PDA

View Full Version : Dernard Wilson came over my house



clown
March-10th-2005, 04:31 PM
this afternoon and we watched our terps f it up against clemson a 3rd time :doh:

if you don't know d. wilson, (MD) he mostly played on ST last year but he got some PT when Bowen got injured at dime back and safety.

he is best friends with Lemar Marshall and here is the inside dish....

Lemar has been told he will start at MLB.

I also asked Dernard if he thinks the skins will draft Rolle or Pac Man and he said if the skins were to draft a corner...it would be Rolle because of his physical aspects.

Also, He said Williams wants to be versatile on D next year for different blitz packages and switching to a 3-4 occasionally....merriman possibly

Wilson wants Merriman and it seems Gregg Williams likes him too.

probably Maryland bias....but Dernard knows a lot of inside stuff so if u have any questions...mainly regarding the D...ask me.

FLSKINSFAN
March-10th-2005, 04:33 PM
Wilson wants Merriman and it seems Gregg Williams likes him too.

I hope this is accurate.

jimster
March-10th-2005, 04:36 PM
so that would make Merriman a situational player?

Dick Edds
March-10th-2005, 04:37 PM
Originally posted by clown
this afternoon and we watched our terps f it up against clemson a 3rd time :doh:

if you don't know d. wilson, (MD) he mostly played on ST last year but he got some PT when Bowen got injured at dime back and safety.

he is best friends with Lemar Marshall and here is the inside dish....

Lemar has been told he will start at MLB.

I also asked Dernard if he thinks the skins will draft Rolle or Pac Man and he said if the skins were to draft a corner...it would be Rolle because of his physical aspects.

Also, He said Williams wants to be versatile on D next year for different blitz packages and switching to a 3-4 occasionally....merriman possibly

Wilson wants Merriman and it seems Gregg Williams likes him too.

probably Maryland bias....but Dernard knows a lot of inside stuff so if u have any questions...mainly regarding the D...ask me.

sweet . . . thanks for the info

clown
March-10th-2005, 04:39 PM
Lemar has been told he will start at MLB.

also, the Marshall hired Jesse Armstead's former trainer (the one who got Jesse to bulk up 20 lbs to play in the NFL) to bulk himself up 10-15 lbs without losing speed.

bird_1972
March-10th-2005, 04:40 PM
Originally posted by clown


also, the Marshall hired Jesse Armstead's former trainer (the one who got Jesse to bulk up 20 lbs to play in the NFL) to bulk himself up 10-15 lbs without losing speed.

What happens to Barrow, then?

Are we gonna try and trade down or snag Merriman at #9?

How is the team feeling about all of the disruptions over the past few weeks?

FLSKINSFAN
March-10th-2005, 04:41 PM
Originally posted by clown


also, the Marshall hired Jesse Armstead's former trainer (the one who got Jesse to bulk up 20 lbs to play in the NFL) to bulk himself up 10-15 lbs without losing speed.

Very interesting. Thanks for the info.

Skinned
March-10th-2005, 04:44 PM
Originally posted by bird_1972


What happens to Barrow, then?

Are we gonna try and trade down or snag Merriman at #9?

How is the team feeling about all of the disruptions over the past few weeks?

I think Barrow is one big question mark. Perhaps if he shows during off-season workouts that he is close to 100%, then they might keep him. If not, I would think that he might be a June 1st casualty. Regardless, I doubt that he is being considered the #1 MLB at this point.

bird_1972
March-10th-2005, 04:44 PM
Er.... clown .... are you there?

Danny Montana
March-10th-2005, 04:46 PM
Thanks for the inside info man. It's much appreciated. Keep it coming. :D

:cheers: :helmet:

Coach Williams
March-10th-2005, 04:47 PM
why leave on your own thread?

Tae Bo
March-10th-2005, 04:48 PM
Originally posted by jimster
so that would make Merriman a situational player?

No it would make him a DE who can drop back into pass coverage and allow the team to switch from a 4-3 to a 3-4 without having to sub, which means we could disguise the 3-4 from the other team until the last minute

Skinned
March-10th-2005, 04:49 PM
Clown -

Not to doubt you, but why is Denard hanging out with a 16 year old? What's the story behind this? Fill us in!

clown
March-10th-2005, 04:50 PM
What happens to Barrow, then?

Dernard doesn't know and doesn't talk to Barrow.




How is the team feeling about all of the disruptions over the past few weeks?

he said the team won't miss Coles and Gardner: These are Dernards words: "Lav and Rod would just sit in the film room and ***** about the gameplan...coles didn't like getting hit by linebackers and Rod didn't like 2 balls getting thrown to him a game....

as for Smoot, the team will miss him but there's plenty of talent in the secondary and Springs is a good motivator.

as for Pierce, Dernard didn't want to talk much about him.

bird_1972
March-10th-2005, 04:51 PM
Originally posted by Skinned
Clown -

Not to doubt you, but why is Denard hanging out with a 16 year old? What's the story behind this? Fill us in!

Just what I was thinking ...

Phat Hog
March-10th-2005, 04:51 PM
Originally posted by jimster
so that would make Merriman a situational player?

That’s what I was thinking. Hopefully we won’t use a #1 pick for a situational player unless he’s really going to make an impact in those situations. Even then, I just don’t know…a first round pick? :( At least that should allow us to trade down and get another pick.

Tae Bo
March-10th-2005, 04:52 PM
Originally posted by Phat Hog


That’s what I was thinking. Hopefully we won’t use a #1 pick for a situational player unless he’s really going to make an impact in those situations. Even then, I just don’t know…a first round pick? :( At least that should allow us to trade down and get another pick.


idiot ...gosh

clown
March-10th-2005, 04:52 PM
though someone would finally ask!!!

rdavis2005
March-10th-2005, 04:54 PM
Denard Wilson was placed injured reserve last year during training camp. He is someone that GW liked though.

http://www.redskins.com/news/newsDetail.jsp?id=5951

First-year player Dennard Wilson suffered a knee injury early in training camp last year and was placed on injured reserve shortly thereafter. A Maryland product, Wilson hopes to make a name for himself in offseason workouts and training camp.

clown
March-10th-2005, 04:54 PM
Not to doubt you, but why is Denard hanging out with a 16 year old? What's the story behind this? Fill us in!


though someone would finally ask!!!

my brother, a walk on at College Park 3 years ago became best friends with Dernard at Maryland...Dernard always comes over....he is pretty fast i might add.

i wouldn't say we are friends but we know each other very well.

Ghost of Nibbs McPimpin
March-10th-2005, 04:57 PM
Interesting that he didn't want to talk about Pierce.

clown
March-10th-2005, 04:58 PM
Denard Wilson was placed injured reserve last year during training camp. He is someone that GW liked though.

o seriously....i didn't follow the skins untill late last year because Dernard came over a lot...he said he got inured during the season and got some PT...maybe he was talking about the preseason.

my bad.

Skinned
March-10th-2005, 05:00 PM
Originally posted by clown



Dernard always comes over....he is pretty fast i might add.



Does he live next door? That would explain why he comes over so fast...:laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

bubba9497
March-10th-2005, 05:03 PM
:doh: enough of this guy


but for you terp homers


http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v481/bubba9497/ff106255.jpg

method man
March-10th-2005, 05:08 PM
If Williams were to get a CB, would it be in the 2nd or 3rd round? How does Williams feel about guys like Eric Green and Marlin Jackson that are first round talent but are just overshadowed by the juniors?

Ernie5
March-10th-2005, 05:10 PM
I don't how credible any of this is, but I'd luuuuvvv to get Merriman.

clown
March-10th-2005, 05:13 PM
If Williams were to get a CB, would it be in the 2nd or 3rd round? How does Williams feel about guys like Eric Green and Marlin Jackson that are first round talent but are just overshadowed by the juniors?

Gregg Williams like physical corners as his STARTERS but he loves speed and coachibility for his backup corners....

we were talking about who the depth chart at corner and he said there's a 100 percent chance they'll add another corner becuase Walt Harris is injury prone...

Chopper Dave
March-10th-2005, 05:14 PM
Originally posted by Phat Hog


That’s what I was thinking. Hopefully we won’t use a #1 pick for a situational player unless he’s really going to make an impact in those situations. Even then, I just don’t know…a first round pick? :( At least that should allow us to trade down and get another pick.

Hey, Suggs, a player highly comparable to Merriman, was a situational player for Bmore his rookie year. We all know how good he was.

And I had never though of what Merriman brings to the table as far as switching between 4-3 and 3-4 on the fly.

Everyone, you can officially consider me the driver of the Merriman bandwagon.

carter23
March-10th-2005, 05:36 PM
Originally posted by clown

as for Pierce, Dernard didn't want to talk much about him.

what does that mean

authentic
March-10th-2005, 06:04 PM
this is good information , thanks clown

zallera
March-10th-2005, 06:32 PM
How can Dan Pompei call Merriman small for an end when he's listed at 272 lbs.? There a lot smaller guys you play end regularly.

Fred Jones
March-10th-2005, 06:34 PM
Just looking at his stats, he needs to add strength when he comes to the NFL.

Chopper Dave
March-10th-2005, 06:34 PM
Originally posted by zallera
How can Dan Pompei call Merriman small for an end when he's listed at 272 lbs.? There a lot smaller guys you play end regularly.

Because before his junior year he was listed at 240. Therefore he's small.

At least I think that's how the broken thought processes of the football talking heads work.

Chopper Dave
March-10th-2005, 06:35 PM
Originally posted by Fred Jones
Just looking at his stats, he needs to add strength when he comes to the NFL.

Why's that?

terps'n'skins
March-10th-2005, 06:36 PM
thanks for the information...thats awesome that you know him...i didnt know that he was still on the team i had thought he had gotten cut, along with jafar williams but i guess not...id love to get merriman thats good news.
keep it coming!

clown
March-10th-2005, 06:36 PM
How can Dan Pompei call Merriman small for an end when he's listed at 272 lbs.? There a lot smaller guys you play end regularly.

I think it means Merriman has a small frame...most of weight could be in legs possibly....??

He's a slower Leanord Little, but much better against the run IMO.

terps'n'skins
March-10th-2005, 06:37 PM
how fast is leonard little?!

i thought merriman ran in the 4.5-4.6 range?

Chopper Dave
March-10th-2005, 06:39 PM
Originally posted by terps'n'skins
how fast is leonard little?!

i thought merriman ran in the 4.5-4.6 range?

Little is really fast.

As far as Merriman goes, the scouts compare him to Arrington, but if he's got that full array of pass rush moves that his stats indicate, then I'd be inclined to compare him to Suggs or a less long-armed Kearse.

miragv
March-10th-2005, 06:45 PM
Read the Sig

jimster
March-10th-2005, 06:54 PM
Originally posted by Chopper Dave


Hey, Suggs, a player highly comparable to Merriman, was a situational player for Bmore his rookie year. We all know how good he was.

And I had never though of what Merriman brings to the table as far as switching between 4-3 and 3-4 on the fly.

Everyone, you can officially consider me the driver of the Merriman bandwagon.

I wasn't doubting, I was actually asking - would we be using him as an End or LB, but it sounds as though he could do both, which I KNOW would be attractive to Williams.

If we could take him in the first and get a CB in the 2nd (if we get one) or 3rd to be a nickel/dime, that would be pretty exciting.

The X-Factor
March-10th-2005, 07:00 PM
Originally posted by Fred Jones
Just looking at his stats, he needs to add strength when he comes to the NFL.

Stregnth you can add in thh NFL, instincts are un-teachable. It looks like he has all the tools, but just needs some fine tuning to be a very good DE.

Leonard Washington
March-10th-2005, 07:08 PM
so you guys want to draft him @ #9?

Zen-like Todd
March-10th-2005, 07:20 PM
Interesting. Was Dennard the guy who got hurt and the coaches were bitter because they thought he was strong on special teams?

I wouldnt mind Merriman at all. Greg Williams is a freak when it comes to desiging packages to bring pressure, and adding Lavar and Merriman to what we had last year would be ridiculous.

bird_1972
March-10th-2005, 07:27 PM
Originally posted by Zen-like Todd


I wouldnt mind Merriman at all. Greg Williams is a freak when it comes to desiging packages to bring pressure, and adding Lavar and Merriman to what we had last year would be ridiculous.

One can dream ...

The X-Factor
March-10th-2005, 07:28 PM
Originally posted by Leonard Washington
so you guys want to draft him @ #9?

Maybe not that high, but trading down a few spots would be very nice. He should still be there unless he has an amazing workout.

RonJeremy
March-10th-2005, 07:33 PM
Interesting read...if you have any more "inside" info....pass it on!

:cool:

SkinsHokieFan
March-10th-2005, 07:35 PM
If we can trade down at grab him at say 14-18 I think he is a good pick.

I think at 9 we need to address WR or CB, although I do not see us going with a CB.

I would much rather take the option of dropping down and picking up Merriman and picking up an ad'l pick

Chopper Dave
March-10th-2005, 07:43 PM
If Merriman works out well, given his potential and versatility, he could very easily be gone by 11. We probably couldn't trade down and get him at that point.

fdarugar
March-10th-2005, 07:49 PM
Merriman will be gone by 11, he is a perfect fit for the chicken of the sea.

Chopper Dave
March-10th-2005, 07:50 PM
Originally posted by fdarugar
Merriman will be gone by 11, he is a perfect fit for the chicken of the sea.

Which is why we must take him. Seriously, the thought of him lining up at DE in the 4-3 and then suddenly dropping back to LB and changing the play to a 3-4 instantly just gives me goosebumps.

miragv
March-10th-2005, 09:22 PM
Originally posted by Chopper Dave


Hey, Suggs, a player highly comparable to Merriman, was a situational player for Bmore his rookie year. We all know how good he was.

And I had never though of what Merriman brings to the table as far as switching between 4-3 and 3-4 on the fly.

Everyone, you can officially consider me the driver of the Merriman bandwagon.

Sorry Chopper Dave, you can take a backseat in the bandwagon because I have been driving it since December. I remember you converting after I showed you an article or something.

Lowghost
March-10th-2005, 09:34 PM
Originally posted by Chopper Dave


Which is why we must take him. Seriously, the thought of him lining up at DE in the 4-3 and then suddenly dropping back to LB and changing the play to a 3-4 instantly just gives me goosebumps.

:cheers:

I like the way you think.

miragv
March-10th-2005, 10:32 PM
OK then, Merriman it is!

If we can get a board concensus then there is no way our FO could decide otherwise......right....?

jtyler42
March-11th-2005, 03:31 AM
I am still officially on the Mike Williams bandwagon but that Merriman bandwagon is looking better everyday! :D

SlobberKnockinFootball
March-11th-2005, 07:46 AM
I don't think we are going after a WR after all the recent moves and the sort of endorsement of McCants for next year by Gibbs. He called McCants a playmaker so why would we waste a draft pick on a guy that is probably just as comparable to Williams? I was on the Williams bandwagon at first before all the moves started happening. But I seriously can see us taking Merriman at 9. Everyone says that's too high, but everyone and their grandmothers have him slated to go at 11. 2 spots isn't that big a difference.

I see our first 2 picks being on Defense. The middle rounds will be on the OL, QB, maybe TE.

authentic
March-11th-2005, 07:55 AM
[QUOTE][i]Originally posted by SlobberKnockinFootball I don't think we are going after a WR after all the recent moves and the sort of endorsement of McCants for next year by Gibbs. He called McCants a playmaker so why would we waste a draft pick on a guy that is probably just as comparable to Williams? I was on the Williams bandwagon at first before all the moves started happening. But I seriously can see us taking Merriman at 9. Everyone says that's too high, but everyone and their grandmothers have him slated to go at 11. 2 spots isn't that big a difference.
QUOTE]

I really like Merriman, but i with Smoot gone it would be prudent to go after a corner, especially with Rolle available... if we don't get Williams at WR.. Rolle would be the next best thing

SlobberKnockinFootball
March-11th-2005, 07:58 AM
Originally posted by authentic
[QUOTE][i]Originally posted by SlobberKnockinFootball I don't think we are going after a WR after all the recent moves and the sort of endorsement of McCants for next year by Gibbs. He called McCants a playmaker so why would we waste a draft pick on a guy that is probably just as comparable to Williams? I was on the Williams bandwagon at first before all the moves started happening. But I seriously can see us taking Merriman at 9. Everyone says that's too high, but everyone and their grandmothers have him slated to go at 11. 2 spots isn't that big a difference.
QUOTE]

I really like Merriman, but i with Smoot gone it would be prudent to go after a corner, especially with Rolle available... if we don't get Williams at WR.. Rolle would be the next best thing

It all depends if we gain a 2nd round pick in a trade/trade down scenario. If we gain a 2nd rounder I'm sure we can pick up a CB there. From what I've heard the CB position has some decent depth on it. The way I see it is Merriman, and CB in the 2nd round if we gain one.

ciresolstice
March-11th-2005, 08:17 AM
I guess I'll hop on the wagon too... I'm converted...well a new rider! *lol*

If I jump off and skin my knee and get bad road rash it's on me.

Sounds beastly! The D would be dominant with that kinda flexibility, I know that is something Williams likes.

I'm not sure how it can happen though...I'd hate to spend a 9 on the guy on general principle, and trading down a few spots beyond 11 or so we might miss him.


And nice post..I like this inside scoup stuff...food for thought...We'll see how it all plays out. :cheers: