This is somewhat true and you hear it implied in plenty of arguments. The whole not "traditional/conventional QB" nonsense that you hear folk like Mark Schlereth spew. The kid has shown he can throw the ball and be as accurate as any other QB in the league yet he's still knocked for not throwing the ball around 40-50 times per game and for his ability to run (aka he takes too many hits).
Last edited by Saqs; December-5th-2012 at 10:05 AM.
I think the most bizarre thing he ever came up with is that black players don't like being disciplined by Roger Goodell because so many of them grew up without fathers.
I actually don't know if Cowherd is a "racist." However, he is certainly, a race-baiter, And that actually may be worse. At least a racist has his convictions. Cowherd picks at a scab because it gets him ratings.
---------- Post added December-5th-2012 at 12:07 PM ----------
Cowherd thinks that. Not me.
Bull****. Luck is throwing for under 60 pct completion percentage. That's a decent number in 1985 but not 2012, even for a rookie. His turnovers, some of his poor decisions, etc. all weigh against him and I think it is VERY interesting that someone with his statistics, which are mediocre overall (at best) is in the conversation against two...other...qbs who have far better numbers. RWilson's stats vs. common opponents are VASTLY superior to Luck's.
This discussion isn't happening if the roles were reversed. BTW, I'm not just talking Cowherd. The overall discussion clearly reflects the bias.
Look, it's not that anyone "hates" anyone, but there are biases in this discussion. Again, we're not talkin 70 vs. 65 pct compl and 3 to 1 vs. 2.5 to 1 TD/int.
It's a HUGE gulf between the two, other than Luck through sheer dint of passing it all the damn time has more attempts and yards.
Last edited by Ghost of Nibbs McPimpin; December-5th-2012 at 10:25 AM.
You will give the Redskins an ideal to strive towards. They will race behind you, they will stumble, they will fall. But in time, they will join you in the sun. In time you will help them accomplish wonders.
Ratings..exactly. I agree he tends to have a somewhat controversial opinion to get people talking. And it works so I find it hard to fault him, it's his job.
And regarding the black/father topic. I can see how that could hit a nerve. But how is that different from complementing RG3 for having such a level head on his shoulders to his stable family and military upbringing? Which is something I've heard Cowherd mention as well.
Last edited by mojo; December-5th-2012 at 10:19 AM.
Yes, PEOPLE WHO LIKE HIM think that. The fact is, the statistical gap is so large that the fact anyone is still claiming Luck is better NOW (later, sure maybe) is a very, VERY odd thing. I'm TELLING YOU that were the stats reversed, we're not having these dsicussions.
Also, check the fan boards..."Vick 2," "running QB" "cocky" "flashy." Hell, I've even heard Vince Young brought into it. And the "people figured out Cam newton" angle, they'll figure him out.
Did they figure out Steve Young?
Last edited by Ghost of Nibbs McPimpin; December-5th-2012 at 10:30 AM.
You will give the Redskins an ideal to strive towards. They will race behind you, they will stumble, they will fall. But in time, they will join you in the sun. In time you will help them accomplish wonders.
Well, in 5 years when we've been ridiculously successful and half the teams in the league are attempting to implement this type of offense, those dismissals will stop. The spread is as college as it comes and didn't gain much respect in the NFL until Brady spent a few years shredding defenses with it. We run the same plays (as you mentioned) from the pistol, so I don't see how it is gimmicky or even has a shelf life. It's no different than shotgun, other than the fact that you can run more from the pistol.
"Washington strolled to the NFC championship, outscoring their two playoff opponents by a combined total of 48 points. Their domination was more than impressive, it was historic. The 1991 Redskins boasted the largest average margin of victory among all Super Bowl champions."
--- America's Game
Another thing, if anyone knows my history, they know I don't just throw out the racial angle. In this case, I can't really see what else is going on....I mean if for some reason Russell Wilson went #1 and RG3# but RW had Luck's stats, no one would be saying he was playing better.
You will give the Redskins an ideal to strive towards. They will race behind you, they will stumble, they will fall. But in time, they will join you in the sun. In time you will help them accomplish wonders.
Prove that. Seriously, either stop that line or prove it to be.
---------- Post added December-5th-2012 at 11:44 AM ----------
A one jump leap to conclusion all expenses paid.
And I can read that yes he probably is a race baiter, but we are better than that aren't we. After all we have the SBMVP Doug Williams to stand behind.
Last edited by SWFLSkins; December-5th-2012 at 10:47 AM.
RIP 21
NO Pressure, No Diamonds, KNOW Pressure, Know Diamonds!
Griffin said that he was going to watch the game with his family and that he will never attend a Super Bowl if he needs a ticket to get in.
Offering my Baylor perspective here. I experienced the same emotions last year as this year in Luck to RG3 comparisons. The only difference is RG3 was not nearly as well known at the very beginning of last football season, as he was by the end. It took months for people to come around on RG3, and the way people eventually came around is that they couldn't ignore Robert anymore. People were extremely ignorant about Robert, and for sure applied stereotypes. 1 of 2 draft experts on the mothership ESPN, Todd McShay, actually called Robert a WR on the next level. That is pure ignorance and could only be concluded by someone applying a stereotype and not actually watching Robert play.
The biggest "Heisman moment" came when Robert and Baylor knocked off Oklahoma on national TV. OU was #5 in the country, and hoping to possibly sneak back into the national title picture. Luck was at Stanford and Stanford had the better record than Baylor (same as Colts better record than Skins), but people couldn't ignore what they saw with their own eyes any longer.
For RG3 to convince some of the people like Cowherd, I think it's just going to take more "moments" that they simply can't ignore. I know there have been a ton of them already, but it will probably take Robert doing something big and the team really making a serious run for a playoff spot these last few weeks. I know they are primed for that, so we'll see how it plays out. For about 3 years, the Cowherd types have been conditioned that Luck and only Luck is the greatest QB prospect in 30 years. Suddenly Robert came along last year and upset that apple cart, and it became a 2 man show instead of 1 man. It's still taking these people time to accept that.
I won't comment on the race discussion going on in this thread, but in terms of stats you've hit the nail squarely on the head. Luck has more yards, and his team has a couple more wins, and that's it. He's winning, but he personally is playing near the bottom of the league in terms of efficiency. Meanwhile RGIII is playing better than a bunch of franchise QBs (Cutler, Stafford, Eli) and is right up there with the elite QBs in the league in terms of efficiency.
Luck is gaudy, and has the benefit of a half way decent defense (and a comparatively easy schedule), but that is it.
Didn't the Giants recently run a couple plays out of the pistol a couple weeks ago? Currently wikipedia has something like 8 NFL teams that have incorporated the pistol, I expect that number to jump drastically over the next 5 years.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)