I think it's pretty insane that they won't set a date to resolve this... I guess $18million in cap space isn't important for trying to shape a roster or anything![]()
I think it's pretty insane that they won't set a date to resolve this... I guess $18million in cap space isn't important for trying to shape a roster or anything![]()
If I'm the Redskins this would be a short negotiaton.
NFL: How about we give you back $5 million?
Redskins: Nope. We'll take it ALL back.
NFL: How about ...hmmm...$10 million?
Redskins: Nope. We'll take it all back.
NFL: Surely we can come to an agreement on somewhere around...$15 million??
Redskins: Nope. We'll take it all back. Or we can just get to arbitration now and then court later if necessary.
I think a problem many of us on the board may be having is determining how much fight 18 mil in cap space or 36 million in cap space is worth. Keep in mind, if Snyder pays 5 million in legal fees to fight for 36 million in cap space, he is actually out 41 million. Now what if his doubling the money he is willing to put forth to fight for this makes it happen? triple? How long before we start talking real money, even for Snyder?
Now picture this scenario: Snyder decides to go to arbitration. What if part of the negotiated deal is "Fine we will settle with you, but not till a week after the draft." In the Redskins favor in terms of fan support, Snyder stuck up for the team when they did nothing wrong and won! From the league perspective, they kept the Skins from using cap space they thought the Skins should not have been able to use to get an unfair advantage. The bonus still goes to Snyder because by the time the case is settled, we are squarely in the middle of the secondary FA market where most teams are bargain hunting. Now Snyder doesn't have to spend the money in bidding wars. He can claim to have paid only those Allen thought were worth it. So in this case, Snyder wins, and the NFL wins. As a secondary part of the agreement, there is no floor this season. So if the agreement (private or not) is for the Skins not to spend this year, it is possible the NFL could be appeased on the competitive advantage front too.
I believe my job as a parent is to give my kids all the blocks they need to build a life in which they can attempt to reach everything they strive for and see anything they can imagine. In a world where everybody finds it easier to destroy than build, I wish for my kids to experience the joy of seeing something for the first time and the love of creating something new.
http://thelifewelllived.blogspot.com
If Snyder uses 5M dollars (just using your example) of his own money and loses, he isn't out 41M...he's out the 5M.
We're fighting for the RIGHT to spend that 36M. Not for an actual 36M in cash. Its cap space lost, not a fine taken.
Last edited by ConnSKINS26; April-13th-2012 at 01:42 PM.
"In 2012 the Redskins are gonna be the NFC East champions, and that starts right ****ing today.” --- Kyle Shanahan, 1/1/12.
"ESPN 980 has learned thru two league sources that the #Redskins had 1.5 M of cap space left, BEFORE signing of Tanard Jackson this morning. Exact figure unknown right now, but will be less than 1 million dollars remaining. Washington Redskins"
I wonder if they think they are going to get the cap space back?
Sean Taylor - 'Man, you see The Flintstones the other night?'
I would assume that is after the space set aside for rookies, that would at least come close to adding up with what we seem to have available at the moment.
But that piece also seems to show a lack of understanding of the salary cap. If Jackson signed a minimum salary deal, he won't be taking any (or much) of our cap space. 51 players count towards the cap, so he would just take the place of another player. He'd be getting the vet min, so it might be 1-2 hundred K more than a youngster making the minimum, but that would be all.
Right, rule of 51 means that Jackson doesn't count against the cap. Currently we have 64 guys, Jackson included, so 13 of them don't count against the cap.
And I've been assuming each of these cap updates takes rookie money into account, to the tune of between 5-6M. So in all we're probably looking at around 6.5-7.5M in space.
How is Fletcher close to signing if theres only around 1Mill left? That doesn't make any sense.
Watch my Standup and Comedy Channel http://www.justin.tv/lolhahaha14
I can and WILL play Redskins games too in the future...
What would A World Without Lawyers be like?
PFT had us at 7.6 a week or so ago, which was close to what I had guesstimated. Using Cam Newton's deal as a template, Griffin gets around 5.5 per I believe, but the first year hit should be a bit lower, a little under 5. The rest of the class shouldn't cost a net 1 mil even.
The press asked a Redskins executive about the salary cap penalty and the executive responded, "Ask John Mara." So the press asked Mara and he said, “What they did was in violation of the spirit of the salary cap. "
Oh I see now, even though there was no actual salary cap in 2010 according to the CBA, the "spirit" of the salary cap still existed. Thanks for clearing that up Mara.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)