+ Reply to Thread
Page 4 of 10 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... LastLast
Results 46 to 60 of 143

Thread: Skins may be intested in Strahan

  1. #46
    Ring of Fame
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Brookeville, Maryland
    Age
    25
    Posts
    12,297

    Default Re: Skins may be intested in Strahan

    It makes sense to some extent, but not really. He's old, dramatic, declining, gonna ask for too much money, and has a big gap in his teeth. Plus I'm sick of the NFC East inbreeding.


    Click this banner to check out my Caps blog. All visits appreciated!

  2. #47
    No New Threads
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    The Meadowlands BIG BLUE
    Posts
    374

    Default Re: Skins may be intested in Strahan

    This sounds a lot like when we got damaged LAvar goods.

  3. #48
    The Starter RFK Lives's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Glen Allen, VA
    Age
    42
    Posts
    2,906

    Default Re: Skins may be intested in Strahan

    Quote Originally Posted by NFC Beast
    This sounds a lot like when we got damaged LAvar goods.
    Come on wasn't he worth it.

    At least he got that monster sack against Dallas for the safety before he blew out his Achilles.
    "People talk about Lambeau Field in Green Bay, about its tradition and the fans there, it doesn't hold a candle to RFK." -Darrell Green

  4. #49
    No New Threads
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    The Meadowlands BIG BLUE
    Posts
    374

    Default Re: Skins may be intested in Strahan

    Quote Originally Posted by RFK Lives
    Come on wasn't he worth it.

    At least he got that monster sack against Dallas for the safety before he blew out his Achilles.
    And that was awesome!

  5. #50

    Default Re: Skins may be intested in Strahan

    Quote Originally Posted by jwpanic
    dude stinks against the run. he'll be in camp with the giants by sat.
    For the record I am against obtaining Strahan, but its just ignorant to say he stinks against the run. He's one of the most complete ends in the NFL.
    this space for rent

  6. #51
    The Bruiser Soup's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    vienna
    Age
    31
    Posts
    6,660

    Default Re: Skins may be intested in Strahan

    would you pay 4 million for the probable 10 sacks he can produce if injury free?

    More of My Sigs HERE //// Twitter @soupgfx

  7. #52
    The Field Goal Team SkinsRMoney06's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Solomons, MD
    Age
    28
    Posts
    681

    Default Re: Skins may be intested in Strahan

    It seems like every time a player is cut or is holding out the skins are "interested". I hope this is just a rumor like all of the others..

  8. #53

    Default Re: Skins may be intested in Strahan

    Quote Originally Posted by Brandon Lloyd Christmas
    this is the worst idea ever. if we do this, snyder is truly an idiot.
    Snyder doesn't make these moves. It would be up to Coach Gibbs and Coach Williams and The Dan would sign the check.
    “Hey, about an hour ago, all right, their [defensive] coordinator [Juan Castillo] told us, told [offensive line coach Chris] Foerster, that [if] the Giants would have lost last week, they were in the playoffs,” Kyle Shanahan said. “He didn’t mention that they had to beat us today. **** him, **** these guys. In 2012 the Redskins are gonna be the NFC East champions, and that starts right ****ing today.”

    - Kyle Shanahan

  9. #54
    The Bruiser
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Washington D.C
    Age
    50
    Posts
    6,001

    Default Re: Skins may be intested in Strahan

    I'm like the majority . Not sure how to feel on that I was reading on espn.com that the skins may be interested in Simeon Rice.

  10. #55

    Default Re: Skins may be intested in Strahan

    Quote Originally Posted by jrockster77
    For the record I am against obtaining Strahan, but its just ignorant to say he stinks against the run. He's one of the most complete ends in the NFL.
    I don't think so, I'm not saying this because I watch giants game film or anything but I think strahan is subpar against the run. All he cares about is getting to the HOF and the way he can do that is by getting sacks. Also, on 1st and 10 the other day Skip and some other guy were talking about who is better now Rice or strahan and they both talked about how strahan was subpar against the run. I'm not hear to say he's a sucky run defender but when analysts say he's not a great run defender, then it's usually not ignorant. It is pretty ignorant though to assume that someone else is ignorant based on what you feel and have no evidence to back it up.
    “Hey, about an hour ago, all right, their [defensive] coordinator [Juan Castillo] told us, told [offensive line coach Chris] Foerster, that [if] the Giants would have lost last week, they were in the playoffs,” Kyle Shanahan said. “He didn’t mention that they had to beat us today. **** him, **** these guys. In 2012 the Redskins are gonna be the NFC East champions, and that starts right ****ing today.”

    - Kyle Shanahan

  11. #56
    Ring of Fame SkinsFTW's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Hong Kong, Philippines, San Diego CA
    Age
    7
    Posts
    16,812

    Default Re: Skins may be intested in Strahan

    Quote Originally Posted by SkinsTerps26
    This will totally offset the chemistry of the team. This season will be all about strahan, espn bashing of the skins b/c of signing expensive and old players... bruce smith redux.

    I want this season to be about JC's development, portis' comback, the return of our Defense and Joe Gibbs.

    Say no to strahan.
    Agree.

    Strahan will just be a distraction that Gibbs will never sign off on anyway.
    Last edited by SkinsFTW; August-2nd-2007 at 10:23 AM.

  12. #57

    Default Re: Skins may be intested in Strahan

    Quote Originally Posted by WSHRedskins3ATLBraves3
    I don't think so, I'm not saying this because I watch giants game film or anything but I think strahan is subpar against the run. All he cares about is getting to the HOF and the way he can do that is by getting sacks. Also, on 1st and 10 the other day Skip and some other guy were talking about who is better now Rice or strahan and they both talked about how strahan was subpar against the run. I'm not hear to say he's a sucky run defender but when analysts say he's not a great run defender, then it's usually not ignorant. It is pretty ignorant though to assume that someone else is ignorant based on what you feel and have no evidence to back it up.

    I never said he excelled against the run, but he's certainly not terrible at it. He's primarily a pass-rushing DE, but he can also play the run well. This is why he's one of the most well-rounded DEs in the league.
    this space for rent

  13. #58
    The Bruiser
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Vienna, VA
    Age
    29
    Posts
    6,289

    Default Re: Skins may be intested in Strahan

    So what did they say...? I think Doc may be speculating here.

  14. #59
    Ring of Fame zskins's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Somewhere inside of a server room.
    Age
    14
    Posts
    10,176

    Default Re: Skins may be intested in Strahan

    Ok lets get one thing straigt here:

    1. Who the hell thinks 35 is OLD. I can still lift servers over my head like I am 20.
    2. Even if he is good for one year then why not make this year the Skins loads up to get in the playoffs and make history.
    3. Strahan currently has 132.5 career sacks, 794 career tackles, 4 career interceptions, 21 forced fumbles and 2 career touchdowns in 200 games over a 14 year career (through 2006 season).

    I could go on but I need to go lift some more servers!!!

  15. #60

    Default Re: Skins may be intested in Strahan

    Quote Originally Posted by ThePreciating
    Strahan and Carter

    Landry and Taylor

    Springs and Smoot

    SUPER and BOWL
    LOL, nice one man

+ Reply to Thread

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts