+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 150

Thread: Is it time to start evaluating the Scouting Dept? (what should we do going forward?)

  1. #1
    Ring of Fame authentic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Baltimore
    Age
    36
    Posts
    12,241

    Default Is it time to start evaluating the Scouting Dept? (what should we do going forward?)

    Yes we're at a cross roads with Shanny at the midway point of his 5 year contract. As i've said multiple times in various threads "I'm no longer an unconditional supporter of Mike". We've also agreed that Haslett is over his head as a DC, which makes his release all but a formality at this point. Its not a matter of "if", but "when" regarding his status. Kyle's status is also in the air, in that we are closing on the end of his 3 year contract. And the insiders have speculated that his desire to return is uncertain.

    -But lets forget all of that for a second. What about the Scott Campbell and Morocco Brown? Is it time to look at this department a bit more closely? Can we say with certainty that we've done a great job in aquiring talent? Sure the roster, today, is better than it was in 2009. However, IMO we still lack top end talent (i.e. playmakers). I'm not saying that they should definitely be let go and that we should clean house. But I do see this as a possiblity among those who propose a HC change. At this point we could confidently say that possibly Garcon, RG3, Morris, Trent, Orakpo, and Kerrigan are 1st and/or 2nd teir players.. But then what can we say about the remainder of the roster? The way i see it, we're stuck with a bunch of average, depth players... At what point do we hold them accountable, if at all?
    Last edited by authentic; November-14th-2012 at 10:12 AM.

  2. #2
    The Starter
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    toxic city texas
    Age
    49
    Posts
    2,697

    Default Re: Is it time to start evaluating the Scouting Dept? (what should we do going forward?)

    I made a reference to questioning the scouting team awhile back, mostly out of curiousity as to why the receivers we end up with are average size at best. Tall shifty receivers are not easy to come by, but I can't remember the last time we had one.
    Look around the league, and there are plenty of them on other teams, just not on the Redskins squad. Why? It would be nice to have at least 1 over 6'2 who can and is willing to go up after the ball at its highest point, rather than waitingh for the ball to drop into their hands; as if they could catch it to begin with might be a bigger question...

  3. #3
    The Free Agent Hiro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    4,689

    Default Re: Is it time to start evaluating the Scouting Dept? (what should we do going forward?)

    Quote Originally Posted by authentic View Post
    However, IMO we still lack top end talent (i.e. playmakers). I'm not saying that they should definitely be let go and that we should clean house. But I don't see this as a possiblity among those who propose a HC change. At this point we could confidently say that possibly Garcon, RG3, Morris, Trent, Orakpo, and Kerrigan are 1st and/or 2nd teir players.. But then what can we say about the remainder of the roster? The way i see it, we're stuck with a bunch of average, depth players
    I would say that out of those guys you mentioned, the only ones who seem to be on track to become 1st tier players at their positions are Trent and RG3.

    The others, however, seem to be destined to remain in the 2nd tier. When especially looking at our two best pass rushers, I don't see guys who have the potential to take over a game. While Campbell and Brown have been solid, I don't see us unearthing gems the way other teams have done so. Even the UDFA 'gems' we have found (like Logan, Lorenzo, Banks and Armstrong) are depth players at best. When's the last time we managed to find a guy like a Victor Cruz, Miles Austin, Tramon Williams as an UDFA? When's the last time we took one team's garbage player off the trash heap, and turned him into an absolute gem for our team?

    While we have some promising players, I want to see better results. We need starters to come out of rounds besides 1-4. So to answer your question, yes I think it's absolutely time to take a look at the scouting department. By all accounts, Shanahan has been really listening to them and taking their advice heavily into his consideration.
    Last edited by Hiro; November-13th-2012 at 02:26 PM.

    Formerly known as Hero21. Click for my best memory of royallypwned

  4. #4
    The Dirtbags RonArtest15's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Jamaica, Queens
    Age
    33
    Posts
    1,545

    Default Re: Is it time to start evaluating the Scouting Dept? (what should we do going forward?)

    Are any of those guys holdovers from Vinny's era? I think it's beyond insane that 3/16 players selected by us in the 08/09 draft are still on a NFL roster...not just w/ the Skins, but on an NFL roster. Think about it. That's mind-blowing and a HUGE problem as far as scouting is concerned.

  5. #5
    Ring of Fame
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Chantilly, VA
    Posts
    13,738

    Default Re: Is it time to start evaluating the Scouting Dept? (what should we do going forward?)

    I think we've done okay in getting some young talent, but it takes a while to build a pipeline. You gotta commit to the draft year after year after year after year, etc.
    "In 2012 the Redskins are gonna be the NFC East champions, and that starts right f–king today.” Kyle Shanahan, 1/1/12

  6. #6
    The Gadget Play
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    New York, New YORK
    Age
    41
    Posts
    3,974

    Default Re: Is it time to start evaluating the Scouting Dept? (what should we do going forward?)

    I question this scouting department's ability to close in on true 3-4 personnel. Everyone on the front seven has played in the 4-3 in the NFL or in college. You look at team's like NE, Pitt, and Balt. who run the 3-4 and they are drafting players who played in the 3-4 in college. The Redskins aren't doing that.

  7. #7
    Ring of Fame authentic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Baltimore
    Age
    36
    Posts
    12,241

    Default Re: Is it time to start evaluating the Scouting Dept? (what should we do going forward?)

    Quote Originally Posted by Warhead36 View Post
    I think we've done okay in getting some young talent, but it takes a while to build a pipeline. You gotta commit to the draft year after year after year after year, etc.
    see, thats my problem we seem to have nothing but "okay" players. Now, we must also keep in mind (especially regarding the defense) that they aren't always being put in the best position to succeed. But at the sametime, when you consider that year in and year out, we're often out matched and out muscled, can't tackle can't run.... it seems to me that the constant lack of playmaking talent is a reflection of whats going on upstairs.

    ---------- Post added November-13th-2012 at 03:33 PM ----------

    Quote Originally Posted by Redskins4ever View Post
    I question this scouting department's ability to close in on true 3-4 personnel..
    Yes, starting with Cofield.

  8. #8
    The Gadget Play
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    New York, New YORK
    Age
    41
    Posts
    3,974

    Default Re: Is it time to start evaluating the Scouting Dept? (what should we do going forward?)

    Quote Originally Posted by authentic View Post
    see, thats my problem we seem to have nothing but "okay" players. Now, we must also keep in mind (especially regarding the defense) that they aren't always being put in the best position to succeed. But at the sametime, when you consider that year in and year out, we're often out matched and out muscled, can't tackle can't run.... it seems to me that the constant lack of playmaking talent is a reflection of whats going on upstairs.

    ---------- Post added November-13th-2012 at 03:33 PM ----------



    Yes, starting with Cofield.
    Not so. Barry Cofield played NT at Northwestern but was drafted by the NY Midgets as a DT in a 4-3 scheme. Brian Orakpo and Ryan Kerrigan are natural defensive ends playing OLBs. They are able to play OLB in the 3-4 because of their athletic ability and their level of awareness. Perry Riley and Keenan Robinson also 4-3 middle LBs. Jarvis Jenkins played in a 4-3 defense as a DT at Clemson and Adam Carriker was a DT with the Rams. With the exception of Cofield, the Redskins have no natural 3-4 personnel.
    Last edited by Redskins4ever; November-13th-2012 at 02:42 PM.

  9. #9
    Ring of Fame authentic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Baltimore
    Age
    36
    Posts
    12,241

    Default Re: Is it time to start evaluating the Scouting Dept? (what should we do going forward?)

    Quote Originally Posted by Redskins4ever View Post
    Not so. Barry Cofield played NT at Northwestern but was drafted by the NY Midgets as a DT in a 4-3 scheme. Brian Orakpo and Ryan Kerrigan are natural defensive ends playing OLBs. They are able to play OLB in the 3-4 because of their athletic ability and their level of awareness. Perry Riley and Keenan Robinson also 4-3 middle LBs. Jarvis Jenkins played in a 4-3 defense as a DT at Clemson and Adam Carriker was a DT with the Rams. With the exception of Cofield, the Redskins have no natural 3-4 personnel.
    Well most rookie OLBs in the NFL were natural DEs in college. Regarding Cofield, we would have to agree to disagree, but Cofield has been MUCH more effective in the 4-3. He doesn't have the frame, nor the strength to hold the fort as a NT in the 3-4. He's often beat one-on-one, which isn't supposed to occur in a successful 3-4. I would prefer we start Baker and move Cofield to DE, temporarily, until we can address that position for real.

  10. #10
    The Heavy Hitter Enter Apotheosis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    At The Drive-In
    Age
    26
    Posts
    7,935

    Default Re: Is it time to start evaluating the Scouting Dept? (what should we do going forward?)

    Quote Originally Posted by Redskins4ever View Post
    I question this scouting department's ability to close in on true 3-4 personnel. Everyone on the front seven has played in the 4-3 in the NFL or in college. You look at team's like NE, Pitt, and Balt. who run the 3-4 and they are drafting players who played in the 3-4 in college. The Redskins aren't doing that.
    That's not true at all. Woodley and Suggs were 4-3 ends in college and Ngata, McPhee, Hood, Hampton, and Keisel were 4-3 tackles.

    The Patriots are hardly a base 3-4 team these days but in their prime as a 3-4 unit they had a bunch of players who played the 4-3 in college. Seymour was a 4-3 DT, Wilfork was a 4-3 DT, Warren was a 4-3 DT/DE, McGinest was a 4-3 DE, Colvin was a 4-3 LB/DE, and both Bruschi and Vrabel were 4-3 DEs despite being moved to ILB in Belichick's 3-4.



  11. #11
    The Playmaker
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Arlington, VA
    Age
    22
    Posts
    3,272

    Default Re: Is it time to start evaluating the Scouting Dept? (what should we do going forward?)

    Quote Originally Posted by RonArtest15 View Post
    Are any of those guys holdovers from Vinny's era? I think it's beyond insane that 3/16 players selected by us in the 08/09 draft are still on a NFL roster...not just w/ the Skins, but on an NFL roster. Think about it. That's mind-blowing and a HUGE problem as far as scouting is concerned.
    Slightly higher than 3/16, but not by much. Davis, Orakpo, Jackson are still with us, Rinehart and Tryon are on other teams, but only Rinehart looks like he'll last anytime past the next year or two...maybe. Eddie Williams is on IR with the Browns. So 6/16, which is still terrible, and only 2 of them are starter quality.

    Pretty sure 08/09 was all Vinny too.

    Quote Originally Posted by Warhead36 View Post
    I think we've done okay in getting some young talent, but it takes a while to build a pipeline. You gotta commit to the draft year after year after year after year, etc.
    This is the big thing. Like was mentioned by RonArtest15, only a few of the players we drafted in '08/'09 are even still in the NFL, let alone here. Orakpo, Davis, and Jackson are still here, and that's it. Vinny robbed this team of talent with his terrible picking.

    I think when we finally started listening to the scouts our picking improved, but that only happened in 2010. We need a few more years of decent picking, and we'll start to see the pace of good players pick up.

    As for picking, secondary is the new Oline, in that we should probably throw 2-3 picks at it every draft. I remember how we always needed Oline picks, but never took anyone. We finally have some guys (with the notable exception of RT), but our secondary is pretty bare. That and a true NT, though I think safeties rank a little higher on the needs pyramid.

  12. #12
    The Starter BRAVEONTHEWARPATH93's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Drexel Univ by way of Upper Marlboro, MD
    Age
    20
    Posts
    2,879

    Default Re: Is it time to start evaluating the Scouting Dept? (what should we do going forward?)

    Quote Originally Posted by authentic View Post
    Well most rookie OLBs in the NFL were natural DEs in college. Regarding Cofield, we would have to agree to disagree, but Cofield has been MUCH more effective in the 4-3. He doesn't have the frame, nor the strength to hold the fort as a NT in the 3-4. He's often beat one-on-one, which isn't supposed to occur in a successful 3-4. I would prefer we start Baker and move Cofield to DE, temporarily, until we can address that position for real.
    definitely...I think that is the most underrated part of our issues on the 3-4. I'd love for Baker to get more shots at nose. Cofield is out of position at an NFL Level NT position
    "Watching RG3 today is like watching Jordan vs. the Blazers years ago. Waiting for him to shrug his shoulders as he runs by cameras." - John Keim, November 22, 2012. Thanksgiving at Dallas

  13. #13
    The Special Teams Ace Bishop Hammer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Laurel, MD
    Age
    32
    Posts
    408

    Default Re: Is it time to start evaluating the Scouting Dept? (what should we do going forward?)

    From what I've read Shanahan doesn't listen to his scouting department. He will base an opinion on a player from watching his best highlights and believes "I can coach them up to that level all the time." To paraphrase Mikey.
    http://sports.yahoo.com/news/nfl--mi...-05511709.html

    Keep in mind I'm posting this article to discuss his scouting techniques. Not on the rebuilding process, that the article touched on. That's a seperate discussion altogher.
    All the other D's with the pumped up schemes
    You better run, better run, outrun my QB
    All the other D's with the pumped up schemes
    You better run, better run, faster than RG3.

  14. #14
    The Run Stopper
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Nowhere
    Posts
    5,930

    Default Re: Is it time to start evaluating the Scouting Dept? (what should we do going forward?)

    Quote Originally Posted by authentic View Post
    see, thats my problem we seem to have nothing but "okay" players. Now, we must also keep in mind (especially regarding the defense) that they aren't always being put in the best position to succeed. But at the sametime, when you consider that year in and year out, we're often out matched and out muscled, can't tackle can't run.... it seems to me that the constant lack of playmaking talent is a reflection of whats going on upstairs.
    I think part of it is that some talent needs to time develop. And not in the way that lost cases like Taylor Jacob and Malcom Kelly and Devin Thomas needed to develop (as in they would never develop ever and every other team except ours---read: Vinny---realied they wouldn't).

    I mean, Jordy Nelson had three full years in the NFL before he finally exploded in 2011. Eric Decker is about to explode in his third year. Darrius Heyward-Bey was supposed to be the bust of all bust and he had a really solid season in 2011, Victor Cruz was on the bench all season before he came on in 2011. Pierre Garcon had a career year in 2011 with his mess of quarterbacks in year 4.

    Look at the receivers taken in the first round of this year's draft. Justin Blackmon and Michael Floyd are both struggling to adapt; both of them are third on their teams depth chart, basically. A.J Jenkins hasn't even seen the field if I can recall. Who would've thought Kendall Wright would be the best looking rookie of the class?

    I know I'm going on about receivers but I feel like that applies to other people. It's hard to know whether Richard Crawford is the guy we saw in preseason or not when he's not being put in a position to succeed, when he's even active, it's hard to judge Jarvis Jenkins coming off a knee injury. Perry and Ryan both are trending backwards, but their coach could barely coach defensive backs and now he's trying to coach them.

    I feel like we've acquired good talent. Your early round draft picks are always going to be your blue-chippers; that's why they're first round picks. Saying we "only" found high end talent in our first round picks or in the early rounds...well, yeah. That's how most teams do it.

    The undrafted free agent gems are harder to come by. If every team could find a Victor Cruz or Miles Austin...well, then they'd draft them in the first round. The idea of undrafted free agent gems is bigger than the actual occurance of them; they are rare.

    And the late round picks usually take more time to develop; that's why they're late round picks.

    It's hard when you have a team like this that's sucked at acquiring talent for so long it's hard to be patient. But the caliber of talent we've acquired is way better than it used to be.

  15. #15
    Ring of Fame
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Maryland
    Age
    77
    Posts
    15,492

    Default Re: Is it time to start evaluating the Scouting Dept? (what should we do going forward?)

    Since Mike Shanahan's first draft in 2010, the Skins now have five starters out of their drafts. Belichik has added eight in the same period. Bear in mind that he presumably started with a weaker roster and, by rule, seven higher value picks, so it should have been easy for Mike to add more starters than Belichik. (Source: Pro Football Reference, November 2012)
    Last edited by Oldfan; November-14th-2012 at 06:54 AM.

+ Reply to Thread

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. ES Scouting Dept.: Meet the Bengals
    By KDawg in forum The Stadium
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: September-21st-2012, 07:47 AM
  2. ES Scouting Dept.: Meet the Rams
    By KDawg in forum The Stadium
    Replies: 38
    Last Post: September-14th-2012, 07:08 AM
  3. The Skins' Scouting Dept.
    By Portis4President in forum The Stadium
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: November-16th-2006, 12:34 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts