+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: Our Offense is Suited for the Patriots Scheme

  1. #1
    The Field Goal Team
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Frederick
    Posts
    526

    Default Our Offense is Suited for the Patriots Scheme

    We should not run the power style football that we try to establish IMO. It has worked at times, but not with Campbell at the helm. It has worked with Collins and Brunell, which relies the quarterback to make quick reads off of the playaction.

    The more I watch Cassel, the more I see the reason for his success. He was getting sacked a lot early on, so they started using him in a lot of shotgun, 4wr sets. This allowed him to hit the short throws, screens, and use the pass to set up the run. Campbell is more of this type quarterback, because he is too slow under center. This would also allow Portis to excel, because he is so quick, and with a 6 man box he could be a serious threat.:gaintsuck

    We have two players that can be effective just as Wes Welker is, in Santana Moss and Randel El. Campbell is also good at the short throws under 15 yards.


    Zorn should really look into this. I think he may try this in the future, and this is why he stock piled on wide recievers.
    Last edited by Chiefinonhaze; December-22nd-2008 at 02:22 AM.

  2. #2
    The Deep Threat
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Bethesda, MD
    Age
    30
    Posts
    4,088

    Default Re: Our Offense is Suited for the Patriots Scheme

    I agree. I was begging for Gibbs to coach like this years ago. We'd maximize the use of our offensive players, and put our best 11 out there, if we adopted a more open scheme. It would also do a lot to mask our weaknesses on the O-line. I don't think Campbell is accurate enough to run it though. He is surprisingly off target in the short-passing game.
    Last edited by RedskinzOwnU; December-22nd-2008 at 02:55 AM.

  3. #3
    The Special Teams Ace
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Springfield, VA
    Age
    26
    Posts
    342

    Default Re: Our Offense is Suited for the Patriots Scheme

    I think you make some valid points here--- anything to get us back to scoring at least 20points would be nice. The only problem i have is with a 6 man box i dont know if our o-line can handle that pressure. I hope zorn does try this --- as much as i like him im tired of simple screens and slants that I can usualy tell waht they are as soon as i see the formation

  4. #4
    The Rookie
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Where the beer flows like wine
    Age
    29
    Posts
    1,122

    Default Re: Our Offense is Suited for the Patriots Scheme

    Quote Originally Posted by Chiefinonhaze View Post
    Campbell is also good at the short throws under 15 yards.
    This gave me a chuckle.

  5. #5
    The Pro Bowlers
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Frederick
    Age
    29
    Posts
    8,765

    Default Re: Our Offense is Suited for the Patriots Scheme

    We can't run power football with a crap oline, and our feature "power back" is on his last leg and weighs about 215.

  6. #6
    The Dirtbags
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Charlotte Represent
    Posts
    1,677

    Default Re: Our Offense is Suited for the Patriots Scheme

    I think we should have utilized a shotgun more w/4WR sets, so I agree with you on that. However, I think the Patriots still have a better o-line than we do. You still need time to throw the ball, weather it's 40 yards or 5 yards.

  7. #7
    The Dirtbags
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Age
    27
    Posts
    1,763

    Default Re: Our Offense is Suited for the Patriots Scheme

    Quote Originally Posted by RedlightG20 View Post
    This gave me a chuckle.

    Your sig gave me even more of a chuckle. Keep that man out of DC please.

  8. #8

    Default Re: Our Offense is Suited for the Patriots Scheme

    This does make sense to an extent but I'm not sure if Campbell can execute it...

  9. #9
    The Waterboy
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    ellicott city, MD
    Posts
    64

    Default Re: Our Offense is Suited for the Patriots Scheme

    Yea most def. Let's do the same thing as the patriots. Except we don't have Randy Moss,Wes Welker,Tom brady and their o line. And please don't say randle el could be our wes welker. Cause he couldn't hold welkers jock....

  10. #10
    The Dirtbags Warpath11's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Somerset, New Jersey
    Age
    34
    Posts
    1,956

    Default Re: Our Offense is Suited for the Patriots Scheme

    Our offense is built for the Patriots shceme??? dude no offense but where have you been the last 4 years? Gibbs built this team to be the exact opposite of the 4-WR spread sets. Gibbs' vision was a powerful smashmouth run team that beat you up along the trenches and used the run to set up the simple downfield vertical passing game. Nothing on this team (especially up front) resembles a spread them out 4-WR team.

    Maybe in a few years when we get the bodies to play such a scheme we would implement it but as things stand right now we are sitll what Gibbs created.

  11. #11
    The Benchwarmer
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Ft. Lauderdale, FL
    Age
    34
    Posts
    153

    Default Re: Our Offense is Suited for the Patriots Scheme

    As weird as this sounds I really like the KC spread offense with Tyler Thigpen. Watch for them next year. We need a scheme like that.

  12. #12

    Default Re: Our Offense is Suited for the Patriots Scheme

    Quote Originally Posted by RedskinzOwnU View Post
    I agree. I was begging for Gibbs to coach like this years ago. We'd maximize the use of our offensive players, and put our best 11 out there, if we adopted a more open scheme. It would also do a lot to mask our weaknesses on the O-line. I don't think Campbell is accurate enough to run it though. He is surprisingly off target in the short-passing game.
    i dont think he is accurate enough either. but we do have brennan, who played in the spread in college. so does it make more sense to go with him if we were to give the spread a shot?

+ Reply to Thread

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts