View Poll Results: Was the 3rd and 21 all out blitz the worst call you've ever seen?

Voters
437. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    138 31.58%
  • No

    123 28.15%
  • It was a bad call, but you need to chill out. Romo made a play.

    176 40.27%
+ Reply to Thread
Page 21 of 37 FirstFirst ... 11 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 31 ... LastLast
Results 301 to 315 of 543

Thread: 3rd and 21.. clearly the play of the game.. Fault Haslett?

  1. #301
    The Deep Threat SAli457180's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Northern VA
    Age
    32
    Posts
    4,300

    Default Re: 3rd and 21.. clearly the play of the game.. Fault Haslett?

    Quote Originally Posted by Botched View Post
    The second time we handed the ball to Cooley on 3rd and short may have been the worst call of the game. Right before the snap I was thinking there was no way Shanny was dumb enough to do that again. It was a good call the first time because nobody on Earth could have guessed that we might give our 8-year veteran tight end his first carry ever.
    Yeah, that was AWFUL! Fool me once, shame on me, fool me twice shame on you. Barring the defensive call in question, this was a game the Skins could have won if they stick to the fundamentals by the running the ball and taking time off the clock. Instead, Shanahan (Kyle) puts the ball in Grossman's hands and decides to be aggressive. This game was there for the taking, but they let it slip away. Hopefully it's a lesson learned for all and they will better for it as the season goes on.

  2. #302
    The Role Player TMK9973's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Never where I'm supposed to be
    Age
    39
    Posts
    778

    Default Re: 3rd and 21.. clearly the play of the game.. Fault Haslett?

    Its not a bad call actually....
    You have a center who has been messing up the snap all day, You have a injured QB who shouldn't be very mobile and scared of getting hit, you have a team that in theory needs time to pass the ball 20+ yards.
    If you lay back you risk Tony Romo having time in the pocket until someone gets free and giving him a chance to set up and throw. Then every one on here is screaming about how we had no pressure on him.

    He made a great play. They do pay those guys as well....
    To be honest -I'm more upset about the Facemask. I think they need to bring back the 5 yard facemask call. Cause 15 yards on a glance of the facemask is crazy.

  3. #303

    Default Re: Jim Haslett Lost the Game

    probably not the best decision, in hindsight. Realistically though the game was lost with the inabilty to run the ball. This is an area that needs to step it up or we will have many games like this.

  4. #304
    The Role Player
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Houston,Tx
    Age
    36
    Posts
    813

    Default Re: 3rd and 21.. clearly the play of the game.. Fault Haslett?

    3rd and 21, here is what you do.. You play good solid D; you give up the underneath routes and protect deep. We would have made the tackle and its 4th and do it again. DAMN

  5. #305
    The Gadget Play darrell1106's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Boston
    Age
    33
    Posts
    3,874

    Default Re: 3rd and 21.. clearly the play of the game.. Fault Haslett?

    Quote Originally Posted by Brotherz View Post
    I get this thought. I am tempted to feel this way too. To an extent that is fair. But, they in traditional skins fashion, let the big back breaking play up at the critical moment. 3rd and 21 was certainly one of them. They also played incredible inside the redzone and they can get kudos for that etc. But they gave up huge runs to a team that cannot run against anyone else because they overpursued and dallas saw them and beat them. Our defense is going to see cutbacks like that the rest of the season. They better get that fixed or steven jackson will have a field day against us. Hall is officially a liability in coverage at this point as well.

    We played good defense. We just couldn't get the job done when we most needed it. Championship defense's get that done.
    We aren't a championship defense like a 3-4 team usually is. We are still missing that anchor in the middle and a solid inside LB core. Let's assume Jenkins is healthy next year, then we are only 1-2 solid inside LBs away. Fletch is awesome but we have to plan for the future.

    With that said, they did a great job holding the pukes to 6 FGs. We HAVE to score TDs or we do not belong in this league. The 'W' goes to the team that scores the most points.

    ---------- Post added September-27th-2011 at 10:56 AM ----------

    Quote Originally Posted by justice98 View Post
    I think it's faint praise though to give a team credit for allowing 6 FGs. They did allow a team to keep getting into scoring territory that many times. Six FGs is a lot of scoring chances, and none of those kicks were all that difficult. God forbid they'd been at full strength, they'd have punched it in a few times and it'd have been 30-10 or some such thing. How about the D make them punt a few more times? Three punts all game. They had the one TO deep in Redskins territory, but otherwise, the Cowboys other 5 scoring drives were lengthy.

    All that said, this thing about it's either the O or the D is nonsense. They're both to blame. And special teams too for that matter with the block and no decent returns. Total team loss.
    Agree. You need all the phases to do their job but rarely do we see that for any team. Think about all the 3 and outs that offense had. Left the D out there waaayyy too long in some instances. Dallas lead in TOP by 3 minutes. Not huge but it I can't ask a D to do much more then that. When you have to nit pick at a few long runs and a 5'8" guy get out jumped by a 6'2"? guy then that lends me to believe the other 2 phases didn't step up. Bothed FG, penalties in red zone. I think we all saw this in pre-season and everyone chalked it up to "pre-season". Where here we go.
    Last edited by darrell1106; September-27th-2011 at 09:51 AM.

  6. #306
    No New Threads C.Cooley47's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Hebron, MD
    Age
    24
    Posts
    82

    Default Re: 3rd and 21.. clearly the play of the game.. Fault Haslett?

    No. I don't blame Haslett. Sure it's easy to look back on a play that doesn't work out and say it was a bad call. but what if London Fletcher sacks Romo on that play? Everyone would be saying what a call. that was the right thing to do. personally i would of only rushed 6. but there is a reason hes the coordinator. it came down to deangelo hall on dez bryant. a match up we had dominated all game. only 3 catches before that. and Deangelo Hall had to make a play and he didn't I don't blame anyone. I give Romo credit for rolling out and making a nice throw where bryant could get it. What about Roccas botched snap? What about grossmans pick? that one call did not cost us the game. If I said one thing cost us the game it would be redzone offense. we have to score when we get that close, if we score touchdowns this game is not even close. But lets not hang our heads. we have to plan hard for the Rams and bounce back like good teams do.
    Hail!

  7. #307
    No New Threads
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Fort Washington, Maryland
    Posts
    112

    Default Re: 3rd and 21.. clearly the play of the game.. Fault Haslett?

    Quote Originally Posted by SittingBull View Post
    , the offense lost the game not the defense.
    Cosigned

  8. #308
    Ring of Fame


    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Solomons, MD
    Age
    49
    Posts
    11,622

    Default Re: 3rd and 21.. clearly the play of the game.. Fault Haslett?

    Quote Originally Posted by Snarf View Post
    that blocked fg that rocca messed up was huge
    No way,,, you mean the points that would have won the game?

    Man, someobody ought to tell people around here.

    ~Bang

  9. #309
    The Playmaker Idaho fan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Nampa, Idaho
    Age
    40
    Posts
    3,008

    Default Re: 3rd and 21.. clearly the play of the game.. Fault Haslett?

    I didn't like the call but it is what it is... plenty of blame to go around to everyone in my opinion. I still can't believe with all the problems they had at receiver and at center that they were able to beat us. Had that botched FG made it through the uprights who knows... if... if... if.... Skins can't win every game... can't dominate every play.. this is the NFL.... things aren't going to go our way every time. Time to suck it up and move on. Hopefully they learn from this and improve. I think we will know how far this team has truly come (or not) by watching them against the Lambs. They have to go into the bye with a record of 3-1 if they want to contend this year I think.

  10. #310
    The Field Goal Team Tin Man's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Atlanta VIA Temple Hills
    Age
    45
    Posts
    475

    Default Re: Worst Defensive Call Ever?

    Quote Originally Posted by windsofcreation View Post
    Ok so it's 3rd and 21. Jim Haslett calls an all out blitz. The third such call in a row.

    If we played man with 2 deep safeties the Redskins win this game. Unbelievable.

    So. Was it the worst defensive call you've ever seen?

    Maybe it's the heat of the moment and I'm overreacting but wow. That was just an incredibly idiotic call IMHO.
    You're not overreacting, you're telling the truth. NO ONE runs the exact same play three times in the row in the pros. Everyone's a professional and to be that arrogant as to actually believe that your opponent will not make an adjustment is unacceptable. I wouldn't even have played Revis against Dez Bryant one on one with all of that empty field and 3rd and 21! That's !@#$* ridiculous.




  11. #311

    Default Re: 3rd and 21.. clearly the play of the game.. Fault Haslett?

    Quote Originally Posted by SirClintonPortis View Post
    People, have you folks forgotten that had Ogletree ran a good route, we would have been burnt on a similar play EARLIER IN THE SAME GAME. Luckily Romo threw a pick, but there is no reason to tempt fate TWICE, especially WITH A LEAD.
    Not really...Barnes was right with him until he saw the ball and cut over to catch it. I thought the same thing as you did until they showed the replay.
    "Washington strolled to the NFC championship, outscoring their two playoff opponents by a combined total of 48 points. Their domination was more than impressive, it was historic. The 1991 Redskins boasted the largest average margin of victory among all Super Bowl champions."

    --- America's Game

  12. #312
    The Special Teams Ace brasi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    TROY, NY
    Age
    42
    Posts
    386

    Default Re: 3rd and 21.. clearly the play of the game.. Fault Haslett?

    1. Regardless of the call, Hall was burnt.
    2. That was two-down territory, btw. If they didn't convert, t would have been 4th and 21 (or less) and we'd would have had to stop them again. To me the blitz makes sense in that case.
    3. We should have been up by at least 4 at that point.
    4. We also had a good shot at scoring after this play. The false start was horrible in that situation. We overcame it but had it not happened the Skins would have had better flow on the drive. Lastly, Rex fumbled because he had to run for his goddamn life. Our O-line needs an upgrade.

    We win as a team we lose as a team. This game displayed weaknesses and exposed some of our faults. But we're not horrific.

    We're 2-1 with an honest shot at 3-1. Relax.
    Last edited by brasi; September-27th-2011 at 11:28 AM.
    Washington Redskins





  13. #313
    The Cover Corner Skinz4Life12's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Arlington (Rosslyn)
    Age
    27
    Posts
    5,341

    Default Re: 3rd and 21.. clearly the play of the game.. Fault Haslett?

    ^i disagree. If its 4th and 21 on their own 30 I doubt they go for it with 2 timeouts and the two minute warning.


  14. #314

    Default Re: 3rd and 21.. clearly the play of the game.. Fault Haslett?

    Quote Originally Posted by shakinaiken View Post
    yep, i agree... romo on his heels, throws a prayer, and bryant happens to make a play.. sometimes, nothing you can do. But i feel that we're in the minority that believes haslett actually made a decent playcall

    I'm okay with it.

    Sucks to lose that one but we're still not the Redskins of 2 years ago. And we're a good team.

    1-1 in the NFC East, still got Dallas at home. I still think we can make a run at the division.
    Eli Manning will be 31 years old when the 2012 season starts.
    Michael Vick will be 32 years old when the 2012 season starts.
    Tony Romo will be 32 years old when the 2012 season starts.
    ROBERT GRIFFIN III will be 22 years old when the 2012 season starts.


  15. #315

    Default Re: 3rd and 21.. clearly the play of the game.. Fault Haslett?

    Quote Originally Posted by stevej3658 View Post
    I said it before as long as Haslett is run'in that defense we can not and will not be playoff contenders - he should been gone last season
    If that's true, we are in deep trouble. I thought the defense played a very good game, with the exception of a few plays. The offense, on the other hand, was just ineffective. There were times I had no idea who Rex was throwing to. I think we got away from the running game too soon. Our FG unit is so iffy.....gah! If the offense would have just picked things up 50%, that game would have been ours.

+ Reply to Thread

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts