Who will have a bigger impact? Springsteen in Wisconsin? Or Curt Schilling in NH?

[Kilmer17]

http://msnbc.msn.com/id/6355907/

[Art]

Springsteen can't even carry New Jersey yet according to the polls. What good is he :).

[Kilmer17]

It's kind of funny. But I think back to Howard Stern coming out the day before the elction for Gov in NJ and telling his minions to vote for Whitman. And she overcame a few point defecit.

Im not saying that Schilling will affect alot of people. But if NH is within a few thousands, there may be some Red Sox fans so elated right now they'd do anything he told them to do.

[Destino]

I doubt Shilling will succeed in doing much more then pissing off a bunch of his fans. And Springsteen isn't the heavy weight he thinks he is anymore.

[gstahl]

The only one who could have any impact is Springsteen as I think New Hampshire is not at issue, but that said, I think Springsteen will not have any impact as those still on the fence are not looking for a musician to sway their vote one way or another.

I would rather have both of them just tell all their fans to get out and vote no matter who it is for. I am in CA, my vote for president means basically nothing, but I will definitely vote and ensure I vote against any new taxes on the local level (as this is the in vogue way to spend money in CA). =)

[December90]

As much as I like Curt Schilling coming out for Bush, anyone who votes because of what an athlete, musician, or movie star says is just downright stupid.

Form your own opinions about the candidates. Read what they say, study what they do and make an informed decision.

[THE HAMMER'IN HOG]

Originally posted by December90
As much as I like Curt Schilling coming out for Bush, anyone who votes because of what an athlete, musician, or movie star says is just downright stupid.

Form your own opinions about the candidates. Read what they say, study what they do and make an informed decision.

Hit that one out of the park!

An uninformed voter is the left's best customer!