DannyUpper90
September-28th-2009, 09:52 AM
I think about teams like Baltimore, Philly, New England, and (with Parcells recently coming there, to an extent) Miami who are able to get successful results because of the personnel that's in place.
I am STILL baffled as to what we were doing in the 2008 draft. Why did we draft 2 wideouts and a tide end and, if we are still convinced that we should have followed this strategy (and not drafted O-Line personnel which is what we really need), here are some offensive players that were available (vs who we drafted) and how they're doing with their respected teams:
34. Washington Redskins- Devin Thomas (1 reception 7 yards)
44. Chicago Bears- Matt Forte (150 rushing yards 73 receiving yards)
48. Washington Redskins-Fred Davis (2 receptions 11 yards)
49. Philadelphia Eagles- DeSean Jackson (48 rushing yards 259 receiving yards 2 receiving TDs 1 return TD)
51. Washington Redskins-Malcolm Kelly (6 receptions 65 yards)
55. Baltimore Ravens- Ray Rice (192 rushing yards 85 receiving yards 1 td)
You can throw every excuse out there... "Eagles have a better QB". Really? Kolb is better than Campbell? Kolb- Round 2 Pick 36 in 2007. Campbell- Round 1 Pick 25 in 2005.
2007 Draft? We took Laron Landry over Adrian Peterson, Patrick Willis, Marshawn Lynch.
2006 Draft wasn't too bad with Rocky McIntosh probably the best linebacker available but he still hasn't panned out IMO, I'd love for someone to prove me wrong...
2005 Draft we took Campbell and Rogers. Players that were still available include Aaron Rogers, Fabian Washington, Roddy White...
My question is: Are we failing to develop the talent, or are we not scouting the talent well enough in your opinion?
Are we not scouting, or not coaching?
Would Ozzie Newsome, Bill Parcells, or anyone else have done a better job making draft picks, or is it a case where they would have done the same and the draft picks just aren't being coached correctly?
I find it hard to believe that Adrian Peterson is just in a good spot in Minnesota, that Desean Jackson is a marque receiver in his second year just because he has a good QB, and that Matt Forte wasn't the best all-around back in the NFL last year because Chicago had a better coach and not that THEY'RE BETTER PLAYERS and we're making HORRIBLE personnel decisions.
I am STILL baffled as to what we were doing in the 2008 draft. Why did we draft 2 wideouts and a tide end and, if we are still convinced that we should have followed this strategy (and not drafted O-Line personnel which is what we really need), here are some offensive players that were available (vs who we drafted) and how they're doing with their respected teams:
34. Washington Redskins- Devin Thomas (1 reception 7 yards)
44. Chicago Bears- Matt Forte (150 rushing yards 73 receiving yards)
48. Washington Redskins-Fred Davis (2 receptions 11 yards)
49. Philadelphia Eagles- DeSean Jackson (48 rushing yards 259 receiving yards 2 receiving TDs 1 return TD)
51. Washington Redskins-Malcolm Kelly (6 receptions 65 yards)
55. Baltimore Ravens- Ray Rice (192 rushing yards 85 receiving yards 1 td)
You can throw every excuse out there... "Eagles have a better QB". Really? Kolb is better than Campbell? Kolb- Round 2 Pick 36 in 2007. Campbell- Round 1 Pick 25 in 2005.
2007 Draft? We took Laron Landry over Adrian Peterson, Patrick Willis, Marshawn Lynch.
2006 Draft wasn't too bad with Rocky McIntosh probably the best linebacker available but he still hasn't panned out IMO, I'd love for someone to prove me wrong...
2005 Draft we took Campbell and Rogers. Players that were still available include Aaron Rogers, Fabian Washington, Roddy White...
My question is: Are we failing to develop the talent, or are we not scouting the talent well enough in your opinion?
Are we not scouting, or not coaching?
Would Ozzie Newsome, Bill Parcells, or anyone else have done a better job making draft picks, or is it a case where they would have done the same and the draft picks just aren't being coached correctly?
I find it hard to believe that Adrian Peterson is just in a good spot in Minnesota, that Desean Jackson is a marque receiver in his second year just because he has a good QB, and that Matt Forte wasn't the best all-around back in the NFL last year because Chicago had a better coach and not that THEY'RE BETTER PLAYERS and we're making HORRIBLE personnel decisions.