ExtremeSkins FF Dynasty League

[ConnSKINS26]

Motion passes with 8, correct?

[twenty-eight]

Yup! PASSSED

[the burgundy and gold]

I assume we'll have to wait for the new season to start on FF in 10 days before this change can be made, correct?

[ConnSKINS26]

Correct, b&g.

[Touchdown Redskins]

Agree with the new lineup changes, even though my vote doesn't matter at this point.

I know many people aren't for it, but hopefully this is a stepping stone to becoming almost fully flexible with our lineups. I proposed this last offseason and it was shot down, but if we're going to try to mimic the NFL, we should recognize that there are teams that are essentially phasing out the usefulness of the RB (Pats) and that there are teams who run-heavy (49ers). Clearly both models work, and I think our lineup options should reflect that. My original proposal was to have 1 WR, 1 RB, and 1 TE, with 3 RB/WR/TE positions so that you could potentially run a "smashmouth" lineup or a "spread offense" lineup. But anyway, that's a discussion for another day. I'm pretty happy with what we have here so far.

[twenty-eight]

I think V-Jack's value takes a hit if he isn't with SD...

Interesting..

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com...is-improbable/

[GOSKN5]

advice...

jimmy graham for finley, 1.4 and 1.9....

I am giving graham and need youth at all positions... finley just re signed in GB... thoughts.. how much more should I try to get for graham?

also got offered 2013 1st and 2012 3rd for Vjax... still not sure that is enough... the 1st will likely be in the bottom half...

[ChrisCooleyFunkFactory]

Agree with the new lineup changes, even though my vote doesn't matter at this point.

I know many people aren't for it, but hopefully this is a stepping stone to becoming almost fully flexible with our lineups. I proposed this last offseason and it was shot down, but if we're going to try to mimic the NFL, we should recognize that there are teams that are essentially phasing out the usefulness of the RB (Pats) and that there are teams who run-heavy (49ers). Clearly both models work, and I think our lineup options should reflect that. My original proposal was to have 1 WR, 1 RB, and 1 TE, with 3 RB/WR/TE positions so that you could potentially run a "smashmouth" lineup or a "spread offense" lineup. But anyway, that's a discussion for another day. I'm pretty happy with what we have here so far.

Im warming up to it but I think it might decrease trading, although thats never been a problem in this league.

[twenty-eight]

advice...

jimmy graham for finley, 1.4 and 1.9....

I am giving graham and need youth at all positions... finley just re signed in GB... thoughts.. how much more should I try to get for graham?

also got offered 2013 1st and 2012 3rd for Vjax... still not sure that is enough... the 1st will likely be in the bottom half...

Keep Vjack (tell him to F off)
And I think I'd do that TE deal...CCFF?

[GOSKN5]

i am trying to pull off the TE deal... i like graham.. but I think finley bounces back and closes the gap between the two... we will see if he goes for it..

[twenty-eight]

i am trying to pull off the TE deal... i like graham.. but I think finley bounces back and closes the gap between the two... we will see if he goes for it..

Ah. Thought that was a proposal. No way he goes for it.

[GOSKN5]

he is considering...

what if it was just finley and 1.4 for Graham....

I am not sure that is enough....

[Drop]

i like the flex lineup that was voted on, and in 9 days we can begin making all these changes we've voted on in Flea Flicker.

And I also thought about the flex stuff having a negative effect on trading. That's something I don't want to see...but i don't think it'll be problem.

GO...love the TE deal with the 1.9. Not sure i'd do it for just the 1.4 and Finley though. And I run hot and cold on Vincent Jackson...but i'd keep him before i'd take that offer.

[RiggosMohawk]

GO - I don't know if you're getting enough for VJax with 2 2013 picks, but I would definitely move him if there is interest. I think Rivers made him more than the reverse. Just look at his production without him or Gates or LT gone, and even against top defenses. PR is a straight up baller stuck with a bad playoff HC.

[Touchdown Redskins]

If you could pull off the Graham deal with two 1sts, I'd do it. Finley will always be an injury risk, but it's mitigated by his per-game performances. Plus two firsts where you could hit on a study...or move up and nab a top three pick. It's a risk.

Two 1sts for V-Jax I think is good value, but it sucks that you're not getting a player back. Trading a known for an unknown is not the way to go in dynasty.