What would A World Without Lawyers be like?
Agree. Not professional.
(Granted, neither is the "journalist". But still.)
Edit:
And I would like to take this opportunity to be grateful that at least ES does not appear to have descended as far into the muck as the rest of the country.
Edit2:
Well, except for the posters who live in the muck, all the time.![]()
Last edited by Larry; November-1st-2012 at 11:57 AM.
Gallup and Rasmussen kind of have been the outliers this year among the major pollsters. If they turn out to have been correct all along, they are going to get a ton of well-deserved credit (and future business).
"The Internet is like a herd of performing elephants with diarrhea: massive, difficult to redirect, awe-inspiring, entertaining, and a source of mind-boggling amounts of excrement when you least expect it" - I wish I had said this.
It certainly does seem like there is some ratings driven narrative coming from this.
---------- Post added November-1st-2012 at 01:02 PM ----------
I actually kinda like Joe Scarborough. He's not so ideological for a talking head. And I like Nate Silver a lot, but I do see how can come off as arrogant. Especially to people, though, who don't take the time to understand what he's trying to do with his models.
---------- Post added November-1st-2012 at 01:02 PM ----------
I actually kinda like Joe Scarborough. He's not so ideological for a talking head. And I like Nate Silver a lot, but I do see how can come off as arrogant. Especially to people, though, who don't take the time to understand what he's trying to do with his models.
What would A World Without Lawyers be like?
Probably wasn't the most professional thing to do but I assume Silver's just frustrated with the criticism his methods are getting.
Comments like this certainly don't help:
In a post for Examiner.com, Chambers sought to discredit Silver’s recent statistical analysis that showed Romney flatlining in the presidential race. Chambers, who rose to prominence by asserting that pollsters were nefariously skewing their results in favor of Democrats, insisted that Silver’s latest finding was more indication of that perceived liberal bias.
How could Chambers tell that Silver is an untrustworthy liberal? His lack of overt masculinity, of course.
“Nate Silver is a man of very small stature, a thin and effeminate man with a soft-sounding voice that sounds almost exactly like the ‘Mr. New Castrati’ voice used by Rush Limbaugh on his program,” Chambers wrote. “In fact, Silver could easily be the poster child for the New Castrati in both image and sound.
Raw Story (http://s.tt/1rb0x)
What would A World Without Lawyers be like?
Wow. This is interesting. Not only did The Economist endorse Obama today, but NYC Mayor Bloomberg gives his support to Obama.
NYT: Bloomberg Backs Obama, Citing Climate
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/02/ny...-decision.html
I guess Bloomberg didn't like that Romney laughed about the idea of climate change in the debate.
Last edited by Duckus; November-1st-2012 at 02:22 PM.
What would A World Without Lawyers be like?
People don't get to where Bloomberg is by doing many knee jerk things.
I suspect, he and Christie are acting based on the same information.
I suspect, they both think that Obama is going to win, and long term being associated with the winner, even if they are in other parties will benefit them (though, I do understand that Christie didn't endorse Obama, but he's gone out of his way recently to cooperate and be complementary to him).
What would A World Without Lawyers be like?
The endorsement of the Economist is interesting ... essentially ... Obama has been a huge disappointment in many regards with some mitigating actions, but Romney and the GoP offers even less hope.
We're screwed.
"The Internet is like a herd of performing elephants with diarrhea: massive, difficult to redirect, awe-inspiring, entertaining, and a source of mind-boggling amounts of excrement when you least expect it" - I wish I had said this.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)