PDA

View Full Version : Galloway: Jerry Jones let Eldorado go; now it's time for Jerry to let it go


tr1
June-27th-2009, 06:53 PM
http://www.sacbee.com/846/story/1982933.html
By RANDY GALLOWAY

One last confession before summer vacation:

All you lovers of Eldorado Owens were right. The Cowboys, you said, would deeply regret the ouster of this lugnut.

And already, it's obvious, even long before the first official snap of the '09 NFL season. Eldo is missed.

Not by a majority. Maybe not even by 10 percent. But I do think it's a strong opinion of one.

The one is Jerry.

The Valley Ranch voice of Jerry Jones has rambled on-and-on for weeks about the whats-and-whys involving the ouster of the receiver formerly known as No. 81.

Yes, you can blame the media for this "Owens issue" continuing to surface. Questions are asked, of course. But, and I swear, it has happened more than once that Jerry just launched into an explanation, bringing it up himself, as if he were answering voices in his head.

Not to go shrink on Jerry, but the best guess from here is Mr. Jones is still extremely uncomfortable with his decision - and it was strictly his decision - to release the lovely and somewhat-talented Terrell Eldorado Owens. Plus, another best guess is that Jerry is now deep into personal regret.

To this day, Jones has yet to step up and simply tell the truth:

Eldo is gone because he's not worth the trouble. And obviously, he is serious trouble. At previous stops in the NFL, Owens' teams eventually had the same opinion. He's not worth the serious trouble.

But in admitting the truth, Jerry would also be admitting he made a mistake in bringing Eldo to town to start with. Rather than the truth, Jerry gives vague explanations that throw everybody else under the bus, including his quarterback ("Romo-friendly offense") and a young receiver in Miles Austin, who Jerry claimed was ready to be Owens' replacement in passing situations.

I love Miles Austin. But no, he's not yet ready for that.

Under the team-first concept, the Cowboys are better off without Owens being here. Under the how-many-games-will-they-win concept, I think that will be 10 in the regular season. In other words, about the same as when Owens was here.

But it's all about the playoffs anyway. Winning a playoff game would be a good place to start.

Going shrink again on Jerry, I bet he now wishes he had never pulled that trigger on Owens. Jerry was always comfortable with Owens, although jolted a couple of weeks ago when his pal Eldo publicly called Jones a liar.

Owens made a brief local visit last week, and while on Jones' turf, wouldn't again publicly hang the liar tag on Jerry, which seems kind of chicken-spit. You come to a man's town, say the same thing you said about him from afar.

Actually, Terrell was verbally docile while he was here, whining only about being a "scapegoat" at Valley Ranch. With Eldo, it's always the fault of somebody else.

But his retreat is only temporary. In time, Owens will again be firing plenty of mouthy grenades from a Buffalo distance.

Without question, the ouster of Owens was the significant move of the off-season for the Cowboys. Addition by subtraction does work, but you only win with talent, and the Cowboys still have to sort through the talent level at receiver, which, by the way, was the same as it was with Owens here.

Plus, while the Cowboys spent the off-season attempting to end the locker room backstabbing of December, other teams in the NFC East seemed to be making leaps forward. Well, not the Redskins.:doh: But certainly the Eagles, and possibly even the Giants, although even for a run-heavy club, you have to wonder about the loss of two veteran receivers who could be deadly at times.

Maybe that's Jerry's motive for this Owens regret. He can read a depth chart. He can wonder if the Cowboys, with or without Owens, have slipped in the off-season to No. 3 in the divisional pecking order.

The opening of training camp in San Antonio is now one month away, and it's rather interesting that of all people, Jerry himself hasn't seemed to resolve the question of whether or not Owens should be here.

Even more scary, No. 1 son Stephen, the rock of reason at Valley Ranch, had some strange explanation last week on why Eldo is gone.

In describing what role the club wanted for Tony Romo, Stephen told Yahoo.com:

"It's hard to take over leadership when you've got a strong personality like Terrell."

That's a knock right there on Romo. But what followed was the mistake of harking back to the Dynasty Days:

"A lot of people would say Michael (Irvin) was the leader. Then you might say, 'He was a receiver. What about Troy? He was the quarterback. Wasn't he the leader?' And the answer is, yeah, Troy was a leader. But if Michael wasn't supportive of him, Troy would've had problems."

Woo, boy. Stephen just disgraced two icons.

First, Owens should never be mentioned in any reference to Michael as a team leader. Michael was the ultimate team guy.

Michael wanted to win, and he wanted to be a star. Mike knew the only way that could happen was to pal up with Troy. Which, of course, he did.

Second, Irvin was the emotional leader, but as Mike will tell you, Troy was the hard-driving field general, the guy who barked the loudest about "getting it right," right down to the most minute details.

Stephen, you are better than that. Then again, Jerry must be making everybody edgy at Valley Ranch, even his rock of reason in Stephen.

This is no time for sellers' remorse from Jerry. This is the time for Jerry to hunker down and move forward, move beyond the media questions. At the moment, however, that appears to be a problem that only the truth can fix.

tr1
June-27th-2009, 06:54 PM
Can puke fans spell P-A-N-I-C?

paloosa
June-27th-2009, 11:13 PM
As usual these idiots that write articles about the Cowboys can't even admit that the CFowboys are in deep trouble. They asy every team in the NFC East made leaps and bounds except the Redskins but state
"But certainly the Eagles, and possibly even the Giants, although even for a run-heavy club, you have to wonder about the loss of two veteran receivers who could be deadly at times."
Also saying,
"Maybe that's Jerry's motive for this Owens regret. He can read a depth chart. He can wonder if the Cowboys, with or without Owens, have slipped in the off-season to No. 3 in the divisional pecking order."
This is the medias way of saying that they can never be in last place because they are Americas Team, the Dallas Cowboys, Jerry Jones' the brilliant owner and the savior of every malcontent player in the NFL. Well all I can say is the time has come.
How can they say,
"Under the team-first concept, the Cowboys are better off without Owens being here. Under the how-many-games-will-they-win concept, I think that will be 10 in the regular season. In other words, about the same as when Owens was here."

Miles Austin and the rest of the Cowboys receivers are not that good and to say that they can win 10 games this year without TO is just laughable. I hope that everyone on the Cowboys team, fans and especially Jerry Jones have their popcorn ready. It's going to be a long season.

HapHaszard
June-28th-2009, 03:18 AM
Jerry hears voices in his head? hmmmm Time to get out the dried frog pills.

SWFLSkins
July-1st-2009, 07:22 AM
Plus, while the Cowboys spent the off-season attempting to end the locker room backstabbing of December, other teams in the NFC East seemed to be making leaps forward. Well, not the Redskins


Go on Randy, please elaborate.....

Albert Haynesworth and Brian Orapko coming to a backfield near your beloved, and that's not a leap at all?

sideshow24
July-1st-2009, 08:24 AM
Plus, while the Cowboys spent the off-season attempting to end the locker room backstabbing of December, other teams in the NFC East seemed to be making leaps forward. Well, not the Redskins


Go on Randy, please elaborate.....

Albert Haynesworth and Brian Orapko coming to a backfield near your beloved, and that's not a leap at all?

Exactly what I thought too man. People are insane to think the Skins didn't improve their roster. May as well keep those blinders on because they aren't gonna know what hit em.

Roger.Staubach
July-1st-2009, 09:01 AM
Albert Haynesworth and Brian Orapko coming to a backfield near your beloved, and that's not a leap at all?

it's not your defense that needs fixing...

sideshow24
July-1st-2009, 09:03 AM
it's not your defense that needs fixing...

QB pressure and forcing turnovers needed fixing badly.

Riggo#44
July-1st-2009, 09:49 AM
QB pressure and forcing turnovers needed fixing badly.

While that's definitely true, and hopefully addressed, if not fixed. I am VERY concerned about our O-Line and offense in general...

sideshow24
July-1st-2009, 10:00 AM
While that's definitely true, and hopefully addressed, if not fixed. I am VERY concerned about our O-Line and offense in general...

There's reason to be concerned until they show us big improvement over last year. But to pretend the team has done nothing to improve is foolish.

Roger.Staubach
July-1st-2009, 12:04 PM
There's reason to be concerned until they show us big improvement over last year. But to pretend the team has done nothing to improve is foolish.

Quite true about the need for defensive line pressure. I think that the additions that you've made could make the defense truly dominant.

However, if I were the GM, I would have gone for Offensive talent (and perhaps they tried). It just seems to me that you would get much greater bang for the buck on that side of the ball. Your defense really was quite good last year.

Vilandil Tasardur
July-1st-2009, 01:37 PM
Quite true about the need for defensive line pressure. I think that the additions that you've made could make the defense truly dominant.

However, if I were the GM, I would have gone for Offensive talent (and perhaps they tried). It just seems to me that you would get much greater bang for the buck on that side of the ball. Your defense really was quite good last year.
I hear what you're saying, but I didn't see any free agents on offense who would have helped more than Haynesworth and everyone knew we were on our knees for Orakpo before the draft; when he fell we weren't going to pass up a chance to make the coupling a nightly occurence.

I would have loved more help on offense too, but I can't think of who was there for the same value. Plus, we have a LOT invested in our offensive picks from last year and, despite how bad they look, calling them a bust too early could be just as dissasterous.

HighOnHendrix
July-1st-2009, 03:35 PM
But it's all about the playoffs anyway. Winning a playoff game would be a good place to start.

Thirteen years and counting. :evilg:

Gibbs Hog Heaven
July-1st-2009, 09:11 PM
Randy Galloway is one of my favourite current journo's.

Each new Dallas piece is funnier than the last one, and all are so painfully true you can't help but love the dude's work.

And any time I show these to the Texan, and she doesn't punch me hard on the arm, is always a good sign the guys a good one. :D

Hail.

SWFLSkins
July-5th-2009, 12:28 PM
While that's definitely true, and hopefully addressed, if not fixed. I am VERY concerned about our O-Line and offense in general...

I think the OL shapes up just fine. Gone is the idea that your starting spot is safe. RT is open for competition. Thomas is healthy once again, and many, too many are writing him off. Thomas is an excellent guard and played all last year with a compressed disk in his neck, how is that for toughness? I think our fans are underestimating Buges ability to find and coach up talent. Hey, he had a bad year with injuries last year, don't write the guy off.

Also on offense it was a simple re-peat of what hurt the team the year before. Lack of tartgets overall and especially in the Red Zone. Thomas and/or Kelly will actually contribute this year. As will Fred Davis. Look for Zorn to grow as well. The playbook is starting to crack further open. It is a parity league where any team can get on a roll, staying healthy is the first part of that.

As far as the defense goes, so goes the team, and I like that view from here.