Yep, Jenkins isn't very good. Even with Ryan he never amounted to much. Ironic though Ryan's first nfl pass ever was a long td pass to Jenkins.
Yep, Jenkins isn't very good. Even with Ryan he never amounted to much. Ironic though Ryan's first nfl pass ever was a long td pass to Jenkins.
Maybe KDawg is MattFancy? Hmmmm.![]()
All the other D's with the pumped up schemes
You better run, better run, outrun my QB
All the other D's with the pumped up schemes
You better run, better run, faster than RG3.
Atlanta board in case you're interested.
http://boards.atlantafalcons.com/for...t-the-falcons/
Good stuff there
One of these days, maybe the opposition team will be the one that needs to run the ball, to keep our offense off the field.
Seeing where our offense is ranked, maybe we are on our way to finally hearing that.
I know, kinda off-topic but saw this on that Falcon board: http://profootballmock.com/?p=4810![]()
So Long, and Thanks for All the Fish
^^^^^ that is some funny **** right there !!!!
Just saw the Vick talk pop up here. Vick never took anything off his passes in Atlanta. That's why his receivers dropped everything. People talk about how strong an arm is, but one thing Ryan does well is know when to take something off. There's no reason to throw a dart 4 yards to a wide open guy. Ryan makes a lot of different throws, and Vick pretty much strong arms it at 90 mph (at least in Atlanta, I think he's lost some velocity nowadays). That's what makes Ryan so good, and I'm not a guy that thinks he's as good as people make him out to be. I think there are maybe 10 QB's who could be running that offense just as good if not better. Brady, Brees, Rodgers, Schaub, Manning, Manning, maybe Rivers, Stafford. And for the sake of not being a homer, I won't say one way or the other on RG3....
Eli Manning will be 31 years old when the 2012 season starts.Michael Vick will be 32 years old when the 2012 season starts.Tony Romo will be 32 years old when the 2012 season starts.ROBERT GRIFFIN III will be 22 years old when the 2012 season starts.
You need to actually watch some film of Steve Young with the 49ers. When he first got there he was essentially the same QB he had been in Tampa - most of his big plays came on broken plays, he ran a lot and was inconsistent on the timing plays Montana was brilliant at. His completion percentage his first 2 years in SF was just over 50% almost exactly the same as when he was at Tampa. He threw far fewer picks though and that might be about the supporting cast and not playing from behind like he was every week in Tampa.
He was on the bench behind Montana his first few years in SF so that gave a young OC time to work with the natural ability both as an athlete and passer Young possessed. When he replaced Montana the offense he ran under that OC was an adaptation of Bill Walsh's blueprint - same route combinations but more run heavy with much more designed movement off run action to take advantage of Youngs ability to throw on the run. In his 3rd year in SF his completion percentage jumped to well over 60% and it newer dropped below this the rest of his time in SF.
The OC of course was Mike Shanahan.
IMO Steve Youngs improvement in SF was PARTLY a result of a much better supporting cast, PARTLY due to excellent coaching in developing Young as a passer and QB and PARTLY due to the maturation of Young himself. The difference in performance can be explained by other factors than just an improved supporting cast.
To change tack slightly take a look at this break down of the Atlanta passing attack versus a cover 2 concept against the Panthers. Since we leave both our inside backers on the field on literally every snap look for Atlanta to look for opportunities to isolate White on a 'backer in the same way this week as well. I hope our defensive staff have been watching film this week and have an adjustment ready for this.
http://www.nationalfootballpost.com/...s-Cover-2.html
Last edited by MartinC; October-6th-2012 at 10:49 AM.
When I speak of supporting cast, I am thinking of everything:offense, defense, special teams and coaching.
I have heard Steve Young comment on this point. He talks about "organizational support." He used Archie Manning as an example of an excellent QB who never got the help he needed. Archie and Steve Young had similar skill-sets.
Last edited by Oldfan; October-6th-2012 at 12:05 PM.
I don't think anyone can say with a straight face that the supporting cast as you describe it is not vital to a QBs development and success. However it still took Young to buy into what Shanny was selling and teaching - it was not until his 3rd year in that system and under Shanny that he started to become the QB we all remember. Some QBs with great talent just never get it whatever the supporting cast ...
It was more than JUST the supporting cast however defined that accounts for the change in Young in SF and in Tampa. It was a big part though I will give you that.
Last edited by MartinC; October-6th-2012 at 12:06 PM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)