Better to move forward slowly than backwards.
Looking at the numbers there are things in it for both sides. Romney will obviously hit him on the % like he has been and Obama will counter with better than expected jobs.
This is going to have little to no impact on the race.
Other than show that last month's numbers aren't as bogus as the Right claimed. I think it's hilarious that the Right demands that Obama create jobs at a faster rate than Bush lost them. Rmoney has a commercial running out here hat says Obama lost so many jobs, but blatantly refuses to acknowledge that the job losses would have continued regardless of whoever was elected in the previous electon. I hate lies.
Last edited by AsburySkinsFan; November-2nd-2012 at 09:52 AM.
Regardless of political talking points, yes it's good we're adding jobs but....the jobs being added are doing squat for a real recovery. Hence, incomes continue to fall
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sh...#ixzz2B4KKbbAW
Long-Term unemployment also rose in Oct. to 40.6%
http://cnsnews.com/news/article/long...es-october-406
Perhaps consumer confidence is up because we've lowered our expectations![]()
Last edited by Skins24; November-2nd-2012 at 09:14 AM.
Doesn't it make sense that a less saturated job market would send average incomes of those with jobs down? Considering the people who are finding jobs will be paid less since there's a bigger pool of applicants. I don't know if that necessarily sounds like a bad thing for the short term.
Last edited by jnhay; November-2nd-2012 at 10:31 AM.
"Weak right 40 gut. Yum! Yum! How bout that one baby!"
Gotta love Obama apologists - their motto should be: Next to Nothing is Still Something!
or We Would be Happy with Less than nothing! Just keep smiling Barack!
If you are content with the slow to no progress, great, be happy with a few more years with the do-nothing in office.
I am in sales and this "leader" we have has created no economic conditions where my customers are comfortable with spending much at all. It's killing my livelihood and I will be lucky to last another six months to a year.
I dont love Romney but he has GOT to be better than the current incompetent.
coolest room ever
You don't even realize that your statement is an absolute regarding an extremely difficult and dynamic situation which all too often defies absolutes.
Just how many people is Romney going to hire as POTUS? Oh, he'll give tax breaks to encourage hiring....tell me....how has hat worked? After four years this whole thing has become mind numbingly predictable.
I love people that clearly haven't study history at all. If so, people would have a better understanding of what kind of recovery was expected. Regardless of whom is President, unemployment is forecast to drop to 5.3% or so in the next four years. If that's slow and steady, I'll take it.
---------- Post added November-2nd-2012 at 03:49 PM ----------
Perhaps we should cut taxes?
Gotta love people who don't support Romney.
Good news for the economy just absolutely HAS to be countered by insulting things that nobody has said.
- Bureau of Labor Statistics - Employment data
- Seasonally adjusted.
- Total Nonfarm.
- All Employees - Thousands
- Total Nonfarm
- Retrieve Data
- Change start sate to 1999, click "Go."
Total Jobs when W took office (Feb, 2001): 132,529,000
When he left office (Jan, 2009): 133,561,000
Net change: 1,032,000
That's 95 months = 10,863 jobs/month
Total Jobs when Obama took office (Feb, 2009): 132,837,000
Most recent numbers (Oct 2012): 133,755,000
Net change: 918,000
That's 45 months = 20,400 jobs/month
Employment has gone up twice as fast, under Obama, as it did under W.
But Obama's economy is "Less than nothing". "Slow to no progress".
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)