I know where it is but I've been born Maryland all me life
I know where it is but I've been born Maryland all me life
it is a glorified screen pass, but it is a trick play. fake fg's are definitely trick plays. that does not make a play action pass a trick play. there is not a game that goes by that both teams don't run several play action passes. fake fg's and false start screens are not very common.
that said, there is nothing wrong with trick plays. they still count against the defense. trick plays don't diminish what the offense did or inflate what the defense did.
2013
The Mayans Were Wrong, Go Nuts
You forget to mention that Clemson is probably one of the top 3 dynamic and explosive offenses in the county. Last year Alabama gave up 21 points to the Georgia Southern Eagles (who? exactly...) and they were still considered elite. In fact many people joked that Alabamas defense could shut down the dolphins. Yet there they were giving up 302 RUSHING yards to an FCS team. One half of play, let alone one game isnt enough to negate two years of history.
Last edited by big#44; September-27th-2012 at 02:31 PM.
So they saved the couches but what about all the old batteries that are used for ammo?
So wait. Is the fact that Clemson is an explosive offense an excuse? Because Sparty was using what Clemson did to VT last season as an example of how overrated the VT defense was. So do the Clesmon stats only reflect poorly on VT? Or are you guys just pulling **** outta your ass to make FSU look good now? Because VT gave up 23 and 323 to Clemson last year during the regular season. FSU gave up 31 and 426. So how exactly does that help FSU?
![]()
Sig courtesy of Sticksboi05
last year =/= this year. And its just silly to judge two teams based on their play against one common opponent especially if your gonna make the case spanning multiple seasons. I never said VT's defense was over rated last year after they played Clemson. Whatever argument between you and Spartarcus is between you two.I'm not gonna sit here and defend someone else's position on a topic I care little about at the moment.
Last edited by The Evil Genius; September-27th-2012 at 05:20 PM.
__________________
Birds are flying out of water
Underneath the sky
I run up to the rainbow girl
just to pass her by
I'll never have a change of heart
My swan will never sing
I have no heart the swan is gone
And now I wear the wings
I said repeatedly that Stanford would suffer a decline without Jim Harbaugh
I said repeatedly that once he goes that Stanford would fall back down to Earth
I said repeatedly that Andrew Luck was Stanford and that Stanford would take a step back without his talent
I was correct
Yes
Way too early to write the rest of the Pac 12 off. It's still September for crying out loud.
It's also Steve Sarkisian's first graduating class (well, some of them). Perhaps UW is better than people thought? Especially after they got dismissed after getting trounced by LSU (and really, there are a handful of teams who don't).
But, of course Stanford isn't as good as they would be with Luck at QB an/or Harbaugh at coach. Who would be?
Still, they aren't going to drop to the bottom of the Pac 12 anytime soon (like they used to be).
Last edited by The Evil Genius; September-28th-2012 at 11:06 AM.
__________________
Birds are flying out of water
Underneath the sky
I run up to the rainbow girl
just to pass her by
I'll never have a change of heart
My swan will never sing
I have no heart the swan is gone
And now I wear the wings
agreed Oregon is the class of the Pac-12 IMO, but the Pac-12 as a whole showed well in thier non conference games this year.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)