PDA

View Full Version : NFL.com (You Gotta Go Deep In This League)



Number5
May-23rd-2007, 07:17 PM
Excellent read about the depth in the NFL. Gives props to the Eagles, Redskins, and others for their depth on both sides of the ball....



http://www.nfl.com/news/story/10193430

You gotta go deep in this league
By Pat Kirwan
NFL.com Senior Analyst


(May 23, 2007) -- NFL teams have May thru July to fortify the back end of their rosters, and there's no time to lose. As any NFL fan knows, the 16-game season is a war of attrition. It doesn't take long for teams to call on their roster depth to move forward. Where would the Eagles have been in 2006 if Jeff Garcia wasn't on the roster? Garcia, a former starting QB who bounced around the league in recent years, was grabbed up by a smart Philadelphia franchise and he was good enough to keep the team on its winning path.


The Eagles had one of my very best preseason depth charts headed into 2006 and will be good again in 2007. On the other hand, for a number of teams the depth on the roster isn't good enough to keep the winning going when a few choice starters go down with injury. Which clubs lead the way in the roster depth issue? Well, a list of critical questions should lead you to understand if your favorite team is ready for the injuries and holdouts that will start to mount up during organized team activities. For example, the Broncos lost second-year tight end Tony Scheffler for a few months with a broken foot, but their roster depth with Daniel Graham and Stephen Alexander makes the loss less significant than it could have been.

You would hope your team has an answer for all of these questions, but not even the best teams can check off all of the critical components to the depth issue. Keep in mind these players need the experience, talent or both to perform without a lot of practice time until they are called upon. (There's a 2006 example behind each depth question).

OFFENSIVE QUESTIONS
1. An experienced backup quarterback who can win more than half the games he may have to start. (Jeff Garcia)
2. A running back who can come off the bench and deliver 1,000 yards. (Ladell Betts)
3. A third wide receiver who can step up to a starter's spot and deliver five to six receptions a game. (Reche Caldwell)
4. A swing tackle who can stop a pass rush on either the left or right side. (Roman Oben )
5. An inside lineman who can play center or guard ... or at least give the line coach the flexibility to change the combination inside. (Floyd Womack)
6. A second tight end who does not reduce the offensive package. (Stephen Alexander)

DEFENSIVE QUESTIONS
1. A third defensive end who can rush the passer. (Trent Cole)
2. A third defensive tackle who can create a rotation inside to keep the D-line fresh. (Alfonso Boone)
3. At least two backup linebackers with big contributions on special teams. (Larry Izzo )
4. A third corner to build a nickel defense and start when needed. (Philip Buchanon)
5. A third safety to build a dime defense and be versatile enough to play strong or free safety in a pinch. (Chris Harris )

When I look at roster depth, I start with the backup quarterback before any other position. With that in mind, only half the league really has a backup QB with a chance to keep the winning happening. After one question, the league is cut in half. For example, the Colts and Patriots would really struggle if they lost their franchise signal-callers. Neither team has a "Jeff Garcia" backing up the starter.

After the quarterback issue is solved, it's on to backup running back. Is there a 1,000-yard rusher on the bench waiting to take over? Ladell Betts did it for Washington and it looks like Michael Turner would keep the Chargers rolling along -- which is the reason A.J. Smith kept him even though some team apparently offered a first-round pick for him. After the running back question, the depth issue reduced the league to 11 teams.

A swing offensive tackle, a guard/center, a third wide receiver, and a second tight end are all required offensive players for any team thinking about playing meaningful games in December and January. The Eagles, Bears, Redskins and Rams look pretty good when the offensive questions are asked and answered.

After the offensive depth is addressed, it's on to the defense where team need a third defensive end with specialty pass rush skills, a third defensive tackle to keep the rotation going, two backup linebackers who are core players on special teams, a nickel corner and a dime safety. Naturally, some teams look better prepared to withstand the rigors of an NFL season if the defensive depth is challenged

Once again, the Eagles are high on the list and are joined by the Cowboys, Buccaneers, Steelers and Patriots. Philadelphia still has depth questions on the back end of its defense, but look at this list of nonstarters on its roster: Quarterbacks Kelly Holcomb and A.J. Feeley; running backs Correll Buckhalter and Tony Hunt, tight end Matt Schobel; offensive tackle Winston Justice; guard Max Jean-Gilles; and wide receiver Greg Lewis. That is quality depth.

A team like the Redskins may be sitting in the middle of the pack in the NFC, but if injuries become a critical factor around the league, Washington has a very good chance of surviving. Quarterback Mark Brunell, running back Ladell Betts, wide receiver Antwaan Randle El, offensive tackle Jason Fabini, guard/center Ross Tucker, defensive end Renaldo Wynn, defensive tackle Joe Salave'a, cornerback Fred Smoot, safety Pierson Prioleau and linebacker Lemar Marshall make up an impressive group of nonstarters on the team's roster.



Nice for the Skins fans to read something in the National Media that isn't bashing them. And its just as nice to read an article that gives the Eagles F.O props for it depth.

bubba9497
May-23rd-2007, 07:25 PM
http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php?t=199335


Search is our friend :)

McNabbOwnsFedEx
May-23rd-2007, 07:45 PM
I'd rather start a flame war in the redskins section of the board. I'd like to discuss the Eagles and other teams in the article in this thread. Unless you want us all to go over there and talk about the Eagles in the stadium.

Number5
May-23rd-2007, 07:49 PM
http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php?t=199335


Search is our friend :)

That was in the Stadium. Most of us have no reason to go there unlike you Bubba. I posted this article for those of us who are would like to not only read about the Redskins, but have interest in reading the rest of the article. See, if you actually read it, you'll find out that in fact, the Washington Redskins aren't the only team in the galaxy......


Then again, according to some....they in fact are.....

bubba9497
May-23rd-2007, 07:55 PM
That was in the Stadium. Most of us have no reason to go there unlike you Bubba. I posted this article for those of us who are would like to not only read about the Redskins, but have interest in reading the rest of the article. See, if you actually read it, you'll find out that in fact, the Washington Redskins aren't the only team in the galaxy......


Then again, according to some....they in fact are.....
wait, you can't click a link :laugh:


which is what you are supposed to do, since you are NOT supposed to copy the entire article


more lame excuses not to go into the stadium forum :rolleyes:

bubba9497
May-23rd-2007, 07:56 PM
I'd rather start a flame war in the redskins section of the board. I'd like to discuss the Eagles and other teams in the article in this thread. Unless you want us all to go over there and talk about the Eagles in the stadium.


you start a flame war you won't have to worry about discussing the eagles or any other team on this board :)

Number5
May-23rd-2007, 08:08 PM
wait, you can't click a link :laugh:


which is what you are supposed to do, since you are NOT supposed to copy the entire article


more lame excuses not to go into the stadium forum :rolleyes:

I have no problem going over to the stadium....but if knowing I'm going to talk about the Eagles and other teams that are listed, does it really make sense to discuss them in the Redskins Talk only forum?

Please remember that you aren't talking to an idiot......thank you.

P.S.....mighty testy Bubba! That Clinton comment and the Commish's response doesn't have you on edge does it? :D

tr1
May-23rd-2007, 08:13 PM
That was in the Stadium. Most of us have no reason to go there unlike you Bubba. I posted this article for those of us who are would like to not only read about the Redskins, but have interest in reading the rest of the article. See, if you actually read it, you'll find out that in fact, the Washington Redskins aren't the only team in the galaxy......


Then again, according to some....they in fact are.....

:jerk:

bubba9497
May-23rd-2007, 08:20 PM
I have no problem going over to the stadium....but if knowing I'm going to talk about the Eagles and other teams that are listed, does it really make sense to discuss them in the Redskins Talk only forum?

Please remember that you aren't talking to an idiot......thank you.



but yet your comments in your posting of this duplicate article


Excellent read about the depth in the NFL. Gives props to the Eagles, Redskins, and others for their depth on both sides of the ball....


Nice for the Skins fans to read something in the National Media that isn't bashing them. And its just as nice to read an article that gives the Eagles F.O props for it depth.

you contradict yourself

you are talking about the Redskins in the ATN forum :whoknows:

If the Article includes other aspects than the Redskins... there isn't anything wrong with discussing the entire ARTICLE

in fact many articles in the Stadium forum about the NFC East include discussions of the other three teams, not just the Redskins... just like they do in ATN

it is only an issue when either articles posted or thread topics are solely about one team posted in the wrong forum, or when the Redskins ARE USED TO direct the topic off the NFC East team being discussed in the ATN

and yet even though that is pointed out, it still happens quite often :laugh:


Please remember that you aren't talking to an idiot......thank you.




P.S.....mighty testy Bubba! That Clinton comment and the Commish's response doesn't have you on edge does it? :D

:nono: for shame using a cheap shot to take the heat off yourself

I am staff, and know the rules... and only pointing an obvious mistake so you will know better next time :D

OWUeagleMD
May-23rd-2007, 09:19 PM
What I'm confused about is why Pat Kirwan hasn't been killed by the evil media cabal that is sworn to ensure all national media attention on the Redskins is negative.

Since when are they allowed to speak positively about Snyder's guys?