HuffPo: UC Davis Police Pepper-Spray Seated Students In Occupy Dispute (VIDEO) (UPDATES)

Amazed this hasn't been posted.

Link.

Quote:

---

WASHINGTON -- On Friday, a group of University of California, Davis students, part of the Occupy Wall Street movement on campus, became the latest victims of alleged police brutality to be captured on video. The videos show the students seated on the ground as a UC Davis police officer brandishes a red canister of pepper spray, showing it off for the crowd before dousing the seated students in a heavy, thick mist.

---

Photo from another site:

http://davisenterprise.s3-website-us...OccupyUCD3.jpg

And a rather thoughtful post from The Atlantic, on the effects of such tactics.

Quote:

---

While it's easiest to note the incidents of police violence, the protesters' cameras also record what's *not* in the images. Authorities have long claimed that they were merely battling the "black bloc" of violent anarchists. But when you look at all these videos, the bogeyman isn't there.

Instead, it's a dozen scared kids and a police officer named John Pike spraying them in the face from three feet away. And while it's his finger pulling the trigger, the police system is what put him in the position to be standing in front of those students. I am sure that he is a man like me, and he didn't become a cop to shoot history majors with pepper spray. But the current policing paradigm requires that students get shot in the eyes with a chemical weapon if they resist, however peaceably. Someone has to do it.

And while the kids may cough up blood and writhe in pain, what happens to the man who does it is in some ways much, much worse.

---

http://i52.photobucket.com/albums/g3...OccupyUCD3.jpg

I was also thinking "Go be a hippie somewhere else" for that caption.

But, seriously, a pretty gutless display by the cop. I'm not a huge fan of OWS, either, but you don't just spray protesters point blank with pepper-spray.

The smart ones got up and moved 12 feet away where they are apparently allowed to be.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by thebluefood

I was also thinking "Go be a hippie somewhere else" for that caption.

---

I thought about going funny like that but that pic ticked me off, that is just plain ol' lazy copping.

Quote:

---

But, seriously, a pretty gutless display by the cop. I'm not a huge fan of OWS, either, but you don't just spray protesters point blank with pepper-spray.

---

My guess is that he was looking for a testosterone filled story to tell his poker buddies.
Cop: "So there those kids were all huddled together not threatening anyone, so you know what I did...huh...do ya? Well, I'll tell ya, I reached over and grabbed my military grade pepper spray and I sprayed those little pricks right in the eyes...:ols:"
Poker Buddies: :confused: :doh: :twitch:

---------- Post added November-20th-2011 at 09:01 AM ----------

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Thiebear

The smart ones got up and moved 12 feet away where they are apparently allowed to be.

---

You would have been fun to listen to in Selma during the 50's.

Me, my reaction is a mix of emotions, with, I think, rage being dominant.

My gut says that if I'd been there, with a gun, I would have shot him.

My brain says that, in that imaginary scenario, I should have shot him, but I wouldn't have, because I'm a wuss.

----------

Yeah, I do recognize that I think that the nature of protestors have changed. That yeah, there are elements that are drawn to these incidents, with the purpose of escalating the violence. That the cops have, for their own protection, (and for society's) to treat every such situation as a full scale riot that could happen any instant.
[indent]It's kind of like when they raid a suspected drug house. Not every raid turns into a military engagement. But it might. (And, one way to reduce the odds of it happening, is to show up in such overwhelming force that even if The A Team is in there, they'll still lose, anyway. And they know it.) [/indent[

But even then, just because the cops have to show up armed for a riot. Doesn't mean they should use it.

So they were told to leave multiple times, did not listen,and got peppered sprayed. What is the big deal? Were they unable to leave when told to leave?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mikered30

So they were told to leave multiple times, did not listen,and got peppered sprayed. What is the big deal? Were they unable to leave when told to leave?

---

And that's how our country got to this point.

A society who thinks that sitting on a sidewalk without permission justifies multiple assaults by an organized force carrying lethal weapons.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mikered30

So they were told to leave multiple times, did not listen,and got peppered sprayed. What is the big deal? Were they unable to leave when told to leave?

---

And there's the problem.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mikered30

So they were told to leave multiple times, did not listen,and got peppered sprayed. What is the big deal? Were they unable to leave when told to leave?

---

Yes, because a protest is only effective if you do exactly what they say.
How is it you miss that mosty essential aspect of being American?

Should we have stopped dumping tea into a harbor because we were told to stop?

"Do as your told, and no one gets hurt" is for cowards.

~Bang

I get them not leaving, but it looked to me like they were also trying to trap the police inside their circle. Was that the case?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jnhay

I get them not leaving, but it looked to me like they were also trying to trap the police inside their circle. Was that the case?

---

Trap the police inside their circle, when they had their backs to the police in the circle, when they were sitting down? Yeah, that's what they were doing alright.

All this pepper spraying reminds me of Kent State. Four Dead in O-HI-O.

Ever consider that the "agitaters" are plants? Do the agitaters ever get arrested, sprayed, beaten with batons? They seem to melt into the crowds when the real violence by the cops gets started. I've been to many protests and marches and the ones there for the purpose of the protest and/or march are not violent. The ones with a hidden agenda are the ones who often start the violence.

From a protester from 1969 to 2011.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jnhay

I get them not leaving, but it looked to me like they were also trying to trap the police inside their circle. Was that the case?

---

The cops didn't look overly concerned for their safety in the video. They were meandering around, smiling. Watch the cop when he sprayed those kids. Did he really look like he did it out of worry for his safety? Nope.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by LadySkinsFan

Trap the police inside their circle, when they had their backs to the police in the circle, when they were sitting down? Yeah, that's what they were doing alright.

All this pepper spraying reminds me of Kent State. Four Dead in O-HI-O.

Ever consider that the "agitaters" are plants? Do the agitaters ever get arrested, sprayed, beaten with batons? They seem to melt into the crowds when the real violence by the cops gets started. I've been to many protests and marches and the ones there for the purpose of the protest and/or march are not violent. The ones with a hidden agenda are the ones who often start the violence.

From a protester from 1969 to 2011.

---

Agree with everything you say. But I'll also point out that even your perspective fits with the image that I have, of a bunch of hippies with flowers in their hair, singing kumbiyah, while a group of near-terrorists stand 30 feet behind them, throwing rocks and feces and bottles at the cops.

That's why I have to admit (even though I'll admit, I don't like it. It's a grudging admission.) that yeah, I can understand why there's 40 cops, and they're wearing helmets and body armor, and they brought tear gas and gas masks.

Like I said, I can understand the cops bringing their riot gear. It's using it, I have a problem with.