+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 28

Thread: True or False: The 2010 Washington Redskins have below average talent, but above average (and possibly better) coaching

  1. #1
    The Gadget Play
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Silver Spring MD
    Age
    26
    Posts
    3,536

    Default True or False: The 2010 Washington Redskins have below average talent, but above average (and possibly better) coaching

    Sounds about right, IMO. The Redskins are not the divisions most talented team, but they may be the toughest, and perhaps the best coached.

    We all have gone over many times the level of talent on this team at certain spots, but they do have a good coaching staff and it is showing up in the wins.

    Although four of the five games have come down to the final play, you could argue almost that under previous coaching staffs, they would not have even been in the game in the 4th quarter.

    The coaches are doing what they can with the limited talent they have at certain spots (interior line, wide receiver, defensive line) and showcasing the teams strengths (QB, outside linebacker, TE, punt returner). Sounds like a simple thing that any coach would do, but we know that has not been the case in Washington over the last few years.

    The coaching for the most part is what has excited me because after (potentially) a few good offseasons, this team may not only be a well coached team, but a far younger and more talented team as a whole. Shanahan will continue to covet players (whether role player or stud) who fit the scheme and that is a plus.

    All you can hope for is the opportunity for them to build this thing up.

    TRUE

  2. #2

    Default Re: True or False: The 2010 Washington Redskins have below average talent, but above average (and possibly better) coaching

    I still don't think people realize that Gibbs took a trash roster to the playoffs in 2 out of 4 years here. Its the same old story.
    Last edited by skinfan2k; October-10th-2010 at 06:45 PM.

  3. #3
    The Heavy Hitter HailGreen28's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Pikeville, NC
    Posts
    7,589

    Default Re: True or False: The 2010 Washington Redskins have below average talent, but above average (and possibly better) coaching

    Quote Originally Posted by SMOSS89 View Post
    Sounds about right, IMO. The Redskins are not the divisions most talented team, but they may be the toughest, and perhaps the best coached.

    We all have gone over many times the level of talent on this team at certain spots, but they do have a good coaching staff and it is showing up in the wins.

    Although four of the five games have come down to the final play, you could argue almost that under previous coaching staffs, they would not have even been in the game in the 4th quarter.

    The coaches are doing what they can with the limited talent they have at certain spots (interior line, wide receiver, defensive line) and showcasing the teams strengths (QB, outside linebacker, TE, punt returner). Sounds like a simple thing that any coach would do, but we know that has not been the case in Washington over the last few years.

    The coaching for the most part is what has excited me because after (potentially) a few good offseasons, this team may not only be a well coached team, but a far younger and more talented team as a whole. Shanahan will continue to covet players (whether role player or stud) who fit the scheme and that is a plus.

    All you can hope for is the opportunity for them to build this thing up.

    TRUE
    It's true we got allstars, but are thin on talent as a team. Not much depth, and old! The biggest difference so far this year has indeed been the coaching.

    Mike and Kyle are no-brainers. For all the flak Haslett gets for the 3-4, do you guys see Blanche's 4-3 making stops when we need them?
    Last edited by HailGreen28; October-10th-2010 at 06:48 PM.

  4. #4
    The Playmaker
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    USA
    Age
    45
    Posts
    3,019

    Default Re: True or False: The 2010 Washington Redskins have below average talent, but above average (and possibly better) coaching

    I dont see anything above avg in the coaching dept just yet.. At least they demand respect, but as far as gaming decisions or schemes, I dont see it.. Were playing with alot of heart and hope, imo..


  5. #5

    Default Re: True or False: The 2010 Washington Redskins have below average talent, but above average (and possibly better) coaching

    More like...the Redskins have average talent and great coaching and leadership from Shanahan to McNabb. Below average doesn't keep up with the tough teams we've faced

  6. #6
    The Special Teams Ace
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Bristow
    Posts
    313

    Default Re: True or False: The 2010 Washington Redskins have below average talent, but above average (and possibly better) coaching

    True...I think the Skins are outmatched on talent with each game this year and the they have out scheme each opponent except for the Rams game.

  7. #7
    The Gadget Play
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Silver Spring MD
    Age
    26
    Posts
    3,536

    Default Re: True or False: The 2010 Washington Redskins have below average talent, but above average (and possibly better) coaching

    Quote Originally Posted by TimmySmith View Post
    No way. This team is talented, it's just not showing it all quite yet. It's only been together for 5 games.
    I think as far as being 'top heavy', we have some talented guys, but there is not enough depth on the team, and young depth at that.

    I think it's a good sign Shanahan is turning to guys like Banks, Armstrong, Torrain, and Kory Lich (even though he got owned). He does want to get younger.

    That being said, I never meant it in a way that suggested we better have the most talented team in the league or else we lose.

    I meant to say that this coaching staff not only is using their personnel effectively, but rallying this team together so that they believe when its crunch time.

    Talent is not the only barometer of a teams success, hence the thread.

  8. #8
    No New Threads Burgold's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Silver Spring, MD USA
    Age
    44
    Posts
    12,799

    Default Re: True or False: The 2010 Washington Redskins have below average talent, but above average (and possibly better) coaching

    There's no poll?

    I'd say that we have uneven talent. We have some positions we're we are just weak and some where we are well above average. Coaching is really seen in the team discipline and never say die attitude.

  9. #9
    The Role Player RedskinsTime's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Rockville, MD
    Age
    25
    Posts
    725

    Default Re: True or False: The 2010 Washington Redskins have below average talent, but above average (and possibly better) coaching

    Ding ding ding we have a winner

    This, ladies and gentlemen, is your 2010 Washington Redskins.


  10. #10
    The Gadget Play
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Silver Spring MD
    Age
    26
    Posts
    3,536

    Default Re: True or False: The 2010 Washington Redskins have below average talent, but above average (and possibly better) coaching

    Quote Originally Posted by Burgold View Post
    There's no poll?

    I'd say that we have uneven talent. We have some positions we're we are just weak and some where we are well above average. Coaching is really seen in the team discipline and never say die attitude.
    Right, and I said that in the post above yours about how they believe int he 4th quarter and since this team is far more united than past units, we can come through.

  11. #11
    The Rookie Travdaskin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Suffolk, Virginia
    Age
    21
    Posts
    1,229

    Default Re: True or False: The 2010 Washington Redskins have below average talent, but above average (and possibly better) coaching

    We have some studs on both sides of the ball to build around (Santana, Cooley, Hall, Orakpo, Landry, McNabb, Trent) but if they get hurt we are in major trouble. Depth is indeed an issue. I would say we have average talent with above average coaching...
    Last edited by Travdaskin; October-10th-2010 at 07:41 PM.

  12. #12
    The Backup wilco_holland's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Nieuwehorne, the Netherlands
    Age
    22
    Posts
    2,168

    Default Re: True or False: The 2010 Washington Redskins have below average talent, but above average (and possibly better) coaching

    I would say.........we have a solid team that can win ugly and can give up a lot of yards whitout letting the opponents score.

    I am watching this and thinking.....how the hell did we winn this.
    Can we winn enough games like this to make a run deep into the playoffs. I gess we can..if we keep beeing lucky and step up when we need to.

    Coaching staff doens´t make us winn, it is always a combination.......players(talent) and coaching.
    Last edited by wilco_holland; October-10th-2010 at 07:14 PM.

  13. #13
    The Benchwarmer Haszard4's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Manassas, Va
    Age
    45
    Posts
    167

    Default Re: True or False: The 2010 Washington Redskins have below average talent, but above average (and possibly better) coaching

    True,

    But I think it’s still too early to tell how talented our team is. New offense and defensive systems. I know this is the same mantra every year, but when every thing around you is crap it’s hard to rise above. We’ll see, we may not be as crappy as you think.

  14. #14

    Default Re: True or False: The 2010 Washington Redskins have below average talent, but above average (and possibly better) coaching

    This is the first game that I can say we may have outcoached the opponent. We made the proper adjustments, which is the important part of the game. They still made a lot of mistakes, but a key thing was the ability to get pressure on Rodgers, and the switching from run run pass to pass pass pass. Those were essential switches.
    “The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results”.

    "There are no stupid people just stupid posts"

    Interested in learning about math, probability, or Computer Science and their connections to the real world? Learn more at my site: http://www.learninglover.com, or visit me on Twitter: @MindAfterMath

    A recent blog post : The Risk of Competition

  15. #15
    The Run Stopper
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    St. Louis, MO
    Age
    35
    Posts
    5,758

    Default Re: True or False: The 2010 Washington Redskins have below average talent, but above average (and possibly better) coaching

    I think it's amusing that people think when a guy has one great game or season he's a great player suddenly. Heck Reggie Brookes looked like our RB for 10 years after his rookie season.

    Shanahan has turned our 4-12 team into a winner, close or not. It's amazing to me that we've been as successful as we have so far. I figured we were a 6-10 team, 7-9 with a TON of luck, but we're 3-2 right now.

    I love our new coaching staff. I just want to see what we can do with a normal offseason, draft, FA, ect. I really want to see where we're at during the year after next, that's when I see us REALLY being dangerous.

+ Reply to Thread

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 43
    Last Post: July-28th-2010, 07:55 AM
  2. Average CEO makes more in Day than average worker
    By Fred Jones in forum The Tailgate
    Replies: 65
    Last Post: June-25th-2006, 02:29 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts