View Full Version : RI: Jeremy Bridges agrees to terms
paintrain
May-3rd-2009, 10:32 AM
Didn't see this anywhere.. http://blog.washingtonpost.com/redskinsinsider/
Redskins have agreed to terms with OT Jeremy Bridges.. He's started in the NFL for a couple of teams and has impressed coaches in the minicamp.
Does this solve our RT question or is just another guy in the mix?
IbleedBnG83
May-3rd-2009, 10:33 AM
Does this solve our RT question or is just another guy in the mix?
Obviously another guy in the mix. Lets hope him and Mike Williams do something to show they are worth starting.
SkinsTerps26
May-3rd-2009, 10:35 AM
we need a daily mike williams weight watch.
can he be sent to the biggest loser?
Burgold
May-3rd-2009, 10:36 AM
The more competition the better this point. We're in need of everything at this point. Someone to sieze the starters job... no one can claim it by default this year... and depth.
IbleedBnG83
May-3rd-2009, 10:38 AM
The guy is listed as guard on the NFL website...
http://www.nfl.com/players/jeremybridges/profile?id=BRI127961
Rdskn4Lyf21
May-3rd-2009, 10:41 AM
Another guy in the mix.
My mancrush is settled though and it's who I hope is the fix: Mike Williams.
dachozenone
May-3rd-2009, 10:44 AM
Rotoworld is saying he is an upgrade at RT?
http://www.rotoworld.com/content/playerpages/player_main.aspx?sport=NFL&id=742
Redskins agreed to terms with OL Jeremy Bridges, formerly of the Panthers.
The 'Skins are desperate for a youth influx on the offensive line, and Bridges will be an immediate upagrade at right tackle. His addition is good news for Clinton Portis owners, but he'll have to keep his nose clean in D.C. after being arrested twice in the past year.
IbleedBnG83
May-3rd-2009, 10:46 AM
Rotoworld is saying he is an upgrade at RT?
http://www.rotoworld.com/content/playerpages/player_main.aspx?sport=NFL&id=742
Redskins agreed to terms with OL Jeremy Bridges, formerly of the Panthers.
The 'Skins are desperate for a youth influx on the offensive line, and Bridges will be an immediate upagrade at right tackle. His addition is good news for Clinton Portis owners, but he'll have to keep his nose clean in D.C. after being arrested twice in the past year.
Nice! I really hope this is the case. I'll go to the Panthers board and checkout what they think.
DWinzit
May-3rd-2009, 10:46 AM
Does this solve our RT question or is just another guy in the mix?Not sure but at least they're recognizing the issue and looking at lots of options!!!
paintrain
May-3rd-2009, 10:49 AM
From Scouts, Inc.:
Expert's Take Bridges has been with three teams in his ive years in the league. He was picked up by the Panthers and started all 14 games he played in 2006, and in 2007 he started 10 of the 13 games he played after being suspended at the beginning of the season for conduct detrimental to the team. He has some talent and teams keep trying to get him on the field. He is fairly athletic and has quick feet in a small area, and can use his long arms to control and steer defensive linemen past the play. Bridges can drive his feet to sustain blocks but just does not finish most blocks off like he should. He is a little stiff in the hips and can struggle to adjust and recover when he starts to lose it and will fall off some blocks. He has adequate lateral range in pass pro but does not recover and right himself very quickly against counter moves. He does not play as big as he measures and will get out-muscled more than you'd expect. If he can learn to devote himself to the game and keep his intensity level up he can be a very functional right tackle.
Redskins:Victory_or_Death
May-3rd-2009, 10:49 AM
This bothers me:
Panthers OL Jeremy Bridges was arrested for simple assault and battery after an incident with a bouncer at a restaurant bar Saturday night.
He was also cited for "communicating threats" after going Javon Walker with a bottle of Dom Perignon, shaking it up and letting it spew all over the patrons. Bridges allegedly got angry when the bouncer escorted him out and pushed him out of his way. Bridges was found guilty of pointing a gun before last season. The NFL will likely announce a suspension in the offseason.
Panthers starting G Jeremy Bridges was found guilty of pointing a gun and was given a 60-day suspended sentence on Tuesday in Mecklenburg County Court.
Bridges' attorney said his client would appeal the decision, that included one year of unsupervised probation, a fine and community service. Bridges was suspended by the Panthers for the first two games of the season after he was arrested on July 26.
And apparently doesn't brush his teeth:
Panthers G Jeremy Bridges missed Sunday's game with an abscessed molar.
It was a surprise when Bridges was listed as inactive for Sunday's game, but he apparently aggravated the tooth while eating before the game and was in too much pain to play.Hopefully Buges can straighten any attitude out and buy him some Crest.
HailGreen28
May-3rd-2009, 10:50 AM
Not sure but at least they're recognizing the issue and looking at lots of options!!!We HAD lots of options: draft, trade, FA. Now we're down to one: FA
Still I'd prefer this way to mortaging our future yet again with trades. Let's hope the FO can find some diamonds in the rough this time, or it'll be a long season.
Redskins:Victory_or_Death
May-3rd-2009, 10:50 AM
Not sure but at least they're recognizing the issue and looking at lots of options!!!Thank God! :D
chipwhich
May-3rd-2009, 10:51 AM
Not sure but at least they're recognizing the issue and looking at lots of options!!!
It's like when they recognized we had issues at corner and brought in Mike Rumpf and other scrubs. So what if Rumpf was a former first round pick. If they couldn't play in the past, no amount of bringing in scrubs will make them good in the future.
It makes the non drafting of an oline really look scary given how many scrubs they are rolling into Redskins park.
terrifNick21
May-3rd-2009, 10:54 AM
Sounds good to me. Hope he can come in and play well. Not like he has much competition anyway..lol.
Long n Left
May-3rd-2009, 10:54 AM
Living here in Charlotte, I think Bridges showed some flashes for the Puddycats, and was a reliable backup.
Just keep dude away from the strip clubs, and he could very well make the team. Starter? Dunno, but he'll add much needed depth.
jwpanic
May-3rd-2009, 10:54 AM
wow. he sat out a game with a toothache?
toughen up, lady.
Thinking Skins
May-3rd-2009, 10:56 AM
Sounds like a cool pickup. I'd actually expect more from him than from Mike Williams.
gutlead74
May-3rd-2009, 10:58 AM
I dont believe he has moved around due to lack of ability, apperently he is just a dumbass
CapitalDefense
May-3rd-2009, 10:59 AM
He is a guard who has filled in at tackle, and a very big one at that. He started alot of games for Arizona and Philadelphia, then Carolina last year all in a backup roll. I believe he started 5 games for Carolina and filled in nicely last year, they only let him go because of 2 arrest both gun charges.
If he can stay out of legal trouble he will make this team.
DieselPwr44
May-3rd-2009, 10:59 AM
wow. he sat out a game with a toothache?
toughen up, lady.
You ever had an abcessed tooth?
ZoEd
May-3rd-2009, 11:01 AM
we need a daily mike williams weight watch.
can he be sent to the biggest loser?
Tell you what, he looks good for 400lbs. When I heard he was that big I was envisioning big like that DL that used to play for Minnesota or the OL that used to play for Dallas. Sorry, I'm too lazy to search for names right now.
Anyway, he looks pretty lean considering his weight. Ends are going to have to go into a different zipcode to get around him. Hell, snap the ball and all he should have to do is fall down in front of people.
Redskins:Victory_or_Death
May-3rd-2009, 11:02 AM
I dont believe he has moved around due to lack of ability, apperently he is just a dumbassThen he should get along with Vinny really well.
gatorskin77
May-3rd-2009, 11:03 AM
Wow sounds like a pretty classy guy
Rdskn4Lyf21
May-3rd-2009, 11:03 AM
wow. he sat out a game with a toothache?
toughen up, lady.
:rotflmao:
You ever had an abcessed tooth?
Diesel is right though...that affects the rest of you greatly. It still sounds funny :silly:
Thinking Skins
May-3rd-2009, 11:03 AM
He is a guard who has filled in at tackle, and a very big one at that. He started alot of games for Arizona and Philadelphia, then Carolina last year all in a backup roll. I believe he started 5 games for Carolina and filled in nicely last year, they only let him go because of 2 arrest both gun charges.
If he can stay out of legal trouble he will make this team.
I kinda like that versatility. It means that we have some competition with Reinhart for the backup RG spot as well as competition with Jansen/Heyer for the backup RT spot.
MartinC
May-3rd-2009, 11:06 AM
I dont believe he has moved around due to lack of ability, apperently he is just a dumbass
Or a steriod user with the resultant mood and aggression issues.
Hawk Finn
May-3rd-2009, 11:08 AM
I was intrigued when he was released by the Cats due to his versatility. The legal woes are a concern, but I am thrilled to have him on this team. :laugh:
At the very least, he provides quality depth...not just another body on the roster at a position of need, which is what I feared with the Williams signing.
Redskins:Victory_or_Death
May-3rd-2009, 11:11 AM
It's like when they recognized we had issues at corner and brought in Mike Rumpf and other scrubs. So what if Rumpf was a former first round pick. If they couldn't play in the past, no amount of bringing in scrubs will make them good in the future.
It makes the non drafting of an oline really look scary given how many scrubs they are rolling into Redskins park.Well... we had "The Hogs". Then we had "The Dirtbags".
Now it could be "The Misfits".
http://kb3011.k12.sd.us/The%20Misfits.jpg
That's for you STB21. :D
ciresolstice
May-3rd-2009, 11:34 AM
I'm all for it...this is pretty much the only avenue/last effort the Skins have now...bring them in, see what they can do, and maybe a good enough gem will be discovered.(starter, rotational, quality depth.)
Sawyer5500
May-3rd-2009, 11:49 AM
Bridges will be starting at RT. Now if they can re-sign Kendall i will be feeling pretty good about our o-line.
Oldskool
May-3rd-2009, 12:02 PM
Jeremy Bridges-T- Redskins May. 3 - 11:33 am et
Redskins agreed to terms with OL Jeremy Bridges, formerly of the Panthers.
The 'Skins are desperate for a youth influx on the offensive line, and Bridges will be an immediate upgrade at right tackle. His addition is good news for Clinton Portis owners, but he'll have to keep his nose clean in D.C. after being arrested twice in the past year. Aging veteran Jon Jansen will begin picking up snaps at guard and center in anticipation of a reserve role.
Source: Washington Post
Travdaskin
May-3rd-2009, 12:05 PM
Height: 6-4 Weight: 326 Age: 29
Dude has great size, hopefully this spot is now established...
gutlead74
May-3rd-2009, 12:16 PM
Or a steriod user with the resultant mood and aggression issues.
Good and valid point.
RammsteinSkins
May-3rd-2009, 12:18 PM
I think he can start and do pretty well, like Colombo for Dallas. Never did anything in Chicago but did good with Dallas.
spjunkies
May-3rd-2009, 12:19 PM
He was pretty solid in Iron Man.
Chump Bailey
May-3rd-2009, 12:23 PM
Sounds like he has serious character flaws.
Mickalino
May-3rd-2009, 12:24 PM
Not an answer.
Just because we have a large amount of bodies, doesn't necessarily mean we're bound to find a jewel in the rough.
Sounds like we have a HUGE amount of average, or below average players,competing for one job, and an average player will win it.
terpfan
May-3rd-2009, 12:29 PM
May not be a model citizen but at least it sounds like he's got some talent.
LD0506
May-3rd-2009, 12:47 PM
Thanks for the info on this guy, it is always so much easier to just come here and let someone else do all the work.
The guy could be good, and no one knows until we see him in action but he seems to have some definite upside. Getting him into a lockerrom with players like Fletcher and Samuels could easily straighten his ass out, one of our unacknowledged strengths is the character of our team.
I am enjoying how a certain faction here is already dismissing him, Williams, etc., rather than even considering the possibility that a change of scenery might make any difference.
jivelikenice
May-3rd-2009, 12:51 PM
Bridges will be starting at RT. Now if they can re-sign Kendall i will be feeling pretty good about our o-line.
I don't think thats necessary at this point. Reinhart is a natural guard and Bridges has the size and experience to also be a fill in on the interior of the line if anyone goes down to injuries. I like that they're throwing numbers at the problem with the hope that 1-2 guys can produce. Competition should bring up the level of play. The other thing that's a reason for optimism about this group is that these are big dudes and we're really increasing the size of our line which IMP has been a problem in the past.
Lets say Mike Williams can become the starter on the right side at 360 lbs....The average weight of our o-line will be 324 pounds. Last years that number was 304 when Jansen started......Yes we need lineman that are in shape, but our size on the line has been an issue....
James Moss
May-3rd-2009, 12:56 PM
Oh yeah, keep on perpetuating those myths. Steroids don't cause people to become a-holes. It's like this; if you're already are an a-hole; you'll be an even bigger a-hole on roids, but they don't turn ordinary people into a-holes.
bgreg
May-3rd-2009, 01:09 PM
You know, I'd actually feel OK about a Samuels-Dockery-Rabach/Jansen-Thomas-Williams/Bridges line.
Darth Tater
May-3rd-2009, 01:21 PM
We don't really know if anything is the solution until REAL games are actually played. Well, I suppose if we had a machine that could produce the physical version of 2001 or 2002 Jansen along with the experience he's had with Buges, maybe you could say we had a real solution. Even if we'd gotten the consensus best OT in the draft, you really couldn't say the problem is solved. I mean, high pick OTs have busted (Lachey was pretty much a bust until he came here), been moved around (May was drafted to be the stud LT but didn't find traction until he played Guard) or took a few years to become solid.
DCDiesel44
May-3rd-2009, 01:32 PM
The more guys we bring in, the more competition, the more competition, the better we get. Bring em in.
alwaysaskin
May-3rd-2009, 02:19 PM
This is a sign to us and to Jansen that the FO and Zorn are dreading the possibility that Jon will be start on opening day, Bridges, Williams, Heyer, they are hoping one of these players beats Jansen out. It's almost desperation time at RT
Tastes Like Chicken
May-3rd-2009, 02:32 PM
If Samuels goes down, we are in major trouble. Our starting RT is gonna be "meh-by-committee' as it is. But there's not a whole lot we can do about the bookends until next offseason.
TheLongshot
May-3rd-2009, 02:47 PM
This is a sign to us and to Jansen that the FO and Zorn are dreading the possibility that Jon will be start on opening day, Bridges, Williams, Heyer, they are hoping one of these players beats Jansen out. It's almost desperation time at RT
Not really. Bridges is an experienced guy who can play both guard and tackle. If he doesn't win the RT job, he's pretty good depth. Considering all the worrywarts in the JLC OL thread, he should address some of those concerns.
If Samuels goes down, we are in major trouble. Our starting RT is gonna be "meh-by-committee' as it is. But there's not a whole lot we can do about the bookends until next offseason.
Most teams in the NFL would be in trouble if they lost their starting LT. The guys who usually start there are guys who were top draft picks, and you rarely have the equivalent on the bench.
SAli457180
May-3rd-2009, 02:53 PM
If Samuels goes down, we are in major trouble. Our starting RT is gonna be "meh-by-committee' as it is. But there's not a whole lot we can do about the bookends until next offseason.
Yeah that would be a major disaster. Depth has always been a major issue with this team because they've chosen to ignore key positions along the OL in the draft and FA. Hopefully guys like Bridges and Williams can make the team and become that depth that they're searching for.
jtyler42
May-3rd-2009, 03:06 PM
The other thing that's a reason for optimism about this group is that these are big dudes and we're really increasing the size of our line which IMP has been a problem in the past.
Lets say Mike Williams can become the starter on the right side at 360 lbs....The average weight of our o-line will be 324 pounds. Last years that number was 304 when Jansen started......Yes we need lineman that are in shape, but our size on the line has been an issue....
I agree, and I think that this point has been vastly under-rated...our line has been on the smallish side ever since Norv left...I think this is why every yr for the past 4-5 yrs our line wears down by December...We had a finesse type line that was playing smash-mouth and that plays against 3 of the biggest, most physical, defenses in the NFL 6 times a yr...
Tastes Like Chicken
May-3rd-2009, 03:11 PM
Most teams in the NFL would be in trouble if they lost their starting LT. The guys who usually start there are guys who were top draft picks, and you rarely have the equivalent on the bench.
Trouble yes, major trouble though? Not all. I agree that not many teams (at all?) have equivalent talent on the bench. But our dropoff in talent isn't a slope, it's a cliff.
paintrain
May-3rd-2009, 03:12 PM
If Samuels goes down, we are in major trouble. Our starting RT is gonna be "meh-by-committee' as it is. But there's not a whole lot we can do about the bookends until next offseason.That's great insight JLC. If any team loses their Pro Bowl LT they are in trouble. Heyer has filled in previously and would fill in again. It's a dropoff but that's the same scenario 32 teams would be in as well.
TheLongshot
May-3rd-2009, 03:22 PM
Trouble yes, major trouble though? Not all. I agree that not many teams (at all?) have equivalent talent on the bench. But our dropoff in talent isn't a slope, it's a cliff.
Actually, I thought Heyer did alright in replacing Samuels last year. Again, you don't find guys like Samuels on your bench. So no, I don't think it is a cliff. It certainly wasn't a couple of years ago when both Jansen and Thomas went down for the year.
Tastes Like Chicken
May-3rd-2009, 03:48 PM
That's great insight JLC. If any team loses their Pro Bowl LT they are in trouble. Heyer has filled in previously and would fill in again. It's a dropoff but that's the same scenario 32 teams would be in as well.
Thanks for entirely overlooking the word 'major.' :rolleyes:
And, JLC? Geez, personally insult me any other way but calling me THAT. :hysterical:
Heyer filled in? Really? Thanks for THAT major insight. Heyer was on skates much of the time. But I guess our eyes are seeing different things.
Actually, I thought Heyer did alright in replacing Samuels last year. Again, you don't find guys like Samuels on your bench. So no, I don't think it is a cliff. It certainly wasn't a couple of years ago when both Jansen and Thomas went down for the year.
Go back and re-read what I posted above to you. I KNOW that you don't find Chris Samuels on your bench. That's NOT what I'm saying.
I'm saying that you'd hope to find better than what we have at the OT position. And yes, I think it is a cliff moreso than a typical dropoff.
But, as is often the case, it's okay to disagree. My eyes saw something different than yours, it's cool. :)
I'm not okay with potential bookends of Stephen Heyer and '?". But that's just me. Knock on wood, CS is healthy all year and we win the division.
TheLongshot
May-3rd-2009, 03:58 PM
Go back and re-read what I posted above to you. I KNOW that you don't find Chris Samuels on your bench. That's NOT what I'm saying.
I'm saying that you'd hope to find better than what we have at the OT position. And yes, I think it is a cliff moreso than a typical dropoff.
But, as is often the case, it's okay to disagree. My eyes saw something different than yours, it's cool. :)
I'm not okay with potential bookends of Stephen Heyer and '?". But that's just me. Knock on wood, CS is healthy all year and we win the division.
So, what would make you comfortable? As I said, it seems that you want a more proven commodity there, and I'm just saying that most teams don't get much more proven than what we have. At least Heyer has made starts at LT, which is probably more than what you get with most teams.
Tastes Like Chicken
May-3rd-2009, 04:16 PM
So, what would make you comfortable? As I said, it seems that you want a more proven commodity there, and I'm just saying that most teams don't get much more proven than what we have. At least Heyer has made starts at LT, which is probably more than what you get with most teams.
Well for one thing (and let's just start beating the dead horse lol) we haven't had a plethora of draft picks the past several years. There is no supply of young, upper/mid-round draft talent waiting in the wings and developing. Last year we drafted that guard Rinehart, who couldn't even sniff the starting lineup despite the injuries we had.
Yes, Heyer has some playing time under his belt. That's all fine and dandy. But I think his upside is not considerably higher than what we've seen from him. And what I've seen (strictly IMO) was some promising success early, then some struggles (not hugely surprising for an UFA). I think the kid is 3rd tier, could become 2nd tier with development.
It helps the line overall to get Dock back, but let's not kid ourselves about him either and his false starts and inconsistent ability to pull.
Overall, our O line is pretty much piecemeal. I'm not gonna complain too much, as stated previously we at least addressed the D-line this offseason (much much overdue IMO) but it will take NEXT offseason to address the O line in lasting ways (unless Rinehart suddenly shows something on the field).
MrJL
May-3rd-2009, 04:23 PM
Jeremy Bridges-T- Redskins May. 3 - 11:33 am et
Redskins agreed to terms with OL Jeremy Bridges, formerly of the Panthers.
The 'Skins are desperate for a youth influx on the offensive line, and Bridges will be an immediate upgrade at right tackle. His addition is good news for Clinton Portis owners, but he'll have to keep his nose clean in D.C. after being arrested twice in the past year. Aging veteran Jon Jansen will begin picking up snaps at guard and center in anticipation of a reserve role.
Source: Washington Post
I think the Post is a little out of it, since Jansen doing that has nothing to do with this signing. I have to say Heyer was the probable starter before this.
Stormy
May-3rd-2009, 04:30 PM
So, what would make you comfortable? As I said, it seems that you want a more proven commodity there, and I'm just saying that most teams don't get much more proven than what we have. At least Heyer has made starts at LT, which is probably more than what you get with most teams.
I'm happy about the Bridges signing, as I think he is an upgrade at both RT and in terms of talented OL depth, if he can keep his nose clean. If he pans out, our OL becomes more viable for 2009. Then, if the F.O. will just follow through next year and make OL a priority with 2 of their top 3 draft selections, there's a possibility that we could be back in solid shape in terms of the quality of playable depth on our roster. The defensive backfield is young and talented, the DL has the potential to be vastly better for the present and future, the WR/TE corps could be exceptional if 2/3 of our 2008 our trio develops etc... So, we could enter 2010 needing solely to address OL, LB and RB that's very doable).
Here's hoping Bridges works out nicely, and that Williams somehow surprises after so many years off.
HoyaSkins28
May-3rd-2009, 07:52 PM
This is good. I like what Danny and Vinny are doing at the moment. After a sub-par draft with the exception of Orakpo theyre adding role players to come in and compete in areas of need. This is exactly what they should be doing at this time of year. Mike Williams, Bridges, Hackett, Washington... all good choices.
MrJL
May-3rd-2009, 08:30 PM
This is good. I like what Danny and Vinny are doing at the moment. After a sub-par draft with the exception of Orakpo theyre adding role players to come in and compete in areas of need. This is exactly what they should be doing at this time of year. Mike Williams, Bridges, Hackett, Washington... all good choices.
THat's a good point. Everyone's making it like it's a disaster we're signing some guys that aren't top tier players. These people were in the NFL for a few years at least. There's a set number of players in the NFL, but tons of new guys coming in every year. Not enough players retire, and if fact many are playing longer than ever. That translates to proven NFL players looking for a job
wysknz1
May-3rd-2009, 08:48 PM
Sic'im Buges!!
Veretax
May-3rd-2009, 09:29 PM
if his true position is guard, should we be worried about Dock or Thomas?
BoRnAndRaiSedSkinsFan
May-3rd-2009, 09:47 PM
They may have signed him for the right guard position. He might be able to be an upgrade over Thomas and let Thomas be a backup with Rinehart. Then if Heyer can step up and do something at right tackle...the O Line might look ok or at least better than expected.
TheLongshot
May-3rd-2009, 10:44 PM
Well for one thing (and let's just start beating the dead horse lol) we haven't had a plethora of draft picks the past several years. There is no supply of young, upper/mid-round draft talent waiting in the wings and developing. Last year we drafted that guard Rinehart, who couldn't even sniff the starting lineup despite the injuries we had.
Yes, Heyer has some playing time under his belt. That's all fine and dandy. But I think his upside is not considerably higher than what we've seen from him. And what I've seen (strictly IMO) was some promising success early, then some struggles (not hugely surprising for an UFA). I think the kid is 3rd tier, could become 2nd tier with development.
It helps the line overall to get Dock back, but let's not kid ourselves about him either and his false starts and inconsistent ability to pull.
Overall, our O line is pretty much piecemeal. I'm not gonna complain too much, as stated previously we at least addressed the D-line this offseason (much much overdue IMO) but it will take NEXT offseason to address the O line in lasting ways (unless Rinehart suddenly shows something on the field).
So, you're for developing OL, but don't seem to have the patience to develop OL. You've found Heyer lacking even tho he still remains in the mix for the RT position in his third season. You seem to feel that Rinehart is a bust, never mind that he's only had one season and the people ahead of him either didn't get hurt or have the versatility to play multiple positions.
I would have liked to have seen more in the draft his year, but they also seem to like the guys that they've got right now, so we've got to wait and see if their faith is placed in the right people.
SonnyJ
May-4th-2009, 06:58 AM
I'm saying that you'd hope to find better than what we have at the OT position. And yes, I think it is a cliff moreso than a typical dropoff.
Please list all the teams with better situations with depth at OT (and why). Basically, explain what the typical dropoff is and show how it's typical. That would give your claim actual merit.
No team "stocks" its lines like Philly. Yet, when they replaced their two aging OTs, they looked to other teams in order to do so. At a steep cost.
There's not a single team in the league that is two-deep with proven starting caliber players. The notion that there are is pure fantasy.
DGREENHULK
May-4th-2009, 07:35 AM
Not sure but at least they're recognizing the issue and looking at lots of options!!!
April 25th or 26th would have been a good time to recognize the issue....Can't beat the Orakpo pick day 1 but....day 2 was horrible.
onnie007
May-4th-2009, 07:41 AM
Another guy in the mix. We won't know what we really have until we go live. I really hope he and Mike Williams are in a position to compete. Williams could be a monster if he gets his weight down and I am really pulling for him.
MariusVT
May-4th-2009, 09:39 AM
Personally I like what we are doing with the O-Line this off season. Sure they are bringing in a bunch of guys that have had limited success around the league to compete with our aging lines. I look at it like this, if even one of these guys works out as a starter and we gain some decent depth than it is all a success.
I am pulling for Bike Mike to work out because he is a guy that has everything to gain and nothing to lose. The fire to get back something he really loves and has already lost once is a big motivator that cannot be underestimated IMO.
mithong1
May-4th-2009, 09:48 AM
im thinking its gonna be bridges and heyer for the starting RT and williams as the backup.
Probos
May-4th-2009, 09:50 AM
Not sure but at least they're recognizing the issue and looking at lots of options!!!
No. They're looking at one option/avenue -- FA's. And at this point they're picking up all the "trash heap" players and hoping one or two work out.
The FO is grasping. They're "graspers". It wreaks of desperation.
Probos
May-4th-2009, 09:51 AM
im thinking its gonna be bridges and heyer for the starting RT and williams as the backup.
So they're gonna start Bridges and Heyer? How does that work?
SonnyJ
May-4th-2009, 09:58 AM
No. They're looking at one option/avenue -- FA's. And at this point they're picking up all the "trash heap" players and hoping one or two work out.
The FO is grasping. They're "graspers". It wreaks of desperation.
And, yet, they are no worse off than just about every other team in the league...
TD_washingtonredskins
May-4th-2009, 09:59 AM
I would be thrilled if Jansen could eventually become the C over Rabach. I think it could extend his career dramatically and he could be a Pro-Bowl talent there.
Imagine this OL (ideally):
T: Samuels, Williams (Heyer)
G: Dockery, Bridges (Rinehart, Thomas)
C: Jansen (Rabach)
Not bad if Jon could make the transition!
IbleedBnG83
May-4th-2009, 10:14 AM
if his true position is guard, should we be worried about Dock or Thomas?
No need to be worried about Dockery. He has shown he is a VERY good guard who was good enough to get a big contract just a couple of years ago. He is only 28 and we got him at a great price. He will be a solid guard for the next few years.
Thomas, well we need to be worried about him starting, not being replaced. I hope Thomas does get replaced. I hope they can develop Rinehart.
I also like Edwin Williams as a backup to Rabach.
TD_washingtonredskins
May-4th-2009, 10:23 AM
A Big who cares! It doesn't matter who lines up at OL ... its the QB stupid.
If you really think there is no way we can succeed with Jason at QB, are you going to be watching any games this season?
Lombardi's_kid_brother
May-4th-2009, 10:27 AM
I have no idea who that is.
darkhorse472
May-4th-2009, 10:48 AM
I don't see Rabach getting beaten out at C, but I like your depth chart otherwise. Who'd you choose if they add another lineman? Teams normally carry 10 OL on their rosters right?
I would be thrilled if Jansen could eventually become the C over Rabach. I think it could extend his career dramatically and he could be a Pro-Bowl talent there.
Imagine this OL (ideally):
T: Samuels, Williams (Heyer)
G: Dockery, Bridges (Rinehart, Thomas)
C: Jansen (Rabach)
Not bad if Jon could make the transition!
TD_washingtonredskins
May-4th-2009, 10:55 AM
I don't see Rabach getting beaten out at C, but I like your depth chart otherwise. Who'd you choose if they add another lineman? Teams normally carry 10 OL on their rosters right?
You're probably right, but then I'd like to keep Jansen as his backup because I think his value as a tackle is becoming less and less.
The beauty of having Jansen as a center, is that he can play tackle too so it would allow you to either keep only 9 or take a flier on a 10th OL. I don't really know much about the new college kids they signed, so it's very likely one of them could crack the top 10!
rk3025
May-4th-2009, 11:58 AM
Rabach is like an assistant coach on that line and captain's the calls.
I don't see Rabach getting beaten out at C, but I like your depth chart otherwise. Who'd you choose if they add another lineman? Teams normally carry 10 OL on their rosters right?
PROSCOUT
May-4th-2009, 12:03 PM
The reason I like Jansen at center is because it keeps him from false starting.
Powered by vBulletin™ Version 4.0.6 Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.