+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 49

Thread: How Many Current Redskins Would Start for the Giants?

  1. #16

    Default Re: How Many Current Redskins Would Start for the Giants?

    6 for me.

    Kerrigan and Orakpo on Defense.

    Trent Williams is pretty darn good, he'd start for most team including the Gmen.

    RG3 would start over Eli. He is WAY more dynamic of a player and makes defense play an entirely different strategy. If you put RG3 on the Gmen they would score 45 a game.

    Pierre Garcon would most likely start over Hixon or Randle, or whoever else they have playing on the outside.

    Fred Davis

    Morris is a toss up, Bradshaw is pretty good.

  2. #17
    The Playmaker
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Arlington, VA
    Age
    22
    Posts
    3,273

    Default Re: How Many Current Redskins Would Start for the Giants?

    Quote Originally Posted by Renegade7 View Post
    It feels like homerism that we'd try to opt out of this question because they run the 4-3 vs the 3-4. The point is our talent doesn't come close to there's and that's why we suck. Is it a better comparison to use us vs Dallas? I think it'd be worse...
    Nope, it'd be a lot better. Bowen, who left Dallas as a FA, is as good as Coleman or Hatcher. Cofield actually has better stats than Ratliff this year, but I'll refrain from giving him that. Carriker probably would be fighting hard for a spot.

    Orakpo beats Spencer at OLB handily I think, and our two ILBs are better than their two. They do win hands down in the secondary, but remember, they spent a bunch of money and draft picks there, getting Carr and Claiborne there.

    I think there's 4 definite starters for Dallas; Orakpo, Riley, Fletcher, and Bowen, and I think Carriker plays for the other DE spot heads up. Cofield loses to Ratliff not because Ratliff is playing better this year, he's not, but because of his past play for the Boys.

    On offense, Williams is LT again, Griffin has a strong argument over Romo, Davis has a strong argument against a declining Witten, and I think Monty gets a spot somewhere along the interior, and again, Garcon is the #3 on the field in 3 WR sets, which is often, and I think Young beats Vickers. So 6 guys, again, not including RBs who I think would get to contribute.

    Another thing with comparing squads in the east is that every single team has a solid 1 and 2 WR, except for us. Nicks/Cruz, Austin/Bryant, and Jackson/Maclin. I think Garcon *can* be mentioned in the same breath as those guys, but he's not quite there yet.

  3. #18
    The Coach

    pfffffft!!!
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Yes
    Age
    37
    Posts
    19,616

    Default Re: How Many Current Redskins Would Start for the Giants?

    So the question is, does this team lack talent or do they lack "heart" or effort?

    And does either option help Shanahan any?

    I think the answers to all of those questions are clear. If you take the burgundy blinders off, that is
    The soldiers gave three cheers as they urged their tired horses north across the uneven hills. Some of the mounts, exhausted after a week of almost continual marching, began to lag behind; others, spurred on by their enthusiastic riders, began to edge past the regiment's commander. "Boys, hold your horses," Custer cautioned; "there are plenty of them down there for us all."

  4. #19
    No New Threads
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Lebanon Church VA
    Age
    33
    Posts
    3,808

    Default Re: How Many Current Redskins Would Start for the Giants?

    Cofield would start for the Giants because Cofield has started for the Giants

  5. #20

    Default Re: How Many Current Redskins Would Start for the Giants?

    The giants love there polish fullback hynaski so young wouldn't start.

  6. #21
    The Bruiser Chump Bailey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Sterling, Virginia
    Age
    40
    Posts
    6,305

    Default Re: How Many Current Redskins Would Start for the Giants?

    Polumbus is better than Locklear?

    Not even close IMO...
    I want the peace of God in my life.
    To say these words is nothing.
    But to mean these words is everything.
    Nobody can mean these words and not be healed.

    ~Eckhart Tolle

  7. #22
    Ring of Fame
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Back in the old Country unitil the New Year- darn frustrating Government B/S.
    Age
    38
    Posts
    16,090

    Default Re: How Many Current Redskins Would Start for the Giants?

    Quote Originally Posted by Chump Bailey View Post
    Polumbus is better than Locklear?

    Not even close IMO...
    To be fair, both are back-up's at best in an ideal World.

    Your not exactly covering yourself in glory with either starting.

    Hail.

  8. #23
    The Rookie
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Nashville, TN
    Age
    28
    Posts
    1,043

    Default Re: How Many Current Redskins Would Start for the Giants?

    Trent Williams, London Fletcher, and maybe Perry Riley. So, I say two and a half.

    I'm not confident that Morris would start over Bradshaw, or if F. Davis would start over Bennett, and I doubt that 'Rak and Kerrigan would get the nod over JPP or Tuck.

  9. #24
    Ring of Fame authentic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Baltimore
    Age
    36
    Posts
    12,241

    Default Re: How Many Current Redskins Would Start for the Giants?

    Quote Originally Posted by Chump Bailey View Post
    Polumbus is better than Locklear?

    Not even close IMO...
    I don't even think either are good enough for a worthy comparison.

  10. #25
    The Rookie
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Richmond, VA
    Age
    25
    Posts
    1,054

    Default Re: How Many Current Redskins Would Start for the Giants?

    Quote Originally Posted by zoony View Post
    So the question is, does this team lack talent or do they lack "heart" or effort?

    And does either option help Shanahan any?

    I think the answers to all of those questions are clear. If you take the burgundy blinders off, that is
    I think talent wise, it's pretty close to 50/50

    Skins have no heart (offensively or defensively) - no one looks happy to be out on the field. No one looks ecstatic after big plays - they play with no fire.

    there was another thread talking about the differences between our defenses now and in 06,07 - the difference to me is there is in your face leader (fletcher is a great character guy but he doesn't fire the players up like marcus washington use to or how the defense was running off the hits of ST)

    If you combined both teams, talent wise I would take:

    Trent, Garcon, Davis, Cofield, Bowen, Orakpo, Riley, Fletcher, Kerrigan (it'd be close to include Merriweather and Jackson but we have yet to see them in reg. season action) - and you could even add RG3 and Morris to this list looking in the future a year or so. Monty as well with a little more experience (he hasn't quite had a full season of consistent success and needs more time)
    Last edited by steve09ru; November-5th-2012 at 06:19 PM.
    The Hands Will Come

  11. #26
    No New Threads
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Horseheads, NY
    Posts
    243

    Default Re: How Many Current Redskins Would Start for the Giants?

    Morris would start and its not close. I think the Giant's running backs are about as overrated as they come, especially Bradshaw.

  12. #27
    The Heavy Hitter MLSKINS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    SWDC
    Age
    24
    Posts
    7,026

    Default Re: How Many Current Redskins Would Start for the Giants?

    To those saying Locklear over Polumbus, until yesterday, I would have said he was having a decent season. I can't say the same for Locklear. I have see the Giants play all but maybe two games this year, Locklear is still the same bum that he was when he was here....

    Quote Originally Posted by zoony View Post
    So the question is, does this team lack talent or do they lack "heart" or effort?

    And does either option help Shanahan any?

    I think the answers to all of those questions are clear. If you take the burgundy blinders off, that is
    Honestly, I think we have decent talent. I think it is the coaches that are messing up.

    Jim Haslett is running a defense that he barely knows how to run
    Kyle is getting to cute with the play-calling

    But more importantly, I think Mike Shanahan is letting both get away with it., He needs to take over on offense and he needs to bring in a D-Coordinator in who knows how to run a defense and stop hiring D-Coordinators he can control. It didn't work in Denver and it is not working here.

    Gone, but not forgotten... RIP RP

  13. #28
    The Backup J-bomb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Sterling, VA
    Age
    37
    Posts
    2,232

    Default Re: How Many Current Redskins Would Start for the Giants?

    I know fans love him as a person but London fletcher shouldnt even be starting for us let alone giants or boys he is one of worse statistical mlbs this year an if you watch the games he misses way too many tackles and can't cover any TE's....Trent, morris and garcon are the only 3 on O. on D ryan, rak an coefild are the only guys I feel that can start for gmen or boys...

  14. #29
    The Run Stopper
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Fredericksburg, Virginia
    Posts
    5,999

    Default Re: How Many Current Redskins Would Start for the Giants?

    Trent, Monty, Polumbus, Kerrigan
    FREE ROB

  15. #30
    The Deep Threat SkinsCrushCowboys's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Virginia
    Age
    47
    Posts
    4,413

    Default Re: How Many Current Redskins Would Start for the Giants?

    Quote Originally Posted by MusicCitySkin View Post
    Trent Williams, London Fletcher, and maybe Perry Riley. So, I say two and a half.

    I'm not confident that Morris would start over Bradshaw, or if F. Davis would start over Bennett, and I doubt that 'Rak and Kerrigan would get the nod over JPP or Tuck.
    Love Fletcher's heart, but no way he starts there.


+ Reply to Thread

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. ESPN: Shockey leaves former 'Canes to join current Giants
    By RedskinzOwnU in forum 2005 Archives Forum
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: April-27th-2005, 04:30 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts