+ Reply to Thread
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4
Results 46 to 52 of 52

Thread: This might be the deepest (and most controversial) MLB HOF ballot in a long time

  1. #46
    Ring of Fame
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Northern VA
    Age
    31
    Posts
    10,279

    Default Re: This might be the deepest (and most controversial) MLB HOF ballot in a long time

    Quote Originally Posted by Bang View Post
    Can't allow gambling. Rose made his bed.

    And yeah, he does swear he didn't bet on his own team,,, and a million other lies he's been busted in.
    Can't trust a word he says.

    Besides, even if he didn't bet on his eam, his inside knowledge of other teams gives him insights that those he's betting with can use.

    And they're a shady bunch who are willing to do anything.

    ~BaNG
    He bet on his games as a manager. If you're gonna ban him, ban him as a manager, not as a player.

  2. #47

    Default Re: This might be the deepest (and most controversial) MLB HOF ballot in a long time

    Quote Originally Posted by Spaceman Spiff View Post
    Am I the only one who doesn't want to see Morris get in?

    His lifetime ERA is 3.91 which is good but not great. His ERA+ is 105. He lead the league in wins twice, once during a strike shortened year. He lead the league in shutouts once, strikeouts once...then lead the league in wild pitches 6 times and earned runs once. He placed in the top 3 in Cy Young voting twice and never finished higher than third.

    Yes, he was the winning-est pitcher of the 80's but Mark Grace had the most hits of the 1990's and I don't see anyone campaigning for his HoF chances. He was ridiculous in Game 7, 1991.

    To me, it just adds up to a really good career, not a great one.
    I personally don't think Morris gets in. Bert Blyleven should be in before Morris.

    Out of that list, I think the only lock is Biggio. Clemens and Bonds should both eventually get in. They were hall of famers whether they juiced or not. Piazza may or may not get in. Schilling isn't deserving enough, imo. He just doesn't have enough wins. Sosa should never get in. Dude was a liability on defense. And had he not juiced, he would have struggled to even get 500 HR. And the HR count is the only thing really in his favor. Dude was just not that good. I hope McGwire never gets in either. That BS he pulled in front of Congress should keep him out, alone.

    I think this is Dale Murphy's last shot to get in. Maybe it's the homer in me, but I think he belongs. 2-time MVP. And he played on some terrible teams. Played the game the right way.

    ---------- Post added November-30th-2012 at 04:23 AM ----------

    Quote Originally Posted by Spaceman Spiff View Post
    He bet on his games as a manager. If you're gonna ban him, ban him as a manager, not as a player.
    Rose will never get in. What he did was inexcuseable. Way worse than steroids.

  3. #48
    Ring of Fame


    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Solomons, MD
    Age
    49
    Posts
    11,623

    Default Re: This might be the deepest (and most controversial) MLB HOF ballot in a long time

    Quote Originally Posted by Spaceman Spiff View Post
    He bet on his games as a manager. If you're gonna ban him, ban him as a manager, not as a player.
    Who says? Him?
    The known liar?

    Gamblers gamble.

    ~Bang

  4. #49
    The Deep Threat gbear's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Odenton, MD
    Age
    37
    Posts
    4,256

    Default Re: This might be the deepest (and most controversial) MLB HOF ballot in a long time

    Bang,
    Does your gamblers gamble rational apply to Jordan in basketball? He and his teammates supposedly gambled on everything. Do you think they avoided any bets on the NBA? If he did bet on anything NBA related would you no longer think of him as one of the top NBA players of all time?
    I believe my job as a parent is to give my kids all the blocks they need to build a life in which they can attempt to reach everything they strive for and see anything they can imagine. In a world where everybody finds it easier to destroy than build, I wish for my kids to experience the joy of seeing something for the first time and the love of creating something new.

    http://thelifewelllived.blogspot.com

  5. #50
    Ring of Fame
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Northern VA
    Age
    31
    Posts
    10,279

    Default Re: This might be the deepest (and most controversial) MLB HOF ballot in a long time

    Quote Originally Posted by Bang View Post
    Who says? Him?
    The known liar?

    Gamblers gamble.

    ~Bang
    IIRC, the betting sheets said so.

    It's hardly the worst blemish on baseball history. As mentioned before, banning black athletes until Jackie Robinson was way worse and, IMO, arguably the biggest misstep in the history of the game was collusion by the owners in the mid 80's. A group of owners getting together and deciding NOT to make their teams better via free agency because they felt players salaries were getting out of control and didn't want to pay them is awful.

    So Rose gambled, big ****ing deal.

  6. #51

    Default Re: This might be the deepest (and most controversial) MLB HOF ballot in a long time

    Quote Originally Posted by gbear View Post
    Bang,
    Does your gamblers gamble rational apply to Jordan in basketball? He and his teammates supposedly gambled on everything. Do you think they avoided any bets on the NBA? If he did bet on anything NBA related would you no longer think of him as one of the top NBA players of all time?
    The one problem with your theory is that Jordan was never found to have bet on his team. Rose was.

    I laugh at all the Rose supporters. There are levels of cheating. What Rose did isn't comparable to Bonds, Clemens, etc. Besides, Bonds and Clemens were HOFers before they ever started juicing. Bonds was, without question. He was skinny as hell. He was still a 5-tool player. He was even a great OFer in his early days.

    Rose will never get in the Hall. Ever.
    Last edited by Bubble Screen; December-1st-2012 at 05:07 PM.

  7. #52

    Default Re: This might be the deepest (and most controversial) MLB HOF ballot in a long time

    It doesn't look good for Clemens, Bonds, Sosa, etc. This survey shows that they're not likely to come close this time around.

    http://espn.go.com/mlb/story/_/id/86...hall-fame-vote

+ Reply to Thread

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 5
    Last Post: September-22nd-2012, 12:37 PM
  2. Top 10 Controversial Games of All Time
    By edgun88 in forum The Tailgate
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: March-22nd-2009, 01:32 PM
  3. Replies: 11
    Last Post: January-4th-2008, 11:27 AM
  4. TSN: Hang with me: It's Pro Bowl ballot time
    By bubba9497 in forum The Stadium
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: November-3rd-2007, 07:19 AM
  5. Replies: 3
    Last Post: August-31st-2007, 09:19 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts