View Full Version : Taking away the Scissors that Kyle keeps running around with.....future of Rex/Kyle Thread #283
Buford
October-17th-2011, 06:56 AM
After Rex throws his 4th int (which should have been his 6th) of the day, Kyle Shanahan throws up his arms and says “You’re In” to John Beck. What’s weird is that when Rex started the 2nd half, I figured there was nothing he could do to get benched. The choice could have been, and should have been made earlier in the game just by looking at Rex’s “progression” this season.
Vs. NYG – 21/34 – 305 yards 2 TD’s 110.5 rating
Vs. AZ – 25/43 – 291 yards 2 TD’s 2 Ints’s 74.9 rating
Vs. Dallas – 22/37 – 250 yards 1 TD 1 Int 77.5 rating
Vs. St. Louis – 15/29 – 143 yards 1 TD 2 Int 48.5 rating
Vs. Philly – 9/22 – 143 yards 0 TD 4 Int 23.7 rating
He wasn’t going to improve in this game. Everybody knew it, and by missing two OL, we needed mobility at QB all the sudden.
By halftime, Rex should have had 4 Ints if 2 weren’t dropped by the “bad” Eagles defense. So, I’m wondering about the conversation between the offensive coordinator and head coach at halftime, and if one had to convince the other to leave Rex in to start the 2nd half. Then I worry if the conversation was really more son and father than one coach that works for another, and if that father was willing to give a little more time because his son was asking for Rex to stay in.
Am I wrong to be concerned that Kyle WANTS Rex to be successful in his system over knowing when its time to pull the guy? Understanding that the Skins were basically playing from behind the whole game, the 37 passes to 14 rushes (really 12 because Beck took off twice) ratio was not getting it done. Running these bunched packages where the Eagles D knew they had to cover a WR, a TE and then stack the box, just was not working….and I don’t remember if we spread it all way out and then handed it off to thin out their middle. Seems that was part of what worked for other teams the past few weeks.
I know two OL were lost, I know Cooley was lost. But this really goes back to two serious questions going into Carolina.
#1. Should Rex Grossman be kept on the roster for the rest of the season? I waited overnight to ask this question here so it wouldn’t appear kneejerk. But, we’ve seen him regress this season. He’s not going to improve, I think everybody know this….well, except maybe a few people. Having him on the roster and as an option is dangerous if now you’re going to give Beck time to play. I know the question is “Who becomes the backup QB?” I honestly don’t know. There are guys on the street that you wouldn’t put in a game unless there is an injury. Can we say that for Rex?
#2. How does somebody remove playcalling duties from their son? I’m curious of the dynamic in Houston when Kyle was the OC. This is a difficult situation I’m sure for the HC because he knows the calls have been less than good too often. Allowing Kyle to keep calling plays, and giving him the option to go back to Rex is a dangerous combination. If Kyle is running with scissors or keeps trying to touch the hot stove….how do you stop him? If you take away the duties, you can’t give them back, right? Kyle is 0-2 with creating/calling a scheme with his QB's so far in Washington. Will he be 0-3 when this season is over?
What is the solution here?
LD0506
October-17th-2011, 07:10 AM
IMO the solution is in your question, who's the backup? What can be done @ the QB position? We all hope and pray that Beck can be functional but until we fix that spot, every thing else suffers.
MLSKINS
October-17th-2011, 07:38 AM
It was one drive this year, I can't remember which game it was (Gun to my head I would say it was our only TD versus Dallas) where I swear that Mike Shanahan was calling the plays. I don;t think Kyle has quite gotten that he is not in the AFC South anymore. His playcalling needs to be aggressive from the get go, but it still has to be smart and unpredictable. How come yesterday was the first time we ran a WR screen? Torain only had ten carries :doh: Hopefully with Beck, in all likelihood becoming the starter, Kyle can open this thing up.
Mursilis
October-17th-2011, 07:55 AM
#1. Should Rex Grossman be kept on the roster for the rest of the season?
NO! Why keep him?!? Why? What value does he add? We know his full potential at this point, and he's simply not good enough to be good/great QB in this league! He's had MORE than enough chances, and he was who we thought he was. Somewhere out there is the next Tom Brady - some unknown who's been overlooked and merely needs a shot. Look at Ryan Fitzpatrick up in Buffalo. Buffalo took a shot on a guy who's been in the league a bunch of years but hasn't played much (and when he did, it was on AWFUL teams), showed some patience, and now they've got a top-10 QB, and didn't sink a bunch of high draft picks into getting him either. Grossman ISN'T the QB of the future here. Beck may be, or he may not be, but it's time to find out. Give Beck an extended audition, and cut Grossman for someone else who may have some hidden potential. There are more Fitzpatricks and Bradys and Warners out there - this team just has to have the guts to give them a shot.
airborneskins
October-17th-2011, 08:10 AM
How come yesterday was the first time we ran a WR screen?
HA! Never thought that I would see somebody say this.
Bang
October-17th-2011, 08:15 AM
NO! Why keep him?!? Why? What value does he add? We know his full potential at this point, and he's simply not good enough to be good/great QB in this league! He's had MORE than enough chances, and he was who we thought he was. Somewhere out there is the next Tom Brady - some unknown who's been overlooked and merely needs a shot. Look at Ryan Fitzpatrick up in Buffalo. Buffalo took a shot on a guy who's been in the league a bunch of years but hasn't played much (and when he did, it was on AWFUL teams), showed some patience, and now they've got a top-10 QB, and didn't sink a bunch of high draft picks into getting him either. Grossman ISN'T the QB of the future here. Beck may be, or he may not be, but it's time to find out. Give Beck an extended audition, and cut Grossman for someone else who may have some hidden potential. There are more Fitzpatricks and Bradys and Warners out there - this team just has to have the guts to give them a shot.
Let's say Beck breaks his leg neext wek.
Who you gonna call? Ghostbusters?
Rex is a backup, that's obvious. And unfortunately, he's the one we have.
We could go get Garrard, I guess, but that means dropping one QB that no one wants for another QB that no one wants, including his team that cut him a few days before the season began.
As far as finding the Fitz's, Warners and Bradys out there... good luck turning over rocks. To assume the Redskins aren't looking is pretty silly.
~Bang
Buford
October-17th-2011, 08:28 AM
Let's say Beck breaks his leg neext wek.
Who you gonna call? Ghostbusters?
Rex is a backup, that's obvious. And unfortunately, he's the one we have.
We could go get Garrard, I guess, but that means dropping one QB that no one wants for another QB that no one wants, including his team that cut him a few days before the season began.
As far as finding the Fitz's, Warners and Bradys out there... good luck turning over rocks. To assume the Redskins aren't looking is pretty silly.
~Bang
~Bang
That's my point. If Beck breaks his leg, what's the difference between Grossman and some guy you sign today to be your #2? Rex has been in the system for 3 years and threw 4 picks. I'd say we can't do much worse. What's important to me is...what if Beck struggles in a game, how long do they give him before forgetting how back Rex was?
Oldfan
October-17th-2011, 08:32 AM
#1. Should Rex Grossman be kept on the roster for the rest of the season? Yes. The NFL East could be won by a 9-7 or even an 8-8 team his year. Rex knows the scheme and can be more effective coming into a game when defenses haven't game planned for him.
#2. How does somebody remove playcalling duties from their son?When offensive plays fail, the problem is due to poor execution 80% of the time. Yet, the OC's playcalling will be second-guessed 100% of the time.
Mursilis
October-17th-2011, 08:34 AM
Let's say Beck breaks his leg neext wek.
Who you gonna call?
Anybody but Rex. You mentioned Garrard. He's too old now at age 33 to be the future, but he's got a 85 career QB rating vs. 70 for Grossman, so he'd clearly be an upgrade. But still, there's a good lesson there. Garrard was a 4th round pick who was pretty good for a few years down there in Jax. He got them to 11-5 one year, and made the Pro Bowl. When was the last time a 'skins QB did either? Jax took a risk on a guy with no rep, and it worked out for them for a while. Meanwhile we continue to waste draft picks chasing a parade of QBs who ultimately do nothing worthwhile here.
As far as finding the Fitz's, Warners and Bradys out there... good luck turning over rocks. To assume the Redskins aren't looking is pretty silly.
If this team is really looking, why are we still wasting a roster spot and practice time on Grossman, and we let a potential sleeper stud like Chase Daniels get away?
gortiz
October-17th-2011, 08:36 AM
you are right ... i know for a fact that Garrard could come in and play better than Grossman, he at least would not throw 4 (shoud have been 6) INT's in a game. damn the 2-3 years Rex has with Kyle.
Now, i'm willing to extend faith for Kyle. He's proven. Granted, only a few years in Houston, but he did well there. Unlike Zorn and Spurrier, he at least has something on his resume as a playcaller, so I think he has it in him.
But, but, if it was Kyle lobbying to keep Rex in the game and if it his him that is going to bat for Rex, we have an issue cause even I know Rex is done. And he's not done because of the last game, it is that downward progression you mentioned Buford and not the number, but the types of INT's he's throwing.
---------- Post added October-17th-2011 at 09:38 AM ----------
Yes. The NFL East could be won by a 9-7 or even an 8-8 team his year. Rex knows the scheme and can be more effective coming into a game when defenses haven't game planned for him.
great point Oldfan ... basically he would serve just right as a backup.
Mursilis
October-17th-2011, 08:40 AM
That's my point. If Beck breaks his leg, what's the difference between Grossman and some guy you sign today to be your #2? Rex has been in the system for 3 years and threw 4 picks. I'd say we can't do much worse. What's important to me is...what if Beck struggles in a game, how long do they give him before forgetting how back Rex was?
Exactly! Someone gets it. Of course, the difference is, some guy you sign off the street could be the next Kurt Warner/Warren Moon, whereas Rex Grossman will always be Rex Grossman!
MLSKINS
October-17th-2011, 08:41 AM
HA! Never thought that I would see somebody say this.
I am serious though. We have recievers that will murder somebody on a screen. Put Banks in sometimes and see what he can do on a screen. Mix stuff up.
Grossman isn't going anywhere this year. Entertaining the thought is pointless......
The Dude
October-17th-2011, 08:49 AM
"Pro sports is full of these hopelessly daddy-addicted athletes who wouldn't think of taking a s--t without their father's approval. When I hear the sons of coaches talking on television, they sound to me like parent-pleasers and ass-kissers." - George Carlin, When Will Jesus Bring the Pork Chops?
Buford
October-17th-2011, 08:51 AM
When offensive plays fail, the problem is due to poor execution 80% of the time. Yet, the OC's playcalling will be second-guessed 100% of the time.
A lot was left of the table yesterday, especially in the run game. You don't execute spreading out your offense (forcing the D to spread) and then running at their weakness. That's a playcall we didn't go with at all. Why not? We kept bunch it up and trying to run into a traffic jam? At some point the decisions to throw on 1st down, or to run from a bad set has to be questioned. Who is sending in those packages that aren't working and haven't worked yet?
gortiz
October-17th-2011, 09:15 AM
A lot was left of the table yesterday, especially in the run game. You don't execute spreading out your offense (forcing the D to spread) and then running at their weakness. That's a playcall we didn't go with at all. Why not? We kept bunch it up and trying to run into a traffic jam? At some point the decisions to throw on 1st down, or to run from a bad set has to be questioned. Who is sending in those packages that aren't working and haven't worked yet?
it just seems like we complicate the offense so much, the skins/kyle/mike get way to cute.
there also seems to be a weird void of certain plays on offense ... WR screen, we ran one, at it was great, but just one. Double moves, stop and gos, NEVER SEE THEM. TE screens, pitches and tosses, what has happened to the naked bootleg? The ever absent back shoulder throw, curles? we never see those. it almost seems like we did not run one stretch play yesterday. Quick hitting running plays, shovel passes.
Buford
October-17th-2011, 09:22 AM
it just seems like we complicate the offense so much, the skins/kyle/mike get way to cute.
there also seems to be a weird void of certain plays on offense ... WR screen, we ran one, at it was great, but just one. Double moves, stop and gos, NEVER SEE THEM. TE screens, pitches and tosses, what has happened to the naked bootleg? The ever absent back shoulder throw, curles? we never see those. it almost seems like we did not run one stretch play yesterday. Quick hitting running plays, shovel passes.
I've noticed we run the same packages with the same motion over and over. I know that doesn't mean its the same play. But its usually similar protections. For every flea flicker, there is a predictable part of the offense that you can identify from the stands or on TV, so you know the other team can too. They aren't good enough to say "We're going to run on you.....so try stopping us".
Bang
October-17th-2011, 09:57 AM
That's my point. If Beck breaks his leg, what's the difference between Grossman and some guy you sign today to be your #2? Rex has been in the system for 3 years and threw 4 picks. I'd say we can't do much worse. What's important to me is...what if Beck struggles in a game, how long do they give him before forgetting how back Rex was?
Well, as far as I'm concerned, once this change is made it's for the year. Can't flip back and forth.
~Bang
tiger187126
October-17th-2011, 10:02 AM
Let's say Beck breaks his leg neext wek.
Who you gonna call? Ghostbusters?
Rex is a backup, that's obvious. And unfortunately, he's the one we have.
We could go get Garrard, I guess, but that means dropping one QB that no one wants for another QB that no one wants, including his team that cut him a few days before the season began.
As far as finding the Fitz's, Warners and Bradys out there... good luck turning over rocks. To assume the Redskins aren't looking is pretty silly.
~Bang
garrard won't come in to be a backup and it's pretty late to try to teach him the entire system. he already turned down a couple teams and oakland seems perfect for him.
i think all we need is a qb who is not going to cost the team until we get our franchise guy. beck has the long term contract and grossman is 1 and done right now.
Buford
October-17th-2011, 10:09 AM
Well, as far as I'm concerned, once this change is made it's for the year. Can't flip back and forth.
~Bang
If I believed that was the case, I wouldn't say you gotta drop Rex. But if Beck struggles.....they are going to slowly forget how bad Rex was with all those reps the past 5 weeks. You have to give Beck at least the same amount of time. Rex found a way to turn it over 11 times in 5 games. That's magical.
Let me put it this way. I'd rather trade Stallworth or whoever to Denver for Brady Quinn to be the backup. That's right. I said it.....I would take Brady Quinn as backup over Rex Grossman.
TD_washingtonredskins
October-17th-2011, 10:14 AM
I think you have to keep Grossman, but I think the QB switch should be permanent (injury aside of course). What Rex might bring that none of us know is the ability to put the offense in the right plays based on the defense. Hell, for all we know, that's the only reason he was starting over Beck. If you bring in Garrard or bring back someone from the preseason, you might not have a QB that knows the system well enough to even call an audible at the line.
So, for me, I would play Beck as the starter as long as he's healthy with Rex as the backup. If Beck were to be hurt for the rest of the year, you play Rex until you have someone here for a couple weeks to learn a couple things.
gaskinsfan
October-17th-2011, 10:21 AM
My 2 cents on your questions:
1. Yes emphatically, the offense is complicated, you need to be able to call your full complement of plays to have a chance to win, if there was a younger QB we have tutored along on the roster maybe you could give them a chance but there is not. Switch the roles, give Beck a good chance, and have Rex as backup. We are rebuilding, so no reason to panic. I was glad when Jeff George was taken off the roster, but keeping Rex only makes sense.
2. Kyle seemed to open up more of the offense when Beck got in there. Let's see how his game plan goes with Beck at the helm before making final judgement about the offense. Kyle can only work with what he has, and Rex simply is not mobile and cannot read defenses or find check-down receivers.
Look we are 3-2, 1/2 game down from the Giants, lots of football left. O Line depth is an issue, Beck is more mobile, hopefully we get things going with a win in Carolina.
joeknows
October-17th-2011, 08:07 PM
i know there are a ton of threads about the game yesterday so if the mods feel the need to merge this somewhere please do...
The Redskins are my life. i dont like NBA, NHL or MLB. i ONLY watch and keep up with the Redskins and the NFL. there has been a lot of talk about the lame game planing / play calling.
it comes as no surprise to me and i believe it is directly related to Grossmans short comings as a qb. prior to the beginning the season or right around week 1 there was an interview with Grossman where he said that the plays were drawn up for him to go to one specific receiver and then the check down.
i wish i had the link for the article but i have been mostly getting the news on my phone from sources such as... your very own Washington post, ESPN, and Yahoo. < have been without internet for a couple of months>
but the quote concerned me then and even more so now. it sounded to me like the coaches dont have faith in him reading defenses and going through his progressions. they have been relying on him to MANAGE games and do what he is told. thereby handcuffing the creativity of the offense... which leads us to yesterday and Kurt Coleman having a stellar day against us. the play calling has become so predictable that Coleman states in the following link that he was able to read Grossman all day.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/dc-sports-bog/post/kurt-coleman-said-he-could-read-rex-grossman/2011/10/17/gIQAaQ4brL_blog.html
i was, like many of you, behind Grossman and hoped and prayed he would prove Chicago and my Illinois family wrong. i have now resigned myself to the understanding that he is.... the same as he ever was.
im looking forward to Beck hitting the field. hopefully he can make better use of the few options that we actually do have.
and by the way... to those of you in the DC area.... could you list some of your local newspaper links or where you get you news from because i am not around a computer often anymore and like to get the news on my phone when possible. Please.... and thank you in advance.
Redskins432
October-17th-2011, 09:31 PM
If I believed that was the case, I wouldn't say you gotta drop Rex. But if Beck struggles.....they are going to slowly forget how bad Rex was with all those reps the past 5 weeks. You have to give Beck at least the same amount of time. Rex found a way to turn it over 11 times in 5 games. That's magical.
Let me put it this way. I'd rather trade Stallworth or whoever to Denver for Brady Quinn to be the backup. That's right. I said it.....I would take Brady Quinn as backup over Rex Grossman.
Rather than trade for a backup, personally I would just bring back Clemens. He went through camp, and should know some of the system.
Personally, I think that Beck should start. Grossman has shown us all he can do, and that is a highly inconsistent quarterback who has some good flashes.
It's a no brainer that we need a franchise QB and since Rex has now shown that he's incapable of being our QB, you play Beck and hope for the best. Regardless though, I hope we draft a QB in the first round.
Enter Apotheosis
October-17th-2011, 09:43 PM
So, I’m wondering about the conversation between the offensive coordinator and head coach at halftime, and if one had to convince the other to leave Rex in to start the 2nd half. Then I worry if the conversation was really more son and father than one coach that works for another, and if that father was willing to give a little more time because his son was asking for Rex to stay in.
Am I wrong to be concerned that Kyle WANTS Rex to be successful in his system over knowing when its time to pull the guy?
You're wrong for being concerned about that and you're even more wrong for drumming up so much completely speculative bull**** about the nature of the working relationship of the Shanahans. That is honestly one of the stupidest possible things to be worrying about right now. You're actually inventing a problem which may very well not even exist and are conflating it with other, very legitimate concerns which you then fail to address properly because you trace said concerns back to your original, likely nonexistent problem.
Bang
October-17th-2011, 09:47 PM
If I believed that was the case, I wouldn't say you gotta drop Rex. But if Beck struggles.....they are going to slowly forget how bad Rex was with all those reps the past 5 weeks. You have to give Beck at least the same amount of time. Rex found a way to turn it over 11 times in 5 games. That's magical.
Let me put it this way. I'd rather trade Stallworth or whoever to Denver for Brady Quinn to be the backup. That's right. I said it.....I would take Brady Quinn as backup over Rex Grossman.
If it came to that, I'd rather call Kellen Clemens back.
Hell, I'd rather call him back anyway.
~Bang
tr1
October-17th-2011, 09:55 PM
Isn't ironic that everyone wants a Captain Checkdown...! :ols:
Two of Rex's INTs were on receivers...he's an aggressive minded qb, whose arm doesn't match what he thinks his arm is. I love his touch passes, but he doesn't have the rifle...and, it's killing us.
Beck may not throw INTs, but his accuracy pretty much sucks...but then again, he probably won't hit defenders.
It's going to be bumpy from here on out, but didn't we all know that going in?
FuriousD
October-17th-2011, 10:17 PM
I got tired of repeating myself yesterday but what the hell, today is another day: It's not Kyles play-calling that's the problem, this offense just isn't executing well at all. Darrel Young in todays presser said the exact same thing! (paraphrasing) > we'll start playing better when we start executing better! We desparately need some consistency from the blocking, passing and running game but we're not getting it. When that happens, the play-calling will look 10x better.
1198skinsfuture
October-17th-2011, 10:42 PM
Isn't ironic that everyone wants a Captain Checkdown...! :ols:
Two of Rex's INTs were on receivers...he's an aggressive minded qb, whose arm doesn't match what he thinks his arm is. I love his touch passes, but he doesn't have the rifle...and, it's killing us.
Beck may not throw INTs, but his accuracy pretty much sucks...but then again, he probably won't hit defenders.
It's going to be bumpy from here on out, but didn't we all know that going in?
whatttt? the book coming out on john is he is extremely accurate, one of the most accurate ever in college,
Enter Apotheosis
October-17th-2011, 11:16 PM
I got tired of repeating myself yesterday but what the hell, today is another day: It's not Kyles play-calling that's the problem, this offense just isn't executing well at all. Darrel Young in todays presser said the exact same thing! (paraphrasing) > we'll start playing better when we start executing better! We desparately need some consistency from the blocking, passing and running game but we're not getting it. When that happens, the play-calling will look 10x better.
The fact that people keep commenting on how Kyle Shanahan "opened up the playbook" when John Beck came in the game without really being able to explain how (beyond the obvious bootlegging) is a pretty good example of this. I'm far less convinced that what people were really seeing was a product of radically different playcalling than it was having a QB who is seeing more of the field and trying to hit a wider variety of spots.
RandyHolt
October-17th-2011, 11:34 PM
i have thought it all year, but most laugh when they hear it.
Good Rex always leads to bad Rex. When Rex does well, rotate in Beck for a series, or quarter. Dont let Rex get into his I already got laid mode, its time for a snooze. Since they seemed fairly close in preseason, I hoped we would see both used early and often. Keep Rex focused and in a competition. Not, I was in the super bowl ha its my job.
Not rotate every series. more like you stunk in the first half, lets try the other guy. I have long thought that coaches reward mediocre QB play far too much, yet rotate WR's RB's TE's DL's LB's and DB's every damn series. Playing the starting QB for chemistry all damn year is bunk when the offense is struggling. Beck led us to a TD, right? Jay Schroeder wouldnt have had the longest pass from scrimmage in one play, after JoeT broke his leg, if chemistry for JoeT and the O was that important. Few QBs start as the starter. The backup just needs someone that believes in them, and an OC that doesnt have his head up his ass and call horrible plays. The boot by Beck was by FAR Kyles best play call all day.
stp240
October-18th-2011, 12:15 AM
whatttt? the book coming out on john is he is extremely accurate, one of the most accurate ever in college,
He is likely refering to the accuracy shown in the Eagles game. That is the least accurate I have seen Beck play, and he still performed 1000x better than Grossman.
Beck is normally very very accurate.
SkinsFTW
October-18th-2011, 12:16 AM
I know they aren't going to cut Grossman and sign somebody else who doesn't even know the system. I wouldn't even be surprised if he starts the next game either.
SusqySkin
October-18th-2011, 12:24 AM
At this point drop Wrecks and bring up Crompton off the ps.
Bang
October-18th-2011, 12:28 AM
beck started off with a few throws in the dirt, but he settled in right nicely, and his accuracy picked up. The throw to Austin was sweet. He also hit Moss on a nice turn-in in traffic.
He was under pressure quite a bit, and I thought he handled it very well.
The only fault i can find in his outing is the lack of time management on the scoring drive. They were tooo lackadaisical. Needed to look at the clock and realize 2 TDs down with 5 minutes to go means HURRY UP
~Bang
skins2victory
October-18th-2011, 12:49 AM
Wow another Rex's sucks, and he throws lots of int's thread....... Great work, this isnt being discussed anywhere else on this board.
---------- Post added October-18th-2011 at 12:54 AM ----------
beck started off with a few throws in the dirt, but he settled in right nicely, and his accuracy picked up. The throw to Austin was sweet. He also hit Moss on a nice turn-in in traffic.
He was under pressure quite a bit, and I thought he handled it very well.
The only fault i can find in his outing is the lack of time management on the scoring drive. They were tooo lackadaisical. Needed to look at the clock and realize 2 TDs down with 5 minutes to go means HURRY UP
~Bang
He did come in and look pretty good. Your right, his time management wasn’t the best. He got the ball to the WR's, but the ball came out funny on a few of his passes. I believe the announcers called them "wobblers". LOL, not the best complement. So if he does get another opportunity, hopefully he can get that arm to throw with a little more heat.
robotfire
October-18th-2011, 06:35 AM
and by the way... to those of you in the DC area.... could you list some of your local newspaper links or where you get you news from because i am not around a computer often anymore and like to get the news on my phone when possible. Please.... and thank you in advance.The breaking news section on this site is about as good as it gets.
Buford
October-18th-2011, 06:53 AM
beck started off with a few throws in the dirt, but he settled in right nicely, and his accuracy picked up. The throw to Austin was sweet. He also hit Moss on a nice turn-in in traffic.
He was under pressure quite a bit, and I thought he handled it very well.
The only fault i can find in his outing is the lack of time management on the scoring drive. They were tooo lackadaisical. Needed to look at the clock and realize 2 TDs down with 5 minutes to go means HURRY UP
~Bang
Didn't they say he was having helmet radio issues? Its amazing how dependent these guys are now to that. I'd think you should work with signals but still use the radio. However, if it fails (which seems to happen a lot in the league), you're ready.
joeknows
October-18th-2011, 11:03 PM
The breaking news section on this site is about as good as it gets.
i absolutely couldnt agree more... however i have issues with getting this site on my phone.... im still in the dark ages as far as cellular technology. hell ... i was happy to get the Post on the crappy phone i have. i just am not around a computer but a couple hours a day and by then its old news lol.
Bang
October-18th-2011, 11:21 PM
Didn't they say he was having helmet radio issues? Its amazing how dependent these guys are now to that. I'd think you should work with signals but still use the radio. However, if it fails (which seems to happen a lot in the league), you're ready.
I hadn't heard about radio issues.
Maybe they should take a tip from that college that uses those weird signs.
~Bang
wrecker
October-19th-2011, 06:18 AM
For those wanting Garrard, he is having surgery for a herniated disc.
http://www.cbssports.com/mcc/blogs/entry/6315047/32805632
issapunk
October-19th-2011, 07:39 PM
I don't understand some of the play calls Kyle makes. Seems like we pass every 1st down, run on 2nd down, and then have 3rd and long. We don't seem to have 3rd and manageable more than once or twice a game. I thought we were supposed to be a ground and pound team, especially with our QB troubles. Hopefully things will open up with John Beck but I'm not holding my breath.
Bang
October-19th-2011, 09:33 PM
I don't understand some of the play calls Kyle makes. Seems like we pass every 1st down, run on 2nd down, and then have 3rd and long. We don't seem to have 3rd and manageable more than once or twice a game. I thought we were supposed to be a ground and pound team, especially with our QB troubles. Hopefully things will open up with John Beck but I'm not holding my breath.
You, a fan, think we're supposed to be a ground and pound team.
and you're right. We're supposed to be that.
Defensive coordinators know that as well.
The problem is that we put a QB back there that no one fears, and for good reason. In fact, they encourage him to throw by selling out early to stop the run.
So, the choices are to try and beat our heads against gigantic walls of defenders crashing the line to stop the run, or get two or three shots over their heads and make them worry about the pass..
You've got to back them off, you've got to make them concerned that you can go over the top and make them pay for selling out on the line.
If not you go 3 and out, 3 and out , 3 and out, and before long your defense is sucking wind, and the game gets away from you.
Against the Eagles Rex showed why this was a fine strategy. He did exactly what they wanted him to do.
Rex doesn't get 4 reads to make.. he gets 1, maybe 2. He's on a short leash because over his entire career he's shown an almost superhuman ability to make unbelievably bad decisions.
Look at the best QBs playing right now, Tom Brady.. Aaron Rodgers. When they set up in the pocket, their head goes from receiver to receiver to receiver until he finds the one who has the best position. Look at their receiver's stats.. so many different receivers catch passes in their offenses it's ridiculous. We say "Wow! Look at all those weapons!" And those are weapons because the QB utilizes all of them. Any of them can beat a defense because the QB makes it so five or six of them can beat you at any time.
We say we don't have receivers, but you give them to Brady, and they'd get a hell of a lot better because he can use them.
Rex can't do this.
So you limit his decisions. Look at A, if it is covered, throw it away and call another play.
The problem is Rex thinks he can make every throw, and he can't. So he ignores throwing it away, he ignores double coverage down the seam, and what do you know, the Eagles pick him off. (the pick on the bomb to gazffney he finally got what he wants, single coverage on a post, and he underthrows it by FIVE yards! I wanted to PUKE. That play MUST be completed. That was the shot. The defense showed him the crack, and he missed it.)
Beck showed me Sunday that he has more reads to make. His leash was much longer. He utilizes the pocket, buys time. He's more patient, cool under pressure. (At least so far)
I saw plays for him that they don't run with Rex.
It's true you run to set up the pass.
It's also true you pass to set up the run.
~Bang
authentic
October-19th-2011, 09:40 PM
Let me try and explain.
You, a fan, think we're supposed to be a ground and pound team.
and you're right. We're supposed to be that.
Defensive coordinators know that as well.
The problem is that we put a QB back there that no one fears, and for good reason. In fact, they encourage him to throw by selling out to stop the run.
So, the choices are to try and beat our heads against gigantic walls of defenders crashing the line to stop the run, or get two or three shots over their heads and make them worry about the pass..
You've got to back them off, you've got to make them concerned that you can go over the top and make them pay for selling out on the line.
If not you go 3 and out, 3 and out , 3 and out, and before long your defense is sucking wind, and the game gets away from you.
~Bang
I don't know how many times this needs to be said.... Some folks will get it, others never will... Oh well :doh:
Bang
October-19th-2011, 09:53 PM
I will say one more thing about the first pick.. it was double coverage, but the play also saw Donte Stallworth running right into Davis' route, which puts a third defender in the path of the ball.
Not a very good play design with a QB that we know has a weak arm.. to help Rex they need to spread things out and get our receivers away from bunches of defenders.
~bang
SusqySkin
October-20th-2011, 04:41 AM
You, a fan, think we're supposed to be a ground and pound team.
and you're right. We're supposed to be that.
Defensive coordinators know that as well.
The problem is that we put a QB back there that no one fears, and for good reason. In fact, they encourage him to throw by selling out early to stop the run.
So, the choices are to try and beat our heads against gigantic walls of defenders crashing the line to stop the run, or get two or three shots over their heads and make them worry about the pass..
You've got to back them off, you've got to make them concerned that you can go over the top and make them pay for selling out on the line.
If not you go 3 and out, 3 and out , 3 and out, and before long your defense is sucking wind, and the game gets away from you.
Against the Eagles Rex showed why this was a fine strategy. He did exactly what they wanted him to do.
Rex doesn't get 4 reads to make.. he gets 1, maybe 2. He's on a short leash because over his entire career he's shown an almost superhuman ability to make unbelievably bad decisions.
Look at the best QBs playing right now, Tom Brady.. Aaron Rodgers. When they set up in the pocket, their head goes from receiver to receiver to receiver until he finds the one who has the best position. Look at their receiver's stats.. so many different receivers catch passes in their offenses it's ridiculous. We say "Wow! Look at all those weapons!" And those are weapons because the QB utilizes all of them. Any of them can beat a defense because the QB makes it so five or six of them can beat you at any time.
We say we don't have receivers, but you give them to Brady, and they'd get a hell of a lot better because he can use them.
Rex can't do this.
So you limit his decisions. Look at A, if it is covered, throw it away and call another play.
The problem is Rex thinks he can make every throw, and he can't. So he ignores throwing it away, he ignores double coverage down the seam, and what do you know, the Eagles pick him off. (the pick on the bomb to gazffney he finally got what he wants, single coverage on a post, and he underthrows it by FIVE yards! I wanted to PUKE. That play MUST be completed. That was the shot. The defense showed him the crack, and he missed it.)
Beck showed me Sunday that he has more reads to make. His leash was much longer. He utilizes the pocket, buys time. He's more patient, cool under pressure. (At least so far)
I saw plays for him that they don't run with Rex.
It's true you run to set up the pass.
It's also true you pass to set up the run.
~Bang
You sir, are spot on. I applaud your knowledge of the QB position.
SWO-tarious
October-20th-2011, 05:23 AM
You, a fan, think we're supposed to be a ground and pound team.
and you're right. We're supposed to be that.
Defensive coordinators know that as well.
The problem is that we put a QB back there that no one fears, and for good reason. In fact, they encourage him to throw by selling out early to stop the run.
So, the choices are to try and beat our heads against gigantic walls of defenders crashing the line to stop the run, or get two or three shots over their heads and make them worry about the pass..
You've got to back them off, you've got to make them concerned that you can go over the top and make them pay for selling out on the line.
If not you go 3 and out, 3 and out , 3 and out, and before long your defense is sucking wind, and the game gets away from you.
Against the Eagles Rex showed why this was a fine strategy. He did exactly what they wanted him to do.
Rex doesn't get 4 reads to make.. he gets 1, maybe 2. He's on a short leash because over his entire career he's shown an almost superhuman ability to make unbelievably bad decisions.
Look at the best QBs playing right now, Tom Brady.. Aaron Rodgers. When they set up in the pocket, their head goes from receiver to receiver to receiver until he finds the one who has the best position. Look at their receiver's stats.. so many different receivers catch passes in their offenses it's ridiculous. We say "Wow! Look at all those weapons!" And those are weapons because the QB utilizes all of them. Any of them can beat a defense because the QB makes it so five or six of them can beat you at any time.
We say we don't have receivers, but you give them to Brady, and they'd get a hell of a lot better because he can use them.
Rex can't do this.
So you limit his decisions. Look at A, if it is covered, throw it away and call another play.
The problem is Rex thinks he can make every throw, and he can't. So he ignores throwing it away, he ignores double coverage down the seam, and what do you know, the Eagles pick him off. (the pick on the bomb to gazffney he finally got what he wants, single coverage on a post, and he underthrows it by FIVE yards! I wanted to PUKE. That play MUST be completed. That was the shot. The defense showed him the crack, and he missed it.)
Beck showed me Sunday that he has more reads to make. His leash was much longer. He utilizes the pocket, buys time. He's more patient, cool under pressure. (At least so far)
I saw plays for him that they don't run with Rex.
It's true you run to set up the pass.
It's also true you pass to set up the run.
~Bang
+1000 Well said, Sir! :notworthy
Brady has a bunch of guys with the equivalent height of the Hamburgler, but he is still a beast for the reasons you mentioned. He has a quicker mind and spreads it around. He has the ability to make those around him better. He never had a true deep threat until Moss showed up and when he did they broke every record out there. Now that Moss is gone and his deep threat is a TE, he's still the man.
Beck, I'm hoping optimistically, is cut from that cloth.
Powered by vBulletin™ Version 4.0.6 Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.