PDA

View Full Version : After the San Diego game in 2005



gortiz
November-12th-2007, 10:56 AM
The Redskins (5-6) were distraught, their playoff hopes all but erased after losing a late fourth-quarter lead for the third consecutive week. The critical play this time was an obvious tackle-from-behind holding penalty on center Casey Rabach that forced kicker John Hall to try a 52-yard field goal -- beyond his range when he was practicing before the game -- with 30 seconds left. The attempt was wide right and a little short, Hall's first miss of the season after a 9-for-9 start.

"I'm just trying to figure out where we go from here," said linebacker LaVar Arrington, speaking slowly with eyes glazed. "This one's got me confused. We're just letting them get away, the same way, over and over again."

Coach Joe Gibbs was equally somber.

"That's about three of the toughest losses I've been through," Gibbs said. "This is going to be a real test for us. We'll see what we're made of here."

The Redskins lost despite winning the turnover battle 3-0. They were tied for last in the league with a minus-13 differential entering the game, but Carlos Rogers, Shawn Springs and Walt Harris got the team's first interceptions by cornerbacks this season. Springs' pick put the ball at San Diego's 31 with 1:04 left, before Rabach's holding penalty.

Before that game, we lost to Norv and an Oakland team that won four games.

Now, don't forget that during the subsequent run we had we had good matchups with the Eagles not having Mcnutts, Eli being green, and with Bledsoe being on the downside of a career.

cphil006
November-12th-2007, 10:58 AM
well, we need to decide what to do... fold up or go all out....

RedskinzOwnU
November-12th-2007, 11:05 AM
Our remaining schedule is not the cakewalk that it was in 2005. Under Gibbs this team goes nowhere because he can't playcall or manage a game. And if you can't do that - why are you coaching?

SteamRollingRiggo
November-12th-2007, 11:06 AM
Why do we cling to the past?

hail2skins
November-12th-2007, 11:08 AM
We'll definitely need at least a new slogan. Instead of maybe "Five in a Row or we Don't Go," it'll be "Four and One or We're Done."

The Skins may yet win enough to get in, but I think the larger issue is whether Gibbs has hit the proverbial wall with this team. More and more its looking like we should perhaps cast honor aside and let someone else take over next season, much like Parcells did with the Cowboys.

Lombardi's_kid_brother
November-12th-2007, 11:12 AM
It's going to be 2019 and people are going to be citing the 5-game winning streak in 2005 as proof that our 14-year-playoff drought could easily end.

The 2005 winning streak is to Skins' fans as the 2000 Ravens Super Bowl win is to the rest of the league. The planets had to align perfectly in both cases.

USS Redskins
November-12th-2007, 11:12 AM
The Skins are who some of us thought they were.
A mediocre NFC team. They fooled a few people along the way and havent beaten anyone of note - struggled vs. teams with worse records - lost to good teams and were b**** slapped and raped by really good teams. 7 more games of mediocre ball to go......
They deserve to be ranked somewhere in the 12-19 spots on the Power rankings.

superozman
November-12th-2007, 11:13 AM
We don't...we just have 2,000 negative nancies to about 200 normal people here. I belive the poster is trying to show we are in a better spot than 2005, don't lose all hope....which about 90% on here have... :logo:


Why do we cling to the past?

hail2skins
November-12th-2007, 11:14 AM
It's going to be 2019 and people are going to be citing the 5-game winning streak in 2005 as proof that our 14-year-playoff drought could easily end.

And we'll win the SB and somehow people will credit Gibbs even though he'd have been gone for 10 years!