My home town was carved out of swampland.
@chthomas91
If they had simply accepted RP supporters that won legal delegate slots and allowed them their rightful role at the convention, and added some core elements of the platform, many of us would have held our noses and supported Romney (some not all, of course)
We didnt decide to not support the GOP because our chosen candidate wasnt the nominee (most of us knew that harsh reality very early on), we decided not to support them because they didnt want us to support them and treated us accordingly.
Conservatives cant trust Republicans
Well, they're gonna have to deal with it. From what I've heard Gary Johnson pulled in a million votes (still need to find a non-biased source on that) and is the highest polling Libertarian in history. I can't begin to tell you how proud I am to be a part of that.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B39W91O-rUg
My home town was carved out of swampland.
@chthomas91
Funny line and you nailed it.
Everyone said it was armageddon for the Republicans in Nov.2008, and it wasn't, it won't be now.
They'll put a new "face" on the candidate to appeal on a marketing level but it'll be the same old **** on the inside.
Change? The Republicans? Are you kidding me? If they change I assume everyone means they lose the extreme evangelical, racist populist constituent which becomes a third party but what does that leave? Upper and middle class white conservatives? Is that even 20% of the country counting non-voters? Is it even as large as that new third party Fascist Party?
Problem is that next time they're running against a woman who's also a Clinton so best of luck denting the changing demographics.
FYI Miami Cubans don't play well with other latinos, of course that level of nuance will be lost on the GOP.
Question I have is how a 50/50 country breaks 45/55 Republican in the House?
Biggest lesson of the night is that conservative white america can't elect a president on their own, not even after four years of slamming the brakes AND clutching the emergency brake while slinging the worst kind of made up **** all over the ******* place.
Last edited by Rodriggo; November-7th-2012 at 09:10 AM. Reason: wanted to add more
Republican strategy for the past four years has been simple: disenfranchisement. Is that really going to be their strategy going forward?
They lost the black vote 95-5.
They lost the Latino vote 7-3.
They lost the single woman vote 6-4.
They lost the under 30 vote 6-4.
So, instead of courting these voters....they are going to try to keep them from voting? How this a viable strategy?
Essentially nothing changed. We will have the same stalemate for the next two years and that's a shame. We really need to tackle campaign finance reform and do something about the pull corporations have over our government. But how?
The only I hope is that the GOP understands that their fate lat nig was tied to their political games they've been playing. Honestly the GOP didn't lose anything for playing those games so the chance of them waking up is slim.
---------- Post added November-7th-2012 at 09:59 AM ----------
Didn't Romney and Paul have a good relationship?
Last edited by GibbsFactor; November-7th-2012 at 09:00 AM.
Kind of want to give this its own thread, but I'll resist
The Republicans failed to learn from history. In 2004, the Democrats tried to run an ABB (anybody, but Bush) strategy and failed. John Kerry was not a well-loved candidate in his party and really set a campaign that was more about getting rid of G. W. Bush than it was what needed to be done for the United States. Likewiser, the Republican even failed to heed the messages of their own past when G. H. Bush failed to present "the vision thing."
Romney did not present a vision to the country. Sure, he said he wanted things better and wanted to create jobs, but there was no substance, no vision, nothing that the American public could glom onto other than ABO (anyone, but Obama). In fact, I would argue that Romney largely lost because he only wanted to make this about Obama.
The former governor and his GOP fellows were so certain that the American public would reject President Obama and his policies that they became deathly afraid of offering any detail whatsoever. That was their undoing. They gave no one a reason to vote for Romney only reasons to vote against Obama.
The incredible lack of details in Romney's plans. The absolute refusal to explain a single how even in the vaguest forms made him look like an emperor with no clothes. Couple that with a candidate who was such an entirely different person, with entirely different rhetoric in the primaries, on the stump, and in the debates that Governor Romney became a questionmark in every battleground state.
He became such a question that it overwhelmed the prevailing unemployment and other economic issues that beset the nation. In the end, Americans said they wanted meat and potatos, but all Mitt Romney offered was meringue.
They kept things cordial throughout the primary season (as compared to the relationships between the other GOP candidates at least),
But the Romney camp had to go along with the GOP establishment and change rules to go out of their way to disenfranchise RP delegates who legally won their slots. That ended any warm fuzzy's that were even possible.
Conservatives cant trust Republicans
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)