I certainly wasn't even thinking about Waiters. I wanted to trade the pick or take Drummond. I liked TRob for a while but I didn't think his ceiling was terribly high. My thought process was winning this season.
TRob might bethe biggest disappointment high in the draft so far. He hasn't really produced and has already gotten himself suspended.
---------- Post added November-25th-2012 at 02:18 PM ----------
I think they'll be a lot better with Wall and Nene, once they play their way into shape. Around the end of December.
I did'nt like Beal that high he has a passive game and is basically a jump shooter that does'nt shoot a good percentage except his last 10 game stretch he was fools gold like the Wizards winning streak. The only hope is JWall gets him easy shots. With TRob I said that 1 year of producing coming in his junior year was a huge red flag for me. That guy I don't think he even averaged 15mpg until his junior year if he was a stud he woulda forced his way into PT regardless of the Morris twins.
I still would have taken Barnes if I could'nt trade back.
Maybe people here don't realize how bad 95% of rookies tend to play their 1st season and how little they really contribute. I'm not just talking about non-lottery picks, I'm talking lottery and many top-5 picks as well. For all the talk of how good Waiter's is doing: He's averaging 15 points on 38% shooting with 2 assists and 2.5 rebounds per game. Not exactly lighting it up and that's with having more talent around him than the Wiz.
I know when Cleveland drafted Waiters, I was shocked and was curious to know why I hadn't really heard his name discussed that high before. I'm not ready to give up on Beal, I really think he has a good game, but just not what we need right now with Wall out. I think he'd play well with Wall because it would force teams to choose to defend inside or outside. Plus, I think he'll be able to improve his handle and his game and that his shots will start to fall as he continues to play and get a feel for the game. What I didn't like about Beal is basically what we're seeing now, he's a good number 2, but not a number 1 on a team. I think a draft pick that high should be able to be a number 1 as well. But I can understand the thinking of some - that we don't want to create two players who need the ball in their hands to be effective. I also like the fact that Beal is doing other things like playing defense, rebounding and getting assists. He still needs to improve his game more, but he's not a bust by any means, at least not in my opinion.
“The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results”.
"There are no stupid people just stupid posts"
Interested in learning about math, probability, or Computer Science and their connections to the real world? Learn more at my site: http://www.learninglover.com, or visit me on Twitter: @MindAfterMath
A recent blog post : The Risk of Competition
Beal's role on the team is undefined right now. That's a major problem for his productivity, but I don't see it being a big problem with his potential.
Some games, Beal is expected to pull the sled for stretches. Some games he's practically left on the bench.
Right now Beal is taking an inordinate amount of threes, almost 6 a game, which is well over half of the attempts he takes per game. That's basically the only way he's consistently contributing, and it's depressing his shooting percentages.
We don't seem to have an offensive system. We don't seem to have clear offensive roles for our players. We don't even have set lineups or rotations. 11 games into the year.
The only kind of rookie that could come in and thrive in our current mess would be an elite ISO ball shot creator. And even then, that wouldn't contribute much to W/Ls.
We need a better coach and we need our PG back. Otherwise all you're going to get from Beal is a lot of 3s and some defense and rebounding.
"John Wall will never be as good as Kyrie Irving was in his first week in the NBA" - David Falk, published February 14, 2013.
I think part of the addition to Beal's threes is Price and his relying on the threes. He seems to set up the offense around the three point game. If you've noticed, since Livingston's been playing we've taken more shots in the paint. That also could be because of Nene though. Beal's shot hasn't necessarily improved over that period, but I think as the offense begins to rely more on inside shots, you'll see Beal driving more inside as a pure effect of running the offense.
“The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results”.
"There are no stupid people just stupid posts"
Interested in learning about math, probability, or Computer Science and their connections to the real world? Learn more at my site: http://www.learninglover.com, or visit me on Twitter: @MindAfterMath
A recent blog post : The Risk of Competition
http://www.csnwashington.com/basketb...e-walls-return
Back on Sept. 28, when the Wizards announced John Wall had the beginning stages of a stress injury to his left kneecap, team president Ernie Grunfeld estimated his star guard would be sidelined about two months.
As that two-month date approaches, however, Wall has still not practiced with the Wizards and there is no definitive word on when he will.
“I don’t know where we’re at,” Wizards coach Randy Wittman said before Saturday night’s game against the Charlotte Bobcats at Verizon Center. “If I could give you a time I would. I have no idea. He has not practiced at all so until that time comes I don’t know what the timetable is going to be.”
Wall has tossed up soft jumpers but has yet to run the floor at Wizards practices.
DC Sports: The Curse Is Real
This is arguably the most pathetic franchise in sports. Ted is running a Mickey Mouse organization. Either he really is an idiot or he just doesn't care about the Wizards. And for that matter, I hate even typing Wizards, it should be Bullets.
http://wizofawes.com/2012/11/23/erni...in-washington/
Based on the table, Grunfeld appears to be a perfectly adequate drafter, siding with conventional wisdom and not taking many risks.
In hindsight, it is easy to say that if Grunfeld was a better GM, the Wizards could be sitting pretty with Kenneth Faried, Kawhi Leonard, and Jae Crowder. However, NBA analysis tends to be incredibly player-centric because all we see are the games, not the behind the scenes planning sessions and practice where much player improvement actually occurs. When viewed in this context, it’s very silly to take the performance that players have after being drafted by one team and just imagine that same performance would be replicated on another. Each of the players mentioned above were drafted into very good situations, with established veterans and good coaching. Kawhi Leonard shooting above his college three-point shooting percentage in the NBA, with longer three pointers and better competition, while John Wall’s jump shot actually gets worse is a very tangible and clear example where a coaching deficiency seems to be the only explanation for the difference in talent development.
And that might be the most damning thing against Grunfeld: he has failed to create an environment that is conducive to the development of young talent. It might make sense if even two or three of the Wizards young prospects were underachieving. But so far, it’s been all of them. Maybe it’s the lack of locker room veterans – something that Grunfeld has started to address in recent months. Maybe it’s lack of clearly defined roles for most of the young players on the team. Maybe it’s the coaching. It’s most likely a combination of all of those factors and some others ones that I can’t think of. Whatever it is, it’s certainly enough for me to call for Grunfeld’s head.
The GM of a basketball team has a lot of important responsibilities. The responsibilities that get the most coverage are the ones that involve players. But maybe the most important responsibilities are the construction of a coaching staff. So maybe before the next time we watch a young Wizard make a boneheaded play and curse Grunfeld for not drafting someone else, we instead should curse Grunfeld for not developing that player right.
Last edited by Destino; November-26th-2012 at 09:25 AM.
There can be no doubt that almost any player that comes here, vet or rookie, would get worse.
We don't even have a rotation or an offensive system. What in the hell did we do this offseason if we don't even have those two basic things? Could you ever imagine Doc Rivers or Rick Carlisle being in that kind of predicament?
Randy is a ridiculous coach. He's completely out of his depth here. A team like ours needs as strong a coach as possible and we've got one of the worst in the league.
"John Wall will never be as good as Kyrie Irving was in his first week in the NBA" - David Falk, published February 14, 2013.
wow, 0-11 whats new Wizards?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)