybody notice when romo throws a loft, he seems to just lob it into the air and it seems to come down with alot of "snow"
tr1
December-12th-2006, 07:20 PM
Could you just put all of these articles in one thread and call it 'Dallas Sucks' or something like that tr1?
It's really cluttering up the board..
If it really irritates you, I'll be sure to start eight new ones tomorrow...
tr1
December-12th-2006, 07:23 PM
Obessed much?
I'd be worried about her. Imagine when Dallas does win it all.
I'm not gonna be around to see that happen...I'm 51...I doubt I'll be here when I'm 99...
:laugh:
HHM, you have an average team...face it.
BTW, the Skins suck this year.
kevin11
December-12th-2006, 07:29 PM
I think people are making too much of romo..He's young and he will improve. Hell, he is 5-2 as a starter, I'd take that anyday, but I would much rather have dallas defensive.
I hate romo, but the media has overhyped him for his fall, IMHO. You knew that romo was going to have a bad game and of course, the media hyped him up and when he falls, they make a deal out of it. Romo is young and improving, same for JC, VY, Jay Cutler, Matt Leniart(sp), Gradowski(sp), and david guarrand..They will have the highs and lows..It happens, nobody should be saying that romo sucks and bring back grandpa drew.
I do love seeing romo fall, but you guys are making a story out of something that happens to QB everyweek. WHy don't we talk about how peyton manning suck or Tom Brady, instead of somebody that just started 6 weeks ago?
HeHateMe
December-12th-2006, 08:19 PM
I'm not gonna be around to see that happen...I'm 51...I doubt I'll be here when I'm 99...
:laugh:
HHM, you have an average team...face it.
BTW, the Skins suck this year.
Average is 3rd best in the NFC.
I'll take it.
And you'd trade anything to be there too.
HeHateMe
December-12th-2006, 11:22 PM
But that's not what we're discussing.
To the point of the thread: Romo should be fine. He had a bad game. We all knew it was going to happen. He should be fine. So long as this is a one game aberation and not a trend. As has been pointed out elsewhere, Romo hasn't played well against good teams. We'll see what he does in the playoffs....
Last I checked the Colts were a good team.
And the Panthers were rolling along when we played them.
Either way, youre right.
But according to this board, Romo's 15 minutes are over. He's done.
Dallas is doomed.
HeHateMe
December-12th-2006, 11:24 PM
Just putting things in perspective for HeHateMe.
Did anyone compare Campbell to Farve, Brady, Manning, Elway, Marino, etc.... after his first couple of starts???
has ESPN, SI, USA Today, etc.... have Jason Campbell pics, stories, predictions, almost every day since his first start?
Did Redskins fans go on pokefan message boards bragging that the Skins were the best team in the NFL now that Campbell is playing QB?
Comes with the territory when youre the new QB of the America's Team.
And once again, I could care less what any other Dallas fans say.
Find me one post where I proclaimed Tony Romo to be anything. Where I proclaimed the Dallas Cowboys anything regarding being the best team.
HeHateMe
December-12th-2006, 11:25 PM
Classic!
Change the subject.
Denial deluxe!
:laugh:
The same denial youve had all season with your Redskins?
Tell me, what is it like.
jivelikenice
December-12th-2006, 11:44 PM
Yes.
Let's forget that he had 5 drops in the NYG game. 1 which bounced off of Glenn and landed into Kiwanuka's hands. 2 of them came from Owens which would've led to at least big yardage and probably 1 TD. Not to mention drawing a 27 yard PI that would've been a TD to Fasano, but that doesn't go into his statistics.
Romo played poorly against the Saints, but a lot of it was caused by either mental mistakes or lack of execution from his other teammates. The second INT was a perfect example as Witten and Crayton ran into each other and with it being 4th and 5, Romo had to throw the ball and had nowhere to throw it to.
YAKUZA
Lets not also forget that on a late 4th quarter td drive, Gibril Wilson let a interception that would heav easily gone the other way go right through his hands and to the receiver. He made a great play but somehow managed to let the ball go right threw the palms of both hands.
Lets not also forget that Romo could have had another int that would have lost the Colts game but was saved by a pass interference that didn't come from the safety whp picked off the ball. Parcells himself said that Romo got bailed out on that play.
rdsknbill
December-12th-2006, 11:55 PM
Just putting things in perspective for HeHateMe.
Did anyone compare Campbell to Farve, Brady, Manning, Elway, Marino, etc.... after his first couple of starts???
has ESPN, SI, USA Today, etc.... have Jason Campbell pics, stories, predictions, almost every day since his first start?
Did Redskins fans go on pokefan message boards bragging that the Skins were the best team in the NFL now that Campbell is playing QB?
Well Done! .. Nothing to see here Pokes fans. Back to your "man-boob" coach and your conundrum of a QB. (Sorry I refuse to give that POS Wr of yours any press)
Crawl back to the your NAMBLA browsing known as the "zone"
BAFGA
December-13th-2006, 12:58 AM
Dallas fans at work are telling me the reason Owens is dropping passes is that Romo is throwing the ball too hard. They say that Brett Favre used to throw the ball that hard when he was just starting and used to break fingers of people trying to catch his passes. Once again, defending both Owens and Romo in one sentence.
tr1
December-13th-2006, 05:48 AM
I think it's obvious now that they'll have to.
Romo is good back-up material, but will not be a franchise qb.
There's a reason he sat on the bench for four years.
Just think...next year the pukes could have a new qb and a new coach.
Only a SB victory will change that projection...and it's very unlikely.
thespaniard
December-13th-2006, 06:27 AM
Just like people shouldn't get too high on romo for a couple good games, they shouldn't get too low on him for a couple bad ones. He's going through the same growing pains any QB in the NFL goes through. By your logic, the skins should give up on Campbell already too.
:rolleyes:
BTW, was another Romo sucks thread really necessary? There's already about 10 on the ATN page..
KLJ
December-13th-2006, 06:31 AM
BTW, was another Romo sucks thread really necessary? There's already about 10 on the ATN page..
tr1 is obsessed with the cowboys.. he cannot go more than 20 minutes without starting another thread about them.. it's sad really
Westbrook36
December-13th-2006, 07:41 AM
tr1, I don't think you can say with any certainty that Romo can't be a franchise QB. The Cowboys are more set at QB for the future than the Redskins are. Campbell has not had one game of great success like Romo has done about 3 times already. He has had horrible games like Romo had this past weekend, however. If Romo threw two INTs that directly led to opposing TDs, I wonder what you would say? So unless you are advocating drafting a QB for the Skins, you can't really say anything about the Boys.
Riggo#44
December-13th-2006, 07:43 AM
Lets not also forget that on a late 4th quarter td drive, Gibril Wilson let a interception that would heav easily gone the other way go right through his hands and to the receiver. He made a great play but somehow managed to let the ball go right threw the palms of both hands.
Lets not also forget that Romo could have had another int that would have lost the Colts game but was saved by a pass interference that didn't come from the safety whp picked off the ball. Parcells himself said that Romo got bailed out on that play.
Shhhh...you're talking to Tony Romo apologist #1. Stats are everything when Campbell puts up bad ones, but not when Romo does. Then there's an explanation, excuses and rationalization.
Romo's numbers against winning teams: 3 TDs 8 INTs 70.0 QB rating. That's might be fine if it's a 4-9 team with a 2nd year QB building for next year, but not for a playoff team.
Mr. S
December-13th-2006, 08:18 AM
I think it's obvious now that they'll have to.
Romo is good back-up material, but will not be a franchise qb.
There's a reason he sat on the bench for four years.
Just think...next year the pukes could have a new qb and a new coach.
Only a SB victory will change that projection...and it's very unlikely.
man, give up on bashing our enemies. Romo is not lighting it up as much, but he's also not losing much either. 3 losses including their first Giants loss in October? Not too shabby in my opinion. The Cowboys will not draft a new starting QB for next year. They also still have a fair shot at making the Super Bowl as well. I hate them just as much as you do, but be honest here.
tr1
December-13th-2006, 08:41 AM
Just like people shouldn't get too high on romo for a couple good games, they shouldn't get too low on him for a couple bad ones. He's going through the same growing pains any QB in the NFL goes through. By your logic, the skins should give up on Campbell already too.
:rolleyes:
BTW, was another Romo sucks thread really necessary? There's already about 10 on the ATN page..
Campbell is a second year player...and he's starting now.
The question for the pukes is do they draft a back-up quarterback or use a high pick for an top round qb.
If you don't think they'll draft a qb and keep the high priced Bledsoe around, you're dreaming.
As for quality of threads, please avoid them. No one is forcing you to post or read them.
Have a nice day.
:laugh:
tr1
December-13th-2006, 08:41 AM
tr1 is obsessed with the cowboys.. he cannot go more than 20 minutes without starting another thread about them.. it's sad really
You sound like an Eagles fan from last year. :laugh: :laugh:
tr1
December-13th-2006, 08:45 AM
tr1, I don't think you can say with any certainty that Romo can't be a franchise QB. The Cowboys are more set at QB for the future than the Redskins are. Campbell has not had one game of great success like Romo has done about 3 times already. He has had horrible games like Romo had this past weekend, however. If Romo threw two INTs that directly led to opposing TDs, I wonder what you would say? So unless you are advocating drafting a QB for the Skins, you can't really say anything about the Boys.
Well, TO is old...Glenn is old, they have a marginal running attack and their pass defense is like a sieve. I guess you don't watch many of their games.
Romo is an okay qb, but not a franchise one. Frankly, I'd love the pukes to keep him as #1.
As for Campbell, he's in his second year. Romo is in year four. The comparisons are ridiculous.
Romo sat for four years for a reason.
Mr. S
December-13th-2006, 08:46 AM
The question for the pukes is do they draft a back-up quarterback or use a high pick for an top round qb.
If you don't think they'll draft a qb and keep the high priced Bledsoe around, you're dreaming.
Now you're changing a bit, or you could have explained it better earlier. Of course they will draft a back-up QB, or they will pick one up in free agency. It's fair to assume Bledsoe is gone.
You were basically saying though that they will want to draft someone to replace Romo for or during next season. Now if you meant that they will draft some backup, then, yeh, that isn't adding much or being informative.
Westbrook36
December-13th-2006, 08:46 AM
Ah yes, a voice of reason. The Skins are more set at QB than the Cowboys. I apologize. :laugh:
tr1
December-13th-2006, 08:52 AM
Ah yes, a voice of reason. The Skins are more set at QB than the Cowboys. I apologize. :laugh:
You know that they are. You know that in three years, your Eagles will be searching for a new qb while we'll be pummeling the East.
How many bad games will Romo need before you think he's an average qb? Three in a row? Six?
Bill couldn't believe he was playing lights-out...but you do?
:doh:
tr1
December-13th-2006, 08:53 AM
man, give up on bashing our enemies. Romo is not lighting it up as much, but he's also not losing much either. 3 losses including their first Giants loss in October? Not too shabby in my opinion. The Cowboys will not draft a new starting QB for next year. They also still have a fair shot at making the Super Bowl as well. I hate them just as much as you do, but be honest here.
If you think they're going to the SB, I'd like some of what you're consuming...
tr1
December-13th-2006, 08:55 AM
Shhhh...you're talking to Tony Romo apologist #1. Stats are everything when Campbell puts up bad ones, but not when Romo does. Then there's an explanation, excuses and rationalization.
Romo's numbers against winning teams: 3 TDs 8 INTs 70.0 QB rating. That's might be fine if it's a 4-9 team with a 2nd year QB building for next year, but not for a playoff team.
And let's compare Romo's 4th year stats to Campbell's 4th year stats...it will be interesting, I'm sure.
BWareofDWare94
December-13th-2006, 09:22 AM
You know that they are. You know that in three years, your Eagles will be searching for a new qb while we'll be pummeling the East.
How many bad games will Romo need before you think he's an average qb? Three in a row? Six?
Bill couldn't believe he was playing lights-out...but you do?
:doh:
Like someone stated, if you cant judge his good games because he only had a few, why can you judge his bad games, where he only has a few??? I for one do not know what we have at QB right now, Romo has crashed a bit...but to just brush him off as a back up is ridiculous.....and you know it. I know you say he has been in the NFL for four years (1 as a 16 week PS player) but this is still his FIRST year as a "player" in the NFL, outside of some preseason action.
And what in God's name makes you think the Skins will "pummel" the NFC East....:laugh::laugh::laugh:
Number5
December-13th-2006, 09:50 AM
You know that they are. You know that in three years, your Eagles will be searching for a new qb while we'll be pummeling the East.
:laugh: Pummeling in 3 years? All 4 teams are relatively young. Your team is built on FA while everyone else has done it through the draft.....so as far as I can see, in 3 years, everyone else will be using players they drafted who are well versed in the respective systems, while the Redskins are still trying to buy championships with other teams FAs only to have it implode. Besides, do you really think that in 3 years Tuna, Coughlin, and Gibbs will still be around? Hell, I'd be suprised if Reid is still in Philly.
What I'm saying is that nothing is given, and seeing how the current FO's set up....
1 - Washington will continue to trade draft picks for nothing and sign FAs who don't fit their system.
2 - Dallas will go out and draft defensive players and allow Romo to grow by adding older, yet still effective talent.
3 - Philadelphia's FO will change focus once Dawkins retires and will force them to draft impact players instead of "projects".
4 - New York will finally learn that Eli will never be Peyton and it will cost them dearly.
Reic
December-13th-2006, 10:04 AM
4 - New York will finally learn that Eli will never be Peyton and it will cost them dearly.
I am surprised they have not seen that already. I disagree with your number 1 though, we will be forced to start relying on draft picks the next coming years. I hate to have to say we will be forced to though, our F.O is dur dur dur
Riggo#44
December-13th-2006, 10:11 AM
Average is 3rd best in the NFC.
I'll take it.
And you'd trade anything to be there too.
No, and here's why - is Parcells going to be here next year - if they fail to win a playoff game for the 11th straight year, will he continue to deal with TO?
It's going to be another one and done for the Cowboys.
CPortJGibbs89
December-13th-2006, 10:14 AM
man, give up on bashing our enemies. Romo is not lighting it up as much, but he's also not losing much either. 3 losses including their first Giants loss in October? Not too shabby in my opinion. The Cowboys will not draft a new starting QB for next year. They also still have a fair shot at making the Super Bowl as well. I hate them just as much as you do, but be honest here.Seriously, I mean on and on we go. I know I dont have to click on the thread but why is half the threads in this section about you saying the cowboys suck balls and romo sucks. What have the redskins shown over any other team that we are going to a contender in the next couple of years. I think Campbell could be a great qb but he has done nothing compared to Romo in his first 4 games so with your logic we need to draft a qb as well. And here we go with another pissing match as usual.
Passizle
December-13th-2006, 10:45 AM
I think it's obvious now that they'll have to.
Romo is good back-up material, but will not be a franchise qb.
There's a reason he sat on the bench for four years.
Just think...next year the pukes could have a new qb and a new coach.
Only a SB victory will change that projection...and it's very unlikely.
Hey TR1. I am not writing this to instigate an argument. I am not wrtitng this to get you riled up. I am writing this in the hope that you may look at what you post before you post it.
I dont know where you come from with your posts, but I completeley understand you disdain for the Cowboys. I hate them too.
But some of the stuff you post is complete BS. In fact, the more I read your posts, the more you seem like an in house troll without a clue. You dont back up anything you say with anything credible. Most of what you say is your opinion and you are entitled, but put more thoughts behind your posts man.
To say that the Cowbitches are going to draft a QB after Romo has but one bad game is rediculous. I wish that our QB was playing as well as him. Not to take anything from Campbell. He is performing well, but needs some work. Save it for when it counts, instead of trying to get a rise out of HHM or THA.
If you are so intent on starting complete BS threads to entertain yourself, drop by a Cowbitch forum and rile them up there cause no offense man, but you get burned everytime you make a cowbitch comment here. I dont like to see one of my own get burned so much. Hey! You would not be Kenny Wright would you? That might explain the burning.
Here is to friendly EDUCATED ribbing!:cheers:
HTTR Man!
CPortJGibbs89
December-13th-2006, 10:48 AM
Hey TR1. I am not writing this to instigate an argument. I am not wrtitng this to get you riled up. I am writing this in the hope that you may look at what you post before you post it.
I dont know where you come from with your posts, but I completeley understand you disdain for the Cowboys. I hate them too.
But some of the stuff you post is complete BS. In fact, the more I read your posts, the more you seem like an in house troll without a clue. You dont back up anything you say with anything credible. Most of what you say is your opinion and you are entitled, but put more thoughts behind your posts man.
To say that the Cowbitches are going to draft a QB after Romo has but one bad game is rediculous. I wish that our QB was playing as well as him. Not to take anything from Campbell. He is performing well, but needs some work. Save it for when it counts, instead of trying to get a rise out of HHM or THA.
If you are so intent on starting complete BS threads to entertain yourself, drop by a Cowbitch forum and rile them up there cause no offense man, but you get burned everytime you make a cowbitch comment here. I dont like to see one of my own get burned so much. Hey! You would not be Kenny Wright would you? That might explain the burning.
Here is to friendly EDUCATED ribbing!:cheers:
HTTR Man!Great post man I feel the same way and someone had to say it already. I am not trying to rip on you either TR1 but just some of the same crap you write everyday is like your just trying to start an arguement, I cant go into one thread with out pages upon pages of you going back and forth with another person, its going to be a long off-season lets try and have some intellgent well thought out discussions.
BigDave95
December-13th-2006, 11:04 AM
You guys take it easy on TR1. Trashing the Cowboys is really all he has in his sad, little life. Let's just take a look at some of his recent threads:
Romo hits a low (http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php?t=184559)
Puke Fans Are In Denial (http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php?t=184563)
Bad Time For Romo To Become Hand-Off Machine (http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php?t=184674)
How 'Bout Those Cowboys! (http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php?t=184333)
Cowboys crash to earth (http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php?t=184383)
Puke Notes: Foundation showing cracks (http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php?t=184560)
Star Telegram: Saints march right into Dallas and cut through Romo parade (http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php?t=184385)
Pukes haven't won a playoff game in ten years...make it eleven. (http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php?t=184019)
TO's Birthday Party Might Mean Puke Loss? (http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php?t=184055)
If he couldn't start ridiculous Cowboy threads like this one, he wouldn't even have a reason to go on...
OWUeagleMD
December-13th-2006, 11:10 AM
I think I'm going to need to see 1 (one) impressive performance from Campbell before I concede that he is going to lead the Skins to NFCE dominance within the next three years. I guess I'm the moron.
Westbrook36
December-13th-2006, 11:17 AM
He led the Skins to 16 points against a putrid Eagles defense after the Eagles built a huge lead off of his turnovers!!! Don't you see!?!?!?1 The kid has what it takes, even though his numbers are the same as what savy vet Mark Brunnell put up all year!!!
IrishOrange15
December-13th-2006, 11:28 AM
Before the Saints game, Romo's QB rating in the pocket was 102. I charted the Saints game and he wasn't nearly as bad as I originally thought. Tons of mental errors made by O-Linemen, RB's, and WR's. The only thing I would've like to have seen was the coaching tape on a few of the plays where he wound up throwing the ball away or running with it to see if receivers were open or not. It didn't appear like they were.
In reality, the Dallas offensive personnel has to play better which could be more of a problem than if Romo wasn't playing well.
YAKUZA
thespaniard
December-13th-2006, 11:31 AM
Before the Saints game, Romo's QB rating in the pocket was 102. I charted the Saints game and he wasn't nearly as bad as I originally thought. Tons of mental errors made by O-Linemen, RB's, and WR's. The only thing I would've like to have seen was the coaching tape on a few of the plays where he wound up throwing the ball away or running with it to see if receivers were open or not. It didn't appear like they were.
In reality, the Dallas offensive personnel has to play better which could be more of a problem than if Romo wasn't playing well.
YAKUZA
Very true. Let's not forget that the whole Dallas team lost that game, not just Romo. Romo would have had to put up 50 points to win that game. That being said, Dallas's loss may have had something to do with the defense as well.
BigDaddy65
December-13th-2006, 11:51 AM
Very true. Let's not forget that the whole Dallas team lost that game, not just Romo. Romo would have had to put up 50 points to win that game. That being said, Dallas's loss may have had something to do with the defense as well.
Well said sir. I think that kind of loss has more to do with the defense than to Romo. Allowing something about 526 yards and almost 50 points told the story.
Riggo#44
December-13th-2006, 12:12 PM
I charted the Saints game and he wasn't nearly as bad as I originally thought.
Only a matter of time...
tr1
December-13th-2006, 12:20 PM
Seriously, I mean on and on we go. I know I dont have to click on the thread but why is half the threads in this section about you saying the cowboys suck balls and romo sucks. What have the redskins shown over any other team that we are going to a contender in the next couple of years. I think Campbell could be a great qb but he has done nothing compared to Romo in his first 4 games so with your logic we need to draft a qb as well. And here we go with another pissing match as usual.
You need to visit the Stadium...there's plenty of Skins bashing over there.
This thread isn't about the Skins.
tr1
December-13th-2006, 12:24 PM
You guys take it easy on TR1. Trashing the Cowboys is really all he has in his sad, little life. Let's just take a look at some of his recent threads:
Romo hits a low (http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php?t=184559)
Puke Fans Are In Denial (http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php?t=184563)
Bad Time For Romo To Become Hand-Off Machine (http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php?t=184674)
How 'Bout Those Cowboys! (http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php?t=184333)
Cowboys crash to earth (http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php?t=184383)
Puke Notes: Foundation showing cracks (http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php?t=184560)
Star Telegram: Saints march right into Dallas and cut through Romo parade (http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php?t=184385)
Pukes haven't won a playoff game in ten years...make it eleven. (http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php?t=184019)
TO's Birthday Party Might Mean Puke Loss? (http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php?t=184055)
If he couldn't start ridiculous Cowboy threads like this one, he wouldn't even have a reason to go on...
BigDave...we've missed you!
:laugh:
tr1
December-13th-2006, 12:24 PM
Hey TR1. I am not writing this to instigate an argument. I am not wrtitng this to get you riled up. I am writing this in the hope that you may look at what you post before you post it.
I dont know where you come from with your posts, but I completeley understand you disdain for the Cowboys. I hate them too.
But some of the stuff you post is complete BS. In fact, the more I read your posts, the more you seem like an in house troll without a clue. You dont back up anything you say with anything credible. Most of what you say is your opinion and you are entitled, but put more thoughts behind your posts man.
To say that the Cowbitches are going to draft a QB after Romo has but one bad game is rediculous. I wish that our QB was playing as well as him. Not to take anything from Campbell. He is performing well, but needs some work. Save it for when it counts, instead of trying to get a rise out of HHM or THA.
If you are so intent on starting complete BS threads to entertain yourself, drop by a Cowbitch forum and rile them up there cause no offense man, but you get burned everytime you make a cowbitch comment here. I dont like to see one of my own get burned so much. Hey! You would not be Kenny Wright would you? That might explain the burning.
Here is to friendly EDUCATED ribbing!:cheers:
HTTR Man!
Please, put me on ignore.
HTTR, Man!
CPortJGibbs89
December-13th-2006, 12:25 PM
You need to visit the Stadium...there's plenty of Skins bashing over there.
This thread isn't about the Skins.I live in the stadium, I just thought I would voice my opinion as you do. Some people like to actually live in reality. I knew you would resort to questioning my allegiance to this team and thats fine by me I could care less. Your **** gets old and I know I am not the only one that agrees.
tr1
December-13th-2006, 12:26 PM
Before the Saints game, Romo's QB rating in the pocket was 102. I charted the Saints game and he wasn't nearly as bad as I originally thought. Tons of mental errors made by O-Linemen, RB's, and WR's. The only thing I would've like to have seen was the coaching tape on a few of the plays where he wound up throwing the ball away or running with it to see if receivers were open or not. It didn't appear like they were.
In reality, the Dallas offensive personnel has to play better which could be more of a problem than if Romo wasn't playing well.
YAKUZA
Is he the franchise qb?
BigDave95
December-13th-2006, 12:27 PM
BigDave...we've missed you!
:laugh:
I got banned. Can you believe it?! Apparently I got a little too feisty in the "Brandon Lloyd is a better WR than TO" thread so they gave me the boot. My suspension is over now though so I look forward to many more of your insightful and informative threads.
tr1
December-13th-2006, 12:29 PM
I got banned. Can you believe it?! Apparently I got a little too feisty in the "Brandon Lloyd is a better WR than TO" thread so they gave me the boot. My suspension is over now though so I look forward to many more of your insightful and informative threads.
Stay tuned.
CPortJGibbs89
December-13th-2006, 12:33 PM
Stay tuned.Haha were still waiting. :cheers:
BigDave95
December-13th-2006, 12:33 PM
Stay tuned.
I heard the Patriots are also in the market for a new starting QB since that bum they throw out there went 12/25 for 78 yards this past Sunday. Hope they don't draft ahead of us...
tr1
December-13th-2006, 12:35 PM
I heard the Patriots are also in the market for a new starting QB since that bum they throw out there went 12/25 for 78 yards this past Sunday. Hope they don't draft ahead of us...
Okay, let me guess Romo=Brady?
:laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
CPortJGibbs89
December-13th-2006, 12:37 PM
Okay, let me guess Romo=Brady?
:laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:TR1=Fireborn5. :laugh: :rotflmao:
BigDave95
December-13th-2006, 12:38 PM
Okay, let me guess Romo=Brady?
:laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
Only in the sense that they both had crappy games on Sunday. According to you, it only takes one bad game to pull the plug on a QB.
zoony
December-13th-2006, 12:38 PM
The funniest part of TR1's threads is all of the opposing teams fans that continually ***** and whine... call him a troll, cry foul, etc..
BUT THEY CONTINUE TO RESPOND TO HIS THREADS!
I wonder about the intelligence of our opposing teams fans. Seriously.
tr1
December-13th-2006, 12:38 PM
TR1=Fireborn5. :laugh: :rotflmao:
Hey, really, put me on ignore. I'll make it a point not to respond to you anymore.
HTTR!
tr1
December-13th-2006, 12:39 PM
The funniest part of TR1's threads is all of the opposing teams fans that continually ***** and whine... call him a troll, cry foul, etc..
BUT THEY CONTINUE TO RESPOND TO HIS THREADS!
I wonder about the intelligence of our opposing teams fans. Seriously.
SSshhhhhhh!
;)
CPortJGibbs89
December-13th-2006, 12:42 PM
Hey, really, put me on ignore. I'll make it a point not to respond to you anymore.
HTTR!Why put you on ignore that would ruin my fun. I am bored at work you really entertain me with are you logic and vast knowledge on the skins and cowboys. Why cant you respond to me I am trying to just get your point of view on things and understand where you coming from. You seem like a really smart guy. Everyone here really respects your opinions.
Number5
December-13th-2006, 12:43 PM
I live in the stadium, I just thought I would voice my opinion as you do. Some people like to actually live in reality. I knew you would resort to questioning my allegiance to this team and thats fine by me I could care less. Your **** gets old and I know I am not the only one that agrees.
WELCOME TO OUR REALITY! :cheers:
CPortJGibbs89
December-13th-2006, 12:46 PM
WELCOME TO OUR REALITY! :cheers:Haha thank you. I finally respond to this guys posts and he says he is going to ignore me. Not sure I understand his logic but hey its cool if you cant have a conversation with someone who can see both ends of the spectrum and take off his burgundy and gold glasses occasionally.
OWUeagleMD
December-13th-2006, 01:15 PM
The funniest part of TR1's threads is all of the opposing teams fans that continually ***** and whine... call him a troll, cry foul, etc..
BUT THEY CONTINUE TO RESPOND TO HIS THREADS!
I wonder about the intelligence of our opposing teams fans. Seriously.
This thread, I think, is filled with Redskins fans bashing tr1. Some Cowboys fans, but there are at least a few Skins fans in here.
Not to mention, it's pretty much impossible to post in ATN without responding to tr1's threads. I'd say he represents about 50 percent of the threads around here at any given time.
zoony
December-13th-2006, 01:26 PM
This thread, I think, is filled with Redskins fans bashing tr1. Some Cowboys fans, but there are at least a few Skins fans in here.
Not to mention, it's pretty much impossible to post in ATN without responding to tr1's threads. I'd say he represents about 50 percent of the threads around here at any given time.
Please don't make me go back and quote all of the opposing teams fans posts in this thread, along with posts made by those same fans in other threads accusing TR1 of being nothing but a troll, etc.
I've got better things to do with my time, and truth be told, I think you get the point. :)
.....
OWUeagleMD
December-13th-2006, 01:35 PM
Please don't make me go back and quote all of the opposing teams fans posts in this thread, along with posts made by those same fans in other threads accusing TR1 of being nothing but a troll, etc.
I've got better things to do with my time, and truth be told, I think you get the point. :)
.....
Did I sound like I dick in my post?
I thought I was being largely speculative...
InTikiITrust
December-13th-2006, 01:35 PM
Draft a QB?
Not a chance.
BigDave95
December-13th-2006, 03:59 PM
Draft a QB?
Not a chance.
Now while I think there's ZERO chance the Cowboys go in search of a new starting QB this offseason (Tony Romo is the man for the VERY MINIMUM of next season), I do think we draft a QB. My guess is that a 2nd day pick will be spent on a QB for developmental purposes and a veteran backup will be brought in to replace Bledsoe when he gets the axe.
Switchgear
December-13th-2006, 04:45 PM
My guess is that a 2nd day pick will be spent on a QB for developmental purposes and a veteran backup will be brought in to replace Bledsoe when he gets the axe.
You can have Brunell, but not for anything less than a 2nd rounder. Oh wait, you don't have our FO calling the shots. Never mind.
DeMarco Murray 29
December-13th-2006, 04:54 PM
I wouldn't mind somebody like Jared Zabransky. Who you can get the 2nd day and develop. Still need a vet QB on the roster though.
HeHateMe
December-13th-2006, 05:23 PM
SSshhhhhhh!
;)
Consession that she is a troll.
Finally.
tr1
December-14th-2006, 07:31 AM
Considering the fickleness of the puke fans, I think the doom will set in.
They'll likely be tied for first place with two losses in a row...and considering Parcell's recent late season record for nose dives, they'll likely give up hope.
Though the pukes would like to run, Atlanta's run defense has been its one bright spot. Their pass defense sucks, but it's been shown that Romo can't handle taking on the responsiblility for winning on his own.
And as for Vick, considering the puke's weak pass defense, if he has an average game, Atlanta should do well.
I like the Falcons.
:laugh: :laugh:
thespaniard
December-14th-2006, 08:10 AM
If the Pukes Win Saturday Night, Will tr1's head explode? :rolleyes:
Mods please merge with the 100 other Romo threads tr1 has made..
7. Ensure the topic you wish to initiate a thread about hasn’t already been posted. If you are reporting Redskins "news" or "rumors" more than a few hours old, please use the Search Feature or scan the first two pages of the forum before posting, to ensure the news hasn't already been posted and the topic discussed. Multiple topics will be closed or merged. This is a very large and active community, with sweeping media coverage and up-to-the-minute updates. More than likely, if the news is older than a few hours, the information has already posted and is subject of active debate. If you wish to discuss that topic, you are encouraged to do so in the existing thread.
CPortJGibbs89
December-14th-2006, 08:21 AM
Yes TR1 Romo fever will be gone and everyone will declare you a genious. Excuse me while I go comment in the other Romo thread you posted two minutes ago.
dreamshatterer
December-14th-2006, 08:32 AM
No, cause the Boys will make the playoffs so it shall continue. Unless they have a major meltdown and lose out.
Grimm
December-14th-2006, 08:38 AM
We can only hope...
Who Del
December-14th-2006, 08:51 AM
Haha!! You got your own mega merge tr1!
Romo sucks! Romo sucks!
HeHateMe
December-14th-2006, 10:52 PM
Cut Romo now.
End all this madness.
He's a bust.
Yes, an undrafted free agent is a bust.
BenchSeanGlennon
December-15th-2006, 08:32 AM
Oh noes a first year starting QB has had 2 poor starts. Clearly it's the end of the world.
I guess in this case the Redskins have no reason to look for Campbell to do anything in the future... :doh:
Riggo#44
December-15th-2006, 08:47 AM
Oh noes a first year starting QB has had 2 poor starts. Clearly it's the end of the world.
I guess in this case the Redskins have no reason to look for Campbell to do anything in the future... :doh:
Another sterling contribution from our Cowboy friends.
KLJ
December-15th-2006, 09:13 AM
Another sterling contribution from our Cowboy friends.don't you think he has a valid point though? judging by what redskins fans say about romo, you would assume that they feel that there is no hope for cambell either..
young qbs struggle.. there is no getting around that
Riggo#44
December-15th-2006, 09:30 AM
don't you think he has a valid point though? judging by what redskins fans say about romo, you would assume that they feel that there is no hope for cambell either..
young qbs struggle.. there is no getting around that
No one in their right mind would say Romo or Campbell are busts at this point. I am revelling in Romo crashing back to earth and the utter silence from most of the Cowboy blowhards on here.
After all the hype, it is nice to see him fall flat - jsut to shut some people up.
Number5
December-15th-2006, 09:36 AM
Yes TR1 Romo fever will be gone and everyone will declare you a genious. Excuse me while I go comment in the other Romo thread you posted two minutes ago.
And it's because of this post, that a customer just asked me if I was laughing at her! :laugh: :laugh:
CPortJGibbs89
December-15th-2006, 09:37 AM
And it's because of this post, that a customer just asked me if I was laughing at her! :laugh: :laugh:Thank you thank you I am here until 5.
Number5
December-15th-2006, 09:38 AM
Thank you thank you I am here until 5.
Gotta admit bro....I like your style. Plus you talk football as well!
As Darth Vadar once said...."Impressive, Most impressive!"
CPortJGibbs89
December-15th-2006, 09:42 AM
Gotta admit bro....I like your style. Plus you talk football as well!
As Darth Vadar once said...."Impressive, Most impressive!"Thanks man I appreciate it. I think TR1 put me on ignore because he wont talk to me anymore. We were really starting to become good friends.
Number5
December-15th-2006, 09:53 AM
Thanks man I appreciate it. I think TR1 put me on ignore because he wont talk to me anymore. We were really starting to become good friends.
Lol.....
Anyways, for some odd reason, I think the Cowboys will lose. Owens picked a HELL of a time to talk about his "inner demons at Cowboys heaven!" Romo will be tested because for all the talk about Vick, the loss of Dunn and the other RB, it's the defense of Atlanta that will be the factor. A healthy Abraham and Brookings make a fast defense even faster. Hall had his way with TO last season and I believe that DJ Williams can cover Whitten.
The best chance Dallas has in my eyes is to run it with Barber and not Jones. Barber is more punishing and the in your face attack his suited better to punch the undersized Dirty Birds around.
BWareofDWare94
December-15th-2006, 09:56 AM
Lol.....
Anyways, for some odd reason, I think the Cowboys will lose. Owens picked a HELL of a time to talk about his "inner demons at Cowboys heaven!" Romo will be tested because for all the talk about Vick, the loss of Dunn and the other RB, it's the defense of Atlanta that will be the factor. A healthy Abraham and Brookings make a fast defense even faster. Hall had his way with TO last season and I believe that DJ Williams can cover Whitten.
The best chance Dallas has in my eyes is to run it with Barber and not Jones. Barber is more punishing and the in your face attack his suited better to punch the undersized Dirty Birds around.
much respect for ya, but HAHA Hall had his way with Owens, in route to Owens going 7-110.
Falcons are almost dead last in pass D, the Cowboys will run the ball quite a bit, just to set up the pass, expect big games from TO, Glenn and Witten.
CPortJGibbs89
December-15th-2006, 10:05 AM
Lol.....
Anyways, for some odd reason, I think the Cowboys will lose. Owens picked a HELL of a time to talk about his "inner demons at Cowboys heaven!" Romo will be tested because for all the talk about Vick, the loss of Dunn and the other RB, it's the defense of Atlanta that will be the factor. A healthy Abraham and Brookings make a fast defense even faster. Hall had his way with TO last season and I believe that DJ Williams can cover Whitten.
The best chance Dallas has in my eyes is to run it with Barber and not Jones. Barber is more punishing and the in your face attack his suited better to punch the undersized Dirty Birds around.I hope you right. I still dont understand why Barber does not touch the ball more than Jones. Jones has that break away speed but Barber is a beast between the tackles and can wear defenses down. It should be a good game but I wouldnt be surprised if Dallas bounced back. What is your feeling on your battle coming up. Garcia is playing really well right now, if you guys stop the run somewhat I think you have a good shot. Nevermind I will check the thread you started my bad.
OWUeagleMD
December-15th-2006, 10:07 AM
much respect for ya, but HAHA Hall had his way with Owens, in route to Owens going 7-110.
Falcons are almost dead last in pass D, the Cowboys will run the ball quite a bit, just to set up the pass, expect big games from TO, Glenn and Witten.
It is quite ironic how quickly things change in the NFL. Last year, it was Eagles fans defending Owens against Hall last season because of his 7-110 stat line when Skins and Cowboys fans said he was controlled. Now it's the exact opposite.
For what it's worth, Owens didn't have much of an impact in that game, despite the nice ink on the stat page. On the final drive of the game the Birds threw to him 3 straight times before turning it over on downs. Owens didn't ahve an inch of space on Hall on any of those plays.
BWareofDWare94
December-15th-2006, 10:13 AM
It is quite ironic how quickly things change in the NFL. Last year, it was Eagles fans defending Owens against Hall last season because of his 7-110 stat line when Skins and Cowboys fans said he was controlled. Now it's the exact opposite.
For what it's worth, Owens didn't have much of an impact in that game, despite the nice ink on the stat page. On the final drive of the game the Birds threw to him 3 straight times before turning it over on downs. Owens didn't ahve an inch of space on Hall on any of those plays.
Ok, ill take a pass on that, because i wasnt involved in any discussions about TO when he was with the Eagles vs the Falcons.
Well i guess we will see on Saturday how the two match up, but stats or no stats, he will be a factor in the games as will Glenn.
TO will most likley drop a pass while wide open, and Glenn will make some sort of great grab either in the endzone or sideline.
I predict a close game, with Dallas coming out on top by 7, but hell what else would a Cowboys homer say on a Skins board!
HeHateMe
December-16th-2006, 11:43 PM
tr1....come out, come out where ever you are!!!
THEHEREAFTER
December-17th-2006, 12:06 AM
He'll be back around Wednesday. No articles to post right now to fit his agenda. Nothing to talk about.
tr1
December-17th-2006, 07:34 AM
I didn't see the game...
And stop breaking the rules by trying to call me out.
I'll try to watch it this week...
THEHEREAFTER
December-17th-2006, 07:48 AM
I didn't see the game...
And stop breaking the rules by trying to call me out.
I'll try to watch it this week...
Of course you didn't see THIS game. :doh: :laugh:
C'mon mr. 1 WE WANT ARTICLES! WE WANT ARTICLES!
tr1
December-17th-2006, 07:52 AM
Of course you didn't see THIS game. :doh: :laugh:
C'mon mr. 1 WE WANT ARTICLES! WE WANT ARTICLES!
Please, post some.
I'm sure they'll go down well here. :doh:
Oh, and I'm excited about the new ban policy...
tick...tick...tick.
:laugh:
THEHEREAFTER
December-17th-2006, 07:56 AM
Oh, and I'm excited about the new ban policy...
tick...tick...tick.
Ohh I'm sure you are Dwight! Have you pressed the button yet? :rolleyes: :(
Westbrook36
December-17th-2006, 08:39 AM
tr1, don't be a coward. If the Boys lost 35-0, would you come in here talking about how you didn't see the game?
THEHEREAFTER
December-17th-2006, 08:59 AM
tr1, don't be a coward.
Impossible!
If the Boys lost 35-0, would you come in here talking about how you didn't see the game?
Of Course not which is another reason he's a complete fraud. I don't expect any love for the Boys on this site. It's the hypocrites and the inconsistent non-man behavior that irkes me. :laugh:
redskin81
December-17th-2006, 09:03 AM
Impossible!
Of Course not which is another reason he's a complete fraud. I don't expect any love for the Boys on this site. It's the hypocrites and the inconsistent non-man behavior that irkes me. :laugh:
He probably doesnt have nfl network. News flash: the Nfl doesnt revolve around the cowboys. Man I cant wait until you get blown out in the first round again. Lets see if your still arouns. Because I sure didnt see you when ATL was torching your overhyped secondary.
HeHateMe
December-17th-2006, 09:44 AM
I didn't see the game...
And stop breaking the rules by trying to call me out.
I'll try to watch it this week...
Calling you out? Hardly.
You seem to chime in with your insightful analysis everytime Dallas loses.
Just wanted to hear your assessment of this one.
And why am I not surpised you didnt see.
Well, you can read all about it as you do every week and also be sure to let the rest of the board know it too with all the great articles.
And Bubba, find one from Phil Riddle for me. Thats some good reading!
HeHateMe
December-17th-2006, 09:45 AM
tr1, don't be a coward. If the Boys lost 35-0, would you come in here talking about how you didn't see the game?
Wayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy to late for that.
HeHateMe
December-17th-2006, 09:46 AM
News flash: the Nfl doesnt revolve around the cowboys.
You'd never guess that by reading ATN after a Dallas loss.
Triple Threat
December-17th-2006, 02:36 PM
I didn't see the game...
And stop breaking the rules by trying to call me out.
I'll try to watch it this week...
I never thought o would live to see the day that Tr1 is speechless! :laugh: :laugh:
Come out come out where ever you are. Come eat your BS sandwich you served for your self once again! :notworthy
22 for 29 i want to hear you spin this one. Spin away oh dumb one!
tr1
December-17th-2006, 03:01 PM
tr1, don't be a coward. If the Boys lost 35-0, would you come in here talking about how you didn't see the game?
I'll watch the game later this week...I'll be back.
Hey, who dat beat them Aints!
:laugh:
tr1
December-17th-2006, 03:01 PM
I never thought o would live to see the day that Tr1 is speechless! :laugh: :laugh:
Come out come out where ever you are. Come eat your BS sandwich you served for your self once again! :notworthy
22 for 29 i want to hear you spin this one. Spin away oh dumb one!
Nice Avatar...considering your post, I'd suspect your days are numbered too. :laugh:
Powered by vBulletin™ Version 4.0.6 Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.