Mass. Special election.

[twa]

Coakley sucks
So does Brown.

Well they are from Mass, which is a requirement for public office

[ljs]

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epo...tion-1144.html

Holy crap.

Now I am CERTAIN that this poll is an outlier. And Im certain that Coakley is going to win.

But the fact that this state, for this seat, isnt a 30 point spread is AMAZING.

Could you imagine if the GOPer somehow pulls this off?

.......This is Massachusetts and the election is for a national office. Zero chance.

Zero chance. Sorry man. ....

Massachusetts will elect people from the GOP to high state office. Not to high national office. .....

MA is a goofy place in a lot of ways, but there's zero chance they let Kennedy's seat go to a guy with an R next to his name. It just isn't going to happen.

Hmm...really?

[mjah]

Hmm...really?

Oops, looks like ljs wasn't paying attention!

Already asked and answered

I noticed that you didn't post in this thread until just now. Maybe next time you'll be confident enough to question my predictions before the votes are cast.

Or, given the example you just provided, maybe you won't.

[Kilmer17]

Im rarely wrong, but I was wrong about this election.

[cjcdaman]

This is Massachusetts and the election is for a national office. Zero chance.

I know you posted in the other thread EXACTLY ONE DAY BEFORE THIS ELECTION...that you took your prediction back.

Nice try.

[Mickalino]

Im rarely wrong.

Really ?

Care to PM me some lottery numbers ?

[Mickalino]

Zero chance.

Zero chance. Sorry man.

Quoted For......opposite of truth

Oops, looks like ljs wasn't paying attention!

Already asked and answered

I noticed that you didn't post in this thread until just now. Maybe next time you'll be confident enough to question my predictions before the votes are cast.

Or, given the example you just provided, maybe you won't.

Quoted For.....someone trying to backpedal and cover his butt

[Seabee1973]

Really ?

Care to PM me some lottery numbers ?

That would probably be the rarely part LOL

[mjah]

Quoted For.....someone trying to backpedal and cover his butt

You did go read the link, right? Where I clearly indicated that my predictions were 180 degrees off the mark? Once it became clear that I had been obviously wrong?

Yeah. Not exactly butt-covering.

Guys, you have to do this taunting stuff before the results come in, or it just looks like some brow-mopping opportunism on your part. Waiting until now makes you look like you were sheepishly hedging your bets.

[Homercles82]

Oops, looks like ljs wasn't paying attention!

Already asked and answered

I noticed that you didn't post in this thread until just now. Maybe next time you'll be confident enough to question my predictions before the votes are cast.

Or, given the example you just provided, maybe you won't.

You said probably off.

You did go read the link, right? Where I clearly indicated that my predictions were 180 degrees off the mark? Once it became clear that I had been obviously wrong?



Yeah. Not exactly butt-covering.



Guys, you have to do this taunting stuff before the results come in, or it just looks like some brow-mopping opportunism on your part. Waiting until now makes you look like you were sheepishly hedging your bets.

you were hedging your bets by saying "probably off." And of course they can point out you were wrong because you said probably in the post you linked above.

[cjcdaman]

This is Massachusetts and the election is for a national office. Zero chance.

Waiting until now makes you look like you were sheepishly hedging your bets.

You're the one who made the prediction and then tried to go back on it one day before the election.

Here ya go. Enjoy!

[Mickalino]

You did go read the link, right? Where I clearly indicated that my predictions were 180 degrees off the mark? Once it became clear that I had been obviously wrong?

Yeah. Not exactly butt-covering.

Guys, you have to do this taunting stuff before the results come in, or it just looks like some brow-mopping opportunism on your part. Waiting until now makes you look like you were sheepishly hedging your bets.

Yea, I read the whole thing.

But it sounds more like someone who bet for the Cowboys to beat the Vikings, who decides to change their mind with 10 seconds left in the 4th quarter, while losing 34-3.

[Rdskns2000]

Well since we really didn't need another thread, here's what I said in my closed thread about Brown's win tonight:

I don't think his win changes anything that the DEMS will do in 2010.
I think tonight's election only puts them on the clock until the next congress takes over in Jan. 2011. I think the dems will be more inclined to ram thru every piece of their agenda thru anyway they can. Reconciliation, nuclear options, etc... Whatever they have to do, they will get their agenda pass.

Once it's pass it's harder to reverse. So, I really don't see the dems doing anything different this year other maybe accelerate.

[Mickalino]

You're the one who made the prediction and then tried to go back on it one day before the election.

Here ya go. Enjoy!

Well since we really didn't need another thread, here's what I said in my closed thread

But can we start another thread, regarding mjah's "zero chance" pwnage

[boston skins fan]

the thing about this win not only did a republican win in mass but at 52 to 47% this has to be considered a landslide in such a blue state