PDA

View Full Version : DMN: Romo the quarterback needs to become better game manager


bubba9497
October-1st-2008, 12:02 AM
http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/spt/football/cowboys/stories/100108dnspoinsidecowboys.1acc1c7.html



Click link for entire article


Romo the quarterback needs to become better game manager


Tony Romo has been good this season. To characterize it any other way would be silly.

But he needs to be better, if the Cowboys are going to reach their lofty goals.

Romo has to do more than compile gaudy stats and make the occasional play that winds up on SportsCenter because he's turned chaos into yet another big play.

He needs to do a better job of managing the game and making decisions. Although the game plan calls for him to audible out a running play, when there are eight men near the line of scrimmage, he has to be astute enough to know the Cowboys are good enough to run the ball against eight-man fronts.


Emmitt Smith did it all of the time. So does any other running back that's any good. He has to know during the course of the game that passing every down is not the key to success – not when the NFL's most physical running back resides in his backfield.

He must also be astute enough not to force the ball to Terrell Owens. No matter what Romo said, that's what he did Sunday.

It doesn't matter whether he felt T.O. had a matchup he could exploit. Or whether the petulant receiver convinced him to direct seemingly every pass his way. We all know the offense runs best when Romo goes through his progression of reads and makes the right throw because that ensures all of the Cowboys' offensive weapons get involved in the offense.

That said, we can't forget Romo has started only 31 games – not yet two full seasons. He's still learning. He's going to make mistakes.

But he's still one of the league's best quarterbacks. He just needs to do all of the little things it takes to play like one of the best every week.

COWBOYS Q&A

Q: I know Miles Austin has gotten a lot of good press, but do you think he is better than Isaiah Stanback? On the kickoff return for a TD by Felix Jones, Stanback showed some big-time speed and Stanback has better hands than Miles. I just can't forget the skinny post he dropped against the Skins last year. Stanback or Austin, who is better?

Ami Heda, Maplewood, N.J.

TAYLOR: I don't think there's any doubt, right now, that Austin is significantly better than Stanback. Austin played receiver throughout college and has been in the NFL three years. He's just now showing flashes, which began in training camp, that he can be a good player in this league. Stanback has yet to show it. He hasn't had many opportunities, but he played quarterback in college and is still really learning the position. Plus, he essentially missed last year with his foot and shoulder issues. This is his first real year. He'll get better, but Austin is much better right now.

•••

Q: I can't recall Romo scrambling forward this year, even though it seems he could have done it many times. He's probably being coached to do that as an absolute last resort, but I'd rather him run and slide for 8-10 yards for a first down than throw something on the run. Keeping drives alive is the name of the game. What do you think?

Brian R. Bauer, Alexandria Va.

TAYLOR: Romo has never been a runner, though he's athletic enough to pull the ball down and run it, if he needs to do it. He prefers to slide in the pocket and move around in hopes of finding a receiver for a big play. He did run once Sunday for a seven-yard gain.

tr1
October-1st-2008, 06:19 AM
Whoa!

Criticizing St. Romo? In the press?

OMG, the world is upside down.

:rotflmao:

His problem is he keeps trying to force the ball instead of taking a sack or throwing it away.

He ought to give that a try every now and then.

scyber
October-1st-2008, 06:39 AM
His problem is he keeps trying to force the ball instead of taking a sack or throwing it away.

He ought to give that a try every now and then.

Well if what is being said is true (that romo audibled out of a number of running plays) he is also over-confident in the Boys passing game and under-confident in the running game.

There is simply no excuse for only running Barber 8 times (and only 2 times in the 2nd half). Not in a game where the point difference was only one score for most of the game.

dfitzo53
October-1st-2008, 06:50 AM
"He needs to do a better job of managing the game and making decisions. Although the game plan calls for him to audible out a running play, when there are eight men near the line of scrimmage, he has to be astute enough to know the Cowboys are good enough to run the ball against eight-man fronts."

Why would he go against the game plan installed by his coaches, especially when the running game wasn't working?

TheDoyler23
October-1st-2008, 07:36 AM
Why would he go against the game plan installed by his coaches, especially when the running game wasn't working?

The media criticized the coaching staff for throwing it too much. The coaching staff is now pawning it off on Romo for calling the audibles. Romo was in a no-win situation, getting beat at home and was suckered into throwing all day. ...and then there's T.0.

SonnyJ
October-1st-2008, 08:09 AM
Why would he go against the game plan installed by his coaches, especially when the running game wasn't working?

My thoughts exactly. This is such an easy thing to say since the Cowboys lost. What if they had gotten a bunch of big passing plays against the Redskins, instead? We would then be hearing about Romo's acumen. I strongly suspect that Garrett/Romo know more about how the Cowboy offense needs to work than this guy.

It's a classic case of revisionist reasoning - "Well, they lost, so this must be why they lost". No, they lost to a better team on Sunday that had an answer for everything the Cowboys did, a team of people that is also paid to do their jobs well. That final score was as close as it possibly could have been for the Cowboys - it could easily have been a blowout. More dedication to the running game would not have changed that.

The problem wasn't with the Cowboys - the problem was that the Redskins had the ability to execute their defensive game plan. Not many teams do. I would have loved to have seen the Cowboys run more - it was like banging their head against a wall. Barber had one run where he got half his yardage. He was stuffed on most plays like a turkey. Fletcher owns Barber. Their running game wasn't going to do anything for them on Sunday. It would have meant even more 3-and-outs, which would have given them even less opportunity to get the running game going. You need to sustain drives for the running game to get into a groove (presuming it isn't from the outset). Drives are sustained through converting third downs. Converting third downs is difficult in long yardage situations. Forcing the running game would have left them in long yardage situations.

Their only chance was throwing the ball.