I read it as one more confirmation that Romney is a man bereft of any ideas, of any positive contributions to make. He has built much of his campaign - 'you didn't build that', auto industry going to China, tax cuts balanced by unspecified deduction closings, etc - on deception and sometimes falsehood. This final nonsense is the closing argument from a man who wants us to vote for him because he has the ability to work with the other side.
This country needs a management guru like Romney right now. Who cares about what ideas he has. The man is one of the best managers in the world. We need to get the economy back on track and stop worrying about policy that does not effect the present. The present is what is needed to be taken care of right now, not some ideological future.
---------- Post added November-4th-2012 at 09:56 AM ----------
Romney's no Bush and has the best history of anyone running to work across the aisle. Obama had the majority and didn't do much with it. I'm not seeing the "change" Obama promised and won't see it in a second term.
Without campaign finance reform, neither are that different. We can have Obama and his ideology after the financial present is taken care of. I'm ready to give Romney a chance at restructuring the executive branch and every agency within it.
We need a moderate right now. Last one we had worked out pretty good.
ETA: I know most will scoff at this but after researching Romney's career and then hearing "this man will not fail' from his wife (I know I know) but there's some truth to it. I really am pretty high on Romney right now and his ability to do what we need at this present time.
Last edited by GibbsFactor; November-4th-2012 at 09:03 AM.
I don't see Obama promising to give the rich a 20% tax cut, without bothering to pay for it, and while also eliminating two other taxes (the estate tax and the AMT), one of which only affects the rich, and the other of which mostly does. I don't see Obama saying that what we really need is to exempt corporations from more laws and rules.
Yeah, there are differences. The difference between not doing much, and making things worse.
From Mitt's website:
I agree 100% with that and am very tired of hot fixes designed to move one problem to a new problem to be dealt with down the road.Tax policy shapes almost everything individuals and enterprises do as they participate in the economy. With bad design, tax policy can discourage economic activity. With good design, it can encourage it. Yet our current tax system is an accretion of decades of patchwork decisions that came into being with no systematic thought for their implications for job creation or economic growth.
His businesses have always been profitable and I'm willing to take his track record over Obama's. He's got a much better track record.
Obama failed in leading and got bullied by a depleted and weak GOP.
Mitt wants to lower the rates on all Americans and eliminate capital gains taxes on those of us making less than 200K. That will drastically help the middle class.
I don't care about the upper class and as Romney said, we have programs in place for the lower class. The heart of this country is the middle class and Obama hasn't done much to help us. I'm ready for "change".
---------- Post added November-4th-2012 at 10:18 AM ----------
Really? He's a sack of ****? He's only the most qualified candidate since George Bush Sr.
Mitt's business record is extremely exaggerated. His company is the epitome of what is wrong with America. Hostile takeovers, leveraged buyouts, loading companies with debt and extracting millions from them.... His business career would most accurately be labeled as parasitic.
This is hilarious and sad. Who cares what ideas a candidate for POTUS has is not a stunning admission that you aren't voting for Romney and that you are voting against Obama. Frankly, a lot of Republicans invent reasons to vote against Obama when they should just say they are Republicans and would never vote for democrats in the first place.
Whoooooboi it's getting testy in here......where be teh bacon thread?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)