ExtremeSkins FF Dynasty League

[MattFancy]

I've read that Jennings is 3rd and probably will move up to 2nd, but whatever.

I dunno, I don't really know alot about him. I had looked at the Jags depth chart to see what I can find out about him and I saw him listed as their 4th RB. I'm sure Greg Jones will split some time with MJD since Jones has the experience. I figured there's a reason he lasted til the 7th round, so we'll see. It could work out or it could be a dumb move.

[KNGwithOUTaCrwN]

As for the WR/TE position, I'd just rather have our flex be a WR/RB/TE.

im fine with this

[twenty-eight]

Yeah it was that the current RB/WR Flex would get a TE option added.

So it would be

QB
RB
RB
WR
WR
RB/WR/TE

[ChrisCooleyFunkFactory]

To clarify:

There are two ways to add a second starting TE spot.

The first is simple. Add the TE to the current RB/WR flex. The starting roster would look like this:

RB
RB
WR
WR
RB/WR/TE
TE

In this format, we now have the possibility of a new starting roster format in the 2RB,2WR,2TE set. I originally floated this idea around and it got good reviews. Upon further review, however, I noticed that we could add the TE to the WR2 spot, which would allow for another roster format possibility.

Roster format:

RB
RB
WR
WR/TE
RB/WR
TE

This format still allows for the 2RB, 2WR, 2TE set, but also allows for the 3RB,1WR,2TE set. An argument could be made to put a TE flex on the RB2 spot aswell, because that would allow for another format in the 1RB,3WR,2TE set. Yes, it would allow for the 1RB,1WR,3TE set as well, but I think we can all agree that practically speaking, that would never happen.

At the risk of being "non-traditional", I think this final option presents the most flexibility and would add another element of strategy into the game. We can all agree that the TE position is BY FAR the most inferior position of the three, so I don't think a change like this would hurt anyone. But that's just me.

In the interest of progress, I think it would it be best to vote initially on adding the TE to the current RB/WR flex as initially discussed. After that, we can talk more about the stuff I just talked about.

[Drop]

I've read that Jennings is 3rd and probably will move up to 2nd, but whatever.

haha, geez...bitter much there ole' pal? TDR, you have been the first one to chime in on like my last 3 my trades. All in a tone that questions my trade partners sanity.

lol, I mean i must really be owning this **** because everytime i make a trade, TDR is there with the quickness to do his "WAIT A MINUTE, WHAT THE ****" bit.

[f_trizzy]

To clarify:

There are two ways to add a second starting TE spot.

The first is simple. Add the TE to the current RB/WR flex. The starting roster would look like this:

RB
RB
WR
WR
RB/WR/TE
TE

In this format, we now have the possibility of a new starting roster format in the 2RB,2WR,2TE set. I originally floated this idea around and it got good reviews. Upon further review, however, I noticed that we could add the TE to the WR2 spot, which would allow for another roster format possibility.

Roster format:

RB
RB
WR
WR/TE
RB/WR
TE

This format still allows for the 2RB, 2WR, 2TE set, but also allows for the 3RB,1WR,2TE set. An argument could be made to put a TE flex on the RB2 spot aswell, because that would allow for another format in the 1RB,3WR,2TE set. Yes, it would allow for the 1RB,1WR,3TE set as well, but I think we can all agree that practically speaking, that would never happen.

At the risk of being "non-traditional", I think this final option presents the most flexibility and would add another element of strategy into the game. We can all agree that the TE position is BY FAR the most inferior position of the three, so I don't think a change like this would hurt anyone. But that's just me.

In the interest of progress, I think it would it be best to vote initially on adding the TE to the current RB/WR flex as initially discussed. After that, we can talk more about the stuff I just talked about.

I'm voting yes for format #1.

[Drop]

ok i think everyone is fine with just adding the TE to the already existing flex spot. can we move on? it seems like we spend forever on the most mundane crap, lol.

[GOSKN5]

voting yes for TE in the flex... and yes for all the other stuff too douches, lovechilds, etc

[ChrisCooleyFunkFactory]

The following people said that they were in favor of adding a TE flex in some capacity. Most people said the existing RB/WR flex would become a RB/WR/TE flex.

Kur
MattFancy
TDR
King
GOSKIN5
Drop
FTrizz
28
CCFF

9 people is a majority so we are good to go there. The new flex position will be RB/WR/TE.

Not many people said they were in favor of putting the TE flex on the WR2 spot, so I will leave that alone unless someone chimes in favor of it again. I feel strongly that it is better than just the RB/WR/TE flex, but not strongly enough to push it further.

In scrolling through to find the votes I saw this again and had to comment...

I vote with pictures:



+



=

That guy is a BEAST!

Good looks, pho.

[twenty-eight]

haha, geez...bitter much there ole' pal? TDR, you have been the first one to chime in on like my last 3 my trades. All in a tone that questions my trade partners sanity.

lol, I mean i must really be owning this **** because everytime i make a trade, TDR is there with the quickness to do his "WAIT A MINUTE, WHAT THE ****" bit.

TDR, is there something you'd like to say? You jealous of Drop and his sweet moves?

ok i think everyone is fine with just adding the TE to the already existing flex spot. can we move on? it seems like we spend forever on the most mundane crap, lol.

Agreed. I vote yes....Haha I think it's because Colin's post about this little things are so long (boring) and drawn out.

[kuraitengai]

I don't know...in the past page or two. We were initially discussing an RB/WR/TE flex.

I thought you had a photographic memory kur? Some early onset dementia there?

its photographic when i actually pay attention. and most of the stuff going on in here is so pitiful that i stopped paying attention.

[kuraitengai]

The following people said that they were in favor of adding a TE flex in some capacity. Most people said the existing RB/WR flex would become a RB/WR/TE flex.

Kur
MattFancy
TDR
King
GOSKIN5
Drop
FTrizz
28
CCFF

9 people is a majority so we are good to go there. The new flex position will be RB/WR/TE.

Not many people said they were in favor of putting the TE flex on the WR2 spot, so I will leave that alone unless someone chimes in favor of it again. I feel strongly that it is better than just the RB/WR/TE flex, but not strongly enough to push it further.

In scrolling through to find the votes I saw this again and had to comment...



That guy is a BEAST!

Good looks, pho.

so...um...since apparently the vote got taken out of my hands. lol...

whats the final result...add the TE to the existing flex?

[Drop]

so...um...since apparently the vote got taken out of my hands. lol...

whats the final result...add the TE to the existing flex?

yes, that's the final result.

next order of business. TDR trying to assassinate my jedi-like trading ability.

*waves hand......"this IS the trade you are looking for"

[Touchdown Redskins]

haha, geez...bitter much there ole' pal? TDR, you have been the first one to chime in on like my last 3 my trades. All in a tone that questions my trade partners sanity.

lol, I mean i must really be owning this **** because everytime i make a trade, TDR is there with the quickness to do his "WAIT A MINUTE, WHAT THE ****" bit.

Lol, I AM bitter! I should have been pilfering these players, not you.

TDR, is there something you'd like to say? You jealous of Drop and his sweet moves?

Yes, I am. Now I have more contenders to deal with, and I could have used the depth. Now it's more than a one horse race (me being the stallion...you guys are more like ponies).

[stoshuaj]

yo bitches, just dropping by

Drop/28, you should both be ashamed

A
S
H
A
M
E
D

that is all, carry on