+ Reply to Thread
Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 LastLast
Results 46 to 60 of 70

Thread: Jacksonville waives Anthony Armstrong, we should give him Banks' Roster spot

  1. #46

    Default Re: Jacksonville waives Anthony Armstrong, we should give him Banks' Roster spot

    Quote Originally Posted by DC9 View Post
    Yeah... like we do now right? So, no harm = no foul.

    The point I am getting at (and not to nit pick) is why dump Banks for someone we dumped back during cutdown day? Why not bring in someone else who hasn't played or bring in a guy off another teams practice squad?
    Because AA won't need to learn the playbook the way a brand new reciever would. He could contribute immediately. And because he has proven he can have success in this offense, a new reciever hasn't and has higher bust potential. Not saying he has ridiculous value for other teams, but he does have considerable value for THIS team

  2. #47
    The Starter
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Washington, DC
    Age
    42
    Posts
    2,560

    Default Re: Jacksonville waives Anthony Armstrong, we should give him Banks' Roster spot

    I disagree with Coach doesn't hesitate to reverse decisions. Cooley was a no brainier.. ONLY back due to injury. With that said.. AA knows the scheme... some of the playbook.. Anyone know the stats on Briscoe? It does seem that he's dropped more than he's caught. (Nope, I don't know the # of times he's been targeted vs. catches,)

    Bring AA back. Can't be worse that Bank nor Briscoe. Anyway, it won't happen. I don't see Coach doing it.
    ??? Whodat ???

    The 'Skins Fan




  3. #48
    The Dirtbags
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Vienna, VA
    Age
    33
    Posts
    1,566

    Default Re: Jacksonville waives Anthony Armstrong, we should give him Banks' Roster spot

    Seriosuly cut banks and sign AA Tom.

  4. #49

    Default Re: Jacksonville waives Anthony Armstrong, we should give him Banks' Roster spot

    To be honest I didn't even know he signed with Jacksonville after he got cut by the Phins, and I follow and read lots of football.

    Having said that if he couldn't stick with the Jags & Phins after us, he probably doesn't bring too much to the table.

    Thanks to Soup for the sig!

  5. #50
    The Gadget Play
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Owings Mills, MD
    Posts
    3,516

    Default Re: Jacksonville waives Anthony Armstrong, we should give him Banks' Roster spot

    Quote Originally Posted by DeadExField View Post
    Not sure why AA can't stick to a roster. Maybe he is as good as some guys but not clearly better enough to crack the roster
    I think he's just not all that good. He was a 25-26 year old rookie that had one good year wrapped around several not good ones. He's so far proving that 2010 season was a fluke.[COLOR="Gold"]

    ---------- Post added November-13th-2012 at 09:54 AM ----------

    I'm still high on Briscoe, I think he needs more consistent opportunities. The sample size isn't much to go on. He seems like he'd be effective for the fade in the endzone. . . . that is, if we ever threw the ball into the endzone. And he's only 23. If they cut anybody, it should be Banks, IMO.
    Last edited by justice98; November-13th-2012 at 08:57 AM.

  6. #51
    The Special Teams Ace Riggo'sRangers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    From West Virginia relocated by sinister company to Arlington, TEXAS!
    Age
    51
    Posts
    439

    Default Re: Jacksonville waives Anthony Armstrong, we should give him Banks' Roster spot

    Quote Originally Posted by justice98 View Post
    I think he's just not all that good. He was a 25-26 year old rookie that had one good year wrapped around several not good ones. He's so far proving that 2010 season was a fluke.[COLOR="Gold"]

    ---------- Post added November-13th-2012 at 09:54 AM ----------

    I'm still high on Briscoe, I think he needs more consistent opportunities. The sample size isn't much to go on. He seems like he'd be effective for the fade in the endzone. . . . that is, if we ever threw the ball into the endzone. And he's only 23. If they cut anybody, it should be Banks, IMO.
    Agree with this 100%. Briscoe needs more looks. Keep and develop young players. HTTR

  7. #52
    The Dirtbags RVAbrendan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Richmond
    Age
    26
    Posts
    1,907

    Default Re: Jacksonville waives Anthony Armstrong, we should give him Banks' Roster spot

    Briscoe has had a few drops (that were well defended, IIRC) and a few clutch catches. Very small sample size. He beat out AA in camp, why cut him now?

    I'd actually like to give AA another shot - with the recent butterfingers syndrome going on with the wideouts here, could it really hurt? To AA's defense, he did have Blaine Gabbert throwing to him...

  8. #53
    Ring of Fame pjfootballer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Fort Mill, SC, Via Waldorf, MD (Born in D.C.)
    Age
    45
    Posts
    26,033

    Default Re: Jacksonville waives Anthony Armstrong, we should give him Banks' Roster spot

    Quote Originally Posted by Laxpunk2006 View Post
    Like when he benched McNabb? Or when the guy he "put his reputation on" Beck got yanked for ineffectiveness?

    Bringing Markus White back after releasing him? Chris Cooley?

    I can't speak for his time in Denver but Mike Shanahan hasn't hesitated to reverse course on player decisions when it has become obvious a mistake was made.
    Add Keiland Williams to the list. I'm getting tired of everyone associating Shanny with the word "Ego." EVERY head coach has an ego. You HAVE to have an ego to be successful in this business.
    Redskins 2013 Opponents:

    Home- Dallas, NY Giants, Philadelphia, Detroit, Chicago, San Francisco, Kansas City, San Diego
    Away- Dallas, NY Giants, Philadelphia, Green Bay, Minnesota, Atlanta, Denver, Oakland

  9. #54

    Default Re: Jacksonville waives Anthony Armstrong, we should give him Banks' Roster spot

    Sign Armstrong. Cut Banks. Play Briscoe more. Use Robinson whenever you can't help yourself and have to run a gimmicky offensive play.
    "Washington strolled to the NFC championship, outscoring their two playoff opponents by a combined total of 48 points. Their domination was more than impressive, it was historic. The 1991 Redskins boasted the largest average margin of victory among all Super Bowl champions."

    --- America's Game

  10. #55
    No New Threads
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    myrtls beach SC
    Age
    78
    Posts
    456

    Default Re: Jacksonville waives Anthony Armstrong, we should give him Banks' Roster spot

    I would also sign him to a one year vet min contract. Let's give RG3 someone to pass the ball too.

  11. #56

    Default Re: Jacksonville waives Anthony Armstrong, we should give him Banks' Roster spot

    Steelers released Alameda Ta'amu. He was supposed to be the eventual replacement for Casey Hampton. He's had off-field issues but if Banks is to be cut, it should go to this guy...

    http://www.sbnation.com/nfl/2012/11/...2012-nfl-draft

    ---------- Post added November-13th-2012 at 01:16 PM ----------


  12. #57
    The Gadget Play
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Boston/NoVA
    Age
    22
    Posts
    3,630

    Default Re: Jacksonville waives Anthony Armstrong, we should give him Banks' Roster spot

    I'm on board. Banks is a waste. Nothing added to this team from him.

  13. #58
    The Deep Threat redskins55's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Jacksonville, Fl
    Posts
    4,423

    Default Re: Jacksonville waives Anthony Armstrong, we should give him Banks' Roster spot

    Quote Originally Posted by #BgMase76# View Post
    Wait a minute, I live in Jax. I didn't even know he was on the roster. The crazy part is Jax just doesn't go deep. They just started taking shots w/ Cecil Shorts. To the best of my knowledge AA didn't have any hands issues. If we're concerned about him getting off the LOS and jams. How about the coaches coaching. Put the guy in motion or how about stacking the WRs. Lining up off the LOS. By no means am I challenging our coaching staff, but these are simple solutions.
    Count me as one who also didn't know he was on the jags. I think people need to realize two things. #1 just because you get cut from other teams in the NFL doesnt mean that your not good. The Jags have Blackmon, Laurent Robinson, and Cecil Shorts. On top of that, their GM Gene Smith is the worst talent evaluator in the league and is getting fiered at the snd of the season. So consider who they already have and who they have making personnel decisions.

    #2 you don't have to be a super star to be able to contribute. The reason AA was good here was because McNabb gave him a chance throwing deep. Grossman and Beck couldn't get the ball down field to capatlize on AA's strengths. So when we tried to turn him into a possession receiver it failed because AA is a situational receiver not a possession receiver. We have no deep threat but a lot of

    ---------- Post added November-15th-2012 at 04:59 AM ----------

    Quote Originally Posted by #BgMase76# View Post
    Wait a minute, I live in Jax. I didn't even know he was on the roster. The crazy part is Jax just doesn't go deep. They just started taking shots w/ Cecil Shorts. To the best of my knowledge AA didn't have any hands issues. If we're concerned about him getting off the LOS and jams. How about the coaches coaching. Put the guy in motion or how about stacking the WRs. Lining up off the LOS. By no means am I challenging our coaching staff, but these are simple solutions.
    Count me as one who also didn't know he was on the jags. I think people need to realize two things. #1 just because you get cut from other teams in the NFL doesnt mean that your not good. The Jags have Blackmon, Laurent Robinson, and Cecil Shorts. On top of that, their GM Gene Smith is the worst talent evaluator in the league and is getting fiered at the snd of the season. So consider who they already have and who they have making personnel decisions.

    #2 you don't have to be a super star to be able to contribute. The reason AA was good here was because McNabb gave him a chance throwing deep. Grossman and Beck couldn't get the ball down field to capatlize on AA's strengths. So when we tried to turn him into a possession receiver it failed because AA is a situational receiver not a possession receiver. We have no deep threat that can catcutter ball. Bring him back and use him right. Cause Robinson Banks and Brisco arn't cutting it!

  14. #59
    The Gadget Play
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Owings Mills, MD
    Posts
    3,516

    Default Re: Jacksonville waives Anthony Armstrong, we should give him Banks' Roster spot

    Quote Originally Posted by Laxpunk2006 View Post
    Like when he benched McNabb? Or when the guy he "put his reputation on" Beck got yanked for ineffectiveness?

    Bringing Markus White back after releasing him? Chris Cooley?

    I can't speak for his time in Denver but Mike Shanahan hasn't hesitated to reverse course on player decisions when it has become obvious a mistake was made.
    I'll give you McNabb, but the rest are dubious examples. He clearly had no choice on Beck. He wasn't a little ineffective, he was horrible. He's still gotta look the team in the eye.

    I don't think bringing back a guy you cut is admitting you made a mistake. It's usually out of necessity.

  15. #60
    The Run Stopper
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Fredericksburg, Virginia
    Posts
    5,990

    Default Re: Jacksonville waives Anthony Armstrong, we should give him Banks' Roster spot

    Quote Originally Posted by Rhodus333 View Post
    Because AA won't need to learn the playbook the way a brand new reciever would. He could contribute immediately. And because he has proven he can have success in this offense, a new reciever hasn't and has higher bust potential. Not saying he has ridiculous value for other teams, but he does have considerable value for THIS team
    But he didn't make the cut this year and he disappeared in 2011. He had one good year and people learned his one move/route... if we bring in another reciever it should be a flyer in my opinion. We aren't competing this year anyways... take a chance on someone and they may pan out. If not, at least you aren't retreading Armstrong.

    Quote Originally Posted by SemperFi Skins View Post
    Steelers released Alameda Ta'amu. He was supposed to be the eventual replacement for Casey Hampton. He's had off-field issues but if Banks is to be cut, it should go to this guy...
    Wow, this is the dude they traded up to get with us in the 4th round if I am not mistaken. Go get him! Why not?
    Last edited by DC9; November-15th-2012 at 07:21 AM.
    FREE ROB

+ Reply to Thread

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 19
    Last Post: January-3rd-2011, 05:46 AM
  2. Replies: 121
    Last Post: September-3rd-2010, 07:54 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts