View Poll Results: What does the future hold?

Voters
45. You may not vote on this poll
  • Nothing will happen... off the cliff we go weeeeee

    22 48.89%
  • Small(ish) deal will be made on middle and lower class taxes

    21 46.67%
  • Comprehensive deal will be made

    2 4.44%
Results 1 to 15 of 572

Thread: The Fiscal Cliff thread.

Threaded View

  1. #11

    Default Re: The Fiscal Cliff thread.

    Quote Originally Posted by Larry View Post
    The Bush Tax Cuts were passed to save us from a GOP-projected future in which the entire national debt would have been paid off by 2015.
    And yes, it would appear that they were successful.
    It lowered taxes by 3% on the top income tax bracket. Other brackets received different amounts of cuts.
    Dunno about "helped". I'm pretty certain that 401K's existed before Bush, and were completely tax exempt before him. But it wouldn't surprise me if he didn't adjust them in some way or another.
    Nope. Created in 1997.
    The amount that you are allowed to put in them has been increased several times. Don't know if it was in the same law as the tax cuts or not. Might well have been.
    As is typically the case, I have no clue what you're talking about, here.
    Someone is cranky pointing out incorrect heritage foundation reports in the 2001?, but the name in 2010 is really for jobs...
    Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001
    Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003
    Tax Relief, Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization, and Job Creation Act of 2010


    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economi...on_Act_of_2001
    the 15% bracket's lower threshold was indexed to the new 10% bracket
    the 28% bracket would be lowered to 25% by 2006.
    the 31% bracket would be lowered to 28% by 2006
    the 36% bracket would be lowered to 33% by 2006
    the 39.6% bracket would be lowered to 35% by 2006

    and if we passed TARP we would be at 5% unemployment now? They both had their purpose.

    I did see where you posted about removing it altogether will NOT cause the 1% loss in Growth I read it would. - if no harm Kill it!
    If Harm, we just gained 178k jobs (thanksgiving), need 400k a month (lost 500k jobs altogether making the 7.7%). So don't make it worse please.
    And the unemployment rate fell to a four-year low in November from 7.9 percent in October mostly because more people stopped looking for work and weren't counted as unemployed.
    But the government said employers added 49,000 fewer jobs in October and September than it initially estimated.
    Last edited by Thiebear; December-7th-2012 at 09:42 AM.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 158
    Last Post: September-6th-2010, 01:38 PM
  2. AP: Fiscal crises threaten Europe's generous benefits
    By SkinsHokieFan in forum The Tailgate
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: May-24th-2010, 05:52 PM
  3. Economist: America's fiscal deficit Stemming the tide
    By Prosperity in forum The Tailgate
    Replies: 60
    Last Post: November-19th-2009, 11:34 PM
  4. WP:Pelosi Splits Democrats With Push For Murtha
    By SkinsHokieFan in forum The Tailgate
    Replies: 50
    Last Post: November-17th-2006, 06:56 AM
  5. Democrats Push for Troop Cuts Within Months
    By Thiebear in forum The Tailgate
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: November-13th-2006, 05:50 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts