+ Reply to Thread
Page 5 of 25 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 15 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 75 of 373

Thread: Should Kyle still be calling our plays on offense?

  1. #61
    Ring of Fame Hitman21ST's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Chesapeake, VA
    Age
    28
    Posts
    20,190

    Default Re: Should Kyle still be calling our plays on offense?

    Quote Originally Posted by DaSkinzBaby View Post
    Well Alfred Morris has a 6.1 YPC average. No throws down field until Cousins is in. Josh Morgan not being thrown to. That direct snap to the meat of the offensive line knowing our strength is to Trent's side.......Bush league play calling if you ask me. Seems to me that RG3 being such a great athlete tends to mask Kyle's deficiencies. Where is another Gary Kubiak when you need him.......
    You do realize you can't just keep calling plays to one side of the field, right? Nor can you just call for a "throw downfield" whenever you feel like it. You call plays off of what looks the defense gives you, and if they're giving you the underneath stuff, then you call those plays.

    My guess is the Falcons knew of RG3's strengths (deep throws, etc), so they gameplan to take that away. Therefore Kyle calls more runs and shorter passes. Then when Cousins came in, the defense started stacking the box, making Cousins throw it to beat them. He did just that, so they drop back again. You'll notice that Morris couldn't run until that throw to Moss was completed, then when they dropped back he immediately broke another long one?
    OLB Coach for the 3x State Champs: 2001, 2002, 2008 Atlantic Shores Seahawks
    2012 Final Record: 2-9

  2. #62
    The Run Stopper
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Nowhere
    Posts
    5,902

    Default Re: Should Kyle still be calling our plays on offense?

    People don't realize teams play Robert completely different from how you usually play rookie quarterbacks.

    You know the old adage about how you blitz quarterbacks and try to confuse them with different looks? That's not how teams are playing Robert. He's one of the least blitzed quarterbacks in the league right now.

    Teams are rushing four or five at most and dropping everyone else. When teams blitz RG3, he either kills them on the ground or, usually, with his arm. If you were a defensive coordinator, would you want to blitz and leave a receiver one on one on a quarterback with the kind of deep accuracy RG3 has?

    The reason we're not seeing as much deep stuff is because teams are taking away the deep throws and making Robert drive the length of the field. And I'll add that Robert does a pretty damn good job of leading us down the field. The reason the third down stuff hasn't been there is part safe play calling, and part having a quarterback who knows it's better to punt sometimes than to throw an INT. The two picks Kirk threw were plays Robert wouldn't make. And I'm not knockin' Kirk, he's always been that guy. But Robert's always been good about protecting the football. If we had a kicker worth a **** it'd help.

    Kyle's called some awesome games these last few weeks and if you can't see that, that's your problem.

  3. #63
    The Role Player DaSkinzBaby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Clarksburg MD
    Age
    47
    Posts
    832

    Default Re: Should Kyle still be calling our plays on offense?

    Quote Originally Posted by Hitman21ST View Post
    You do realize you can't just keep calling plays to one side of the field, right? Nor can you just call for a "throw downfield" whenever you feel like it. You call plays off of what looks the defense gives you, and if they're giving you the underneath stuff, then you call those plays.

    My guess is the Falcons knew of RG3's strengths (deep throws, etc), so they gameplan to take that away. Therefore Kyle calls more runs and shorter passes. Then when Cousins came in, the defense started stacking the box, making Cousins throw it to beat them. He did just that, so they drop back again. You'll notice that Morris couldn't run until that throw to Moss was completed, then when they dropped back he immediately broke another long one?
    Good points but the one thing I didn't agree with is our not using Banks in the backfield today. That formation presents so many problems. I think more than anything especially today Kyle's playcalling was that of a man in over his head and playing scared. Let the reigns go and let RG3 do what he does best. Pass the ball down field.......

  4. #64
    The Run Stopper
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Nowhere
    Posts
    5,902

    Default Re: Should Kyle still be calling our plays on offense?

    Quote Originally Posted by DaSkinzBaby View Post
    Good points but the one thing I didn't agree with is our not using Banks in the backfield today. That formation presents so many problems. I think more than anything especially today Kyle's playcalling was that of a man in over his head and playing scared. Let the reigns go and let RG3 do what he does best. Pass the ball down field.......
    You mean the triple option?

    You mean the formation that two weeks ago everyone was screaming about how Kyle was getting Robert killed by running him too much?

    And again; there was probably no one OPEN down the field. I know we're used to crappy quarterback play, but typically, ya don't throw down field unless you actually, ya know...have a guy open!

    Part of what's killing the Saints and the Packers is their insistence on trying to take the top off the defense instead of going on methodical drives and setting up the deep throws via play action in the run game and getting everyone to crowd the box. Teams rush four and drop 7 into coverage, particularly deep.

    It's not that we're not calling deep plays; we run play action looking for the deep shot a lot. What's happening is defenses know and are scared of Robert's ability to throw it deep, so they force him to throw it short or intermediate.

    He's not a man in over his head. He's got a quarterback teams are actually scared to blitz and a quarterback who teams are scared to let throw deep.

  5. #65
    Ring of Fame
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Chantilly, VA
    Posts
    13,737

    Default Re: Should Kyle still be calling our plays on offense?

    I'm tired of people saying "take what the defense gives you."

    A good offense doesn't "take what the defense gives them." You think the Patriots give a **** what the defense does?

    A good offense dictates play.
    "In 2012 the Redskins are gonna be the NFC East champions, and that starts right f–king today.” Kyle Shanahan, 1/1/12

  6. #66
    The Cover Corner skins4eva's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    NYC
    Age
    32
    Posts
    5,406

    Default Re: Should Kyle still be calling our plays on offense?

    You know what? You guys are right, this thread is ridiculous. Kyle is the greatest OC of all time. But, before we move on, and some of you dismiss this thread and the posters who don't view Kyle as the second coming of Bill Walsh--just a few facts. Guess what team is tied for absolute last place in third down conversion rate so far this season? Kyle Shanahan's squad. We've converted 13 of 51 3rd downs this seasons. 3rd down is where an offense (and an offensive coordinator) earn their money. 3rd down conversions sustain drives and keep the defense rested. That stat to me is glaring. Last year, we ended the season in the middle of the back--15th in 3rd down conversion rate. But, if you go back to 2010, we ended the season 31 out of 32 teams--with a conversion rate of 29% for the season on 3rd downs. Sorry, guys. But, that just doesn't cut it.

  7. #67
    The Run Stopper
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Nowhere
    Posts
    5,902

    Default Re: Should Kyle still be calling our plays on offense?

    Quote Originally Posted by Warhead36 View Post
    I'm tired of people saying "take what the defense gives you."

    A good offense doesn't "take what the defense gives them." You think the Patriots give a **** what the defense does?

    A good offense dictates play.
    So what? You want Robert to throw into double or triple coverage? Because we had a guy who did that, and everyone keeps complaining that he's still on the team and he gets booed whenever he steps on the field.

    Tom Brady absolutely takes what the defense gives him. That's his whole deal. He'll line up, start his cadence, get the defense to show what their trying to do, then he'll adjust his playcall accordingly. Same with Peyton.

    Robert is still second in the league in terms of yards per attempt and he's top ten with 18 plays over 20 yards. This assertion that we are not attack defenses is bull. Robert is playing his game exceptionally well for a rookie quarterback.

  8. #68
    The Starter Dirt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Kill Devil Hills, NC
    Posts
    2,693

    Default Re: Should Kyle still be calling our plays on offense?

    Since when do people think they understand enough about coaching/playcalling to speak on it..? I mean that's kind of a new thing, right? Used to be: "we're not coaches so we don't know". People suddenly act like football isn't very very very very complicated.

    I don't mean to be so harsh with that first sentence, I mean of course it's fine to speak on it/discuss it...but not to the point where you think you should determine someones job.

    It's knee-jerk because we didn't win. Simple as that.
    DIRT

  9. #69
    The Run Stopper
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Nowhere
    Posts
    5,902

    Default Re: Should Kyle still be calling our plays on offense?

    Quote Originally Posted by skins4eva View Post
    You know what? You guys are right, this thread is ridiculous. Kyle is the greatest OC of all time. But, before we move on, and some of you dismiss this thread and the posters who don't view Kyle as the second coming of Bill Walsh--just a few facts.
    Worst in the league in third down conversions. That's absolutely true.

    We're also fourth in the league in first downs per game.

    Maybe you don't need third down when you get first downs and 1st and 2nd. 3rd down percentage must improve. You're right. But let's not exaggerate Kyle's awfulness.

    And no one is calling him the next Bill Walsh but you.

  10. #70
    The Cover Corner skins4eva's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    NYC
    Age
    32
    Posts
    5,406

    Default Re: Should Kyle still be calling our plays on offense?

    Quote Originally Posted by NLC1054 View Post
    Worst in the league in third down conversions. That's absolutely true.

    We're also fourth in the league in first downs per game.

    Maybe you don't need third down when you get first downs and 1st and 2nd. 3rd down percentage must improve. You're right. But let's not exaggerate Kyle's awfulness.

    And no one is calling him the next Bill Walsh but you.
    All fair points. But, people are defending him, and I'm asking why? What has he done during his tenure here to earn our support? We've fourth in the league in first downs, and that's great. But, I'd much rather have a consistent offense than an offense that picks up chunks of yards but can't sustain drives when it needs to. What I saw out there today was a microcosm of Kyle's playcalling since he's been in DC: completely schizophrenic--no sustained vision behind any of the calls. No setting up the defense for anything down the road. Running the ball just to run the ball, but moving away from it for no reason even when it was working incredibly well. And of course, the requisite head scratchers: the reverse to Leonard freakin Hankerson....my god, one of the worst calls I've seen in some time, and the direct snap to Alfred Morris...another dozy.

  11. #71
    The Role Player
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Andersen AFB, Guam
    Age
    31
    Posts
    739

    Default Re: Should Kyle still be calling our plays on offense?

    Quote Originally Posted by skins4eva View Post
    And of course, the requisite head scratchers: the reverse to Leonard freakin Hankerson....my god, one of the worst calls I've seen in some time, and the direct snap to Alfred Morris...another dozy.
    At least it wasn't the swinging gate.
    "Before I started working here, I drank, smoked, and used bad language. Thanks to this job, I now have good reason." -Jackson Waller

  12. #72
    The Cover Corner skins4eva's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    NYC
    Age
    32
    Posts
    5,406

    Default Re: Should Kyle still be calling our plays on offense?

    Quote Originally Posted by TheGreatBuzz View Post
    At least it wasn't the swinging gate.
    Good point--it could always be worse.

  13. #73
    The Run Stopper
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Nowhere
    Posts
    5,902

    Default Re: Should Kyle still be calling our plays on offense?

    Quote Originally Posted by skins4eva View Post
    All fair points. But, people are defending him, and I'm asking why? What has he done during his tenure here to earn our support? We've fourth in the league in first downs, and that's great. But, I'd much rather have a consistent offense than an offense that picks up chunks of yards but can't sustain drives when it needs to. What I saw out there today was a microcosm of Kyle's playcalling since he's been in DC: completely schizophrenic--no sustained vision behind any of the calls. No setting up the defense for anything down the road. Running the ball just to run the ball, but moving away from it for no reason even when it was working incredibly well. And of course, the requisite head scratchers: the reverse to Leonard freakin Hankerson....my god, one of the worst calls I've seen in some time, and the direct snap to Alfred Morris...another dozy.
    The end around to Hankerson tends to set up plays like this...



    If those plays work, no one is talking about how horrible they are.

    To put a point on it; you see what you want to see. If you don't think Kyle is a good playcaller, the last four weeks don't matter. All that matters is today, he validated your perception.

    Kyle's had to make chicken salad out of chicken **** for the last two years with mediocre talent.

  14. #74
    The Cover Corner skins4eva's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    NYC
    Age
    32
    Posts
    5,406

    Default Re: Should Kyle still be calling our plays on offense?

    Quote Originally Posted by NLC1054 View Post
    The end around to Hankerson tends to set up plays like this...

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RTnZM-KHIMs

    If those plays work, no one is talking about how horrible they are.

    To put a point on it; you see what you want to see. If you don't think Kyle is a good playcaller, the last four weeks don't matter. All that matters is today, he validated your perception.

    Kyle's had to make chicken salad out of chicken **** for the last two years with mediocre talent.
    Ok--I understand where you are coming from. Our perception always guides our reality--it's all relative. And, you are absolutely correct to point out that our talent level has been subpar. With all of that accounted for in my analysis, I still don't think he's the right man for the job. Maybe he'll prove me wrong, but so far, I haven't seen it.

  15. #75
    The Field Goal Team
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Damascus, MD
    Age
    29
    Posts
    652

    Default Re: Should Kyle still be calling our plays on offense?

    Quote Originally Posted by DaSkinzBaby View Post
    What makes you think for the most part he has done a fine job? Seriously this 30 point production was not him it was the league not having tape on RG3 now there is tape and you see what happens we are back to the normal offensive output of 10 points a game the same average we have had since Kyle has been here.....
    You are aware RGIII didn't play the whole game correct?

    So tape from weeks 1, 2, and 3 didn't matter but it was that damned week 4 tape that did us in....the 30+ point games don't count for him but the one 17 point game does count against him. Got it.

+ Reply to Thread

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 118
    Last Post: September-12th-2012, 03:03 PM
  2. Rex Grossman/ Kyle Shanahan and play calling
    By joeknows in forum The Stadium
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: October-17th-2011, 08:07 PM
  3. Is it 'me'?!? Or, is Kyle calling a HORRIBLE game?!?
    By OlufemiBiz in forum The Stadium
    Replies: 41
    Last Post: September-18th-2011, 10:58 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts