View Profile
View Forum Posts
View Forum Threads
Show All Albums
View Friends
Nate Silver has Obama at 85% today, with 306 EC votes.
Re: Kilmer17s non confrontational election prediction-
Nate Silver has Obama at 85% today, with 306 EC votes.
Re: Kilmer17s non confrontational election prediction-
obama will end up with more like 330, and it has absolutely nothing to do with the hurricane. don't let the GOP feed you that lame excuse. mitt's stall occured long before sandy.
Re: Kilmer17s non confrontational election prediction-
With the exception of a two period following the first debate, Mitt stalled out in June.Originally Posted by greenspandan
Re: Kilmer17s non confrontational election prediction-
For those wanting Obama to win you will love CNBC's Jim Kramer's prediction. He has Obama winning 440 to 98.
I will make my final predictions after Midnight tomorrow. I still think Obama will win, he has surged the last week. I think the election won't be settled until 11/17 when Ohio's provisional votes are counted. If Romney pulls the upset he will break history and win without Ohio and win with a couple of regular Dem states.
Re: Kilmer17s non confrontational election prediction-
I don't see how Obama doesn't win.
Re: Kilmer17s non confrontational election prediction-
Well, if the "Redskin Election Prediction" holds true then Romney is going to win in a landslide.
Re: Kilmer17s non confrontational election prediction-
And Carolina had a 1n6 economy leading up to this.
Re: Kilmer17s non confrontational election prediction-
It wasn't true in 2004...won't be true in 2012. The rule is dead.
Re: Kilmer17s non confrontational election prediction-
You hope.
Re: Kilmer17s non confrontational election prediction-
Gore won the popular vote on 2000 and the supreme court decided for Bush so maybe they got it wrong, lol.
Watch my Standup and Comedy Channel http://www.justin.tv/lolhahaha14
I can and WILL play Redskins games too in the future...
Re: Kilmer17s non confrontational election prediction-
Nah, has nothing to do with my hope or desire, just the math of the situation.
Two more days and we'll see, Redskins Rule vs. Math.
Re: Kilmer17s non confrontational election prediction-
Wasn't something up with the Redskins game in 2004, like we should've won that game but a ref screwed up real bad and caused us to lose? I remember something like that because I remember Wilbon saying something like, "the Redskins really won that game. Bad ref call caused the loss." You can't make that argument today, unless you count that TD counting after the whistle lol.
Re: Kilmer17s non confrontational election prediction-
The stat is probably coincidental yet pretty convincing: Since 1940, in 17 of 18 games in which the Redskins won their final home game before the election, the incumbent party has won the White House. When they lose, the challenger wins the presidency http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-400_162-...ential-winner/
Last edited by Thiebear; November-4th-2012 at 04:46 PM.
Re: Kilmer17s non confrontational election prediction-
"probably" a coincidence? What else would it be? A direct cause?
It has been a very interesting happenstance, for sure. Even if Obama wins, I think it will still be trotted out in 2016, because 17 of 19 is still a pretty neat correlation.
"[RG3] is the best throwing athlete I've seen come out in a while. Far better than Michael Vick, in my opinion. Far better than Cam Newton."
~ Brian Billick
Re: Kilmer17s non confrontational election prediction-
I continue to think that it is going to be very, very close. There's a lot of not-yet-hatched chickens being counted in this thread.
"The Internet is like a herd of performing elephants with diarrhea: massive, difficult to redirect, awe-inspiring, entertaining, and a source of mind-boggling amounts of excrement when you least expect it" - I wish I had said this.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Reply With Quote
Visit Homepage
