right!
Yep, ... I didn't realize that his rehab will probably be under Andrews, is that correct? I would have thought he would rehab with someone else.
Printable View
[QUOTE=P()rter;9391430] Me too. But I am going with his original of 6-8 as the best timeframe simply because he did the MRI and the exams and has the most accurate take on it. If it changes, so be it, but I still consider his better than others simply because they have no first hand knowledge of the exact injury.
I don't think most of the comments are meant to "put down" his first surgeon (with the exception of RiverboatGambler's "half assed hack job" comment). He may be equally skilled to Andrews. But all we know now is that Andrews felt that the existing state of the ACL is not sufficient for an athlete like RG3. So, the assumption is that Adicks may be good, but Andrews is even better in this particular case.
[QUOTE=2cents;9391447] I wonder if Andrews actually said that or if Mort was going off of the his own estimates. I really never read anywhere that Andrews was Quoted himself as saying anything. So I don't know. I watched ESPN this morning they had their own Dr. give estimates 6-8 months but never said anything about Dr. Andrews give statements. So..with this circus who knows?