View Full Version : PRO Cutler Folks to sign so we can look back.
DCMONEY
April-2nd-2009, 06:03 AM
I am one who is against the trade for Cutler. I've given my various different reaons for it. There are those who feel Jason doesn't have it. You guys have given your reasons. It looks like this trade is gonna happen. I just want all the people who are for the trade to sign on this thread so next year at this time we can look back and say who was for the trade. There's not really no need for debate. Just leave your mark if you're for Cutler.
robotfire
April-2nd-2009, 06:07 AM
Here's my mark: Campbell is going to continue to improve, and we shouldn't do this trade. We will regret it.
SoCalSkins
April-2nd-2009, 06:07 AM
I am absolutely for it. But we can and will look at the numerous other threads that have already taken place. This thread will not absolve anyone.
Rdskn4Lyf21
April-2nd-2009, 06:08 AM
Completely for it.
Cruemans
April-2nd-2009, 06:10 AM
I hate that it has come to this, but with that being said, bring on cutler!
JVSkins n Hokies
April-2nd-2009, 06:15 AM
grass is always greener right? bring on the diabetic.
THE HAMMER'IN HOG
April-2nd-2009, 06:21 AM
Give me Cutler, or Colt. Either will be a huge upgrade over JC.
wvtbred
April-2nd-2009, 06:23 AM
Absolutely for it, also for trading Jason if the deal for Jay falls through
Rdskn4Lyf21
April-2nd-2009, 06:24 AM
grass is always greener right? bring on the diabetic.
:wtf:
S.T.real,lights,out
April-2nd-2009, 06:24 AM
I know this is not the right spot for it but i didn't want to start a new thread! I really wanna give our JC one more year to do his thing. I know Cutler is a great qb and he may be the qb we have been looking for since idk......i cant remember the last great qb we have had. But i'm really not excited about what we would have to give up in return. I dont wanna lose one of out top D players and i hate not having a 1st or 2nd round pick. Also how much longer i Cutler under contract for?? I'd hate to see him come here for a few years then bolt. The one reason why we have been able to sign so many high price FA is we have never had to pay our QB top money!! Idk if we would be able to afford him two years down the line. Just my two cents!!!!
Geneva
April-2nd-2009, 06:25 AM
100% for Cutler
Vicious
April-2nd-2009, 06:26 AM
against it, we'll suffer for losing those draft picks.
RWJ
April-2nd-2009, 06:26 AM
100% for cutler
+1
Gibbs Hog Heaven
April-2nd-2009, 06:27 AM
Been praying, some times literally, the past few week's since this broke that Jay Cutler would land in DC and finally give us what we've craved for WAYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY too long now, so mark me down as 100% for the trade.
Still hoping and praying. :fingersx::fingersx: (Both hands.).
Hail.
Doozinbrah
April-2nd-2009, 06:29 AM
I'm 100% for it. I like Jason but I just don't see him ever having the fire/leadership to lead a team to a SB.
RWJ
April-2nd-2009, 06:32 AM
I am one who is against the trade for Cutler. I've given my various different reaons for it. There are those who feel Jason doesn't have it. You guys have given your reasons. It looks like this trade is gonna happen. I just want all the people who are for the trade to sign on this thread so next year at this time we can look back and say who was for the trade. There's not really no need for deabte. Just leave your mark if you're for Cutler.
To be totally fair about this, start another thread with those opposed. I know what your getting at DCMONEY. You want to be able to refer back to this thread and bash if Cutler doesn't work out. I caution though, this should be based ONLY on performance only and hope that all those for keeping J. Campbell agree.
A Skinhead in Saints Land
April-2nd-2009, 06:41 AM
To be totally fair about this, start another thread with those opposed. I know what your getting at DCMONEY. You want to be able to refer back to this thread and bash if Cutler doesn't work out. I caution though, this should be based ONLY on performance only and hope that all those for keeping J. Campbell agree.
I totally agree.
Also, I'm totally for the trade for Cutler. I'm tired of Jason "One More Year" Campbell, and if Cutler doesn't work out we can use the ever so popular "Bad O-line" excuse.
HogNose
April-2nd-2009, 06:44 AM
Pull the trigger now Danny. I've been on the Campbell train in the past, but I've finally come to realize that he is not a franchise QB and will never be the QB we all want him to be. How long do we wait for Campbell? We've blamed it on playbooks for too long.
Let him move on and carve out a good backup career. It worked for Gus.
Chump Bailey
April-2nd-2009, 06:48 AM
All for getting Cutler.
GoSkinsGo
April-2nd-2009, 06:49 AM
Pull the trigger. A real franchise quarterback is worth his weight in gold, no player effectively alters the outcome of the game like a quarterback.
Pro Cutler.
sempre_victrix
April-2nd-2009, 06:52 AM
No way would I give up two 1st round picks for Cutler.
Give JC some time in the pocket and if he continues to struggle, then look to replace him.
maskedsuperstar
April-2nd-2009, 06:59 AM
Get it done Vinny!! There is a reason the Skins haven't extended Campbells contract. We have made excuses for Campbell for too long. The offense averages 16 points a game!!! Enough of the OL excuses. The Steelers had the worst OL in the league and won the Super Bowl with good QB play.
maskedsuperstar
April-2nd-2009, 07:00 AM
No way would I give up two 1st round picks for Cutler.
Give JC some time in the pocket and if he continues to struggle, then look to replace him.
Do you think defenses will give Campbell time?
General NSJ
April-2nd-2009, 07:04 AM
Count me in for Cutler!
rd421
April-2nd-2009, 07:06 AM
Im in sign me up.....Campbell has not worked out here as of yet so even if he does well with someone else it will be more of a change of scenery thing I think....Im down!
whlinder
April-2nd-2009, 07:11 AM
I absolutely think Cutler is a better QB than Campbell. Both right now and in to the future. His ceiling is far higher than Campbell's.
Having said that, it depends on what we give up as to whether or not I think it is a good trade if it happens.
RedskinsNation
April-2nd-2009, 07:11 AM
Im against the trade. Keep our DRAFT PICKS PLEASE!!! This team loves to go one step forward and two steps back. By trading away Campbell we essentially trade away a 1st round pick (which he was) and a bunch of other picks that it took to be able to draft him AND whatever we give up now for Cutler. When you add it all up its damm near one entire draft for Tom Brady....oops i mean JAY CUTLER!!!
Cutler has won just about the same # of games as JC....I dont see the fascination - WE ARENT GETTING TOM BRADY!!! People act like John Elway in his prime is going to come here.
Im hopeing the Jets offer the farm or the Bears offer something better.
I think Skins fans are just addicted to change.
bad03xtreme
April-2nd-2009, 07:12 AM
Give me Cutler, or Colt. Either will be a huge upgrade over JC.
I agree 100%
rinkleroot
April-2nd-2009, 07:13 AM
I've never been a JC fan, so HELL YEAH bring on Jay!!
redskinsfanatical
April-2nd-2009, 07:14 AM
Pro Cutler
Spaceman Spiff
April-2nd-2009, 07:17 AM
I'm mostly for it. I think I'll roll my eyes a little if we indeed give up two first rounders...but Cutler will be good for us.
Get him.
jarias
April-2nd-2009, 07:17 AM
Im For It All The Way!
RedlightG20
April-2nd-2009, 07:18 AM
Wait, you want a younger, more firey and more proven leader in Cutler rather than Campbell?
Count me in.
Vicious
April-2nd-2009, 07:18 AM
Wait, you want a younger, more firey and more proven leader in Cutler rather than Campbell?
Count me in.
uh.. Cutler was not considered a leader in denver.. just an fyi
DCMONEY
April-2nd-2009, 07:19 AM
I totally agree.
Also, I'm totally for the trade for Cutler. I'm tired of Jason "One More Year" Campbell, and if Cutler doesn't work out we can use the ever so popular "Bad O-line" excuse.
Actually speaking the O-line excuse wouldn't work for Cutler IMO. They're are those who feel that his(Cutler's) pocket awareness and quick release are so great that it enabled him to be only sacked 12 times. I know better than that. There are some QB's that are better than others but to insinuate that a QB has the ability to be sacked only 12 times even if if his O-line is shot is a laughable thing to me. Cutler would have to perform no matter what the circumstances because thats what the great ones do according to some on this forum. Great or average a QB needs a decent line to consistently perform.
Big Mac Patty Wack
April-2nd-2009, 07:23 AM
Let's go on and get our franchise QB! I still love you Jason!
Buddha
April-2nd-2009, 07:26 AM
I'll sign on to the PRO Cutler list. Campbell has all the measurables on paper but has shown me that he lacks the gunslinger mentality. You can see the indecisiveness in his eyes every time he drops back to pass -- even when the OL gives him a perfect pocket. It's not confusion or a lack of intelligence to read the defense. It's a complete absence of confidence in his own abilities. I don't buy into the fact that he needs to be in a stable offense for more than one year. With the number of games under his belt, the QB swagger should have appeared by now. Cutler may be arrogant and throw interceptions, but I'd take that in a heartbeat over a QB that is too scared to pull the trigger.
This may also be the team's last chance to get real value by dealing Campbell. If he pulls off another season with under 20 TDs and an 8-8 record, he will have next to no trade value in my opinion. This may force the team to overpay him with a long-term deal especially if there are no other decent options on the market.
Send Denver this year's 1st and next year's 1st, then see if Campbell can bring in a high 2nd this year. I could live with that.
DCMONEY
April-2nd-2009, 07:29 AM
I'll sign on to the PRO Cutler list. Campbell has all the measurables on paper but has shown me that he lacks the gunslinger mentality. You can see the indecisiveness in his eyes every time he drops back to pass -- even when the OL gives him a perfect pocket. It's not confusion or a lack of intelligence to read the defense. It's a complete absence of confidence in his own abilities. I don't buy into the fact that he needs to be in a stable offense for more than one year. With the number of games under his belt, the QB swagger should have appeared by now. Cutler may be arrogant and throw interceptions, but I'd take that in a heartbeat over a QB that is too scared to pull the trigger.
This may also be the team's last chance to get real value by dealing Campbell. If he pulls off another season with under 20 TDs and an 8-8 record, he will have next to no trade value in my opinion. This may force the team to overpay him with a long-term deal especially if there are no other decent options on the market.
Send Denver this year's 1st and next year's 1st, then see if Campbell can bring in a high 2nd this year. I could live with that.
Wow! You'd give up two 1st rounders? Whew
MattFancy
April-2nd-2009, 07:31 AM
I'm for Cutler. However, if we don't get him I'm not going to be angry because I think JC is a good QB. I just think that when a QB the likes of Cutler is avaliable you have to try and get him. I would much rather give Colt a chance because I think he has alot of potential, but I think Danny wants Cutler.
Titaw
April-2nd-2009, 07:31 AM
I'm in, as long as we don't give up too much.
DGREENHULK
April-2nd-2009, 07:35 AM
Pull the trigger now Danny. I've been on the Campbell train in the past, but I've finally come to realize that he is not a franchise QB and will never be the QB we all want him to be. How long do we wait for Campbell? We've blamed it on playbooks for too long.
Let him move on and carve out a good backup career. It worked for Gus.
100% agree at times I have conducted the JC train, but an opportunity like landing a YOUNG superstar with a rocket for an arm and a natural born leader just doesn't happen..this is a once in a blue moon opportunity. Go ahead Danny pull the trigger. Besides if JC didn't workout this year we would have used our 2010 1st rounder on a QB anyway.
Good luck JC....I don't think your a back up you'll win a starting job in another city...I just hope it's in the AFC ....
spjunkies
April-2nd-2009, 07:40 AM
I like Jason as a person, but I lime Jay more as a QB.
Tastes Like Chicken
April-2nd-2009, 07:42 AM
see my sig, do this ASAP
McD5
April-2nd-2009, 07:45 AM
100% for it.
And much better than the Haynesworth signing.
The single best move Snyder has ever made.
Gibbs Hog Heaven
April-2nd-2009, 07:45 AM
I like Jason as a person, but I lime Jay more as a QB.
Exactly, but there's NO room for sentiment in sports, let alone football. And even more so when that "nice guy" is under performing on Sunday's.
Hail.
ST is my boy
April-2nd-2009, 07:45 AM
Wow! You'd give up two 1st rounders? Whew
As good as these people think he is........screw it....lets give them our first rounders until 2020.
jasjhughes
April-2nd-2009, 07:47 AM
Cutler is clearly an upgrade over Campbell, but probably not as much as an additional first rounder would require, so I'd have to see the terms.
The problem is that we have now done to campbell what denver did Cutler and we probably have to get it done.
TMK9973
April-2nd-2009, 07:48 AM
I'm for it. Campbell is a OK QB but is never going to be great. Cutler is a very good QB who Could be great.
clubisyohankovic
April-2nd-2009, 07:49 AM
Mainly because the story broke, I am for the trade.
The trade better happen now, because if it doesn't, we'll be in the same situation Denver is -- a disgruntled qb that the team tried to trade away.
Smoot Point Really
April-2nd-2009, 07:49 AM
I'm "Pro-Campbell"... But you can't argue with statistics... Therefore, I'm also "Pro-Cutler".
Cutler is a year and a half younger than Campbell... has 1 more start than Campbell... Has thrown 90 more passes than Campbell... has 87 more completions than Campbell... and now for the telling stats: has 1800 more yards passing than Campbell... has 19 more TDs than Campbell... has 10 games where his team has scored more than 30 points (to Campbell's 2)...
Borrowing from Tandler's blog: We gave up 27 points once last year (pre-Haynesworth)... Cutler is 13-5 over his career when his team gives up 24 points or less on defense. Campbell is 16-14 in those situations over his career.
Even if it doesn't work out... The only justification for not getting this done would be giving up too much in the process... Two 1st round picks is not giving up too much for a proven franchise QB who is 25 and a Pro Bowler. Campbell is a good QB, but he hasn't proven to have the same potential as Cutler yet.
clubisyohankovic
April-2nd-2009, 07:50 AM
Cutler is clearly an upgrade over Campbell, but
The problem is that we have now done to campbell what denver did Cutler and we probably have to get it done.
exactly.
BuryYourDuke
April-2nd-2009, 07:52 AM
I am down!! Mark me down!!! Having Cutler for 10 years is worth taking a step back this year.
Buddha
April-2nd-2009, 07:53 AM
Wow! You'd give up two 1st rounders? Whew
Unfortunately that is a fair market price for a young Pro Bowl QB with a rocket arm that is still a few years away from hitting his prime.
SittingBull
April-2nd-2009, 07:53 AM
When the team fails with Cutler behind center you all will simply blame it on the holes we couldn't fill due to what we gave up to get him. It's a win/win....or a lose/lose depending on how you look at it.
McD5
April-2nd-2009, 07:54 AM
As good as these people think he is........screw it....lets give them our first rounders until 2020.
People act like we are giving up two first rounders, and that is some big deal.
We aren't. Not even close.
We are giving up hardly anything at all.
It would take us one first round pick to draft him. So just think of it as our first round pick this year is Cutler.
Next year? We are giving up a first. And with any luck, we are trading JC for an additional second.
Bottom line? We draft Cutler with the first, and we trade a 1st next year, for an extra second.
That isn't anything for a real quarterback that can start immediately, and not need 5 years to develop like JC.
Drunken Master III
April-2nd-2009, 07:54 AM
I was undecided at first, but now I am for it.
ntotoro
April-2nd-2009, 07:54 AM
I'm not exactly pro-Cutler, but I'm about 1000% convinced Campbell will never take this team anywhere.
Not sure where that puts me.
Diesel70ChipOnWhite
April-2nd-2009, 07:55 AM
Yes.
http://lp.imageg.net/prod?set=key[name],value[C\UTLER]&set=key[number],value[16]&set=key[displaysize],value[220]&load=url[http://chains.imageg.net/graphics/dynamic/chains/p2755248_customback.chain]
6 Was not available.
Warpath11
April-2nd-2009, 07:58 AM
If it is really two first round picks I am not so sure but I do agree with people that are saying Cutler is an upgrade to Campbell. Officially, though, put me down as a pro-Cutler guy.
Smoot Point Really
April-2nd-2009, 07:58 AM
Mainly because the story broke, I am for the trade.
The trade better happen now, because if it doesn't, we'll be in the same situation Denver is -- a disgruntled qb that the team tried to trade away.
No, we won't... Denver tried to trade for a 32-year-old coach's pet-project when they already had a 25-year old Pro Bowl franchise QB.
Cassel had 21 TDs, 11 INTs and 47 sacks last year... The prior year, Brady had 50 TDs, 8 INTs and 21 sacks... Something tells me that if Cutler was behind center for the Patriots, he would've ended up with numbers FAR more closely resembling Brady's than Cassel's...
DCMONEY
April-2nd-2009, 08:12 AM
If it is really two first round picks I am not so sure but I do agree with people that are saying Cutler is an upgrade to Campbell. Officially, though, put me down as a pro-Cutler guy.
If the Skins are offering two 1st rounders and Campbell, I don't know what the hell the Broncos are waiting for.
HokieSean24
April-2nd-2009, 08:16 AM
Cutler is a sure-fire franchise QB, Campbell is a potential franchise QB at best. Its a no-brainer.
The transition would be smooth on here, the QB would still be JC.
DCMONEY
April-2nd-2009, 08:16 AM
I'll say for the record also Jim Zorn will get the blame instead of Cutler. Cutler has been deemed the saviour. Zorn will be the next scapegoat and then Shanahan will be brought in.
fdarugar
April-2nd-2009, 08:18 AM
I'm all for Cutler...dont be a dummy. Cutman...
IbleedBnG83
April-2nd-2009, 08:19 AM
DCMONEY,
will you bump this thread when Cutler works out?
These threads are pointless because NO ONE HERE is better or more qualified then the next person to give an opinion worth holding them against to. If anyone here is right or wrong, its because of a 50/50 chance.
jnhay
April-2nd-2009, 08:20 AM
I am really against it. Not that Cutler isn't good, but our offensive line is old, and we could use our picks to improve in that area.
dieselfan44
April-2nd-2009, 08:20 AM
For it...I like JC but I think he'll always be a decent QB, not a great QB...it's our time to get a guy that can be feared by other teams...I don't think any of our opponets think that JC17 can beat them.
superozman
April-2nd-2009, 08:20 AM
I'm for it...except now i have to buy another damn jersey...sheesh.
USS Redskins
April-2nd-2009, 08:45 AM
The Skins will need a new QB by 2010 anyway, since Campbell isnt the answer. Do the deal. The Skins would only mismanage the picks they are giving away anyway.
nebster21
April-2nd-2009, 08:46 AM
I am for it
ntotoro
April-2nd-2009, 08:48 AM
I'll say for the record also Jim Zorn will get the blame instead of Cutler. Cutler has been deemed the saviour. Zorn will be the next scapegoat and then Shanahan will be brought in.
Wouldn't this make more sense in your thread?
Regardless, making Zorn a scapegoat is implying he's Head Coach material to begin with. I think it's patently obvious that's still questionable.
DCMONEY
April-2nd-2009, 08:53 AM
No, we won't... Denver tried to trade for a 32-year-old coach's pet-project when they already had a 25-year old Pro Bowl franchise QB.
Cassel had 21 TDs, 11 INTs and 47 sacks last year... The prior year, Brady had 50 TDs, 8 INTs and 21 sacks... Something tells me that if Cutler was behind center for the Patriots, he would've ended up with numbers FAR more closely resembling Brady's than Cassel's...
Ding Ding Ding, Well why didn't he do it that for Denver? HE was only sacked 12 times. So why didn't he throw for 50td's?
rumplestilskin
April-2nd-2009, 08:58 AM
Now Cutler is whining that he never wanted to be traded. I just feel like we are giving up a man for a boy. The boy may be better or seem better right now but at the end of the day the man has more to offer. Cutler is a spoiled brat. Campbell is a professional. That is not a debate that is a fact. If we give up JC and the picks we are cutting our throats and digress to the same old cookie jar grap. Then we all know what happens our hands will get slapped,
Trevor
April-2nd-2009, 08:59 AM
I'm for it. Cutler>>>>Campbell in my mind. I just don't see Jason as anything other than a caretaker type of QB. Cutler makes things happen and scores points.
brianm23
April-2nd-2009, 09:00 AM
I"m 100% for it.
Yeah, are you "supporters" the same dummies that signed that thread saying Jason would have 25 TDS last year?.....LOLOLOLOLOLOL
Yeah, you guys should stop while you are ahead. Actually, forget ahead, you are way behind.
sableholic
April-2nd-2009, 09:14 AM
sign me up for the right price, not sure i like the idea of 2 first round picks but I'd easily do campbell + our first.
Smoot Point Really
April-2nd-2009, 09:22 AM
Ding Ding Ding, Well why didn't he do it that for Denver? HE was only sacked 12 times. So why didn't he throw for 50td's?
I don't suppose you would accept the argument that the Patriots are a much better team than the Broncos...
SteveFromYellowstone
April-2nd-2009, 09:23 AM
I'm for it. I'll own up if I'm wrong, but I don't think I will be.
PleaseBlitz
April-2nd-2009, 09:23 AM
Im for it as long as we dont get raped of draft picks.
ATTENTION FRONT OFFICE: The Broncos HAVE to trade him now.......you dont need to give up 2 first round picks.
celts32
April-2nd-2009, 09:28 AM
I am one who is against the trade for Cutler. I've given my various different reaons for it. There are those who feel Jason doesn't have it. You guys have given your reasons. It looks like this trade is gonna happen. I just want all the people who are for the trade to sign on this thread so next year at this time we can look back and say who was for the trade. There's not really no need for debate. Just leave your mark if you're for Cutler.
Yes...get it done Dan!
I think Campbell can be good but Cutler can be great.
Madison Redskin
April-2nd-2009, 09:32 AM
Initially, I supported this trade. After hearing how much Denver wants, I don't. I think Cutler will fail to meet expectations, Jason's development will be hurt, and the Redskins will badly miss the high draft picks it will have given up.
jweisk1
April-2nd-2009, 09:33 AM
Yes...get it done Dan!
I think Campbell can be good but Cutler can be great.
Great behind our O-line....really??
MontanaSkins
April-2nd-2009, 09:35 AM
Cutler will either be really great or really bad for the Redskins IMO. No in between which is what Jason gives them. I am for it because I am just desperate enough to take the chance, just like Danny.
On a side note my dad is a huge Broncos fan with a Cutler jersey. Do you think the Redskins shop will give me a deal on a Redskin Cutler jersey if I trade in the Bronco jersey. :silly:
ntotoro
April-2nd-2009, 09:44 AM
Great behind our O-line....really??
We had an average Line last year. Certainly not great, but not nearly the turnstyle people want to make it out to be.
This seems to be the common excuse for Campbell. He can be good if everything is perfect, all the blocks are picked up, all the routes are perfectly run, etcetera and so on. Otherwise, his performance is constantly excused by one of those. I don't know if Cutler is the answer here, but I'm pretty sure Campbell isn't ever going to become a QB that will lead this team anywhere now or in the future.
Glockypoo
April-2nd-2009, 09:48 AM
Cutler straight up for Campbell would be a no-brainer. But it gets a little sticky when we're talking about trading away multiple first round picks for Culter. That's too much IMHO. Cutler for this years 1st and a 3rd in 2010 I would do - if we can flip J-Cam for a 2nd this year.
Bigkatt
April-2nd-2009, 09:50 AM
If DCMONEY is against it...then it must be a good deal.
SkinsNoles21
April-2nd-2009, 09:52 AM
For it all day ...
skinsarethebest
April-2nd-2009, 09:53 AM
Cutler's the right way to go. You don't continue to have hope in a QB who started the season 6-2 and ended the season 2-6. That's not progression that you would expect from someone who's getting better. It's regression, or at the very least, hitting a very serious wall.
No Excuses
April-2nd-2009, 09:54 AM
100% Cutler supporter. Dude makes plays and gets the job done. Not his fault that his defense is filled with cast away and washed up hags.
People make way to many excuses for Campbell. The dude can't do crap with an elite running back and two solid receivers. He has done nothing in his career so far to warrant this much job security and I'm glad the management is doing something to light a fire under him.
Capt Rich Fla
April-2nd-2009, 09:55 AM
I want to know why the Broncos do not want Cutler. Was he a bad QB? If he was, why do we want him? hmmm
LD0506
April-2nd-2009, 09:57 AM
Don't all of you go trying to throw your panties at the stage at the same time...
http://i68.photobucket.com/albums/i21/ThatDaveGuy7/JayFanClub.jpg
Andre3stacks
April-2nd-2009, 10:10 AM
IM actually for it so fools can realize how stupid we ****in are by not actually waiting **** out and always being quick to act in the offseason. I hope Campbell plays his heart out with the Broncos or wherever he goes.
Andre3stacks
April-2nd-2009, 10:12 AM
Cutler's the right way to go. You don't continue to have hope in a QB who started the season 6-2 and ended the season 2-6. That's not progression that you would expect from someone who's getting better. It's regression, or at the very least, hitting a very serious wall.
the biasness is showing like **** on this forum. How did the Broncos start last year? How did they end?? **** how did Cutlers ass end???
Wrong Direction
April-2nd-2009, 10:20 AM
My first post on ExtremeSkins...I'm for a Cutler trade as long as the price isn't exorbitant.
If we could somehow pull off Campbell, Rogers and our 3rd for Cutler, I'd be ecstatic. Something along the lines of Campbell and our #1 for Cutler would be fine I guess too.
Cutler will bring an entirely different dynamic to the Redskins's offense. Count on it.
Natmagic
April-2nd-2009, 10:21 AM
who's the guy with the "Soul Glow Must Go" sig?
bring on THE CUT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Thirtyfive2seven
April-2nd-2009, 10:25 AM
I am in favor of the trade. I believe that Cutler is a true WCO Quarterback whereas Campbell was thrown into various systems by poor front office planning. I don't believe its entirely Campbell's fault for this, but regardless I want what is best for the Redskins. I believe that Cutler is the real deal, therefore I am in favor of this trade. I guess that also depends on how much the Skins give up to acquire him...
willmb5
April-2nd-2009, 10:42 AM
I want Cutler.......to be our quarterback
Bang
April-2nd-2009, 10:53 AM
I'd take Cutler in a heartbeat.
~Bang
Superbowl Mohawk
April-2nd-2009, 11:42 AM
"Hail!" Bring his drinking vandy butt over here!!! Riggo would get smashed and play hungover, but he'd always get er done!!! LOL! Bring his drinking diabetic butt over here! I proclaim him Jay "Sugar Cane" Cutler!!! 2 first rounders and Campbell for their 3/5 rounders this or next year.
gorebd82
April-2nd-2009, 11:45 AM
I've been a Campbell supporter because I believe he can be very good. I've always hated the Colt supporters because that is just a retarded mancrush. Cutler is a different story. He's simply better than Campbell (by far) and gives us a better chance to win. Not only to compete immediately, but a long term solution that could potentially put together a string of championships.
KyleVA
April-2nd-2009, 11:54 AM
Please don't get Cutler.
Please.
Please.
mark327
April-2nd-2009, 12:05 PM
Do you Pro-Cutler's think he's going to come in here and take this team to the play-offs next year ?
Are you Pro -Cutler's going to be satisfied with another 8-8 season?
This is a BIG mistake by this Redskins organization . They will give up way to much as they always do in trades :mad:
This Organization is Absolutely Nuts Throwing away another 1st round draft pick and from what i'm hearing either Rodgers or Landry :doh:
Pathedic:chair:
tml6157
April-2nd-2009, 12:06 PM
I would think that we would gain the Broncos 2nd rounder in return if we give them JC and our first. IMO here is how it breaks down. It is known that we need an OT and we have a good shot at 2 being available at #13. Also we need an OLB. We will have some of those available at #13 as well. So we if trade away our 1st and gain back their second we would need to fill either of those holes with a player taken with their 2nd round pick. I dont think there is a huge argument as to Cutler being a better QB then Campbell. But what you have to look at is the drop off of talent from #13 to say the 42-45 pick range. If we are picking in the high to mid 40s players like Sintim, Beatty and Loadholt would be there. SO my question to you guys is which would garnish improvement to our team? Campbell and Oher/Smith/Maualuga or Cutler and Beatty/Loadholt/Sintim.
Heidenreich
April-2nd-2009, 12:26 PM
Welcome to DC, Cutler.
Lets get this done.....
Skinned
April-2nd-2009, 12:29 PM
I support a deal for Cutler and would be ecstatic.
I also wouldn't have an issue if they traded Campbell for a 2nd and then used that 2nd to move up to get Sanchez.
QB is the most important position and if you are not happy with what you have, which Snyder and Cerrato clearly aren't, then you try to upgrade when better options appear.
Both Cutler and Sanchez are leaders on that field. The emotion they show is a huge part of getting their teammates behind them and JC clearly doesn't have this. Nobody on the Skins is confident that JC will be the guy....he hasn't given reason to. :2cents:
21 always
April-2nd-2009, 12:29 PM
All for having a QB (Cutler) who when were down 5 with 1 dive left comes out of the huddle with the mindset that im gonna score .. go ahead and stop me! as opposed to Jason who is a deer in headlights!
RiggosMohawk
April-2nd-2009, 12:34 PM
I'm 100% for Cutler.
Put Jaws down for supporting this move too. He has been & still is 100% for Cutler since before the 06 draft, and I actually listen to his opinion on these things.
Powered by vBulletin™ Version 4.0.6 Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.