View Poll Results: Should the Redskins take Sam Bradford if he fall to them at #4?

Voters
445. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes, let him learn under McNabb

    313 70.34%
  • No, draft the best Offensive Tackle

    132 29.66%
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 107

Thread: If Sam Bradford is there, should we take him?

  1. #1
    The Backup
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Maryland
    Age
    33
    Posts
    2,151

    Default If Sam Bradford is there, should we take him?

    At first glance I know alot of you would say no. But let's take a deeper look at our situation. Would you rather have a Peyton Manning/Aaron Rogers and be set at the QB postion for the next 20 years, or would you rather have a great LT with a good QB for the next 2-3 years until he either gets hurt or has to retire... and then go back to the same old song and dance of searching for decades for a QB like we did before, with no one for that great LT to block for, just like Chris Samuels had happen?

    There is also other options besides the draft to address the offensive line, at least in the short term until we actually get more draft picks. There's Flozell Adams, Shaun Andrews, Levi Jones, Jared Gaither, and many more.

    So if I were thinking about long term success for this franchise, and Sam Bradford actually fell to our spot at #4, I would take Sam Bradford if he were there at #4 and sign Adams or trade for Gaither. This would be an idea situation because Sam could sit and learn under McNabb and by the time he's ready to play, we will have our young offensive hogs formed and ready to protect him & dominate defenses.

    Of coarse there is also the option of finding another team that would mortgage the farm to trade up to our spot and get him. And with our lack of picks this season, if offered that kind of deal I'd probably do it. At the same time, it would be painful to know that you may be sacrificing your only chance to lock down the most important position (Quarterback) on the football field for the next 20 years. Not for 3 or so years, but for the next 20 years. And again, we would also need a team willing to make that kind of offer, and still have a good enough first round postion that we could still be in a spot to take someone like Trent Wililams or another great offensive tackle, or even consider Jimmy Clausen.

    I'd like to consider success for the long term and not continue the same short sighted moves that make our struggle a yearly reduntant thing. And that's what I would do. What would you do if Bradford was still on the board by our pick at #4?
    Last edited by JoeKnowsBest; April-16th-2010 at 06:46 PM.
    "It's a crazy league, there's alot of dumb GMs" -Jon Gruden

  2. #2
    "a bull**** ExtremeSkins-fabricated stat"

    a bull**** ExtremeSkins-fabricated stat

    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    DC
    Age
    33
    Posts
    2,370

    Default Re: If Sam Bradford is there, should we take him?

    Yes.

    Not really even a question.

  3. #3
    No New Threads
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Lebanon Church VA
    Age
    33
    Posts
    3,806

    Default Re: If Sam Bradford is there, should we take him?

    I would draft him to trade him. With him officially a Redskin after the number 4 pick we'd have more leverage than just waiting the 15 to 20 minutes for someone to give us a call before we had to make the selection.
    Last edited by MrJL; April-16th-2010 at 06:41 PM.

  4. #4
    The Run Stopper RWJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    West Virginia
    Age
    49
    Posts
    5,891

    Default Re: If Sam Bradford is there, should we take him?

    If Bradford amazingly drops to #4, Shanny/Allen send the card up immediately. He would be our future QB. Super very unlikely to happen though.

  5. #5

    Default Re: If Sam Bradford is there, should we take him?

    Hmm...yes.

    Bradford gets to sit for 2 years behind McNabb, under the tutelage of him and the Shanahans? Sounds sweet. Aw yeah. Never having to worry about QB for a decade or two. Awwwwwwwwwwwww yeaaaaaaaaahhhhh. And we know Mike can turn water into wine on the offensive line. Awwwwwwwwwwww yeah.

    I'd do it if Okung wasn't on the board, or if we couldn't trade down.

  6. #6

    Default Re: If Sam Bradford is there, should we take him?

    Absolutely, no question. It would be a great situation. If Clausen was a little better rated, he'd be in the question too, but fortunately for us, he's not (because that would be a tough decision to make). I don't think Bradford is a sure thing, but he's about as close as they come nowadays.

    I do disagree that it would lock up our QB position for "the next 20 years". That's a bit premature. It would for sure lock it up for the next 5 years, because McNabb should last around 3 years and Bradford will get 2 years regardless of performance (unless he is horrible, but by then he would have 3 years in the system, probably getting a couple starts here or there due to McNabb's somewhat proneness to get injured). Not to mention he'd be learning from a truly top 10-15 QB in the meantime. It'd be a fantastic situation.
    Eli Manning will be 31 years old when the 2012 season starts.
    Michael Vick will be 32 years old when the 2012 season starts.
    Tony Romo will be 32 years old when the 2012 season starts.
    ROBERT GRIFFIN III will be 22 years old when the 2012 season starts.


  7. #7
    The Cover Corner
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    State of Confusion
    Posts
    5,276

    Default Re: If Sam Bradford is there, should we take him?

    It's like deja vu all over again yogi!


    Thank you zskins for the modifications to my girl!

  8. #8
    The Deep Threat SAli457180's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Northern VA
    Age
    32
    Posts
    4,300

    Default Re: If Sam Bradford is there, should we take him?

    I think the Skins should take him if he drops to #4, but they could also stockpile picks if they choose to trade down.

  9. #9
    The Heavy Hitter thesubmittedone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Usually home, I'm boring
    Age
    29
    Posts
    7,062

    Default Re: If Sam Bradford is there, should we take him?

    If our coaches and scouts feel he's as sure a bet to be an elite franchise QB for years to come, then yeah, of course! Only time you don't do that is if you've just drafted one of those types recently or got a younger franchise QB on your roster already.

    If you're not so sure and you feel there is a significant chance he won't be one of the elites, then no. Just wait until another guy shows you that next draft.
    Quote Originally Posted by Mike Shanahan
    "I knew it wasn't going to happen overnight. One thing I told Dan Snyder was: ‘If you don't plan on me being here for five years to do this the right way, then you shouldn't hire Mike Shanahan. But I'm going to do it the right way... But if you're going to ask me to take shortcuts, I'm not going to take shortcuts. I'm going to do it the right way.' And he said he would. And when we do have this thing turned around, people will see it, and say, ‘Oh my God, that's the way you do it.' "

  10. #10
    The Dirtbags Combatant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Maryville, TN
    Age
    33
    Posts
    1,591

    Default Re: If Sam Bradford is there, should we take him?

    Quote Originally Posted by RWJ View Post
    If Bradford amazingly drops to #4, Shanny/Allen send the card up immediately. He would be our future QB. Super very unlikely to happen though.
    If they send the card up immediately they'd be idiots. If they're smart they will take it to the very last second and see what offers come their way.

  11. #11
    No New Threads
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Lebanon Church VA
    Age
    33
    Posts
    3,806

    Default Re: If Sam Bradford is there, should we take him?

    Quote Originally Posted by RWJ View Post
    If Bradford amazingly drops to #4, Shanny/Allen send the card up immediately. He would be our future QB. Super very unlikely to happen though.
    Not that unlikely. All that has to happen is the Rams draft Suh and the Lions and Bucs hold onto their picks.

  12. #12
    Ring of Fame
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Back in the old Country unitil the New Year- darn frustrating Government B/S.
    Age
    38
    Posts
    16,084

    Default Re: If Sam Bradford is there, should we take him?

    The brass obviously feel he won't be or else we wouldn't now have a new name on the #5 jersey; but if by some miracle he was still on the board at 4, to answer your question .....

    HELL YEAH!

    Hail.



  13. #13
    The Backup J-bomb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Sterling, VA
    Age
    37
    Posts
    2,231

    Default Re: If Sam Bradford is there, should we take him?

    I guess I'm in the minority for NOT taking bradford @ 4. I don't believe the hype I've seen him play and I'm not impressed at all. I'd rather us trade down and get OL,LB help and a QB later on maybe Skelton,Crompton or Kafka to sit and learn from Mcnabb for 2-3 yrs.

  14. #14
    The Cover Corner
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Keller Texas
    Posts
    5,455

    Default Re: If Sam Bradford is there, should we take him?

    No

    Not really a question in my opinion. After we got McNabb we did so already knowing we needed Offensive Linemen help. Now we have no second round pick, and still have the same problem. When are some of you going to understand that no matter the QB, whether it's McNabb, Montana, Manning, or anyone else that with no offensive line the QB won't matter they are dead meat?

    I am hoping this exact scenario happens so we can trade down easily. The only way I see us being able to trade down for more picks is if some team wants to jump ahead and get Claussen as I don't believe Bradford will be there. If Bradford is there someone will definitely trade up for him.

    The Raiders at number 8 need a QB, as does Cleveland who picks at 7, and so does Seattle who picks at 6.


    Hopefully one of those teams gives us there 3rd rounder so they can leap frog the Seahawks. We have no need at QB this year, forget about Bradford or McNabb's outta here for sure

  15. #15
    The Benchwarmer
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Front Royal, VA
    Age
    27
    Posts
    207

    Default Re: If Sam Bradford is there, should we take him?

    Won't happen. But, yes.

+ Reply to Thread

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts