View Full Version : NFL Network: Baldinger video on pukes' playoff loses...
tr1
June-4th-2008, 09:41 AM
Finally, someone is noticing that these pukes are choking dogs.
"Been quite some time for Dallas..."
"How many stars this team has, media circus, but when asked if they had the 'last laugh'..."
"Dubious list..."
"Just show up...everybody has a radio show, everybody has a TV show..."
"Last couple of years...falter in December..."
"Game is different at the playoff level..."
See the video:
http://www.nfl.com/videos?videoId=09000d5d808a5f02
TonyRomoProBowl
June-4th-2008, 09:58 AM
Finally, someone is noticing that these pukes are choking dogs.
"Been quite some time for Dallas..."
"How many stars this team has, media circus, but when asked if they had the 'last laugh'..."
"Dubious list..."
"Just show up...everybody has a radio show, everybody has a TV show..."
"Last couple of years...falter in December..."
"Game is different at the playoff level..."
See the video:
http://www.nfl.com/videos?videoId=09000d5d808a5f02
did you watch the show last night or just this video feed? Baldy made it clear at the end oif the show that Dallas "would win a playoff game this year"....so, yes its a bad run, however the run is just about over....:2cents:
NewCliche21
June-4th-2008, 10:15 AM
did you watch the show last night or just this video feed? Baldy made it clear at the end oif the show that Dallas "would win a playoff game this year"....so, yes its a bad run, however the run is just about over....:2cents:
Just about over?
Because some talking head says so? The guy who's been on the Cowboys' collective junk for years? With the rest of the entire world?
You sound like Boston now. "This is the year, this is the year! . . . next year. NEXT YEAR!"
TonyRomoProBowl
June-4th-2008, 10:23 AM
Just about over?
Because some talking head says so? The guy who's been on the Cowboys' collective junk for years? With the rest of the entire world?
You sound like Boston now. "This is the year, this is the year! . . . next year. NEXT YEAR!"
Dude, I get it, I really do. Dallas has lost 6 straight times in the playoffs.....However, dont you also get it, that in 2006 in was a 1st time starting QB leading them to the playoffs and with a chip shot to win that game....then last season a play away from a win vs the SB champs! This team is not the same team from 1998-2003. Sorry, but say what you want, the Cowboys are in position to win a playoff game very soon...Do you really think that the Dallas cowboys are going to "not win a playoff game ever again"?.....Seriously, we all love to rag on eachother and hate eachothers teams.......but at some point you have to understand reality, and reality is,The Dallas Cowboys will be succesfull in the playoffs again, and odds are really good for them to do so thgis season.
NewCliche21
June-4th-2008, 10:38 AM
Dude, I get it, I really do. Dallas has lost 6 straight times in the playoffs.....However, dont you also get it, that in 2006 in was a 1st time starting QB leading them to the playoffs and with a chip shot to win that game....then last season a play away from a win vs the SB champs! This team is not the same team from 1998-2003. Sorry, but say what you want, the Cowboys are in position to win a playoff game very soon...Do you really think that the Dallas cowboys are going to "not win a playoff game ever again"?.....Seriously, we all love to rag on eachother and hate eachothers teams.......but at some point you have to understand reality, and reality is,The Dallas Cowboys will be succesfull in the playoffs again, and odds are really good for them to do so thgis season.
Blah, blah, blah.
I don't want to hear a WORD from you about excuses EVER. Because that's literally all this post was aside from the "THIS IS THE YEAR!" crap that I had already mentioned. I've got a thing or two or two dozen that I can mention about this year alone, but I won't, because I don't make excuses.
The odds were good the past couple of seasons except your quarterback effed it up, twice.
TonyRomoProBowl
June-4th-2008, 10:46 AM
Blah, blah, blah.
I don't want to hear a WORD from you about excuses EVER. Because that's literally all this post was aside from the "THIS IS THE YEAR!" crap that I had already mentioned. I've got a thing or two or two dozen that I can mention about this year alone, but I won't, because I don't make excuses.
The odds were good the past couple of seasons except your quarterback effed it up, twice.
alright...no excauses, a loss is a loss and it is what it is......
Can you go ahead right now and say the Dallas Cowboys will NOT win a playoff game this season......? If it is truley as bad as you and others say, then the odds are in your favor to be right...
I am juts simply saying, it will NOT last forever, and The Cowboys are talented enough and have enough good players to win a playoff game and some........lets not throw all those losses on this current team, just the last two....and Romo is a very Young QB with less then 30 starts under his belt......:2cents:
NewCliche21
June-4th-2008, 11:13 AM
alright...no excauses, a loss is a loss and it is what it is......
Can you go ahead right now and say the Dallas Cowboys will NOT win a playoff game this season......? If it is truley as bad as you and others say, then the odds are in your favor to be right...
I am juts simply saying, it will NOT last forever, and The Cowboys are talented enough and have enough good players to win a playoff game and some........lets not throw all those losses on this current team, just the last two....and Romo is a very Young QB with less then 30 starts under his belt......:2cents:
No, it won't last forever. But you guys suck right now. THAT is the point of the post. :)
ucfSKINS
June-4th-2008, 11:18 AM
Just about over?
Because some talking head says so? The guy who's been on the Cowboys' collective junk for years? With the rest of the entire world?
You sound like Boston now. "This is the year, this is the year! . . . next year. NEXT YEAR!"
hahahahaah. Yeah, if the mediots were right, you would have won the Super Bowl the past two years.....
:silly:
ucfSKINS
June-4th-2008, 11:21 AM
No, it won't last forever. But you guys suck right now. THAT is the point of the post. :)
As a Skins fan, no matter how well the Cowgirls are playing, they will always suck :D
With that being said, they only suck the last three games or so of the year. The first 3/4 of the year, they are great. And I'm ok with that!
tr1
June-4th-2008, 11:23 AM
Can you go ahead right now and say the Dallas Cowboys will NOT win a playoff game this season......?
Yes. In fact, it'll be a struggle for the pukes to even make the playoffs.
BigMike619
June-4th-2008, 11:49 AM
its hard to be the SB favorites every year when you dont even win playoff games. shouldnt they crawl before they try to walk?
TonyRomoProBowl
June-4th-2008, 12:14 PM
its hard to be the SB favorites every year when you dont even win playoff games. shouldnt they crawl before they try to walk?
Every year....can someone please talk reality....in 2006 Dallas went into the season with Bledsoe as QB, and were NOT the SB favorites.........
last year going in, they were getting some talk about being "one of the best" teams in the NFC.
what is this every year business?
Do you all just make this stuff up as you go? Show me the links, or articles or anything from a real media source that shows the Cowboys as favorites to go to the SB EVERY YEAR....:doh:
TonyRomoProBowl
June-4th-2008, 12:17 PM
Yes. In fact, it'll be a struggle for the pukes to even make the playoffs.
someone besides you.......everyone knows your game....at some point the Cowboys will be well on thoer way to a playoff birth and you will change that stance as well.......you will say something like, they had an easy schedule, lucky bounces, no injuries......etc.........
We know that you are on record of 6-10...thats been bookmarked by many of us, trust me.
BigMike619
June-4th-2008, 12:19 PM
Every year....can someone please talk reality....in 2006 Dallas went into the season with Bledsoe as QB, and were NOT the SB favorites.........
last year going in, they were getting some talk about being "one of the best" teams in the NFC.
what is this every year business?
Do you all just make this stuff up as you go? Show me the links, or articles or anything from a real media source that shows the Cowboys as favorites to go to the SB EVERY YEAR....:doh:
you wanna be pissed off then be pissed at your owner and BSPN for all the BS hype that goes around your team each and every year.
quit sitting here acting like you dont see it when those dumbass commentators and "reporters" call you guys the favorites to go to the SB from the NFC.
TonyRomoProBowl
June-4th-2008, 12:27 PM
you wanna be pissed off then be pissed at your owner and BSPN for all the BS hype that goes around your team each and every year.
quit sitting here acting like you dont see it when those dumbass commentators and "reporters" call you guys the favorites to go to the SB from the NFC.
thats the point.....outside of this year (and towards the end of last year) the Cowboys havent been a SB favorite since 1995.
And I am damn happy for the owner and his publicity and hype......its putting money in his pocket, so he can get out of the dept that TR1 has told us all about......without the hype and the publicity, he would be collecting cans to recycle just so he could eat.
BigMike619
June-4th-2008, 12:36 PM
thats the point.....outside of this year (and towards the end of last year) the Cowboys havent been a SB favorite since 1995.
And I am damn happy for the owner and his publicity and hype......its putting money in his pocket, so he can get out of the dept that TR1 has told us all about......without the hype and the publicity, he would be collecting cans to recycle just so he could eat.
riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight, but when WE do the same thing you guys like to make up nicknames like "off season champs" and jokes about how Snyder is "trying to buy a ring".
seems like you need to start kicking the can down the street because you cant be honest and you're throwing out sideways comments to TR1.
TonyRomoProBowl
June-4th-2008, 12:46 PM
riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight, but when WE do the same thing you guys like to make up nicknames like "off season champs" and jokes about how Snyder is "trying to buy a ring".
seems like you need to start kicking the can down the street because you cant be honest and you're throwing out sideways comments to TR1.
I never called the Skins off season Champs in my life (i dont think).....It would be hard for me to use the word Champs in regards to the Skins....its been what? 17 years since the last NFL title was in Washington.........So please, if you wanna continue making stuff up, just stick to making it up that Dallas is the SB favortites EVERY YEAR.........:doh:
Snyder cant buy a ring this year, he is broke.....6-flags has all his cash:laugh:
BigMike619
June-4th-2008, 12:56 PM
I never called the Skins off season Champs in my life (i dont think).....It would be hard for me to use the word Champs in regards to the Skins....its been what? 17 years since the last NFL title was in Washington.........So please, if you wanna continue making stuff up, just stick to making it up that Dallas is the SB favortites EVERY YEAR.........:doh:
Snyder cant buy a ring this year, he is broke.....6-flags has all his cash:laugh:
you really think you represent all dallass fans and I represent all Skins fans huh?
are you so naive to think that just because YOU dont say it (which I doubt as well) that it isnt said by a lot of your fellow fans on here?
seems like you need to stop and just stick to jockin felons and over the hill WRs.
BigDFan5
June-4th-2008, 01:04 PM
Yes. In fact, it'll be a struggle for the pukes to even make the playoffs.
:laugh:
TonyRomoProBowl
June-4th-2008, 01:06 PM
you really think you represent all dallass fans and I represent all Skins fans huh?
are you so naive to think that just because YOU dont say it (which I doubt as well) that it isnt said by a lot of your fellow fans on here?
seems like you need to stop and just stick to jockin felons and over the hill WRs.
none of this is worth a response outside of "over the hill WR's".....:laugh::laugh::laugh: T.O scored 15 TD's and no WR in the league has more over the past two season.
in 2 years with Dallas dude has 166 rec 2535 yds and 28 TD"s.....over what hill?
And lets not talk about Terry Glenn, he is most likley done in Dallas. :2cents:
BigMike619
June-4th-2008, 01:07 PM
none of this is worth a response outside of "over the hill WR's".....:laugh::laugh::laugh: T.O scored 15 TD's and no WR in the league has more over the past two season.
in 2 years with Dallas dude has 166 rec 2535 yds and 28 TD"s.....over what hill?
And lets not talk about Terry Glenn, he is most likley done in Dallas. :2cents:
well you better find someone else to talk about because after TO all you have is fumble fingers Crayton and...............
Witten doesnt count because he is a TE. :2cents:
BigDFan5
June-4th-2008, 01:09 PM
none of this is worth a response outside of "over the hill WR's".....:laugh::laugh::laugh: T.O scored 15 TD's and no WR in the league has more over the past two season.
in 2 years with Dallas dude has 166 rec 2535 yds and 28 TD"s.....over what hill?
And lets not talk about Terry Glenn, he is most likley done in Dallas. :2cents:
TO gonna explode any day now
tick tick *tap tap tap* is this thing working? tick
http://pro.corbis.com/images/CB033848.jpg?size=572&uid=%7B8B3EDFA6-9193-4A08-9364-60F2510F9A56%7D
BigDFan5
June-4th-2008, 01:10 PM
well you better find someone else to talk about because after TO all you have is fumble fingers Crayton and...............
Witten doesnt count because he is a TE. :2cents:
So all we have for a #2 is a guy who had 700 yards and 7 TDs? umm darn?
and Yes Witten counts, I bet you would count him if he didnt have 1000 yards :laugh:
bubba9497
June-4th-2008, 01:12 PM
you really think you represent all dallass fans and I represent all Skins fans huh?
are you so naive to think that just because YOU dont say it (which I doubt as well) that it isnt said by a lot of your fellow fans on here?
naive.... no
calculated... :yes:
it's much easier to deny the truth, twist facts, and hide in semantics when you speak in generalities
and of course follow the Poke Fan Mantra
http://69.90.174.252/photos/display_pic_with_logo/4884/4884,1155319280,1.jpg
TonyRomoProBowl
June-4th-2008, 01:17 PM
So all we have for a #2 is a guy who had 700 yards and 7 TDs? umm darn?
and Yes Witten counts, I bet you would count him if he didnt have 1000 yards :laugh:
a #2 guy that worls hard and gets better each year, and yes has produced 700 yds and 7 TD's..........He could be considered a #1 if he played in another NFCE team........
Team a #1 WR 61-800-3
Team b #1 WR 77-1110-6
Team c #1 WR 70-1025-12
TonyRomoProBowl
June-4th-2008, 01:18 PM
naive.... no
calculated... :yes:
it's much easier to deny the truth, twist facts, and hide in semantics when you speak in generalities
and of course follow the Poke Fan Mantra
http://69.90.174.252/photos/display_pic_with_logo/4884/4884,1155319280,1.jpg
well whada know...bubba posted a picture of his monkey's without bringing anything to the thread we havent seen this game before have we:doh:
BigMike619
June-4th-2008, 01:18 PM
So all we have for a #2 is a guy who had 700 yards and 7 TDs? umm darn?
and Yes Witten counts, I bet you would count him if he didnt have 1000 yards :laugh:
hey smart ass, were talking WRs not TEs. thats why I said he doesnt count.
get your head out of the cowpuke stew and into a serious discussion. You are starting to look even more foolish then normal.
BigMike619
June-4th-2008, 01:19 PM
well whada know...bubba posted a picture of his monkey's without answering a question.........havent seen this game before have we:doh:
its kind of like how you and your buddy BigD keep trying to feed off each other with BS and nonsense like its going to count to anyone but you guys.
TonyRomoProBowl
June-4th-2008, 01:21 PM
its kind of like how you and your buddy BigD keep trying to feed off each other with BS and nonsense like its going to count to anyone but you guys.
"count"....is there a scorecard out there somewhere? If so, I'd love to see TR1's Loss column.......:laugh::laugh::laugh:
BigMike619
June-4th-2008, 01:24 PM
"count"....is there a scorecard out there somewhere? If so, I'd love to see TR1's Loss column.......:laugh::laugh::laugh:
stalk much?
I dont think you can go in a thread without bringing up his name.
did you see a pic or something and fall in love? :doh:
PS: opinion count doesnt mean a literal count. I dont know where you went to school but most places teach that one word can have more then one meaning to it.
BigDFan5
June-4th-2008, 01:24 PM
hey smart ass, were talking WRs not TEs. thats why I said he doesnt count.
get your head out of the cowpuke stew and into a serious discussion. You are starting to look even more foolish then normal.
QB throws ball receiver catches it. Our TE is used like a #2 WR (just like Cooley for you guys)
Our top 3 pas catchers had 3200 yards and 29 TDs I think we are covered
BigDFan5
June-4th-2008, 01:25 PM
"count"....is there a scorecard out there somewhere? If so, I'd love to see TR1's Loss column.......:laugh::laugh::laugh: :laugh:
TonyRomoProBowl
June-4th-2008, 01:25 PM
stalk much?
I dont think you can go in a thread without bringing up his name.
did you see a pic or something and fall in love? :doh:
PS: opinion count doesnt mean a literal count. I dont know where you went to school but most places teach that one word can have more then one meaning to it.
your a funny dude..............
BigDFan5
June-4th-2008, 01:25 PM
stalk much?
I dont think you can go in a thread without bringing up his name.
did you see a pic or something and fall in love? :doh:
PS: opinion count doesnt mean a literal count. I dont know where you went to school but most places teach that one word can have more then one meaning to it.
If our opinion doesnt count why do you keep geting so emotional when we post it? Why reply at all if we dont count
TonyRomoProBowl
June-4th-2008, 01:27 PM
stalk much?
I dont think you can go in a thread without bringing up his name.
did you see a pic or something and fall in love? :doh:
PS: opinion count doesnt mean a literal count. I dont know where you went to school but most places teach that one word can have more then one meaning to it.
yet through it all, your the one defending him.......let him man up and you stick to yourself and defend yourself....dude is like 52, I am sure he can defend himslef.......
bubba9497
June-4th-2008, 01:27 PM
let's please refrain from name calling :)
BigMike619
June-4th-2008, 01:29 PM
If our opinion doesnt count why do you keep geting so emotional when we post it? Why reply at all if we dont count
you want to get all uppity and speak about semantics yet when I am having a discussion about WRs and say I am not including a TE you take that opportunity to TRY and jump all over me like you caught me slippin.
You and your buddy couldnt catch me slippin if I told you when it was going to happen. I am not emotional over you puke fans, I am just having fun clowning you 2.
BigDFan5
June-4th-2008, 01:29 PM
let's please refrain from name calling :)
thanks bubba I agree no reason for him to start the namecalling
bubba9497
June-4th-2008, 01:29 PM
its kind of like how you and your buddy BigD keep trying to feed off each other with BS and nonsense like its going to count to anyone but you guys.
it counts....
they are funnier than Abbott and Costello
except Abbott and Costello got paid to play the fools :laugh:
BigMike619
June-4th-2008, 01:30 PM
yet through it all, your the one defending him.......let him man up and you stick to yourself and defend yourself....dude is like 52, I am sure he can defend himslef.......
because between you and your counterpart you cant seem to get his name off of your lips. you are like a bitter ex that drives by every thread and checks to see if he is talking to any other "fan".
BigMike619
June-4th-2008, 01:30 PM
it counts....
they are funnier than Abbott and Costello
except Abbott and Costello got paid to play the fools :laugh:
:laugh:
:cheers:
BigDFan5
June-4th-2008, 01:31 PM
you want to get all uppity and speak about semantics yet when I am having a discussion about WRs and say I am not including a TE you take that opportunity to TRY and jump all over me like you caught me slippin.
You and your buddy couldnt catch me slippin if I told you when it was going to happen. I am not emotional over you puke fans, I am just having fun clowning you 2.
You are definitely emotional Mike you can always tell when the namecalling starts
I discussed our #2 WR you had no rebuttal for that
I also informed you we use our 1000 yard TE as a #2 WR that is why he does count 3200 yards and 29 TDs I think we are good at the receiving spot
bubba9497
June-4th-2008, 01:32 PM
you want to get all uppity and speak about semantics yet when I am having a discussion about WRs and say I am not including a TE you take that opportunity to TRY and jump all over me like you caught me slippin.
when you got nothing else to back your argument...... argue semantics
BigDFan5
June-4th-2008, 01:32 PM
it counts....
they are funnier than Abbott and Costello
except Abbott and Costello got paid to play the fools :laugh:
shouldnt you be off googling more monkey pictures? :D
TonyRomoProBowl
June-4th-2008, 01:32 PM
let's please refrain from name calling :)
did i miss something? i didnt see any namecalling in this thread..........
TonyRomoProBowl
June-4th-2008, 01:33 PM
shouldnt you be off googling more monkey pictures? :D
:laugh::laugh::laugh:
seriously.
BigDFan5
June-4th-2008, 01:33 PM
when you got nothing else to back your argument...... argue semantics
This is when it would do you well to read the posts Buba
Do you agree when discussing receivers that a TE who is used as a #2 receiver should not count?
If he had 300 yards he would sure count
When you discuss your passing game I bet you count Cooley, with good reason
BigMike619
June-4th-2008, 01:35 PM
You are definitely emotional Mike you can always tell when the namecalling starts
I discussed our #2 WR you had no rebuttal for that
I also informed you we use our 1000 yard TE as a #2 WR that is why he does count 3200 yards and 29 TDs I think we are good at the receiving spot
yeah, I wasnt talking about TEs though no matter how much you try to keep twisting it to include them. We were discussing TO and whoever else was behind him in depth for WR. Please try to keep up.
And Im sure you think I am emotional but you dont really matter. You are NOT a unique snowflake.
BigDFan5
June-4th-2008, 01:37 PM
yeah, I wasnt talking about TEs though no matter how much you try to keep twisting it to include them. We were discussing TO and whoever else was behind him in depth for WR. Please try to keep up.
And Im sure you think I am emotional but you dont really matter. You are NOT a unique snowflake.
Mike go back to the post, notice I mentioned our #2 WR you know the guy with 700 yards and 7 TDs as a 3rd option.
But saying a 1000 yard pass catcher doesnt count is funny as hell, whether he is a TE or not he IS the #2 option
Again with the "you dont matter" stuff. If I matter so little why do you get so emotional and reply to me so much?
BigMike619
June-4th-2008, 01:40 PM
Mike go back to the post, notice I mentioned our #2 WR you know the guy with 700 yards and 7 TDs as a 3rd option.
But saying a 1000 yard pass catcher doesnt count is funny as hell, whether he is a TE or not he IS the #2 option
Again with the "you dont matter" stuff. If I matter so little why do you get so emotional and reply to me so much?
you walked into my convo and tried to turn it to what you wanted. i am not interested in what you have to say now because you obviously didnt pay enough attention the first time.
you can speak about 700 yard WRs now all you want. but you should talk about it to your little buddy over there who seems to laugh like a hyena at everything you have to say. maybe he will care. ;)
and by the way, that was a quote from fight club. i was hoping you had a sense of humor...so much for that idea. :doh:
BigDFan5
June-4th-2008, 01:46 PM
you walked into my convo and tried to turn it to what you wanted. i am not interested in what you have to say now because you obviously didnt pay enough attention the first time.
you can speak about 700 yard WRs now all you want. but you should talk about it to your little buddy over there who seems to laugh like a hyena at everything you have to say. maybe he will care. ;)
and by the way, that was a quote from fight club. i was hoping you had a sense of humor...so much for that idea. :doh:
Havent seen fight club since it was first release many years ago Sorry I didnt catch it my bad
I walked into a comment about "fumble fingers Crayton"
I commented on Crayton
You telling me 700 yards and 7 TDs is not good enough for a #2 WR? especially when you also have a 1000 yard TE?
TonyRomoProBowl
June-4th-2008, 01:47 PM
you walked into my convo and tried to turn it to what you wanted. i am not interested in what you have to say now because you obviously didnt pay enough attention the first time.
you can speak about 700 yard WRs now all you want. but you should talk about it to your little buddy over there who seems to laugh like a hyena at everything you have to say. maybe he will care. ;)
and by the way, that was a quote from fight club. i was hoping you had a sense of humor...so much for that idea. :doh:
:laugh::laugh::laugh:
your funny too, its not just BigDfan.
Crayton had good solid numbers as a #2 WR....and to be blunt about it...the 3rd option in the Dallas passing game....which is the point when talking about Witten.
Crayton is still young, and came into the league as a 7th round pick and was a QB in college...He is still getting better....so need not worry about Crayton, he is just fine in his role...and with TO for the next 4 seasons, we have some time on our side for another WR to come in and become (in time) the #1 guy when T.O does leave.....whether its a draft pick or another top notch FA........
BigMike619
June-4th-2008, 01:53 PM
Havent seen fight club since it was first release many years ago Sorry I didnt catch it my bad
I walked into a comment about "fumble fingers Crayton"
I commented on Crayton
You telling me 700 yards and 7 TDs is not good enough for a #2 WR? especially when you also have a 1000 yard TE?
when he drops balls that can easily be TDs and isnt clutch? yes, I say 700 yards isnt that good. When your QB is setting franchise records of TDs and yards and you get 700 as the #2, then yes I say it isnt good enough.
I ONLY said Witten wasnt included because I was strictly speaking WRs. I gave Witten mad props in the comparing Cooley to Witten thread. :2cents:
BigDFan5
June-4th-2008, 02:02 PM
when he drops balls that can easily be TDs and isnt clutch? yes, I say 700 yards isnt that good. When your QB is setting franchise records of TDs and yards and you get 700 as the #2, then yes I say it isnt good enough.
I ONLY said Witten wasnt included because I was strictly speaking WRs. I gave Witten mad props in the comparing Cooley to Witten thread. :2cents:
I know you gave Witten props, and I like you when you arent getting so pissy
But you are saying Witten doesnt count and thats wrong IMO
You mention the QB setting records that was partly because of the TE you dont want to count
As was said before Crayton is #2 WR but #3 option
It goes
TO
Witten
Crayton
So his 700 yards and 7 TDs were as the 3rd option in the passing game
See what I am saying? You HAVE to count Witten when mentioning Craytons numbers. Witten had a direct affect on his numbers.
tr1
June-4th-2008, 02:18 PM
We know that you are on record of 6-10...thats been bookmarked by many of us, trust me.
You obviously didn't read the whole thread...that's a shame. :laugh:
TonyRomoProBowl
June-4th-2008, 02:19 PM
You obviously didn't read the whole thread...that's a shame. :laugh:
oh yea, thats if healthy...3 wins if they have "significant" injuries.......
bubba9497
June-4th-2008, 02:28 PM
You obviously didn't read the whole thread...that's a shame. :laugh:
you can even get THA to back you up :laugh:
BigMike619
June-4th-2008, 02:33 PM
I know you gave Witten props, and I like you when you arent getting so pissy
But you are saying Witten doesnt count and thats wrong IMO
You mention the QB setting records that was partly because of the TE you dont want to count
As was said before Crayton is #2 WR but #3 option
It goes
TO
Witten
Crayton
So his 700 yards and 7 TDs were as the 3rd option in the passing game
See what I am saying? You HAVE to count Witten when mentioning Craytons numbers. Witten had a direct affect on his numbers.
when I say WRs specifically I mean JUST WRs. When you say receiving corp then I am including TEs. I was talking about what WRs were behind TO. Not who all can catch the ball behind TO.
And I am as pissy as you are stubborn then. ;)
tr1
June-4th-2008, 02:34 PM
oh yea, thats if healthy...3 wins if they have "significant" injuries.......
Still haven't read the thread, eh?
:laugh:
bubba9497
June-4th-2008, 02:36 PM
Still haven't read the thread, eh?
:laugh:
too bad he missed Jumbo's witty post
vBulletin® v3.8.4, Copyright ©2000-2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.