Unnatural power from roids can't kill people?
---------- Post added June-13th-2012 at 12:57 AM ----------
Im a big Pacquiao fan. have been for years. I love watching him fight and have no issue with him. I have an issue with the blind fans who think he is a saint. I have an issue with Arum who is a proven liar and bad for the sport. And I have an issue with Freddie Roach's overrated self. But Pacquiao the boxer? I have nothing but love for. Easily an all time great.
However, I had little issue with the decision originally because I thought Pacquiao got a gift decision against Marquez. Then I rewatched the Bradley fight with no sound and thought the fight was very close and could see the judges giving it to Bradley even if I disagreed.
Manny really didnt connect with a lot of his punches and then just stopped in the late rounds.
As for your point about Pacquiao not connecting on a lot of punches. He still was connecting more than Bradley. And don't give me the argument that the telecast influences people. One of the judges made the same claim. How do you explain the entire MGM Grand (who didn't hear the telecast) thinking Pacquiao had won an easy decision?
Say what you will about that fight but way too many people think this was a one-sided fight. Not just "Pacquiao bum lickers." But ex and current boxers, boxing trainers, boxing analyst, vast majority of fans and even the Mayweathers thought this was an easy Pacquiao victory. No way we could all be wrong.
I said I am a fan. I differentiate myself, the fan, from Pacquiao bum lickers, Of which, there are a lot of. They arent just fans of the boxer, they are on the cult of personality. Being a fan, and being a bum licker of a person are two very different things. I was clear on that too.
Its just like one person being a conservative but not an extreme conservative.
Unless, YOU believe that all Pacquiao fans are bum lickers. If thats true, I take great offense.
And like I said before, if people felt a way about the decison thats fine. I am not going to try and convince people otherwise. People are etched in stone. All I am explaining is that after my rewatch I saw the fight differently than when I saw it live.
Bradley said watch the fight with sound off, Every punch Pac threw crowd went wild even though punches didn't connect, also announcers go crazy over every punch Pac throws but don't comment on Bradleys shots.
He also said him giving the belt back is not going too happen because he feels he won the fight.
Last edited by SiCkSoULjA; June-14th-2012 at 09:09 PM.
Bradley says? Sick, you can do better than that. If Bradley won this fight, take my word, everyone would be saying so. People love an underdog. But too many people (boxers, trainers, analyst, journalist, and fans) who saw the fight says Pac got robbed. 90% of the people who saw this fight can't be wrong.
Sick, I had a few Mayweather fans over. And when I say Mayweather fans I mean they think the sun rises and sets in his ass and they can't stand Pac. Even they said Pac was robbed. Other judges say he was robbed. Back to Bradley. When you say you have to go home and watch the tape to see if you won, that pretty much says it all.
Last edited by DM72; June-14th-2012 at 09:22 PM.
I'll just say this. If I'm Pacquiao, I don't want a rematch. He knows he already beat him. I would demand my next fight be Mayweather then retire. I would even accept the $40 million guarantee even though he should get much more.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)