PDA

View Full Version : A little history lesson...



Vilandil Tasardur
September-27th-2007, 09:12 PM
I just thought I'd take a quick look at the NFL's history and how the superbowls seem to be working. What I intend to do is break down good teams when they had very good runs or windows of opportunity, and then try and see how long it took these teams to return to the super bowl after their original dynasty had shut and they were forced to look for a new window. Lets start with the old:

In 1967 and 1968 the Packers won the first two superbowls after winning I believe 3 championships before that. They made a pretty good mark on the game as it was shaping into what it is today. The Packers would not win another superbowl until 1997.
Span between runs- 29 years

In 1969, and 1970 the superbowl was won by teams who have yet to win another superbowl. The Jets, and Chiefs.

In 1971 the Colts won the superbowl, they would return to win in 2007.
Span between runs- 36 years

In 1972 the Pukes won, with another win in 1978, and appearances in 1979 and 1976. They would return to the superbowl and win in 93, 94, and 96.
Span between runs- 15 years

In 1973 and 1974 the Dolphins would win the superbowl, they have yet to return.

The steelers would go on to win in 1975, 76, 79, and 80. They would not return and win until 2006.
Span between runs- 26 years

The Raiders won in 77 and 81, and have not won a superbowl since.

Then the 49ers would go on to win in 82, 85, 89, 90, and 95. I will be entirely honest and say that I do not know enough history to properly state where one window ended and another began here. I can simply to my best to say that this seems to be the only evidence of a balanced and spread out team over the years except for perhaps the steelers.

Our Washington Redskins won in 83, 88, and 92, and as we well know, have not returned since.

The Bears won in 86 and have not returned since.

The Giants won in 87 and 91, and have not returned since.

In 1998 the Broncos finally got a win, which they followed in 99 and have not returned since.

The Rams won in 2000, and the Ravens in 2001. Neither has won since.

In 2003 the Bucs won and have not returned since.

The rest of the decade has been the heart of the Patriots window while the Colts and Steelers have stolen some of the headlines. For the purpose of this argument, I will not count any teams since prior to 2002, the first of the Patriots wins.

Since the first superbowl played, Ten of the teams that have one at least one dynasty have failed to win another superbowl after their first window had ended. That is to say, that certain teams won one, maybe 2 or three superbowls with one group of guys and one group of players in one age, and TEN of those teams have yet to open a knew window and return.

When these ten teams are taken out of the equation, we are left with:
Packers- 29 years
Colts- 36 years
Pukes- 15 years
Steelers- 26 years

This means that of the 4 teams who have put together two different windows of players and philosophies to win superbowls, their average time span between is 26.5 years. That’s a long time.

One more point, of the 15 teams that I factored into my assessment, ONE of them, the 49ers, put their superbowl runs very spread out and dotted through the eras. The other fourteen see only FOUR teams actually put together a second surge of superbowl victories, and 11 have yet to return to glory as they say.

It may be a roundabout way of saying it, but if we commonly think about the 15-16 years of failure since our superbowl, depending on exactly which dates you use and all, it wouldn't be out of the question to think that we might have to wait another 10 years to meet that 26.5 year average. And that’s IF we would make it at all, some teams have been waiting much, much longer.

Don't get me wrong, I want a superbowl as much as the next guy, but doesn't history seem to be biting us in the rear?

Thoughts, questions, disagreements? Anything is very welcome, I thought I did all right research, but I do love me some constructive criticism.

DButz65
September-27th-2007, 09:15 PM
Didnt the Giants return in like 99 against the Ravens? Or was that later, i cant remember heh

Other than that nice break down

Rdskn4Lyf21
September-27th-2007, 09:16 PM
Hell, if we get 1, just 1 in my lifetime I will die happy.

praise_gibbs
September-27th-2007, 09:18 PM
So, 2018 or so?


I got time to wait. Gonna go take a nap bwteen now and then and all will be well.

Rdskn4Lyf21
September-27th-2007, 09:19 PM
Didnt the Giants return in like 99 against the Ravens? Or was that later, i cant remember heh

Other than that nice break down

Yeah, a 35-7 spanking by the Ravens...

bulldog
September-27th-2007, 09:19 PM
Raiders won in 1984.

Bears returned to the Super Bowl this past year losing to the Colts 29-17.

Giants returned to the Super Bowl after the 2000 season losing to the Ravens 31-7.

The Dolphins returned to the Super Bowl in 1983 and 1985, losing to the Skins and 49ers.

I don't really see any trendlines that are instructive in re the Super Bowl, other than the conferences seem to go in cycles of dominance and that dominance is brought about typically by the level of coaching and the emergence of franchise quarterbacks.

The AFC has dominated recently which is not surprising considering the best two quarterbacks in the NFL, Manning and Brady, play in that conference.

When you are starting Rex Grossman at qb in a Super Bowl it is indicative of the relative strength of your conference.

Ditto for David Woodley in 1983 and Tony Eason in 1986.

Vilandil Tasardur
September-27th-2007, 09:20 PM
Didnt the Giants return in like 99 against the Ravens? Or was that later, i cant remember heh

Other than that nice break downYeah, I was only doing teams that returned and won, mostly because I didn't feel like looking up the runner ups. I probably worded the Giants part wrong, but you're right they did lose to the Ravens.

Also, those dates are all "off" by one year because they are when the superbowl was played, not the NFL season for which is corresponds to if that makes sense.

TheGift
September-27th-2007, 09:22 PM
Oh never mind lol.

Vilandil Tasardur
September-27th-2007, 09:24 PM
Raiders won in 1984.

Bears returned to the Super Bowl this past year losing to the Colts 29-17.

Giants returned to the Super Bowl after the 2000 season losing to the Ravens 31-7.

The Dolphins returned to the Super Bowl in 1983 and 1985, losing to the Skins and 49ers.

I don't really see any trendlines that are instructive in re the Super Bowl, other than the conferences seem to go in cycles of dominance and that dominance is brought about typically by the level of coaching and the emergence of franchise quarterbacks.

The AFC has dominated recently which is not surprising considering the best two quarterbacks in the NFL, Manning and Brady, play in that conference.

When you are starting Rex Grossman at qb in a Super Bowl it is indicative of the relative strength of your conference.

Ditto for David Woodley in 1983 and Tony Eason in 1986.I see your point about the runner ups.

I also find the trends in the conferences very curious. I think between Griese and Elway there are only like 2-3 AFC winners (could be wrong but its a small number) and yet the AFC dominates now. Its pretty intruiging actually.

HEavyJumbo85
September-27th-2007, 09:31 PM
I see your point about the runner ups.

I also find the trends in the conferences very curious. I think between Griese and Elway there are only like 2-3 AFC winners (could be wrong but its a small number) and yet the AFC dominates now. Its pretty intruiging actually.

yeah i'm pretty sure that the NFC won 12 in a row at one point and the AFC now has won i think 8 out of the last 10.

Touchdown Redskins
September-28th-2007, 12:31 AM
I could see this taking another 10 years. Our coaching is going to be in flux either after this year or the year after, and who knows how well the next coach will do? What if Saunders or Williams gets the job and can't coach? What if we bring in someone else who wants to bring in his own guys, then that's another 2 - 3 years of rebuilding. Honestly, we don't have much of a window right now, and with coaching changes in our future, it'll only close more.

CM916
September-28th-2007, 12:59 AM
So, when I am like 35, and either gray or bald, we will win one? As much as I'd love to share the experience with my own hypothetical children, the sooner the better. I don't know how many more years my window of easy access to season tickets will last.

phishisthegreatstuff
September-28th-2007, 01:25 AM
i only see us as one player off. A great DE. That would make a world of a difference.

Lombardi's_kid_brother
September-28th-2007, 07:49 AM
So, you are saying that it is hard to win a Super Bowl.

Good times.

Mark The Homer
September-28th-2007, 07:56 AM
Something just seems wrong with the Redskins. It's not so much that we haven't won any superbowls in 15 years and counting -- it's that we can't even win a divisional playoff game in 15 years. That seems almost impossible. How many NFL teams can make that claim? Damn few, I bet.

youngestson
September-28th-2007, 08:27 AM
In 1973 and 1974 the Dolphins would win the superbowl, they have yet to return.

The Dolphins lost to the REDSKINS in XVII and to the 49ers in IXX


The Raiders won in 77 and 81, and have not won a superbowl since.

The Raiders beat us like bongos in XVIII


I don't object to your over-all theory that building a champ is a hard task requireing time and more than a little luck, and it will be interesting to see how the league reacts to the Colts & New England's apparent dominance this year. Unless something changes dramaticall these two lok like the teams for the next couple of years.

Taylor 36
September-28th-2007, 09:38 AM
[QUOTE=Vilandil Tasardur]
In 1973 and 1974 the Dolphins would win the superbowl, they have yet to return.


Our Washington Redskins won in 83, 88, and 92, and as we well know, have not returned since.

The Bears won in 86 and have not returned since.

The Giants won in 87 and 91, and have not returned since.


QUOTE] The Bears went back last year and lost to the Colts. The Dolphins went back in 83 and lost to us. The Giants lost to the Ravens in 2001.

Soup
September-28th-2007, 09:46 AM
I think it has something to do with the younger crowd-redskin fans. My old man witnessed the 3 superbowls and I was too young but still fell in love with the team. Now, that I'm older it feels like the skins haven't won anything and I'm waiting for that feeling you get when the skins become champions. This generation needs a superbowl win bad.

BKSkinsFan
September-28th-2007, 10:26 AM
As much as I'd love a Super Bowl, the important thing to me at this point is just seeing our team be consistently competitive. One step at a time, I don't just want a 1 year wonder, I want a great team that can maintain competitiveness despite losing players by picking up a few key free agents and finding great players year after year in the draft.

wlbai
September-28th-2007, 10:41 AM
<snipped>..I want a great team that can maintain competitiveness despite losing players by picking up a few key free agents and finding great players year after year in the draft.

The ticket to doing that is to hire a GM. Until that is done I fear we are all in for an up and down ride. I hope I am proven to be wrong.