+ Reply to Thread
Page 8 of 17 FirstFirst ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ... LastLast
Results 106 to 120 of 247

Thread: NFL.com: Report: Mike Shanahan's comments bother Redskins

  1. #106
    The Coach

    pfffffft!!!
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Yes
    Age
    37
    Posts
    19,616

    Default Re: NFL.com: Report: Mike Shanahan's comments bother Redskins

    Quote Originally Posted by thesubmittedone View Post
    I love how everyone can judge "effort", lol. I saw guys trying hard, but they just couldn't get it done. Offensively, we moved the ball but the Panthers got some key stops and held us to field goals for the most part. Defensively, our secondary doesn't have the talent no matter how hard they try and that is due to a combination of scheme, injuries and missing cap space to bring in key contributors.

    I'm definitely not going to judge the team's "effort". That's incredibly hard to do without knowing exactly what was called on the field.

    ---------- Post added November-5th-2012 at 12:37 PM ----------



    Limited early round draft picks? Really? We are missing are first rounders for the next two years, which is a big deal, but that's it. Calling that "limited" is stretching it. Furthermore, we've targeted younger players entering their prime in Free Agency thus far and we'll continue to do that.

    I agree, I think the team tries hard. I think they just suck overall. We have a real vacuum of talented players.

    We probably have 2 players who would start for the Giants.
    The soldiers gave three cheers as they urged their tired horses north across the uneven hills. Some of the mounts, exhausted after a week of almost continual marching, began to lag behind; others, spurred on by their enthusiastic riders, began to edge past the regiment's commander. "Boys, hold your horses," Custer cautioned; "there are plenty of them down there for us all."

  2. #107
    Ring of Fame SkinsFTW's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Hong Kong, Philippines, San Diego CA
    Age
    7
    Posts
    16,812

    Default Re: NFL.com: Report: Mike Shanahan's comments bother Redskins

    Quote Originally Posted by wes View Post
    True but the have stayed heathy. Take away five starters and several players who they were counting on for help this year and they would be in the same boat we are in.
    Definitely, take away just Jared Allen and the Vikings are 2-14. Imagine any of those teams without their #1 WR, TE, LB, and both starting safeties and all their free agent money.
    Watch my Standup and Comedy Channel http://www.justin.tv/lolhahaha14
    I can and WILL play Redskins games too in the future...

  3. #108

    Default Re: NFL.com: Report: Mike Shanahan's comments bother Redskins

    Quote Originally Posted by zoony View Post
    I agree, I think the team tries hard. I think they just suck overall. We have a real vacuum of talented players.

    We probably have 2 players who would start for the Giants.
    That's such a talk radio argument. A lot of fans seem to think that the most important job a head coach has is the pre game speech. It's silly.

    Though sometimes, pre-game speeches do matter. I will let Fat, Bankrupt Raconteur Warren Sapp take it from here:

    In preparation for [the 2002 NFC Championship Game] Jon Gruden have the single best motivational speech I've ever heard. In reality, most coaches' speeches aren't like in the movies, where the coach builds up and up the momentum until the team charges hell-bent onto the field ready to rip down the entire stadium. If a coach does give that type of speech it's usually Saturday night. The Sunday speech is the matter-of-fact review of what we need to do to win the game. All business. Gruden gave this speech at the beginning of the week. He stood up in front of us and explained that there were 10 things we needed to do to beat the Eagles. Ten Things! He went down the list one by one, blah blah blah, blah blah blah, we'd heard it all. But then he got to the number one thing we needed to do, and he started talking about their kick returner Brian Mitchell. "I want Brian Mitchell's ass on a plate," he said. "And once we finish with the Philadelphia Eagles we are going to go to San Diego for the Super Bowl..." he paused, grinned and concluded, "Where the coach is gonna get two hotel rooms for all my bitches!"

    The room erupted. Exploded. That was it, that was the greatest motivational speech ever. There isn't even a second place. "The coach is gonna get two hotel rooms for all my bitches!"

  4. #109

    Default Re: NFL.com: Report: Mike Shanahan's comments bother Redskins

    to the people that are saying shanahan shouldnt be given another season..dont you all also say that this team needs continuity? i dont think firing shanahan shows continuity. then RG3 would have to learn another system. i want shanahan here another season at least.

  5. #110
    Ring of Fame cphil006's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Virginia Beach, VA
    Age
    34
    Posts
    13,778

    Default Re: NFL.com: Report: Mike Shanahan's comments bother Redskins

    He'll clear it up... basically he said that he wants to see what kind of character this team has... he's evaluating players.... how they respond... will they keep fighting...

    To the players it bothered... suck it up and... "fight on, fight on till you have won!"
    Being a Redskins fan prepares you for life.
    Quote Originally Posted by suze109
    ... ES is the "official" team message board, so we qualify as a "league source".
    Vinny Cerrato believes he gave Jim Zorn a roster that can make the playoffs. A playoff kicker doesn't miss that kick. A playoff safety doesn't bite multiple times by a double move in the same game.

  6. #111
    The Role Player
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    N.C.
    Age
    37
    Posts
    903

    Default Re: NFL.com: Report: Mike Shanahan's comments bother Redskins

    Quote Originally Posted by Boss_Hogg View Post
    So we know that Lorenzo and two unnamed players were upset with the "evaluation" comment. Any guesses as to who the unnamed players are?
    Shawn Springs?


    Psalms 37:7 Wait patiently on the Lord,and fret not...

  7. #112
    The Playmaker
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    3,364

    Default Re: NFL.com: Report: Mike Shanahan's comments bother Redskins

    I think it's a lot deeper than just a talent issue. Yes, we would see a benefit from having better talent, but good coaches can scheme around the talent they have and get better production than what we've seen. Gregg Williams did some great scheming the 1st year he was here in Gibbs 2. We weren't loaded with elite talent. We had some good players, like we do now. That defense swarmed to the ball. We got a lot of pressure on QBs with smoke and mirrors. We didn't have elite talent on the line like the Giants did with Michael Strahan. I know a very good D Coor. could get a lot better results with our current roster than what we are seeing. You have to be more creative. You have to get more exotic with the blitzes. If you don't have an elite line that can just physically outplay every oline out there and get to the QB, you have to get pressure from other areas, like Gregg Williams did.

  8. #113
    No New Threads
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Albion, NY
    Posts
    1,260

    Default Re: NFL.com: Report: Mike Shanahan's comments bother Redskins

    Quote Originally Posted by Cooleyfan1993 View Post
    to the people that are saying shanahan shouldnt be given another season..dont you all also say that this team needs continuity? i dont think firing shanahan shows continuity. then RG3 would have to learn another system. i want shanahan here another season at least.
    RG3 IS NOT JC. He would have no problem excelling in another system. To be honest, I don't like all these gimmick plays that the Shanahans are running for RG3. It's like they don't have confidence that he can be a drop back QB. I say get rid of the Shanahan's now.

  9. #114
    Ring of Fame


    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Solomons, MD
    Age
    49
    Posts
    11,623

    Default Re: NFL.com: Report: Mike Shanahan's comments bother Redskins

    Quote Originally Posted by DM72 View Post
    RG3 IS NOT JC. He would have no problem excelling in another system. To be honest, I don't like all these gimmick plays that the Shanahans are running for RG3. It's like they don't have confidence that he can be a drop back QB. I say get rid of the Shanahan's now.
    By the same token, by doing that you remove many of the threats he can present to a defense.
    he can pass, sure, but he also has abilities that make him a much more threatening weapon.
    the more defenses think he can do to them, the more that they have to scheme against.
    and the more they have to do that, the better chance to find holes in it to exploit.


    Yesterday on the play called back for an illegal formation.. he scrambled out, and the defense left Hank alone in the end zone and pursued, worried about his threat.
    Instead he tosses an easy pass for a score... as easy as it can be.
    (too bad for the penalty.)


    ~Bang

  10. #115
    The Cover Corner Skinz4Life12's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Arlington (Rosslyn)
    Age
    27
    Posts
    5,342

    Default Re: NFL.com: Report: Mike Shanahan's comments bother Redskins

    Quote Originally Posted by cphil006 View Post
    He'll clear it up... basically he said that he wants to see what kind of character this team has... he's evaluating players.... how they respond... will they keep fighting...
    this was my initial feeling when i heard the presser yesterday. I didn't think anything of it. I feel like his comments are getting blown out of proportion by the media, but the players need to suck it up


  11. #116

    Default Re: NFL.com: Report: Mike Shanahan's comments bother Redskins

    Quote Originally Posted by Bang View Post
    By the same token, by doing that you remove many of the threats he can present to a defense.
    he can pass, sure, but he also has abilities that make him a much more threatening weapon.
    the more defenses think he can do to them, the more that they have to scheme against.
    and the more they have to do that, the better chance to find holes in it to exploit.


    Yesterday on the play called back for an illegal formation.. he scrambled out, and the defense left Hank alone in the end zone and pursued, worried about his threat.
    Instead he tosses an easy pass for a score... as easy as it can be.
    (too bad for the penalty.)


    ~Bang
    Ben Roethlisberger does the same thing. And he's a big fat guy.

    You are going to have spy RGIII whether he is running this offense or Marty Schottenheimer's 1979 scheme. Every time he flinches, a defense is going to react to it.

    That is a weapon that is never going away.

    Just let him play QB and he will go to multiple Pro Bowls. You don't need to give him 10 designed runs a game. All that does is allow Justin Tuck to powerslam him freely.

  12. #117
    The Role Player
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Nampa Idaho
    Age
    39
    Posts
    758

    Default Re: NFL.com: Report: Mike Shanahan's comments bother Redskins

    If any undercover Skins personnel are lurking, I'd recommend making some calls to Eugene Oregon and making nice with Chip Kelly...guy's a winner who doesn't take BS from knuckleheads. And being the engineer of an explosive college offense, he'd have insight on the best way to use our sophomore year QB. Food for thought...
    Last edited by hawgboy; November-5th-2012 at 02:19 PM.
    "Free agent signings haven't lifted Washington to a Super Bowl yet, though. Maybe austerity will prove better."- Rick Snider 3/12/2013

    "I am actually coming around to the belief that including Mara might be an insult to douchebags."- LD0506 11/24/2012

  13. #118
    The Heavy Hitter thesubmittedone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Usually home, I'm boring
    Age
    29
    Posts
    7,062

    Default Re: NFL.com: Report: Mike Shanahan's comments bother Redskins

    Quote Originally Posted by zoony View Post
    I agree, I think the team tries hard. I think they just suck overall. We have a real vacuum of talented players.

    We probably have 2 players who would start for the Giants.
    I think it's more than 2 players who would start, but... I think starting might be too high a standard when comparing us to the Giants considering how much continuity they've had over there in terms of coaching and schemes.

    I think we've got a lot of football players that would make the Giants team as depth, though, and that's more than we can say than at any time in our recent Redskins history.
    Quote Originally Posted by Mike Shanahan
    "I knew it wasn't going to happen overnight. One thing I told Dan Snyder was: ‘If you don't plan on me being here for five years to do this the right way, then you shouldn't hire Mike Shanahan. But I'm going to do it the right way... But if you're going to ask me to take shortcuts, I'm not going to take shortcuts. I'm going to do it the right way.' And he said he would. And when we do have this thing turned around, people will see it, and say, ‘Oh my God, that's the way you do it.' "

  14. #119

    Default Re: NFL.com: Report: Mike Shanahan's comments bother Redskins

    Quote Originally Posted by thesubmittedone View Post
    I think it's more than 2 players who would start, but... I think starting might be too high a standard when comparing us to the Giants considering how much continuity they've had over there in terms of coaching and schemes.
    If continuity is so important, why do 7 to 8 teams fire their coach every single year? Are NFL teams dumb? Are the Chargers secretly brilliant?

  15. #120
    The Starter
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    toxic city texas
    Age
    49
    Posts
    2,697

    Default Re: NFL.com: Report: Mike Shanahan's comments bother Redskins

    Quote Originally Posted by Bang View Post
    I don't know,, many of them simply are not capable.
    they can try all they want, but the results are the same.
    Inadvertent whislte aside, on Williams' long TD run, did anyone else notice the angle Doughty took? Did anyone else realize as soon as you saw him coming on where he did that williams was going to score?
    Serioulsy, as soon as Doughty came shooting into that gap, I said, "he's gone".

    Doughty, Madieu,, it doesn't matter if they've quit. they can't play any better anyway.

    ~Bang
    On that run, wasn't it Hall trying his ass off to get a ref to throw a flag, acting [ or possibly actually ] being held, with his hands up in the air, but I didn';t see him really making an effort to tackle the guy, he seemed more content to engaging with ther blocker...

    ---------- Post added November-5th-2012 at 02:22 PM ----------

    Quote Originally Posted by hawgboy View Post
    If any undercover Skins personnel are lurking, I'd recommend making some calls to Eugene Oregon and making nice with Chip Kelly...guy's a winner who doesn't take BS from knuckleheads. And being the engineer of an explosive college offense, he'd have insight on the best way to use our sophomore year QB. Food for thought...
    I doubt it would take a college whiz to see we need receivers who can actually CATCH the ball, much less any play designing...

+ Reply to Thread

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 25
    Last Post: September-16th-2012, 09:27 PM
  2. Replies: 20
    Last Post: October-1st-2011, 08:06 PM
  3. Replies: 26
    Last Post: August-9th-2011, 07:29 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts