ExtremeSkins FF Dynasty League

[ChrisCooleyFunkFactory]

Im pretty much the only person who hasnt signed his rookies. I do not feel comfortable with this as my only clearance to do this was from Kur.

I believe this should go to a vote because I do not want my peers to think Im trying to pull one by them.

So, Kur, can you help me with this?

Also, I want to suggest allowing the Flex to include a 2nd TE. I doubt someone will ever have a TE that is better than the flex RB or WR but i like the FLEX-ibility. Can we do this for this season? If not, no biggie.

[twenty-eight]

Im pretty much the only person who hasnt signed his rookies. I do not feel comfortable with this as my only clearance to do this was from Kur.

I believe this should go to a vote because I do not want my peers to think Im trying to pull one by them.

So, Kur, can you help me with this?

Also, I want to suggest allowing the Flex to include a 2nd TE. I doubt someone will ever have a TE that is better than the flex RB or WR but i like the FLEX-ibility. Can we do this for this season? If not, no biggie.

Colin, like i said I don't think anyone cares about the rookie thing. Anyone...?


And I like allowing a TE in the flex...

[MattFancy]

Colin, like i said I don't think anyone cares about the rookie thing. Anyone...?


And I like allowing a TE in the flex...

I wouldn't mind a TE in the flex. I don't know how often I'd use a TE over a RB or WR, but it wouldn't hurt.

[Touchdown Redskins]

CCFF, I kind of glossed over your thing about the rookies. Could you explain it again?

And I agree, I think adding the TE option to the flex would make things more interesting. I was thinking about that too at some point this offseason.

[Drop]

CCFF, you're cool on the rookie thing. i don't think anyone minds.

Twenty-eight, i feel you bro. I was watching the game last night in the company of some freeeesh PPP. If you've never heard of it, Google it homie.

And the TE flex is a fine idea. IF you happen to have two ballin' ass TE's, it can be a good thing.

[SkinsNut73]

...I hope you clowns do start 2 TE's...

[f_trizzy]

Hey King and Trizzy...did you guys announce this ridiculous trade, or am I just (not) seeing things?

Yes we announced it like a week ago but just got around to putting it thru FF now.

[Touchdown Redskins]

Yes we announced it like a week ago but just got around to putting it thru FF now.

Okay, I guess I just forgot how horrible it was.

King, your team now has a lifespan of 2 years of minor comptetiveness.

[ChrisCooleyFunkFactory]

Thanks for the feedback, fellas.

I've got an idea for a late change on the TE flex thing.

If we put the TE flex on one of the WR spots, you get an extra roster format in the 3RB, 1WR, 2TE set. You still get the 2,2,2 format if you added the TE onto the prexisting RB/WR Flex spot as was previously proposed and agreed upon.

I can see both of these formats being used equally, although infrequently on the total.

Kur, is this possible on FF?.... and never mind on the vote thing. thanks.

The Roster spots would be like this:

QB
RB
RB
WR
WR/TE
RB/WR
TE

What do you guys think?

[Drop]

i don't really think it matters. i see the small difference, but honestly, how often is someone gonna go with 2 TE's and 1 WR?

[MattFancy]

I agree with Drop. I wouldn't mind adding another TE, but unless you have 2 top 5 TEs, why would you use a flex spot on a TE?

[twenty-eight]

I agree with Drop. I wouldn't mind adding another TE, but unless you have 2 top 5 TEs, why would you use a flex spot on a TE?

You wouldn't unless you were hit by a ton of injuries...or you feel very strongly about your TE's matchup.

Of course if you have Antonio Gates & Vernon Davis you'd start two TE's

[MattFancy]

You wouldn't unless you were hit by a ton of injuries...or you feel very strongly about your TE's matchup.

Of course if you have Antonio Gates & Vernon Davis you'd start two TE's

Haha Vernon Davis...what a joke

[kuraitengai]

Im pretty much the only person who hasnt signed his rookies. I do not feel comfortable with this as my only clearance to do this was from Kur.

I believe this should go to a vote because I do not want my peers to think Im trying to pull one by them.

So, Kur, can you help me with this?

Also, I want to suggest allowing the Flex to include a 2nd TE. I doubt someone will ever have a TE that is better than the flex RB or WR but i like the FLEX-ibility. Can we do this for this season? If not, no biggie.

one at a time...

but you arent the only one. i have two rooks i havent added yet cuz i wanted to see how the guys i was replacing did in a couple preseason games.

so start with that. all in favor of changing the signing of rookies from the beginning of preseason to the end. say 'CCFF is a douche'

or if you dont really care about the vote, but just wanna call CCFF a douche, feel free to chime in.


yes votes:
kur

[kuraitengai]

Thanks for the feedback, fellas.

I've got an idea for a late change on the TE flex thing.

If we put the TE flex on one of the WR spots, you get an extra roster format in the 3RB, 1WR, 2TE set. You still get the 2,2,2 format if you added the TE onto the prexisting RB/WR Flex spot as was previously proposed and agreed upon.

I can see both of these formats being used equally, although infrequently on the total.

Kur, is this possible on FF?.... and never mind on the vote thing. thanks.

The Roster spots would be like this:

QB
RB
RB
WR
WR/TE
RB/WR
TE

What do you guys think?

yeah. either way is possible. i could actually create a flex thats a QB/RB/WR/TE/K/DEF/DL/LB/DB if i wanted. not that id ever do that. but just saying that you can do any combo of flexes.

but since its not actually changing roster size. i got no problem with doing this. just wait til after the vote on the rooks.