+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 16 to 29 of 29

Thread: The difference in #10 Defense and the one we have now?

  1. #16
    The Waterboy
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Rockville, Maryland
    Posts
    92

    Default Re: The difference in #10 Defense and the one we have now?

    It's the pass rush. We need a super nose tackle and a heavier, faster Rak.

  2. #17
    Ring of Fame darrelgreenie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Baltimore, MD
    Age
    36
    Posts
    12,350

    Default Re: The difference in #10 Defense and the one we have now?

    Quote Originally Posted by dposton View Post
    Think back to when this defense made the jump to #10-13 ranking. What is the only difference? Most will not want to acknowledge this. LaRon Landry. Would a safety core of Brandon Meriweather, LaRon Landry, Tanard Jackson and Jordan Berstein have made a difference?
    Losing Orakpo was huge. Much more impactful then our safety play. Also it depends on your opinion of LaRon. I think LaRon was overrated.

  3. #18
    The Playmaker
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Arlington, VA
    Age
    22
    Posts
    3,268

    Default Re: The difference in #10 Defense and the one we have now?

    Landry was hurt most of last year, and when he was on the field he wasn't 100%. Having a safety out there helps, but it wasn't Landry.

    The biggest difference is Orakpo and Carriker are missing. The pass rush they generated is the difference between being the 26th best pass rush in 2012, and the 10th best in 2011. When you have a pass rush that gets to the QB a lot, it really screws up the passing game, doubly so if the guys rushing can get their hands up and bat down a ball or two like we saw Rak doing early in the year. The solution against a pass rush is quick passes, and the solutions against that are bump and tight press coverage (which we aren't good at) and batting balls at the line, which we were much better at (Kerrigan does it most weeks).

  4. #19

    Default Re: The difference in #10 Defense and the one we have now?

    the difference is we have an offense now.

    other teams would go up by a score and shut it down because they knew we were no threat. the second half game plans would all be about slowing things down and grinding the game to a halt. we weren't getting into shootouts, so the defense wasn't really tested. teams beat us 17-10 or 20-6 and the defense came out looking pretty good even though we were never really in the game. if the other team had NEEDED to score another couple touchdowns, they would have. our secondary has been AWFUL for years. there's just been little reason to exploit it.

  5. #20
    The Dirtbags thomasroane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Hampton, VA
    Age
    50
    Posts
    1,839

    Default Re: The difference in #10 Defense and the one we have now?

    Quote Originally Posted by maskedsuperstar View Post
    Landry? No. There is a reason why the Skins didn't re-sign him. He can't cover and always looking for the big hit.
    Exactly! Brady used him like a dirty dish rag. Pass on LL. He would have been great with Sean Taylor cause Taylor could cover sideline to sideline which would allow LL to just run to the ball, blitz and kill people. When he has to be disciplined he's pretty much useless out there. Plus, his body breaks down cause his joints aren't made to handle that much muscle mass. You gotta know that if the NFL can figure out how to test HGH he'd be the first one suspended.
    "So live your life that the fear of death can never enter your heart." -- Chief Tecumseh, Shawnee Nation

  6. #21
    Ring of Fame
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Cross Junction, Virginia
    Age
    49
    Posts
    10,141

    Default Re: The difference in #10 Defense and the one we have now?

    Quote Originally Posted by dposton View Post
    Think back to when this defense made the jump to #10-13 ranking. What is the only difference? Most will not want to acknowledge this. LaRon Landry. Would a safety core of Brandon Meriweather, LaRon Landry, Tanard Jackson and Jordan Berstein have made a difference?
    We are also missing Orakpo and Carriker (13-14 sacks plus their threat would probably add 5-6 more and create a few more errant passes). Meriweather played in one game and Jackson in none.

    If you consider who we are missing, no matter what you think of Haslett, the defense would be 15-20% better if they had not been injured (or in Jackson's case, suspended) which would make this a top-10 defense. Also remember, a lot of the more exotic things Haslett is trying are directly related to missing horses like Orakpo, Carriker and probably Jackson and Meriweather.
    Last edited by Darth Tater; November-26th-2012 at 09:15 AM.
    A bad plan well executed may work. A good plan badly executed will always fail.

  7. #22
    The Field Goal Team Wildbunny's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    France
    Age
    38
    Posts
    508

    Default Re: The difference in #10 Defense and the one we have now?

    First our difference is that we went from 4-3 to 3-4.

    I like Coffield, but we need better play from the NT position. Adds in that our best S are either injured or suspended. Even if like Doughty, he's a great replacement, not an all down S.
    Then the inuries to Rak and Carriker hurt us really bad.

    Then you have an expleanation at why do we look like crap this year on D. And L have nothing got to do with it.

  8. #23

    Default Re: The difference in #10 Defense and the one we have now?

    Quote Originally Posted by darrelgreenie View Post
    Losing Orakpo was huge. Much more impactful then our safety play. Also it depends on your opinion of LaRon. I think LaRon was overrated.
    I agree with you in this thread. I think our defense (most defenses) is built around our pass rush. This year we've also been going for more turnovers which leads to bigger plays and allows more yards, but a big problem is that we have no pass rush - the same thing that haunted us before Orakpo. But unlike then, we've also had poor tackling by others who let a 3 yard gain turn into a 7 yard gain and that's just not good.
    “The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results”.

    "There are no stupid people just stupid posts"

    Interested in learning about math, probability, or Computer Science and their connections to the real world? Learn more at my site: http://www.learninglover.com, or visit me on Twitter: @MindAfterMath

    A recent blog post : The Risk of Competition

  9. #24
    The Starter BRAVEONTHEWARPATH93's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Drexel Univ by way of Upper Marlboro, MD
    Age
    20
    Posts
    2,875

    Default Re: The difference in #10 Defense and the one we have now?

    If we kept Landry, I doubt we would have brought in the other two
    "Watching RG3 today is like watching Jordan vs. the Blazers years ago. Waiting for him to shrug his shoulders as he runs by cameras." - John Keim, November 22, 2012. Thanksgiving at Dallas

  10. #25
    The Starter
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    germantown, md
    Age
    45
    Posts
    2,542

    Default Re: The difference in #10 Defense and the one we have now?

    Quote Originally Posted by Darth Tater View Post
    We are also missing Orakpo and Carriker (13-14 sacks plus their threat would probably add 5-6 more and create a few more errant passes). Meriweather played in one game and Jackson in none.

    If you consider who we are missing, no matter what you think of Haslett, the defense would be 15-20% better if they had not been injured (or in Jackson's case, suspended) which would make this a top-10 defense. Also remember, a lot of the more exotic things Haslett is trying are directly related to missing horses like Orakpo, Carriker and probably Jackson and Meriweather.
    Its not Haslett's fault. I mean, the guys wants to be aggressive but...............the defense is 3rd against the run. That's pretty good. But its seems nobody wants to admit the fact that Orakpo is gone. Thats huge.

  11. #26
    The Run Stopper
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Fredericksburg, Virginia
    Posts
    5,983

    Default Re: The difference in #10 Defense and the one we have now?

    Quote Originally Posted by ArmchairRedskin View Post
    Last I saw Landry he was getting smoked in the NE game.
    I think NE just scored again.
    FREE ROB

  12. #27
    The Free Agent
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    USA
    Age
    47
    Posts
    4,822

    Default Re: The difference in #10 Defense and the one we have now?

    Not much really, just very different coaches. Blache didn't believe in pressure. Haslet does, but it's either all or nothing. When Haslet sat back and made Blache proud, we sucked and racked up a bunch of losses. Getting back to blitzing, we have had two of our easier wins all year.

    Running a 3-4 now so things are different, but we don't have a huge NT, which I thought was very important to anchor the whole damn thing.

    But FS play always seems to dominate the discussions about defense.

    And our free safety spot still has a guy better suited to play strong (Madieu), just like when we had the incredible hulk Landry there. And just like then, its easy to hammer away on him instead of realizing they are far from being used in their optimal position. But that position for some reason almost is expected to make or break a defense, or handcuff a coordinator.

  13. #28

    Default Re: The difference in #10 Defense and the one we have now?

    Quote Originally Posted by Darth Tater View Post
    We are also missing Orakpo and Carriker (13-14 sacks plus their threat would probably add 5-6 more and create a few more errant passes). Meriweather played in one game and Jackson in none.

    If you consider who we are missing, no matter what you think of Haslett, the defense would be 15-20% better if they had not been injured (or in Jackson's case, suspended) which would make this a top-10 defense. Also remember, a lot of the more exotic things Haslett is trying are directly related to missing horses like Orakpo, Carriker and probably Jackson and Meriweather.
    Yepppp. Orakpo and Carriker accounted for 13 sacks last year. Jackson and Jenkins are on pace for 3. Our pass rush stinks on ice right now.

  14. #29
    The Run Stopper DCsportsfan53's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Falls Church, VA
    Age
    29
    Posts
    5,704

    Default Re: The difference in #10 Defense and the one we have now?

    Firstly, give me a ****ing break and quit crying over guys who weren't that good and didn't want to be here.

    Secondly, were I making this thread to me the answer is easy and easy to miss.....it's the offense. For sometime now we've been a defense that kept games close but could never stand up and make the plays that really counted. Same is true now, largely. The difference is teams can no longer count on it requiring an act of God for our offense to put up 20 points and they, therefore, play far less conservatively against us than they used to. Or offense now puts pressure on them to keep up and they respond accordingly.
    Last edited by DCsportsfan53; November-26th-2012 at 02:10 PM.

+ Reply to Thread

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 21
    Last Post: September-18th-2007, 09:39 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts